okane818
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1000
|
|
December 20, 2017, 01:17:18 PM |
|
Monero solid market. THanks to Monero, I got some profits.
Best regards
Okane Satoshi
|
|
|
|
jemura
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 406
Merit: 100
“Revolutionising Marketing and Loyalty”
|
|
December 20, 2017, 02:23:25 PM |
|
Monero is the best currency for a dark web market
|
|
|
|
sneakyraccoon
Member
Offline
Activity: 85
Merit: 10
|
|
December 20, 2017, 02:26:18 PM |
|
is there a specific reason why XMR is skyrocketing right now? i support XMR through mining for 6 months now, glad that it finally is appreciated the way it should be but why now?
|
|
|
|
wachtwoord
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2338
Merit: 1136
|
|
December 20, 2017, 02:36:28 PM |
|
Okay, trying to catch up to the latest transfer changes here. The command for transfering is the following:
transfer [<priority>] [<ring_size>] <address> <amount> [<payment_id>]
1. What is the lowest priority? I read somewhere that 0 means normal (aka 4x) and 1 is unimportant (x1). is that correct? 2. How much is 1x? 1 times what? 3. Are zero fees not included? 4. I looked at a block explorer and there are many blocks smaller than 300 KB. Am I correct in my assumption that this means any transaction will be picked up by miners in such a block? (<300KB) 5. I remember there are restrictions added to ring_size. Is that true? Is there a minimum now? 6. How do you select again which inputs get used? (or predict which will if it's an automatic process)
Thanks!
|
|
|
|
dEBRUYNE
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2268
Merit: 1141
|
|
December 20, 2017, 04:22:45 PM |
|
Okay, trying to catch up to the latest transfer changes here. The command for transfering is the following:
transfer [<priority>] [<ring_size>] <address> <amount> [<payment_id>]
1. What is the lowest priority? I read somewhere that 0 means normal (aka 4x) and 1 is unimportant (x1). is that correct? 2. How much is 1x? 1 times what? 3. Are zero fees not included? 4. I looked at a block explorer and there are many blocks smaller than 300 KB. Am I correct in my assumption that this means any transaction will be picked up by miners in such a block? (<300KB) 5. I remember there are restrictions added to ring_size. Is that true? Is there a minimum now? 6. How do you select again which inputs get used? (or predict which will if it's an automatic process)
Thanks!
1. "unimportant" is the lowest priority. You can make this default by typing "set priority 1". 2. It's related to the dynamic fee algorithm. See: https://getmonero.org/2017/12/11/A-note-on-fees.html3. Zero fees are not possible with the default CLI/GUI wallet. However, fees are not enforced on a consensus level, i.e., you could theoretically tweak the code, compile it yourself, and broadcast a transaction with a fee lower than the unimportant level. 4. If the mempool is lower than 300 kB (and your transaction is in the mempool), the miner will include it in the next block. 5. Yes, 5 is the minimum. If you simply leave out the [<ring_size>] of your command, it'll use 5 as ring size. In other words, transfer <address> <amount> will use 5 as ring size. 6. As far as I know, you can't literally choose them yourself (you can choose a different amount to get different outputs though). However, you can use "set print-ring-members 1" and it'll show you which outputs the transaction will use. Furthermore, it'll warn you if you are trying to spend multiple outputs that are detrimental to privacy, i.e., outputs that came in the same transaction (for some reason) or two outputs from two transactions from the same block. Hopefully this sufficiently answered your questions.
|
|
|
|
dEBRUYNE
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2268
Merit: 1141
|
|
December 20, 2017, 04:24:17 PM Merited by wachtwoord (20) |
|
I've been exploring and trying to set up a node running in one of my local PCs (Windows 7) for the intent purpose of allowing Monerujo to connect to it as my private node instead of using one of the public nodes for obvious reasons.
These are my port forwards (DD-WRT router):
These are the args inserted in the monerod Shortcut Target:
~monerod.exe --rpc-bind-ip 0.0.0.0 --restricted-rpc --confirm-external-bind
I then used the following node address in Monerujo as my (private) node address:
EXT.WAN.IP.ADDRESS:18081
Unfortunately, Monerujo says: "Cannot reach node! Try again or another." Is there anything I missed in my setup? Since I'm definitely networking/CLI-challenged, I wouldn't be surprised.
