Bitcoin Forum
April 27, 2024, 09:08:38 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 [805] 806 807 808 809 810 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 824 825 826 827 828 829 830 831 832 833 834 835 836 837 838 839 840 841 842 843 844 845 846 847 848 849 850 851 852 853 854 855 ... 1315 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN][BURST] Burst | Efficient HDD Mining | New 1.2.3 Fork block 92000  (Read 2170601 times)
mczarnek
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 527
Merit: 500


View Profile
December 17, 2014, 10:50:06 PM
 #16081


I think that is not a good idea, because if they public key are not registred in the network, those accounts are really unsafe, and we make a donation to the thiefs that looks for that kind of accoutns.



Can somebody explain why are accounts with no public key unsafe? Its because possible password collision?

Yes, there are infinite passwords that lead to same BURST address ... (thats not really a collision) ... to bind the address to your password a incomming transaction with your public key is needed, after that only your password will work, all others will cause a exception ... that the address is already taken.

PS: you can make a incomming transaction without public key, will work, but wallet will be accessible with all passwords that lead to this address, until you make a outgoing transaction.

That makes sense.. could that explain the people who had their accounts hacked a little while back?  Seemed like a few people did.

Hacker simply brute forces passwords attempting to find unregistered public keys?

BitSend ◢◤Clients | Source
www.bitsend.info
█▄
█████▄
████████▄
███████████▄
██████████████
███████████▀
████████▀
█████▀
█▀












Segwit | Core 0.14 | Masternodes
XEVAN | DK3 | Electrum soon
Bitcore - BTX/BTC -Project












BSD -USDT | Bittrex | C.Gather | S.Exchange
Cryptopia | NovaExchange | Livecoin
Litebit.eu | Faucet | Bitsend Airdrop













████
 ████
  ████
   ████
    ████
     ████
      ████
       ████
        ████
       ████
      ████
     ████
    ████
   ████
  ████
 ████
████

████
 ████
  ████
   ████
    ████
     ████
      ████
       ████
        ████
       ████
      ████
     ████
    ████
   ████
  ████
 ████
████
1714252118
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714252118

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714252118
Reply with quote  #2

1714252118
Report to moderator
1714252118
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714252118

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714252118
Reply with quote  #2

1714252118
Report to moderator
1714252118
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714252118

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714252118
Reply with quote  #2

1714252118
Report to moderator
Make sure you back up your wallet regularly! Unlike a bank account, nobody can help you if you lose access to your BTC.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714252118
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714252118

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714252118
Reply with quote  #2

1714252118
Report to moderator
1714252118
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714252118

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714252118
Reply with quote  #2

1714252118
Report to moderator
dcct
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 280
Merit: 250


View Profile
December 17, 2014, 11:30:27 PM
 #16082

That makes sense.. could that explain the people who had their accounts hacked a little while back?  Seemed like a few people did.

Hacker simply brute forces passwords attempting to find unregistered public keys?

I guess only accounts with weak passwords got hacked. Public keys are 64 bit wide - that's not safe but still too much for the average attacker.

mczarnek
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 527
Merit: 500


View Profile
December 17, 2014, 11:37:34 PM
 #16083

That makes sense.. could that explain the people who had their accounts hacked a little while back?  Seemed like a few people did.

Hacker simply brute forces passwords attempting to find unregistered public keys?

I guess only accounts with weak passwords got hacked. Public keys are 64 bit wide - that's not safe but still too much for the average attacker.



Could be.. wallet somewhat forces you to pick a strong password, so I don't see many people choosing their own password.. but could be.

And all it takes is one above average attacker!

