[ANN][BURST] Burst | Efficient HDD Mining | New 1.2.3 Fork block 92000

[fivebells]

There's a create AT button in the ui in the AT tab under transactions

Thanks.

When I try to run the assembly code from the lottery example through your assembler, I get the following error:

Code:

fivebells@hostname:~/alien/burstcoin/at/ATAssembler/src/scala$ scala ATAssembler.scala tst.s 
/home/fivebells/alien/burstcoin/at/ATAssembler/src/scala/ATAssembler.scala:151: error: Sanity check failed: over 25000 symbols created for pattern match.
    for (line <- lines) {
              ^

tst.s contains the contents of the "Assembly Code" section of the ciyam.org lottery page.  Tried it with and without the asterix after the initial "00000000".  Running on ubuntu 14.04, using the ubuntu "scala" package.

Also, scala stinks. :-)

[1714305207]

1714305207

[1714305207]

1714305207

[1714305207]

1714305207

[b3da]

I noticed that coinia balance viewer have some troubles, so I made something similar to coinia income charts.
I'm still working on it, also my Burst daemon is falling sometimes, so please be kind and let me know if something does not work.

[mmmaybe]

I have sent mmmaybe the edited version, I will also put the pdf here for public judgment
https://www.dropbox.com/s/hguoyzrg0s2iaxo/sc%20edit.pdf?dl=0

Should you decide not to go with it, I will remove it

I like the new version, a few nice tweaks to it, thanks xizmax!

Thank you xizmax, I sent you a donation for your work

[maxpayne1256]

I noticed that coinia balance viewer have some troubles, so I made something similar to coinia income charts.
I'm still working on it, also my Burst daemon is falling sometimes, so please be kind and let me know if something does not work.

http://s4.postimg.org/az7xk2s15/Burst_Mining_Income_Chart_Img.jpg

Cool, but I don't understand the difference between pool/solo setting in the first combobox.
I've switched between pool & solo mining sometimes, so I can't calculate my effective income with your calculator.

When I change to solo I can see every block income, but not the effective value regarding my historical rewardassignment-setting.
When I change to pool my income is too low (it's showing 97.68 Burst for 23-12-2014, which is too low)

To-date could not be set > 24.12
Smaller font-size would be great.

[b3da]

...

Cool, but I don't understand the difference between pool/solo setting in the first combobox.
I've switched between pool & solo mining sometimes, so I can't calculate my effective income with your calculator.

When I change to solo I can see every block income, but not the effective value regarding my historical rewardassignment-setting.
When I change to pool my income is too low (it's showing 97.68 Burst for 23-12-2014, which is too low)

To-date could not be set > 24.12
Smaller font-size would be great.

At this time it is most effective on accounts which have been dedicated just to mining. I have difficulties with getting historical information about reward assingment from API simple way, but maybe I'm not searching hard enough..
Right now its only about daily income/found blocks (independently on where your reward assignment setting was pointed). I will feed this with more detailed informations, but I need to study API first.
I'll do something with font-size too.

[maxpayne1256]

...

Cool, but I don't understand the difference between pool/solo setting in the first combobox.
I've switched between pool & solo mining sometimes, so I can't calculate my effective income with your calculator.

When I change to solo I can see every block income, but not the effective value regarding my historical rewardassignment-setting.
When I change to pool my income is too low (it's showing 97.68 Burst for 23-12-2014, which is too low)

To-date could not be set > 24.12
Smaller font-size would be great.

At this time it is most effective on accounts which have been dedicated just to mining. I have difficulties with getting historical information about reward assingment from API simple way, but maybe I'm not searching hard enough..
Right now its only about daily income/found blocks (independently on where your reward assignment setting was pointed). I will feed this with more detailed informations, but I need to study API first.
I'll do something with font-size too.

I'd recommend to access the database directly due to speed enhancements.

[xizmax]

I have sent mmmaybe the edited version, I will also put the pdf here for public judgment
https://www.dropbox.com/s/hguoyzrg0s2iaxo/sc%20edit.pdf?dl=0

Should you decide not to go with it, I will remove it

I like the new version, a few nice tweaks to it, thanks xizmax!

Thank you xizmax, I sent you a donation for your work

Glad you like it. When you get more material written I can take a look at it. Free of charge

[m3ta]

Not bad, however it still needs a bit of work. For example
a) the site has two S's ie SMART CONTRACTSS
b) the docx download is missing
c) the announcement could use a bit of formatting imo (some char spacing)
d) the most important one for me: the style of writing and some other stuff should be improved. I mean what does this sentence even mean "And Proof of Stake has its known to have security complications and problems, yet Burst still capable of implementing 90% against attack."

