NEM (XEM) Official Thread - 100% New Code - Easy To Use APIs

[Eadeqa]

Every time I come to this thread wishing to read about NEM all I see is NXT, NXT and NXT. Is it just me? Could we discuss NEM more here?

Totem22 and Eadeqa, please be kind enough to continue your Nxt fight somewhere else(maybe Nxt thread).

I do not mention Nxt. I am interested in Nem as I bought several stakes. It's one of UF several sock puppet who keeps bringing Nxt.

I will not mention Nxt unless someone is outright posting lies

[1714146317]

1714146317

[1714146317]

1714146317

[jnuqsx]

This is FANTASTIC!!!AMAZING!!!BEAUTIFUL!!!

Nice!Outstanding job!
Can't wait

[Jaguar0625]

Jaguar0625, I want to say I don't have any problem with 25% development stakes. You guys absolutely deserve it, and all the money raised during the IPO. Far more than UF for example.

I just don't to this to overboard with there are very large amount of unclaimed stakes.

You do raise a good point about how we should handle unclaimed stakes. We had assumed that the number would be much less than 25%, but we do need a contingency plan in case there are that money (or more). We're busy putting the finishing touches on the alpha, so it might take a few days before we come to a decision, but we are discussing it.

[Totem22]

Every time I come to this thread wishing to read about NEM all I see is NXT, NXT and NXT. Is it just me? Could we discuss NEM more here?

Totem22 and Eadeqa, please be kind enough to continue your Nxt fight somewhere else(maybe Nxt thread).

I do not mention Nxt. I am interested in Nem as I bought several stakes. It's one of UF several sock puppet who keeps bringing Nxt.

I will not mention Nxt unless someone is outright posting lies

My last post. I only brought out NxT because your demand to NEM dev. team is unreasonable and we need a point of comparison. It is a normal conversational technique.

But some of your Nxt guys are disgusting. First UF is TaunSew https://nxtforum.org/pub-crawl/10'000-nxt-for-speech-analysis ; Now UF is Totem22. What's next ? UF is peacefulmind? https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=651057.0 Everyone who criticizes NxT now is UF ?

[instacalm]

I will not mention Nxt unless someone is outright posting lies

+1

Everyone who criticizes NxT(?) now is UF ?

Not at all.

We're busy putting the finishing touches on the alpha

Looking forward! Keep it going.

[instacalm]

If there's a sockpuppet then it's instacash.  He used nem.io to get my IP.  I noticed Call from Above used that website in his signature days ago.

Yes, I own http://nem.io (reserved for community use) -- posted it on Nem Trello board days ago and on June 13 in this very thread. Why would I be a sockpuppet, let alone CfA?

Accusations all the way, what's the matter with you?

P.S. CfA used my domain in his signature, really? what for?

[TaunSew]

If there's a sockpuppet then it's instacash.  He used nem.io to get my IP.  I noticed Call from Above used that website in his signature days ago.

Yes, I own http://nem.io (reserved for community use) -- posted it on Nem Trello board days ago. Why would I be a sockpuppet, let alone CfA?

Accusations all the way, what's the matter with you?

It's a blank website nobody uses and then you used it to disclose my IP to freaks on the net and then ruffled through my posts.

Only a few people have been taken off stakeholder list and your actions are deserving.  Like to create some blank 'community page' and its' first use is to stalk another stakeholder isn't excusable.  This is supposed to be the no envy movement.

[instacalm]

It's a blank website nobody uses and then you used it to disclose my IP to freaks on the net and then ruffled through my posts.

Correct, http://nem.io is a placeholder for now and has been used to host the stakeholder list for my personal research -- bought it for NEM a while ago (06-01). Where is this related to sockpuppetry if you don't mind me asking?

You used it to disclose my IP to freaks(?) on the net and then ruffled through my posts. Only a few people have been taken off stakeholder list and your actions are deserving.  Like to create some blank 'community page' and its' first use is to stalk another stakeholder isn't excusable.  This is supposed to be the no envy movement.

Not sure what these sentences mean, but I can do whatever I wish with my personal sites/domains/servers as long as they are my property.

[instacalm]

With an attitude like that then nobody will use your "community" website

Website? the domain would be transferred to the NEM developers if there's interest for a short and sleek domain (e.g. blockexplorer at blocks.nem.io).

Developers please remove his stake, he exhibits characteristics unbecoming of a stakeholder.  

No comment, are you sure you're right here?

[TaunSew]

With an attitude like that then nobody will use your "community" website

Website? the domain would be transferred to the NEM developers if there's interest for a short and sleek domain (e.g. blockexplorer at blocks.nem.io).

Developers please remove his stake, he exhibits characteristics unbecoming of a stakeholder.  

No comment, are you sure you're right here?

You have no shame in creating a website intended for the "community", but it's first purpose is to lie in a private message and then bait me to click it?  Only to prove I'm not UF but you then continue to ruffle through deleted posts?

Read up the definition of asocial.  Apparently you haven't have a clue from right or wrong.  No rational sane human could see your viewpoint.

