wh00per
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 07, 2014, 08:19:23 PM |
|
And now I'm starting to be worried .. ![Huh](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/huh.gif) I'm too old for these things below ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) What I suspect is that the machine is doing something after the update .. but with no change-logs on the tech-blog, this is the last update I make. Uptime:5 | FPGA ver:32 -----BOARD-0----- PSU[EMERSON1200]: 960->1339w[852 856 852] (->916w[916 916 916]) (lim=1340) 0c cooling:0/0x0 -----BOARD-1----- PSU[EMERSON1200]: 816->1294w[724 720 716] (->776w[776 776 776]) (lim=1295) 0c cooling:0/0x0 LOOP[0] ON 0: disabled (Asic all engines fail BIST) 1: disabled (Asic all engines fail BIST) 2: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:593 vlt2:597(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:749) 23W 38A 31c] ASIC:[ 85c 350hz(BL:1045) 16 (E:107) F:0] LOOP[1] ON 3: disabled (Asic all engines fail BIST) 4: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:593 vlt2:597(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:749) 22W 37A 38c] ASIC:[ 85c 350hz(BL:1045) 30 (E:116) F:0] 5: disabled (Asic all engines fail BIST) LOOP[2] ON 6: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:595 vlt2:600(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:749) 23W 38A 39c] ASIC:[ 85c 350hz(BL:1045) 26 (E:119) F:0] 7: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:597 vlt2:600(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:749) 24W 40A 38c] ASIC:[ 85c 360hz(BL: 360) 24 (E:193) F:0] 8: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:595 vlt2:600(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:749) 23W 39A 32c] ASIC:[ 85c 350hz(BL:1045) 17 (E:169) F:0] LOOP[3] ON 9: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:595 vlt2:600(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:749) 25W 42A 39c] ASIC:[ 85c 375hz(BL: 375) 36 (E:193) F:0] 10: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:597 vlt2:600(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:749) 25W 41A 42c] ASIC:[ 85c 370hz(BL: 370) 26 (E:193) F:0] 11: disabled (Asic all engines fail BIST) LOOP[4] ON 12: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:595 vlt2:600(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:749) 22W 36A 43c] ASIC:[ 85c 350hz(BL:1045) 26 (E:166) F:0] 13: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:595 vlt2:600(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:749) 22W 37A 42c] ASIC:[ 85c 350hz(BL:1045) 20 (E:123) F:0] 14: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:595 vlt2:600(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:749) 22W 38A 35c] ASIC:[ 85c 350hz(BL:1045) 16 (E:185) F:0] LOOP[5] ON 15: disabled (Asic all engines fail BIST) 16: disabled (Asic all engines fail BIST) 17: disabled (Asic all engines fail BIST) LOOP[6] ON 18: disabled (Asic all engines fail BIST) 19: disabled (Asic all engines fail BIST) 20: disabled (Asic all engines fail BIST) LOOP[7] ON 21: disabled (Asic all engines fail BIST) 22: disabled (Asic all engines fail BIST) 23: disabled (Asic all engines fail BIST) LOOP[8] ON 24: disabled (Asic all engines fail BIST) 25: disabled (Asic all engines fail BIST) 26: disabled (Asic all engines fail BIST) LOOP[9] OFF (test serial failed or something) 27: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:0 vlt2:578(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:749) 0W 0A 34c] ASIC:[ 85c 1060hz(BL:1060) 21 (E:0) F:0] 28: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:0 vlt2:578(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:749) 0W 0A 33c] ASIC:[ 85c 1060hz(BL:1060) 13 (E:0) F:0] 29: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:0 vlt2:578(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:749) 0W 0A 31c] ASIC:[ 85c 1060hz(BL:1060) 10 (E:0) F:0]
[H:HW:1299Gh,W:235,L:0,A:13,MMtmp:0 TMP:(25)=>=>=>(41,34)] Pushed 27 jobs , in HW queue 4 jobs (sw:3, hw:3)! min:25 wins:623[this/last min:31/40] bist-fail:1779, hw-err:0 leading-zeroes:40 idle promils[s/m]:0/88, rate:699gh/s asic-count:10 Fan:70, conseq:94 AC2DC BAD: 0 0 R/NR: 204/0 RTF asics: 0 29 restarted 0 reset 0 reset2 0 fake_wins 0 stuck_bist 0 low_power 0 stuck_pll 5 runtime_dsble 0 purge_queue 3 read_timeouts 0 dc2dc_oc 45 read_tmout2 0 read_crptn 0 purge_queue3 0 bad_idle Adapter queues: rsp=2, req=21
TOP:1 BOTTOM:1
PSU[EMERSON1200]: 960->1339w[852 856 852] (->916w[916 916 916]) (lim=1340) 0c cooling:0/0x0 PSU[EMERSON1200]: 816->1294w[724 720 716] (->776w[776 776 776]) (lim=1295) 0c cooling:0/0x0
[H:HW:1299Gh,W:235,L:0,A:13,MMtmp:0 TMP:(25)=>=>=>(41,34)]
|
CSA/cUL Certified Power Distribution Panels - Basic, Switched, Metered. 1-3 phases. Up to 600V. NMC:N4F9qvHz11BHcc4nh1LCJFsrZhA1EWgVwj
|
|
|
bobsmoke
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 07, 2014, 08:29:16 PM |
|
And now I'm starting to be worried .. ![Huh](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/huh.gif) I'm too old for these things below ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) What I suspect is that the machine is doing something after the update .. but with no change-logs on the tech-blog, this is the last update I make. What I noticed when upgrading to the last firmware was that the Fan settings were changed to 70% which had significant impact on the temperature. I had to put the fan settings back to 80$. I also had to reboot (not minergate restart) the machine 2 times after upgrading with about 20 minutes difference between them. It takes around 20 minutes for the machine to reach its peak performance after a reboot with the last firmware .. at least in my case. Did you already rebooted the machine?