EDIT: Hell, gimme the docx I will improve it for you today or tomorrow

Appreciate you pointing this stuff out.. I think we announced it slightly too soon.. we're all excited about Smart Contracts

And sorry that was my bad regarding 90% thing.  So you know, what that sentence is trying to say is that Burst is capable of the same 90% protection against attack that Nxt has.  Meaning that even 90% of the mining power could be trying to attack it.. (at least short term.. gets complicated longer term for new miners joining the network trying to figure out which fork is the correct one) and the miners currently mining can continue mining on the correct fork.. so as long as you can trust a few or that even just one miner is on the right fork, new miners can get on the network that way.

I have sent mmmaybe the edited version, I will also put the pdf here for public judgment
https://www.dropbox.com/s/hguoyzrg0s2iaxo/sc%20edit.pdf?dl=0

Should you decide not to go with it, I will remove it

Faultless grammar and spelling - a true breath of fresh air on this thread. Hopefully it will raise awareness about the importance of proper communication.
Major kudos.

[mczarnek]

You guys may want to consider voting this up/commenting:

http://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/2qv62y/burstcoin_becomes_first_coin_to_support_customer/

[Pilotseye]

Not bad, however it still needs a bit of work. For example
a) the site has two S's ie SMART CONTRACTSS
b) the docx download is missing
c) the announcement could use a bit of formatting imo (some char spacing)
d) the most important one for me: the style of writing and some other stuff should be improved. I mean what does this sentence even mean "And Proof of Stake has its known to have security complications and problems, yet Burst still capable of implementing 90% against attack."

EDIT: Hell, gimme the docx I will improve it for you today or tomorrow

Appreciate you pointing this stuff out.. I think we announced it slightly too soon.. we're all excited about Smart Contracts

And sorry that was my bad regarding 90% thing.  So you know, what that sentence is trying to say is that Burst is capable of the same 90% protection against attack that Nxt has.  Meaning that even 90% of the mining power could be trying to attack it.. (at least short term.. gets complicated longer term for new miners joining the network trying to figure out which fork is the correct one) and the miners currently mining can continue mining on the correct fork.. so as long as you can trust a few or that even just one miner is on the right fork, new miners can get on the network that way.

I have sent mmmaybe the edited version, I will also put the pdf here for public judgment
https://www.dropbox.com/s/hguoyzrg0s2iaxo/sc%20edit.pdf?dl=0

Should you decide not to go with it, I will remove it

Faultless grammar and spelling - a true breath of fresh air on this thread. Hopefully it will raise awareness about the importance of proper communication.
Major kudos.

Grammar Check passed - LOL 

[Tommo_Aus]

Please update TomPool from http://tompool.org:82 to http://mining.tompool.org:82 I had to make some changes after some DDoS attacks.

[FakeAccount]

looking through the logfiles of Blago's miner I found 2 interesting entries:

stat-log.csv:

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,48695,3893490,17 ( However blockexplorer says it took 4.72 mins to solve and Generator is BURST-2A99-N2WF-BPY5-FHMF6 <-- not me )
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,48628,2166197,538 ( However blockexplorer says it took 18.10 mins to solve and Generator is BURST-F4J9-MESK-VDX5-8DM2T <-- not me )

according to my logfiles content, both deadlines were confirmed, yet I didn't get these blocks

what does this mean?  anyone have weird stuff in logs like this?

someone could write a tool that accepts blago miner's "stat-log.csv" and compares against blockchain to single out strange entries like these 2 I found manually
http://burstcoin.eu/ or https://bchain.info/BURST/tools/ could be good spots for this analyzer

[burstcoin]

There's a create AT button in the ui in the AT tab under transactions

Thanks.

When I try to run the assembly code from the lottery example through your assembler, I get the following error:

Code:

fivebells@hostname:~/alien/burstcoin/at/ATAssembler/src/scala$ scala ATAssembler.scala tst.s 
/home/fivebells/alien/burstcoin/at/ATAssembler/src/scala/ATAssembler.scala:151: error: Sanity check failed: over 25000 symbols created for pattern match.
    for (line <- lines) {
              ^

tst.s contains the contents of the "Assembly Code" section of the ciyam.org lottery page.  Tried it with and without the asterix after the initial "00000000".  Running on ubuntu 14.04, using the ubuntu "scala" package.

Also, scala stinks. :-)

Does it throw that error for any input, or just that example, and what version of scala are you using?

[Nerull]

Im just starting out on this coin and got the newest wallet, Im running win 8 and it says i dont have java installed but i do. Ive tried starting it with the java executable and the run bat

[burstcoin]

Im just starting out on this coin and got the newest wallet, Im running win 8 and it says i dont have java installed but i do. Ive tried starting it with the java executable and the run bat

If you don't have java in your system path, the bat file is still aimed at java 7. If you have java 8 installed open the bat file in notepad and change jre7 to jre8.

[Nerull]

Im just starting out on this coin and got the newest wallet, Im running win 8 and it says i dont have java installed but i do. Ive tried starting it with the java executable and the run bat

If you don't have java in your system path, the bat file is still aimed at java 7. If you have java 8 installed open the bat file in notepad and change jre7 to jre8.

yeah just figured that out

the windows 8 installed it as jre1.8.0_25 so changed batfile and its up and running. Thanks tho!