BitSend ◢◤Clients | Source
www.bitsend.info
█▄
█████▄
████████▄
███████████▄
██████████████
███████████▀
████████▀
█████▀
█▀












Segwit | Core 0.14 | Masternodes
XEVAN | DK3 | Electrum soon
Bitcore - BTX/BTC -Project












BSD -USDT | Bittrex | C.Gather | S.Exchange
Cryptopia | NovaExchange | Livecoin
Litebit.eu | Faucet | Bitsend Airdrop













████
 ████
  ████
   ████
    ████
     ████
      ████
       ████
        ████
       ████
      ████
     ████
    ████
   ████
  ████
 ████
████

████
 ████
  ████
   ████
    ████
     ████
      ████
       ████
        ████
       ████
      ████
     ████
    ████
   ████
  ████
 ████
████
Pilotseye
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 210
Merit: 100


View Profile
December 17, 2014, 11:46:01 PM
 #16084

If you have problems with RAM performance use Runaurufu Burst Miner, change pool and directories in configuration.xml to fit your needs - tool has been checked by forum members and is clean - using it myself long time already.
cisahasa
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 910
Merit: 1000


View Profile
December 18, 2014, 12:01:18 AM
 #16085


I think that is not a good idea, because if they public key are not registred in the network, those accounts are really unsafe, and we make a donation to the thiefs that looks for that kind of accoutns.



Can somebody explain why are accounts with no public key unsafe? Its because possible password collision?

Yes, there are infinite passwords that lead to same BURST address ... (thats not really a collision) ... to bind the address to your password a incomming transaction with your public key is needed, after that only your password will work, all others will cause a exception ... that the address is already taken.

PS: you can make a incomming transaction without public key, will work, but wallet will be accessible with all passwords that lead to this address, until you make a outgoing transaction.

so the address protocol is different from btc?
i cant send my money to offline generated wallet, or u are saying its unsafe?
( i hate nxt a dont even care to find out how it works, and quite lost my interest on this one as well.)

jamoes
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 89
Merit: 10


View Profile
December 18, 2014, 12:15:09 AM
 #16086

I never understood why NXT went with 64 bit addresses. They're still long enough that you have to copy and paste them, but they're significantly less secure than bitcoin's 160 bit addresses. This is an unfortunately part of NXT that Burst has inherited.

If it were up to me, I would transition Burst addresses to standard 160 bit scheme used by most other crypto-currencies. I'd also change the account system to discourage address re-use rather than encouraging it. This is better for user privacy, and more resilient against the advent of quantum computers.
mmmaybe
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 462
Merit: 250



View Profile WWW
December 18, 2014, 01:37:47 AM
Last edit: December 18, 2014, 05:40:09 PM by mmmaybe
 #16087

If you have problems with RAM performance use Runaurufu Burst Miner, change pool and directories in configuration.xml to fit your needs - tool has been checked by forum members and is clean - using it myself long time already.

For f*cks sake, answer the damn questions you have gotten several times!

1) Which members have checked it?
2) Where is the source?
and 3) Why the hell do you want us to use that miner...?

Pilotseye
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 210
Merit: 100


View Profile
December 18, 2014, 01:43:36 AM
 #16088

If you have problems with RAM performance use Runaurufu Burst Miner, change pool and directories in configuration.xml to fit your needs - tool has been checked by forum members and is clean - using it myself long time already.

For f*cks sake, answer the damn questions you have gotten several times!

1) Which members have checked it?
2) Were is the source?
and 3) Why the hell do you want us to use that miner...?

Why are you talking like that? Use the search option for gods sake, meanwhile I quoted the comment from wmikrut 2(!) times already! It was posted on Burstforum initially, so please get over there and search. Feel free to use any miner you want, but this is the only one that does not cause RAM problems for me. YOU sir may also disregard my posts at ANY time!
mczarnek
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 527
Merit: 500


View Profile
December 18, 2014, 01:51:22 AM
 #16089

I never understood why NXT went with 64 bit addresses. They're still long enough that you have to copy and paste them, but they're significantly less secure than bitcoin's 160 bit addresses. This is an unfortunately part of NXT that Burst has inherited.

If it were up to me, I would transition Burst addresses to standard 160 bit scheme used by most other crypto-currencies. I'd also change the account system to discourage address re-use rather than encouraging it. This is better for user privacy, and more resilient against the advent of quantum computers.

I would use a longer wallet address, agreed.

But I love Nxt's RS wallet address.  It's a great idea to somewhat protect users against copy and paste mistakes and that kind of thing.  Which their wallet address does.

