[ANN][BURST] Burst | Efficient HDD Mining | New 1.2.3 Fork block 92000

[doctorbyte]

any working web wallet?
my offline wallet not syncing

THE REASON IS YOU NEED INTERNET. OFFLINE=NO_INTERNET=NO_P2PCONNECTION=NO_SYNC

[1714304293]

1714304293

[1714304293]

1714304293

[1714304293]

1714304293

[eldinhadz]

Is this ok ?

Code:

Using eu.burstcoin.io port 8126

Could not get mining info from Node. Will retry..
0 MB read/0 GB total/deadline 28692897211s (28692897179s left)
New block 51183, basetarget 1602615

Could not get mining info from Node. Will retry..
0 MB read/0 GB total/deadline 26926532562s (26926532536s left)

[dec93]

Hello All.

Does anyone have non java miner for ARM cpu? i tried to compile dcct's c miner for Linux but no success...

Thanx!

replace the shabal.s file with the one for the arm platform.
the url for the shabal.s file is mentioned in the source.
worked for me fine.

callmejack thank you for your advice but i cannot find the url now...

found it must be here i think http://www.shabal.com/?p=213#more-213

[fivebells]

Although I haven't played with that assembler tool myself perhaps try this instead:

Code:

ADD @00000000 $00000001

Thanks, that worked and produced matching output.

[fivebells]

Is there an easy way to run AT code independently of the blockchain?

[CIYAM]

Is there an easy way to run AT code independently of the blockchain?

Apart from using a "testnet" you could use the C++ prototype, however, it can only emulate API functions with appropriately provided test data (and doesn't implement the A and B 256 bit registers at this stage).

I agree that it would make things easier to have a better "emulator" for testing (but am unfortunately rather too busy at the moment to put a lot more effort into the C++ prototype).

Perhaps this is something that Burst could consider creating (having an Assembler tool is a great start as writing pure machine code is very time consuming).

[CIYAM]

Although I haven't played with that assembler tool myself perhaps try this instead:

Code:

ADD @00000000 $00000001

Thanks, that worked and produced matching output.

Glad to know - I will make a note to update all the test cases (as many of the op codes are going to have the same issues). Unfortunately when the test cases were first created the precise syntax had not been worked out (am happy to see that burstdev has been very accurate to what had been intended). This was mostly an issue of the "list" output from the original C++ prototype and the Java version of that (rather than an issue with the specification itself).

The use of @ indicates a variable to be "assigned" whereas the use of $ indicates a variable to be "read" (of course @ could mean read and write but $ should never indicate write and normally the first variable will be the one to be assigned if there are two).

Creating a simple and consistent syntax for a "virtual CPU" is actually not so easy (as I discovered).

I will say that you are in good hands with the Burst developer as he has even corrected myself over inconsistencies with AT.

If you are keen to participate more with AT then feel free to make more direct contact with those involved to become "part of the team" (there is no intention to make ATs "too hard" but we are at the very start of creating tools to make that easier so I hope people can be tolerant while we work on making it more accessible).

[Irontiga]

any working web wallet?
my offline wallet not syncing

wallet.burstcoin.io

that will do the trick

[oktay50000]

any working web wallet?
my offline wallet not syncing

wallet.burstcoin.io

that will do the trick

tnx mate

[fivebells]

there is no intention to make ATs "too hard" but we are at the very start of creating tools to make that easier so I hope people can be tolerant while we work on making it more accessible

The competition sets a very high bar.

[CIYAM]

The competition sets a very high bar.

True - but they are also trying to convince everyone to use their own browser (something we are not planning to do).

Also it should be noted that if we get GCC to do AT then you'll have every fancy tool you could ever want at your disposal.

[coinits]

The competition sets a very high bar.

True - but they are also trying to convince everyone to use their own browser (something we are not planning to do).

Stay away. Goldman Sachs is involved so that means co-opted by Banksters.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q5FDvzj8YX4

[fivebells]

Also it should be noted that if we get GCC to do AT then you'll have every fancy tool you could ever want at your disposal.

That would be awesome.  Is anyone working  on that?  I was looking at the feasibility of an LLVM backend today, but decided it was probably too awkward because it's claimed here that the binary it produces for a minimal program is 10KB, and the current maximum code size for a burst AT (if I'm reading correctly from MAX_MACHINE_CODE_PAGES in AT_Constants.java) is 2.5K.  I am pretty clueless about compiler technology, though, would love to be wrong.  Does the machine code size depend on the backend you use?

[CIYAM]

Also it should be noted that if we get GCC to do AT then you'll have every fancy tool you could ever want at your disposal.

That would be awesome.  Is anyone working  on that?

Not as yet.

In regards to a minimum program size understand that things like "standard I/O" don't apply to AT so basically you would need to look at something closer to cross compiling I think (just like people creating programs for CPUs that don't have an OS - and note that at this stage there is not even a "heap").

Over time the plan is to extend the AT API to include more and more functionality to make it easier for standard systems such as GCC to work with it.

[electrogen]

Hi, I have noticed that the pool doesn't pay me when I have accrued large share values. Last night I found a block in 5 seconds so was expecting a 1000+ burst payment that never came. also this thing happens with smaller payments too.

[xizmax]

Hi, I have noticed that the pool doesn't pay me when I have accrued large share values. Last night I found a block in 5 seconds so was expecting a 1000+ burst payment that never came. also this thing happens with smaller payments too.

Would also help if you said which pool is in question here

[electrogen]

lol sorry I thought this was the pool thread. (early poster). it burst.ga.

[xizmax]

lol sorry I thought this was the pool thread. (early poster). it burst.ga.

Hmm, I'm not certain what is happening there. Since you found a block for the pool everything should've been in order.

I mine at burst.ga as well and haven't noticed such a problem.

Crowetic or irontiga will be more of help here, I'm just a noob

[electrogen]

I got a payment for 256 burst but my share value on main page said 1125 burst. I was top of the list so should have been first paid

[unsoindovo]

new burst network size record!!!
thi is really promising!!!

really much more of the low volumes on c-cex