[vbcs]

There's a create AT button in the ui in the AT tab under transactions

Thanks.

When I try to run the assembly code from the lottery example through your assembler, I get the following error:

Code:

fivebells@hostname:~/alien/burstcoin/at/ATAssembler/src/scala$ scala ATAssembler.scala tst.s 
/home/fivebells/alien/burstcoin/at/ATAssembler/src/scala/ATAssembler.scala:151: error: Sanity check failed: over 25000 symbols created for pattern match.
    for (line <- lines) {
              ^

tst.s contains the contents of the "Assembly Code" section of the ciyam.org lottery page.  Tried it with and without the asterix after the initial "00000000".  Running on ubuntu 14.04, using the ubuntu "scala" package.

Also, scala stinks. :-)

Does it throw that error for any input, or just that example, and what version of scala are you using?

The lottery case in ciyam.org/at site is using the old api and needs changes. Maybe this is the reason why you cant use it with the ATAssembler. I have the new version ready to run, but i am not gome these days to deploy it.

[burstcoin]

There's a create AT button in the ui in the AT tab under transactions

Thanks.

When I try to run the assembly code from the lottery example through your assembler, I get the following error:

Code:

fivebells@hostname:~/alien/burstcoin/at/ATAssembler/src/scala$ scala ATAssembler.scala tst.s 
/home/fivebells/alien/burstcoin/at/ATAssembler/src/scala/ATAssembler.scala:151: error: Sanity check failed: over 25000 symbols created for pattern match.
    for (line <- lines) {
              ^

tst.s contains the contents of the "Assembly Code" section of the ciyam.org lottery page.  Tried it with and without the asterix after the initial "00000000".  Running on ubuntu 14.04, using the ubuntu "scala" package.

Also, scala stinks. :-)

Does it throw that error for any input, or just that example, and what version of scala are you using?

The lottery case in ciyam.org/at site is using the old api and needs changes. Maybe this is the reason why you cant use it with the ATAssembler. I have the new version ready to run, but i am not gome these days to deploy it.

Regardless of the api version, that error message shouldn't result from it. It actually seems more likely that it's a compiler bug. I only get 3 hits on google for that error, one of them is a tweet from 3 years ago, and two of them are:

Code:

def recordSyntheticSym(sym: Symbol): Symbol = {
_syntheticSyms += sym
if (_syntheticSyms.size > 25000) {
cunit.error(owner.pos, "Sanity check failed: over 25000 symbols created for pattern match.")
abort("This is a bug in the pattern matcher.")
}
sym
}

[rollingMyCar]

Not bad, however it still needs a bit of work. For example
a) the site has two S's ie SMART CONTRACTSS
b) the docx download is missing
c) the announcement could use a bit of formatting imo (some char spacing)
d) the most important one for me: the style of writing and some other stuff should be improved. I mean what does this sentence even mean "And Proof of Stake has its known to have security complications and problems, yet Burst still capable of implementing 90% against attack."

EDIT: Hell, gimme the docx I will improve it for you today or tomorrow

Appreciate you pointing this stuff out.. I think we announced it slightly too soon.. we're all excited about Smart Contracts

And sorry that was my bad regarding 90% thing.  So you know, what that sentence is trying to say is that Burst is capable of the same 90% protection against attack that Nxt has.  Meaning that even 90% of the mining power could be trying to attack it.. (at least short term.. gets complicated longer term for new miners joining the network trying to figure out which fork is the correct one) and the miners currently mining can continue mining on the correct fork.. so as long as you can trust a few or that even just one miner is on the right fork, new miners can get on the network that way.

I have sent mmmaybe the edited version, I will also put the pdf here for public judgment
https://www.dropbox.com/s/hguoyzrg0s2iaxo/sc%20edit.pdf?dl=0

Should you decide not to go with it, I will remove it

Faultless grammar and spelling - a true breath of fresh air on this thread. Hopefully it will raise awareness about the importance of proper communication.
Major kudos.

hi m3ta!

io sono un altro "non inglese" lingua madre scrittrice !!!

perché avete bisogno di sottolineare ogni volta se qualche utente scrivere in un non perfetto inglese ??

stiamo cercando di scrivere un corretto inglese ... ma quando non riusciamo, saremo molto più felici se ci si corregge e non se si dice "bla !!! quel povero inglese"

 

[mczarnek]

Im just starting out on this coin and got the newest wallet, Im running win 8 and it says i dont have java installed but i do. Ive tried starting it with the java executable and the run bat

If you don't have java in your system path, the bat file is still aimed at java 7. If you have java 8 installed open the bat file in notepad and change jre7 to jre8.

yeah just figured that out

the windows 8 installed it as jre1.8.0_25 so changed batfile and its up and running. Thanks tho!

Is there a way we could make this more user friendly? Would be nice if new users didn't have to edit .bat files.