|
|
|
|
wh00per
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 07, 2014, 08:42:18 PM Last edit: October 07, 2014, 09:04:36 PM by wh00per |
|
Yeap, the 30 seconds power down, + some soft reboots .. here's the last log (will pump up the fans back to 80% again). Uptime:1309 | FPGA ver:32 -----BOARD-0----- PSU[EMERSON1200]: 1472->1336w[1336 1336 1320] (->1345w[1344 1345 1345]) (lim=1340) 0c cooling:0/0x34007600 -----BOARD-1----- PSU[EMERSON1200]: 1424->1284w[1284 1284 1272] (->1290w[1290 1290 1290]) (lim=1295) 0c cooling:0/0x34007600 LOOP[0] ON 0: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:701 vlt2:706(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:749) 69W 97A 62c] ASIC:[ 85c 765hz(BL: 765) 58 (E:193) F:0] 1: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:703 vlt2:706(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:749) 72W 103A 64c] ASIC:[ 85c 790hz(BL: 790) 55 (E:191) F:0] 2: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:703 vlt2:706(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:749) 75W 107A 57c] ASIC:[ 85c 830hz(BL: 830) 63 (E:193) F:0] LOOP[1] ON 3: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:701 vlt2:706(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:749) 71W 100A 63c] ASIC:[ 85c 780hz(BL: 780) 53 (E:192) F:0] 4: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:703 vlt2:709(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:749) 76W 107A 79c] ASIC:[105c 840hz(BL: 840) 50 (E:193) F:0] 5: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:705 vlt2:709(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:749) 69W 98A 71c] ASIC:[ 85c 765hz(BL: 765) 51 (E:193) F:0] LOOP[2] ON 6: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:705 vlt2:709(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:749) 74W 105A 82c] ASIC:[ 90c 825hz(BL: 825) 51 (E:193) F:0] 7: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:705 vlt2:709(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:749) 82W 116A 88c] ASIC:[110c 875hz(BL: 875) 41 (E:193) F:0] 8: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:703 vlt2:709(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:749) 78W 110A 67c] ASIC:[105c 840hz(BL: 840) 53 (E:193) F:0] LOOP[3] ON 9: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:683 vlt2:688(DCl:794 Tl:688 Ul:749) 67W 97A 74c] ASIC:[110c 755hz(BL: 755) 62 (E:193) F:0] 10: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:683 vlt2:688(DCl:794 Tl:688 Ul:749) 72W 106A 86c] ASIC:[110c 820hz(BL: 820) 51 (E:193) F:0] 11: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:707 vlt2:709(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:749) 74W 104A 83c] ASIC:[100c 805hz(BL: 805) 61 (E:193) F:0] LOOP[4] ON 12: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:662 vlt2:669(DCl:794 Tl:669 Ul:749) 59W 88A 85c] ASIC:[110c 740hz(BL: 740) 54 (E:193) F:0] 13: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:669 vlt2:674(DCl:794 Tl:674 Ul:749) 57W 85A 82c] ASIC:[110c 710hz(BL: 710) 52 (E:193) F:0] 14: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:675 vlt2:680(DCl:794 Tl:680 Ul:749) 63W 93A 68c] ASIC:[110c 760hz(BL: 760) 50 (E:193) F:0] LOOP[5] ON 15: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:691 vlt2:695(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:749) 64W 93A 59c] ASIC:[ 85c 740hz(BL: 740) 36 (E:193) F:0] 16: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:689 vlt2:695(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:749) 69W 99A 63c] ASIC:[ 85c 780hz(BL: 780) 47 (E:191) F:0] 17: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:693 vlt2:695(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:749) 67W 97A 54c] ASIC:[ 85c 765hz(BL: 765) 40 (E:193) F:0] LOOP[6] ON 18: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:691 vlt2:695(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:749) 68W 98A 64c] ASIC:[ 85c 775hz(BL: 775) 47 (E:193) F:0] 19: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:689 vlt2:695(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:749) 67W 96A 74c] ASIC:[ 85c 770hz(BL: 770) 51 (E:193) F:0] 20: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:691 vlt2:695(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:749) 67W 97A 72c] ASIC:[ 85c 770hz(BL: 770) 45 (E:193) F:0] LOOP[7] ON 21: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:693 vlt2:695(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:749) 72W 103A 83c] ASIC:[100c 805hz(BL: 805) 47 (E:193) F:0] 22: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:689 vlt2:695(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:749) 66W 95A 83c] ASIC:[ 85c 770hz(BL: 770) 65 (E:193) F:0] 23: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:689 vlt2:695(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:749) 66W 95A 66c] ASIC:[100c 745hz(BL: 745) 46 (E:193) F:0] LOOP[8] ON 24: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:693 vlt2:698(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:749) 68W 98A 74c] ASIC:[110c 770hz(BL: 770) 61 (E:193) F:0] 25: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:693 vlt2:698(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:749) 69W 99A 88c] ASIC:[110c 790hz(BL: 790) 58 (E:193) F:0] 26: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:691 vlt2:695(DCl:794 Tl:695 Ul:749) 81W 117A 94c] ASIC:[110c 885hz(BL: 885) 48 (E:193) F:0] LOOP[9] ON 27: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:693 vlt2:698(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:749) 69W 99A 91c] ASIC:[110c 765hz(BL: 765) 35 (E:189) F:0] 28: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:681 vlt2:685(DCl:794 Tl:685 Ul:749) 60W 87A 87c] ASIC:[110c 710hz(BL: 710) 38 (E:193) F:0] 29: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:669 vlt2:674(DCl:794 Tl:674 Ul:749) 62W 92A 74c] ASIC:[110c 745hz(BL: 745) 43 (E:193) F:0]
[H:HW:4532Gh,W:2085,L:0,A:30,MMtmp:0 TMP:(24)=>=>=>(75,77)] Pushed 27 jobs , in HW queue 4 jobs (sw:0, hw:0)! min:41 wins:1512[this/last min:44/30] bist-fail:229, hw-err:9 leading-zeroes:42 idle promils[s/m]:0/0, rate:2097gh/s asic-count:30 Fan:70, conseq:200 AC2DC BAD: 0 0 R/NR: 1359/0 RTF asics: 0 1 restarted 0 reset 0 reset2 0 fake_wins 0 stuck_bist 0 low_power 0 stuck_pll 0 runtime_dsble 0 purge_queue 1 read_timeouts 0 dc2dc_oc 15 read_tmout2 0 read_crptn 0 purge_queue3 30 bad_idle Adapter queues: rsp=3, req=20
TOP:1 BOTTOM:1
PSU[EMERSON1200]: 1472->1336w[1336 1336 1320] (->1345w[1344 1345 1345]) (lim=1340) 0c cooling:0/0x34007600 PSU[EMERSON1200]: 1424->1284w[1284 1284 1272] (->1290w[1290 1290 1290]) (lim=1295) 0c cooling:0/0x34007600
[H:HW:4532Gh,W:2085,L:0,A:30,MMtmp:0 TMP:(24)=>=>=>(75,77)]
Here's with the fans at 80% .. still hot ASICS inthere .. Uptime:463 | FPGA ver:32 -----BOARD-0----- PSU[EMERSON1200]: 1488->1340w[1332 1340 1336] (->1346w[1346 1346 1346]) (lim=1340) 0c cooling:0/0x7200 -----BOARD-1----- PSU[EMERSON1200]: 1392->1244w[1244 1224 1224] (->1271w[1271 1243 1243]) (lim=1295) 0c cooling:0/0x7200 LOOP[0] ON 0: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:697 vlt2:701(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:749) 67W 95A 58c] ASIC:[ 85c 755hz(BL: 755) 56 (E:193) F:0] 1: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:697 vlt2:701(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:749) 70W 100A 59c] ASIC:[ 85c 775hz(BL: 775) 53 (E:191) F:0] 2: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:699 vlt2:701(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:749) 73W 104A 53c] ASIC:[ 85c 815hz(BL: 815) 50 (E:193) F:0] LOOP[1] ON 3: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:697 vlt2:701(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:749) 68W 97A 59c] ASIC:[ 85c 760hz(BL: 760) 49 (E:192) F:0] 4: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:695 vlt2:701(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:749) 71W 101A 71c] ASIC:[ 85c 800hz(BL: 800) 57 (E:193) F:0] 5: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:697 vlt2:701(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:749) 65W 93A 65c] ASIC:[ 85c 740hz(BL: 740) 49 (E:193) F:0] LOOP[2] ON 6: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:697 vlt2:701(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:749) 69W 98A 74c] ASIC:[ 85c 785hz(BL: 785) 58 (E:193) F:0] 7: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:697 vlt2:701(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:749) 76W 108A 78c] ASIC:[100c 835hz(BL: 835) 52 (E:193) F:0] 8: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:697 