BitSend ◢◤Clients | Source
www.bitsend.info
█▄
█████▄
████████▄
███████████▄
██████████████
███████████▀
████████▀
█████▀
█▀












Segwit | Core 0.14 | Masternodes
XEVAN | DK3 | Electrum soon
Bitcore - BTX/BTC -Project












BSD -USDT | Bittrex | C.Gather | S.Exchange
Cryptopia | NovaExchange | Livecoin
Litebit.eu | Faucet | Bitsend Airdrop













████
 ████
  ████
   ████
    ████
     ████
      ████
       ████
        ████
       ████
      ████
     ████
    ████
   ████
  ████
 ████
████

████
 ████
  ████
   ████
    ████
     ████
      ████
       ████
        ████
       ████
      ████
     ████
    ████
   ████
  ████
 ████
████
mczarnek
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 527
Merit: 500


View Profile
December 18, 2014, 02:17:14 AM
 #16090

Anyone know how often the block reward decreases in terms of blocks? (As opposed to once per month)

BitSend ◢◤Clients | Source
www.bitsend.info
█▄
█████▄
████████▄
███████████▄
██████████████
███████████▀
████████▀
█████▀
█▀












Segwit | Core 0.14 | Masternodes
XEVAN | DK3 | Electrum soon
Bitcore - BTX/BTC -Project












BSD -USDT | Bittrex | C.Gather | S.Exchange
Cryptopia | NovaExchange | Livecoin
Litebit.eu | Faucet | Bitsend Airdrop













████
 ████
  ████
   ████
    ████
     ████
      ████
       ████
        ████
       ████
      ████
     ████
    ████
   ████
  ████
 ████
████

████
 ████
  ████
   ████
    ████
     ████
      ████
       ████
        ████
       ████
      ████
     ████
    ████
   ████
  ████
 ████
████
FakeAccount
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 248
Merit: 100


I'm not real


View Profile
December 18, 2014, 02:49:19 AM
Last edit: December 18, 2014, 03:04:04 AM by FakeAccount
 #16091

If you have problems with RAM performance use Runaurufu Burst Miner, change pool and directories in configuration.xml to fit your needs - tool has been checked by forum members and is clean - using it myself long time already.
NO, it hasn't been vetted!!!
mmmaybe
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 462
Merit: 250



View Profile WWW
December 18, 2014, 02:53:47 AM
 #16092

Anyone know how often the block reward decreases in terms of blocks? (As opposed to once per month)

Didn't dev wright that early on? I'll check

mczarnek
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 527
Merit: 500


View Profile
December 18, 2014, 03:39:09 AM
Last edit: December 18, 2014, 03:50:31 AM by mczarnek
 #16093

Anyone know how often the block reward decreases in terms of blocks? (As opposed to once per month)

Didn't dev wright that early on? I'll check

Thanks burstcoin and mmmaybe who've both told me that it's Block #10800 for anyone else who is curious.

BitSend ◢◤Clients | Source
www.bitsend.info
█▄
█████▄
████████▄
███████████▄
██████████████
███████████▀
████████▀
█████▀
█▀












Segwit | Core 0.14 | Masternodes
XEVAN | DK3 | Electrum soon
Bitcore - BTX/BTC -Project












BSD -USDT | Bittrex | C.Gather | S.Exchange
Cryptopia | NovaExchange | Livecoin
Litebit.eu | Faucet | Bitsend Airdrop













████
 ████
  ████
   ████
    ████
     ████
      ████
       ████
        ████
       ████
      ████
     ████
    ████
   ████
  ████
 ████
████

████
 ████
  ████
   ████
    ████
     ████
      ████
       ████
        ████
       ████
      ████
     ████
    ████
   ████
  ████
 ████
████
Haggisahh
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 39
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 18, 2014, 07:45:28 AM
 #16094

Hello,
After some struggling, I *think* i'm finally mining.
However, after running the miner for 24h with a 800 gb plot (i'll create more once I know its actually working) I have yet to see any payouts from the burst.ga pool.
Is this normal? Is there any way I can ensure I'm actually mining and that everything is properly working?
My miner window gets these messages every now and then too (connect function failed with error: 10060).
 
tex81
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 145
Merit: 100


View Profile
December 18, 2014, 09:21:18 AM
 #16095

Anyone know how often the block reward decreases in terms of blocks? (As opposed to once per month)
Reward -5% every 10800 blocks.