I also tried it on a Windows 7 GUI wallet (netbook) for good measure but nothing happens when I click on "Connect":
That's the correct command / setup (though you might want to add the --rpc-login flag too to set a specific login + username). Can you check if your ports are properly opened / forwarded?
|
|
|
|
wachtwoord
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2338
Merit: 1136
|
|
December 20, 2017, 04:52:05 PM |
|
Thanks dEBRUYNE!
|
|
|
|
revelacaogr
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1316
Merit: 1021
2009 Alea iacta est
|
|
December 20, 2017, 06:02:08 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
dEBRUYNE
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2268
Merit: 1141
|
|
December 20, 2017, 09:15:37 PM |
|
Thanks dEBRUYNE! You're welcome
|
|
|
|
OWZ1337
Member
Offline
Activity: 140
Merit: 17
BITCOIN===>THE DISRUPTIVE CYBERCURRENCY
|
|
December 20, 2017, 09:21:50 PM |
|
big news hitting the wires could go to Bcash prices or DASH prices XMR is a better coin :-D hodl till. 05-.09 weeeeeeee https://poloniex.com/exchange#btc_xmr
|
I am not a Financial Analyst, Investment Broker, Financial Adviser, Crypto-Guru or any sort of professional that would be deemed trustworthy! weee™
|
|
|
visdude
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1081
Merit: 1001
|
|
December 20, 2017, 11:28:05 PM |
|
I've been exploring and trying to set up a node running in one of my local PCs (Windows 7) for the intent purpose of allowing Monerujo to connect to it as my private node instead of using one of the public nodes for obvious reasons.
These are my port forwards (DD-WRT router):
These are the args inserted in the monerod Shortcut Target:
~monerod.exe --rpc-bind-ip 0.0.0.0 --restricted-rpc --confirm-external-bind
I then used the following node address in Monerujo as my (private) node address:
EXT.WAN.IP.ADDRESS:18081
Unfortunately, Monerujo says: "Cannot reach node! Try again or another." Is there anything I missed in my setup? Since I'm definitely networking/CLI-challenged, I wouldn't be surprised.
I also tried it on a Windows 7 GUI wallet (netbook) for good measure but nothing happens when I click on "Connect":
That's the correct command / setup (though you might want to add the --rpc-login flag too to set a specific login + username). Can you check if your ports are properly opened / forwarded? Thanks. Per DD-WRT control panel, both ports have been opened/forwarded (applied changes and rebooted router). There are no related firewall events either each time I try to connect. I initially thought that it could be my VPN but sorta dismissed it as other remote mobile apps (i.e. TeamViewer, VNC, etc) have had no issues making their way to the same PC over VPN tunnels (both ends). My EXT.WAN.IP.ADDR as indicated by my router should be valid. Re --rpc-login flag, does it make monerod require a username/password to be established upon launch and in turn be required when a remote device/app attempts to connect to the running daemon? Furthermore, is it a requirement to remotely connect to the daemon or just an option (existing public nodes don't require it)? I see the Username/Password fields under "Login (optional)" in GUI Wallet Settings but no such option in Monerujo mobile wallet.
|
|
|
|
exciter.0
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 10
Merit: 0
|
|
December 21, 2017, 08:20:10 AM |
|
Thanks.
Per DD-WRT control panel, both ports have been opened/forwarded (applied changes and rebooted router). There are no related firewall events either each time I try to connect. I initially thought that it could be my VPN but sorta dismissed it as other remote mobile apps (i.e. TeamViewer, VNC, etc) have had no issues making their way to the same PC over VPN tunnels (both ends). My EXT.WAN.IP.ADDR as indicated by my router should be valid.
Re --rpc-login flag, does it make monerod require a username/password to be established upon launch and in turn be required when a remote device/app attempts to connect to the running daemon? Furthermore, is it a requirement to remotely connect to the daemon or just an option (existing public nodes don't require it)? I see the Username/Password fields under "Login (optional)" in GUI Wallet Settings but no such option in Monerujo mobile wallet.
In Monerujo, you can include the login in the node line: user:password@ip_addr:portPerhaps your issue is due to the fact dd-wrt doesn't support hairpin routing? https://superuser.com/questions/418928/dd-wrt-port-not-fowarding-when-connecting-with-public-ip-from-lanSomeone suggested try connecting to the internal LAN IP, was that successful?
|
|
|
|
alexeyneu
Member
Offline
Activity: 351
Merit: 37
|
|
December 21, 2017, 01:51:45 PM |
|
But jokes aside. I don't think a team who is not competent enough to write a simple GUI interface for a coin that's 3 years old and market 1.5 billion - are competent enough to write code that claims to be untracebale and securea and all that they claim... I'm not buying it. I have 5 wallets running on my system - monero wallet is the weirdest sh*t I've seen so far.. it's like a buying a car that you would have to push everywhere yourself... lol
they'd pay 6k bucks for this thing and looks like out of gas after that. https://github.com/monero-project/monero-gui/pull/1025view key: ac5bfc40151557e9796f8237dfedb1ed1a9c3426e647be56beb495c91d99e80f
|
|
|
|
visdude
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1081
Merit: 1001
|
|
December 21, 2017, 06:36:40 PM |
|
Thanks for the lead. However, the topic on your link is about being able to connect to a server via the public/exterior address of a DD-WRT router from within the same LAN, I think. I assume that's what "hairpin roiuting" means; a 180° turn right back to the same LAN. It's not what I am after. I would be at home in such a scenario and wouldn't be needing a mobile wallet to transact; I'd just fire up a GUI Wallet on one of my PCs. What I need is to finally be able to transact while out and about and on the go (outside of my LAN) with unfortunately the only viable XMR mobile wallet app so far (Monerujo) without having to use public nodes (moneroworld, etc.) but my own private node running at home through the public/external IP address of my DD-WRT router. So far, no success in spite of doing it by the book and also trying different sets of port forwarding parameters (good o'l trial & error bit), hoping I would hit one of them and finally able to connect.