If NEM community tolerates this behaviour from Instacash then we are no better than the coins we trying to overcome.

[instacalm]

You have no shame in creating a website intended for the "community", but it's first purpose is to lie(?) in a private message and then bait me to click it?  Only to prove I'm not UF but you then continue to ruffle through deleted posts?

This was not its first purpose, it was a spontaneous idea (no shame indeed). Yeah, your earlier nonsense posts got me interested thus I checked your background.

to all those who don't know what TaunSew is talking about - I was checking whether he's an alt account of utopianfuture or not. I can confirm he's not.

what do you have to say about NEM, TaunSew?

[Jaguar0625]

Here is a write up by coinsource:

http://www.coinssource.com/inside-nem-new-economy-movement/
http://www.coinssource.com/nem-timeline/

It's mostly positive.

One typo (I think):

Despite these comments andallegations that followed we believe this coin is certainly interesting and given the right circumstances perhaps a bright future is not in the distance.

And one inaccuracy:

Given that the coin is almost an exact copy of its mother coin, Nxtcoin, its understandable that the public may be confused about its delayed launch and overall completion of development processes.

[Eadeqa]

But some of your Nxt guys are disgusting.

Not as disgusting as yours amd TaunSew ranting about Nxt. This is Nem thread. Why can't you stick to that topic?

[Eadeqa]

If this guy keeps his stake and trello position then it only looks bad for NEM.  

I don't think it's as bad as what UF did with trolling with sock puppets You cannot take away anyone "stakes" unless they are sock puppets.

Sorry to disappoint you

[twistelaar]

how much is 1 NEM stake worth on the NXT AE at the moment? thanks

[Totem22]

But some of your Nxt guys are disgusting.

Not as disgusting as yours amd TaunSew ranting about Nxt. This is Nem thread. Why can't stick to that topic?

As I said I only bought NxT up as a point of comparison to your demand. It is a normal discussion technique. While all comparison I made about NxT's IPO, big holder holding percentage etc. are factual and reasonable, you vehemently defended NxT, accused me of lying. You did all of that with no regard to how these discussions relate to NEM. That's not sticking to the topic.

For example: fact 1: 8 Nxt big holders out of genesis block holding 40% of Nxt. Relating point: it is fair and very reasonable that 8 NEM core developers and multiple other developers and helpers sharing 25% of NEM. I just made a very simple point. How is that not relevant ?

[Eadeqa]

As I said I only bought NxT up as a point of comparison to your demand. It is a normal discussion technique. While all comparison I made about NxT's IPO, big holder holding percentage etc. are factual and reasonable, you vehemently defended NxT, accused me of lying. You did all of that with no regard to how these discussions relate to NEM. That's not sticking to the topic.

You made a factual statement that all Nxt developers hold 5% each. This was factually untrue. Only CfB was original stake holder and a developer (not 5% one). Jean Luc was an investor who became "developer" later - -much later -- after the launch. It's not clear if he owns 5% as you claimed.  No other Nxt developer is original stake holder and none of them hold 5% of Nxt

[Totem22]

As I said I only bought NxT up as a point of comparison to your demand. It is a normal discussion technique. While all comparison I made about NxT's IPO, big holder holding percentage etc. are factual and reasonable, you vehemently defended NxT, accused me of lying. You did all of that with no regard to how these discussions relate to NEM. That's not sticking to the topic.

You made a factual statement that all Nxt developers hold 5% each. This was factual untrue. Only CfB was original stake holder and a developer (not 5% one). Jean Luc was an investor who became "developer" later. No other Nxt developer is a original stake holder and none of them hold 5% of Nxt

Show the quote? You are accusing me of writing something I did not again. This is not the first time you did that.

[Eadeqa]

As I said I only bought NxT up as a point of comparison to your demand. It is a normal discussion technique. While all comparison I made about NxT's IPO, big holder holding percentage etc. are factual and reasonable, you vehemently defended NxT, accused me of lying. You did all of that with no regard to how these discussions relate to NEM. That's not sticking to the topic.

You made a factual statement that all Nxt developers hold 5% each. This was factual untrue. Only CfB was original stake holder and a developer (not 5% one). Jean Luc was an investor who became "developer" later. No other Nxt developer is a original stake holder and none of them hold 5% of Nxt

Show the quote? You are accusing me of writing something I did not again. This is not the first time you did that.

I went back and I see you actually said " JeanLuc and several Nxt whales holding 5% of Nxt each". I read  "whales" as "developers".

Sorry about that.

There are only 2 who hold 5% each (JC is not one of them unless he spilt his account), and no I don't have a problem with that, just as I don't have a problem with satoshi holding 10% of BTC. They invested 1 BTC  in an unknown IPO when such a thing wasn't common on BT forum  and got lucky it wasn't a scam and prices went up.

[gadsden76]

I have been on the sidelines for a while, just came back to catch up with NEM, so much has changed...

I requested my stake from patmast3r is he still distributing these?

I want to spread the word about NEM with a local Bitcoin club that I take part in. I am trying to figure out a way to get them interested.