Russia
Pilotseye
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 210
Merit: 100


View Profile
December 18, 2014, 09:27:59 AM
 #16096

If you have problems with RAM performance use Runaurufu Burst Miner, change pool and directories in configuration.xml to fit your needs - tool has been checked by forum members and is clean - using it myself long time already.
NO, it hasn't been vetted!!!

NOT by you that's for sure, I even quoted the comment 2(!) times for YOU *facepalm*
Pilotseye
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 210
Merit: 100


View Profile
December 18, 2014, 09:33:05 AM
 #16097

If you have problems with RAM performance use Runaurufu Burst Miner, change pool and directories in configuration.xml to fit your needs - tool has been checked by forum members and is clean - using it myself long time already.
NO, it hasn't been vetted!!!

https://www.virustotal.com/en/file/19a7ccd3db1e95d6721912f0eebe5567c847391b78a05fa4a1978f69408369fb/analysis/1418895099/ now go and troll yourself FakeAccount  Cool
vesipyks
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 182
Merit: 100


View Profile
December 18, 2014, 09:35:50 AM
 #16098

I would really like to put my few coins on a paper wallet. Is there a service?

You could just print your passphrase to paper. Maybe as QR-code.


Yeah, but might be a thing we could make a bit good locking and user-friendly, like bitcoinpaperwallet.com? Which coins offer paper wallets, btw?

I, of course, only use brain wallets. Every day is exiting wheather you lost your coins or not Wink

I agree, it should be user friendly and bit good looking. Othervise it is just an piece of paper that could get lost easily between other boring paper. Tongue

▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓    ▶▶▶▶ Get Your Free Tokens Now ◀◀◀◀  First PoS Smart Contract Token
    PoSToken       Free Airdrop ●  No-ICO ●  100% Annual Interest First Year
▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓    ANN ●  WebSite  ●  Twitter  ●  Slack  ●  Whitepaper
Beoga
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2646
Merit: 1141


View Profile
December 18, 2014, 09:39:59 AM
 #16099

Man, im almost back to the burst world, just a couple more days.

All our assets will be paid out and updated in a few days. I'm in a region with crappy internet and only my phone, so haven't been able to do much. I have been buying bust for bytegear, and will do hard invest payout soon. Won't sell any more though, because we want to get rid of it, but we will give current owners real nice benefits. But more on that later.

Are any news?
duncan_idaho
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 355
Merit: 250


View Profile
December 18, 2014, 09:44:46 AM
 #16100

What is current burst diff ? Is it grow to the moon ? I have very little payment froma uary eu pool compare to last week. Is it pool problems or network diff ?

            ▄▄████▄▄
        ▄▄██████████████▄▄
      ███████████████████████▄▄
      ▀▀█████████████████████████
██▄▄       ▀▀█████████████████████
██████▄▄        ▀█████████████████
███████████▄▄       ▀▀████████████
███████████████▄▄        ▀████████
████████████████████▄▄       ▀▀███
 ▀▀██████████████████████▄▄
     ▀▀██████████████████████▄▄
▄▄        ▀██████████████████████▄
████▄▄        ▀▀██████████████████
█████████▄▄        ▀▀█████████████
█████████████▄▄        ▀▀█████████
██████████████████▄▄        ▀▀████
▀██████████████████████▄▄
  ▀▀████████████████████████
      ▀▀█████████████████▀▀
           ▀▀███████▀▀



.SEMUX
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
  Semux uses 100% original codebase
  Superfast with 30 seconds instant finality
  Tested 5000 tx per block on open network
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
Pages: « 1 ... 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 [805] 806 807 808 809 810 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 824 825 826 827 828 829 830 831 832 833 834 835 836 837 838 839 840 841 842 843 844 845 846 847 848 849 850 851 852 853 854 855 ... 1315 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!