vlt2:703(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:749) 74W 105A 61c] ASIC:[ 85c 815hz(BL: 815) 37 (E:193) F:0] LOOP[3] ON 9: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:695 vlt2:701(DCl:794 Tl:701 Ul:749) 73W 105A 73c] ASIC:[110c 800hz(BL: 800) 58 (E:193) F:0] 10: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:701 vlt2:703(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:749) 81W 115A 85c] ASIC:[110c 875hz(BL: 875) 55 (E:193) F:0] 11: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:701 vlt2:703(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:749) 71W 101A 76c] ASIC:[ 85c 785hz(BL: 785) 40 (E:193) F:0] LOOP[4] ON 12: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:677 vlt2:682(DCl:794 Tl:682 Ul:749) 65W 96A 84c] ASIC:[110c 785hz(BL: 785) 49 (E:193) F:0] 13: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:683 vlt2:688(DCl:794 Tl:688 Ul:749) 65W 94A 81c] ASIC:[110c 765hz(BL: 765) 66 (E:193) F:0] 14: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:695 vlt2:698(DCl:794 Tl:698 Ul:749) 73W 105A 69c] ASIC:[110c 835hz(BL: 835) 59 (E:193) F:0] LOOP[5] ON 15: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:685 vlt2:690(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:749) 60W 87A 54c] ASIC:[ 85c 710hz(BL: 710) 47 (E:193) F:0] 16: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:685 vlt2:690(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:749) 66W 96A 58c] ASIC:[ 85c 765hz(BL: 765) 63 (E:191) F:0] 17: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:687 vlt2:690(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:749) 64W 92A 50c] ASIC:[ 85c 740hz(BL: 740) 33 (E:193) F:0] LOOP[6] ON 18: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:689 vlt2:693(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:749) 68W 99A 60c] ASIC:[ 85c 785hz(BL: 785) 36 (E:193) F:0] 19: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:685 vlt2:693(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:749) 67W 97A 68c] ASIC:[ 85c 775hz(BL: 775) 48 (E:193) F:0] 20: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:689 vlt2:693(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:749) 67W 97A 66c] ASIC:[ 85c 775hz(BL: 775) 42 (E:193) F:0] LOOP[7] ON 21: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:689 vlt2:693(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:749) 72W 105A 77c] ASIC:[ 85c 820hz(BL: 820) 49 (E:193) F:0] 22: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:685 vlt2:693(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:749) 66W 96A 75c] ASIC:[ 85c 780hz(BL: 780) 39 (E:193) F:0] 23: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:687 vlt2:693(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:749) 64W 93A 59c] ASIC:[ 85c 740hz(BL: 740) 54 (E:193) F:0] LOOP[8] ON 24: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:687 vlt2:693(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:749) 65W 94A 67c] ASIC:[100c 750hz(BL: 750) 47 (E:193) F:0] 25: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:689 vlt2:693(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:749) 67W 97A 78c] ASIC:[100c 785hz(BL: 785) 42 (E:193) F:0] 26: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:689 vlt2:693(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:749) 78W 113A 82c] ASIC:[100c 865hz(BL: 865) 63 (E:193) F:0] LOOP[9] ON 27: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:689 vlt2:693(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:749) 66W 95A 80c] ASIC:[105c 750hz(BL: 750) 36 (E:189) F:0] 28: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:685 vlt2:693(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:749) 61W 88A 78c] ASIC:[105c 700hz(BL: 700) 46 (E:193) F:0] 29: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:687 vlt2:693(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:749) 68W 98A 69c] ASIC:[105c 780hz(BL: 780) 45 (E:193) F:0]
[H:HW:4524Gh,W:2072,L:0,A:30,MMtmp:0 TMP:(24)=>=>=>(72,68)] Pushed 27 jobs , in HW queue 4 jobs (sw:3, hw:3)! min:33 wins:1478[this/last min:40/59] bist-fail:342, hw-err:8 leading-zeroes:42 idle promils[s/m]:0/0, rate:4124gh/s asic-count:30 Fan:80, conseq:200 AC2DC BAD: 0 0 R/NR: 869/0 RTF asics: 0 4 restarted 0 reset 0 reset2 0 fake_wins 0 stuck_bist 0 low_power 0 stuck_pll 0 runtime_dsble 0 purge_queue 4 read_timeouts 0 dc2dc_oc 60 read_tmout2 0 read_crptn 0 purge_queue3 0 bad_idle Adapter queues: rsp=0, req=22