|
|
|
|
niknik1966
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 266
Merit: 251
DIW - Security Decentralized,Life Revolutionized
|
|
December 21, 2017, 06:54:12 PM |
|
Monero is now also acting as bitcoin. Bitcoin falls and monero, too, but for a smaller percentage. I wonder what his prediction is in the new year?
|
|
|
|
liveflipcoin
|
|
December 21, 2017, 07:16:06 PM |
|
Monero is now also acting as bitcoin. Bitcoin falls and monero, too, but for a smaller percentage. I wonder what his prediction is in the new year?
Yes, I have been noticing that also. Instead of BTC/Altcoin, I’m seeing a lot of XMR/Altcoin. It’s going to take over Bitcoin.
|
|
|
|
OWZ1337
Member
Offline
Activity: 140
Merit: 17
BITCOIN===>THE DISRUPTIVE CYBERCURRENCY
|
|
December 21, 2017, 07:55:17 PM |
|
Thanks for the lead. However, the topic on your link is about being able to connect to a server via the public/exterior address of a DD-WRT router from within the same LAN, I think. I assume that's what "hairpin roiuting" means; a 180° turn right back to the same LAN. It's not what I am after. I would be at home in such a scenario and wouldn't be needing a mobile wallet to transact; I'd just fire up a GUI Wallet on one of my PCs. What I need is to finally be able to transact while out and about and on the go (outside of my LAN) with unfortunately the only viable XMR mobile wallet app so far (Monerujo) without having to use public nodes (moneroworld, etc.) but my own private node running at home through the public/external IP address of my DD-WRT router. So far, no success in spite of doing it by the book and also trying different sets of port forwarding parameters (good o'l trial & error bit), hoping I would hit one of them and finally able to connect. BCN is only 100 satoshi and does the same thing as XMR i'm not understanding the price disparagement :\ whateverrrrrr bytecoin was first<<<< https://poloniex.com/exchange#btc_bcn
|
I am not a Financial Analyst, Investment Broker, Financial Adviser, Crypto-Guru or any sort of professional that would be deemed trustworthy! weee™
|
|
|
visdude
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1081
Merit: 1001
|
|
December 21, 2017, 08:07:07 PM |
|
Wrong quote there, bud.
|
|
|
|
Gyro
|
|
December 21, 2017, 08:12:48 PM |
|
Thanks for the lead. However, the topic on your link is about being able to connect to a server via the public/exterior address of a DD-WRT router from within the same LAN, I think. I assume that's what "hairpin roiuting" means; a 180° turn right back to the same LAN. It's not what I am after. I would be at home in such a scenario and wouldn't be needing a mobile wallet to transact; I'd just fire up a GUI Wallet on one of my PCs. What I need is to finally be able to transact while out and about and on the go (outside of my LAN) with unfortunately the only viable XMR mobile wallet app so far (Monerujo) without having to use public nodes (moneroworld, etc.) but my own private node running at home through the public/external IP address of my DD-WRT router. So far, no success in spite of doing it by the book and also trying different sets of port forwarding parameters (good o'l trial & error bit), hoping I would hit one of them and finally able to connect. BCN is only 100 satoshi and does the same thing as XMR i'm not understanding the price disparagement :\ whateverrrrrr bytecoin was first<<<< https://poloniex.com/exchange#btc_bcnBytecoin had a yuge premine. We are supposed to beleive that bytecoin went unnoticed for a couple of years while it was being mined on the dark webz. haha.. yeah.. the premine was like 60% or more. that's why Monero took over. Code was good, devs were shady as fuck.
|
|
|
|
OWZ1337
Member
Offline
Activity: 140
Merit: 17
BITCOIN===>THE DISRUPTIVE CYBERCURRENCY
|
|
December 21, 2017, 08:32:56 PM |
|
|
I am not a Financial Analyst, Investment Broker, Financial Adviser, Crypto-Guru or any sort of professional that would be deemed trustworthy! weee™
|
|
|
|