TOP:1 BOTTOM:1
PSU[EMERSON1200]: 1488->1340w[1332 1340 1336] (->1346w[1346 1346 1346]) (lim=1340) 0c cooling:0/0x7200 PSU[EMERSON1200]: 1392->1244w[1244 1224 1224] (->1271w[1271 1243 1243]) (lim=1295) 0c cooling:0/0x7200
[H:HW:4524Gh,W:2072,L:0,A:30,MMtmp:0 TMP:(24)=>=>=>(72,68)]
|
CSA/cUL Certified Power Distribution Panels - Basic, Switched, Metered. 1-3 phases. Up to 600V. NMC:N4F9qvHz11BHcc4nh1LCJFsrZhA1EWgVwj
|
|
|
bobsmoke
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 07, 2014, 08:52:32 PM Last edit: October 07, 2014, 09:33:36 PM by bobsmoke |
|
Yeap, the 30 seconds power down, + some soft reboots .. here's the last log (will pump up the fans back to 80% again). [H:HW:4532Gh,W:2085,L:0,A:30,MMtmp:0 TMP:(24)=>=>=>(75,77)]
4.5 Th/s with 77 Degree and Fan @ 70% looks ok ...i think ... [H:HW:4524Gh,W:2072,L:0,A:30,MMtmp:0 TMP:(24)=>=>=>(72,68)]
That is really good (imo) ..
|
|
|
|
opentoe
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1274
Merit: 1000
Personal text my ass....
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 07, 2014, 09:19:51 PM |
|
This is a beautiful and proper built miner! Indeed, it's beautiful well built professional grade hardware, if only the price... Beautiful well built hardware is great but it does no good if btc price keeps falling and difficulty keeps going up. How good is a miner if BTC goes sub $100 and it costs more to power the thing than it earns. ![Cry](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cry.gif) It's not getting any better either. Unfortunately since most manufacturer's run a pre-order model a lot of people are just screwed right now because of the value of BTC right now. Yea, you can be optimistic about it and say it will jump back up, but no one wants to wait over a year to get their money back and by that time it is already obsolete hardware. I just feel bad for anyone that ordered anything now. I'm already looking to turn off at the hosting facility because BTC is so low. Once it starts costing more to run, power off.
|
|
|
|
faraway
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 07, 2014, 09:39:59 PM |
|
Do you know you to fix the 1300W MURATA limitation while using the last firmware: 2.4.21.
-----BOARD-0----- PSU[NEW-MURATA]: 1404->1300w[1300 1298 1298] (->1307w[1307 1307 1307]) (lim=1300) 0c cooling:0/0x0 -----BOARD-1----- PSU[NEW-MURATA]: 1398->1306w[1298 1300 1306] (->1295w[1295 1295 1295]) (lim=1300) 0c cooling:0/0x0
The limits that we set are ignored. Is there a fix?
|
|
|
|
opentoe
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1274
Merit: 1000
Personal text my ass....
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 08, 2014, 01:46:10 AM |
|
Due to my NDA, I can't tell you all why bitcoin is tanking. Only a few certain people are allowed to know why.
|
|
|
|
seriouscoin
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 08, 2014, 02:07:21 AM |
|
Due to my NDA, I can't tell you all why bitcoin is tanking. Only a few certain people are allowed to know why.
lol you suck at trolling.
|
|
|
|
RawDog
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1026
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 08, 2014, 02:30:11 AM |
|
Hi Guys,
I was expecting these machines could produce upto $50 dollars per day minimum for each machine.
Actually, there is only one 'Guy'. Your math isn't very good. Maybe you can go back to your university and get a refund from them.
|
|
|
|
Zelek Uther
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 08, 2014, 04:51:09 AM |
|
zvi,
Given the fall in the btc and high electric rates here I've changed my UK machines to "slow fans, medium rate"
SP10: Before 1425GH / 1280W = 0.8982 w/GH After 1160GH / 880W = 0.7586 w/GH
SP30: Before: 4500GH / 2900W = 0.6444 w/GH After: 4050GH / 2420W = 0.5975 w/GH
Those have made a significant difference making the SP10 in particular profitable to run again (just). I was wondering if you could work your magic and have a best effeciency setting that automatically tunes the machine to achieve the best w/GH possible as that's the most important thing at the moment rather than outright speed.
That's an excellent suggestion. Zvi is on holiday for the next 2 weeks, I will ask him to take a look at it as soon as he is back. Gadi +1 for a "best efficency" setting.
|
Run a Bitcoin node, support the network.
|
|
|
bobsmoke
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 08, 2014, 07:52:23 AM |
|
Any idea what does the 2.4.21 firmware brings? Would be nice to have some sort of change log .. even if its high level to increase visibility to the SP community about changes introduced.
|
|
|
|
jtoomim
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 08, 2014, 05:27:06 PM |
|
A few of the SP30s we have at http://toom.im with Murata power supplies are reporting strange AC power consumption numbers. For example, here's one of our customer's machines: AC pwr : 1472/1310 DC 12V pwr : 1352/1366 PSU limit : 1350/1360 Efficiency %: 91.85/104.27 So either some of the Murata power supplies have a built-in generator (or fuel cell?), or they give anomalous AC draw readings. I expect the latter is true. However, we have also measured the power consumption of some of our Murata PSU SP30s and found that they are usually accurate within about 1-2%. The anomalous readings are usually way off, and the rest are pretty good. It seems that the Murata PSUs are considerably more efficient than the Emerson ones. The Murata PSUs we have running that are reporting believable consumption figures typically indicate PSU efficiency of 90%-93%, whereas the Emerson PSUs report efficiencies in the 87% to 90% range. Reliability is a different issue, though. Still collecting data on that.
|
Hosting bitcoin miners for $65 to $80/kW/month on clean, cheap hydro power. http://Toom.im
|
|
|
wh00per
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 08, 2014, 05:36:31 PM |
|
Any idea what does the 2.4.21 firmware brings? Would be nice to have some sort of change log .. even if its high level to increase visibility to the SP community about changes introduced.
Main thing noted is the cgminer 4.6.0 deployment and that the ASICS run hotter than before. Exhaust temperature is within the limits though. The overall feeling is that the units are better balanced and the two boards are running in sync now. >>> http://powerprice.info/SPT/graphic.phpGuess there are some other updates with respect to Murata power supplies. These babies can draw 8A from the wall (vs 7A for Emerson), so I suspect the units can be overclocked a little more than the ones sent out before. However, the PSU power output limit in the 2.4.21 firmware is 1300W .. I guess they are temperature limited now. jtoomim - what firmware are those units received with? Uptime:1728 | FPGA ver:32 -----BOARD-0----- PSU[EMERSON1200]: 1520->1344w[1344 1344 1340] (->1363w[1363 1363 1363]) (lim=1340) 0c cooling:0/0x3000 -----BOARD-1----- PSU[EMERSON1200]: 1472->1296w[1296 1292 1296] (->1311w[1311 1310 1310]) (lim=1295) 0c cooling:0/0x3000 LOOP[0] ON 0: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:699 vlt2:703(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:749) 67W 95A 54c] ASIC:[ 85c 750hz(BL: 750) 95 (E:193) F:0] 1: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:699 vlt2:703(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:749) 70W 99A 55c] ASIC:[ 85c 770hz(BL: 770) 90 (E:191) F:0] 2: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:699 vlt2:703(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:749) 73W 104A 50c] ASIC:[ 85c 815hz(BL: 815) 95 (E:193) F:0] LOOP[1] ON 3: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:699 vlt2:703(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:749) 69W 98A 55c] ASIC:[ 85c 765hz(BL: 765) 73 (E:192) F:0] 4: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:697 vlt2:703(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:749) 72W 102A 68c] ASIC:[ 85c 810hz(BL: 810) 110 (E:193) F:0] 5: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:699 vlt2:703(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:749) 65W 93A 61c] ASIC:[ 85c 730hz(BL: 730) 81 (E:193) F:0] LOOP[2] ON 6: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:699 vlt2:703(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:749) 71W 101A 71c] ASIC:[ 85c 800hz(BL: 800) 90 (E:193) F:0] 7: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:699 vlt2:703(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:749) 77W 110A 75c] ASIC:[ 95c 845hz(BL: 845) 91 (E:193) F:0] 8: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:699 vlt2:703(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:749) 74W 105A 57c] ASIC:[ 85c 810hz(BL: 810) 75 (E:193) F:0] LOOP[3] ON 9: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:697 vlt2:703(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:749) 75W 106A 69c] ASIC:[110c 810hz(BL: 810) 91 (E:193) F:0] 10: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:699 vlt2:703(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:749) 80W 114A 80c] ASIC:[105c 865hz(BL: 865) 96 (E:193) F:0] 11: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:699 vlt2:703(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:749) 69W 98A 72c] ASIC:[ 85c 770hz(BL: 770) 78 (E:193) F:0] LOOP[4] ON 12: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:685 vlt2:690(DCl:794 Tl:690 Ul:749) 69W 100A 82c] ASIC:[110c 810hz(BL: 810) 95 (E:193) F:0] 13: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:695 vlt2:698(DCl:794 Tl:698 Ul:749) 69W 99A 80c] ASIC:[110c 790hz(BL: 790) 81 (E:193) F:0] 14: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:701 vlt2:706(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:749) 75W 107A 66c] ASIC:[110c 840hz(BL: 840) 100 (E:193) F:0] LOOP[5] ON 15: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:689 vlt2:695(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:749) 64W 92A 53c] ASIC:[ 85c 735hz(BL: 735) 72 (E:193) F:0] 16: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:689 vlt2:695(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:749) 69W 99A 56c] ASIC:[ 85c 780hz(BL: 780) 81 (E:191) F:0] 17: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:695 vlt2:695(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:749) 67W 97A 48c] ASIC:[ 85c 765hz(BL: 765) 69 (E:193) F:0] LOOP[6] ON 18: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:693 vlt2:695(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:749) 68W 98A 57c] ASIC:[ 85c 775hz(BL: 775) 70 (E:193) F:0] 19: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:689 vlt2:695(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:749) 68W 98A 67c] ASIC:[ 85c 780hz(BL: 780) 76 (E:193) F:0] 20: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:693 vlt2:695(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:749) 67W 97A 65c] ASIC:[ 85c 775hz(BL: 775) 72 (E:193) F:0] LOOP[7] ON 21: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:691 vlt2:695(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:749) 72W 104A 76c] ASIC:[ 85c 815hz(BL: 815) 76 (E:193) F:0] 22: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:689 vlt2:695(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:749) 67W 97A 75c] ASIC:[ 85c 785hz(BL: 785) 90 (E:193) F:0] 23: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:691 vlt2:695(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:749) 66W 95A 59c] ASIC:[ 85c 750hz(BL: 750) 94 (E:193) F:0] LOOP[8] ON 24: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:691 vlt2:695(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:749) 69W 100A 67c] ASIC:[100c 790hz(BL: 790) 103 (E:193) F:0] 25: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:689 vlt2:695(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:749) 67W 97A 78c] ASIC:[100c 780hz(BL: 780) 71 (E:193) F:0] 26: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:693 vlt2:698(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:749) 80W 115A 83c] ASIC:[100c 870hz(BL: 870) 80 (E:193) F:0] LOOP[9] ON 27: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:695 vlt2:698(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:749) 71W 102A 84c] ASIC:[105c 795hz(BL: 795) 68 (E:189) F:0] 28: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:693 vlt2:698(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:749) 64W 92A 80c] ASIC:[100c 725hz(BL: 725) 65 (E:193) F:0] 29: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:695 vlt2:698(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:749) 72W 103A 70c] ASIC:[110c 810hz(BL: 810) 98 (E:193) F:0]
[H:HW:4576Gh,W:2117,L:0,A:30,MMtmp:0 TMP:(21)=>=>=>(70,70)] Pushed 27 jobs , in HW queue 4 jobs (sw:0, hw:0)! min:28 wins:2526[this/last min:26/58] bist-fail:412, hw-err:27 leading-zeroes:42 idle promils[s/m]:0/0, rate:4054gh/s asic-count:30 Fan:80, conseq:200 AC2DC BAD: 0 0 R/NR: 640/0 RTF asics: 0 1 restarted 0 reset 0 reset2 0 fake_wins 0 stuck_bist 0 low_power 0 stuck_pll 0 runtime_dsble 0 purge_queue 1 read_timeouts 0 dc2dc_oc 15 read_tmout2 1 read_crptn 0 purge_queue3 60 bad_idle Adapter queues: rsp=0, req=22
TOP:1 BOTTOM:1 ========================================================================= PSU[EMERSON1200]: 1520->1344w[1344 1344 1340] (->1363w[1363 1363 1363]) (lim=1340) 0c cooling:0/0x3000 PSU[EMERSON1200]: 1472->1296w[1296 1292 1296] (->1311w[1311 1310 1310]) (lim=1295) 0c cooling:0/0x3000
[H:HW:4576Gh,W:2117,L:0,A:30,MMtmp:0 TMP:(21)=>=>=>(70,70)]
|
CSA/cUL Certified Power Distribution Panels - Basic, Switched, Metered. 1-3 phases. Up to 600V. NMC:N4F9qvHz11BHcc4nh1LCJFsrZhA1EWgVwj
|
|
|
wh00per
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 08, 2014, 06:00:00 PM |
|
AC pwr : 1472/1310 DC 12V pwr : 1352/1366 PSU limit : 1350/1360 Efficiency %: 91.85/104.27
So either some of the Murata power supplies have a built-in generator (or fuel cell?), or they give anomalous AC draw readings. I expect the latter is true.
I suspect that the unit logs the AC power at a different time than the DC power .. if you capture both readings synchronously, you'll always have less W for DC than AC.
|
CSA/cUL Certified Power Distribution Panels - Basic, Switched, Metered. 1-3 phases. Up to 600V. NMC:N4F9qvHz11BHcc4nh1LCJFsrZhA1EWgVwj
|
|
|
jtoomim
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 08, 2014, 06:35:46 PM Last edit: October 08, 2014, 09:31:01 PM by jtoomim |
|
I suspect that the unit logs the AC power at a different time than the DC power .. if you capture both readings synchronously, you'll always have less W for DC than AC.
No, the readings for individual PSUs are consistently inaccurate, at least for one starting of minergate. One possibility is that the PSUs measure AC voltage once and current repeatedly, and multiply out-of-date voltage readings with current current readings. Another possibility is that the current meter on the Murata PSUs is a non-RMS meter, or somehow gets confused by AC harmonics.
|
Hosting bitcoin miners for $65 to $80/kW/month on clean, cheap hydro power. http://Toom.im
|
|
|
bobsag3
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 08, 2014, 09:57:30 PM |
|
I suspect that the unit logs the AC power at a different time than the DC power .. if you capture both readings synchronously, you'll always have less W for DC than AC.
No, the readings for individual PSUs are consistently inaccurate, at least for one starting of minergate. One possibility is that the PSUs measure AC voltage once and current repeatedly, and multiply out-of-date voltage readings with current current readings. Another possibility is that the current meter on the Murata PSUs is a non-RMS meter, or somehow gets confused by AC harmonics. We have noticed this as well. We have racks of miners that report up to a 10V difference across the machines
|
|
|
|
Biodom
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3864
Merit: 4280
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 08, 2014, 10:05:11 PM |
|
I suspect that the unit logs the AC power at a different time than the DC power .. if you capture both readings synchronously, you'll always have less W for DC than AC.
No, the readings for individual PSUs are consistently inaccurate, at least for one starting of minergate. One possibility is that the PSUs measure AC voltage once and current repeatedly, and multiply out-of-date voltage readings with current current readings. Another possibility is that the current meter on the Murata PSUs is a non-RMS meter, or somehow gets confused by AC harmonics. We have noticed this as well. We have racks of miners that report up to a 10V difference across the machines yep, one of my hosts (thanks, Jeff!) reported that sp-30 was crashing because miner was initially reading voltage as above 300V when, in fact, it was 246-254V. I guess, this was an extreme case of the same phenomenon. When this Sp-30 was later moved to 208V (otherwise it would not work), miner was initially reading 246V instead.
|
|
|
|
jtoomim
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 08, 2014, 10:07:36 PM |
|
We have noticed this as well. We have racks of miners that report up to a 10V difference across the machines
The voltage reported on the minepeon front page is acquired once at cgminer (or minergate?) launch. This is true for both Emersons and Muratas, and doesn't concern me much, since the power company charges by power usage, not voltage or current usage. For the Emersons, it seems that the AC power consumption metric remains accurate even if the reported voltage is not. For the Muratas, the AC power consumption appears to be inaccurate, but I don't know if that's because they're using an inaccurate voltage or because of something else.
|
Hosting bitcoin miners for $65 to $80/kW/month on clean, cheap hydro power. http://Toom.im
|
|
|
-ck
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4214
Merit: 1644
Ruu \o/
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 08, 2014, 10:19:43 PM |
|
Any idea what does the 2.4.21 firmware brings? Would be nice to have some sort of change log .. even if its high level to increase visibility to the SP community about changes introduced.
While I've not been involved in the firmware side directly, I've seen a lot of work going on behind the scenes to improve stability of the Murata PSU based devices which don't recover properly after the initial tuning attempts and the devices are more stable with the newest firmwares, so my guess is it's this.
|
Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel 2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org -ck
|
|
|
jtoomim
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 08, 2014, 10:26:13 PM |
|
yep, one of my hosts (thanks, Jeff!) reported that sp-30 was crashing because miner was initially reading voltage as above 300V when, in fact, it was 246-254V. I guess, this was an extreme case of the same phenomenon. When this Sp-30 was later moved to 208V (otherwise it would not work), miner was initially reading 246V instead.
300V does not sound normal. I usually see +/- 5V of variation. I have occasionally seen anomalous readings (e.g. 180V instead of 245V) that disappear after restarting minergate or rebooting. I have not seen any consistently erroneous readings. If you are frequently seeing high voltage readings that continue after restarting a device, then I would suspect that you either have a faulty power supply or large voltage harmonic distortion on your power line.
|
Hosting bitcoin miners for $65 to $80/kW/month on clean, cheap hydro power. http://Toom.im
|
|
|
|