Scientific proof that God exists?

Quote from: skillink on October 22, 2017, 04:22:11 AM

I agree the first human is adam and Eve. While the theory of darwin is just a theory that is not based on DNA research. What is taught in my religion is the same, that is Adam and Eve is the first human

Quote from: BCEmporium on October 22, 2017, 01:03:07 PM

That would be pretty boring though. What would people argue about if we suddenly found proof?

After any god is proven, next is the Tooth Fairy.

Quote from: skillink on October 22, 2017, 04:22:11 AM

I agree the first human is adam and Eve. While the theory of darwin is just a theory that is not based on DNA research. What is taught in my religion is the same, that is Adam and Eve is the first human

Your religion teaches incest??

Can you even stop to think for just one second what would have happend to the gene pool if our species was inbreeding for centuries (let alone millenniums...)

Quote from: Vod on October 22, 2017, 11:45:19 PM

Quote from: BCEmporium on October 22, 2017, 01:03:07 PM

That would be pretty boring though. What would people argue about if we suddenly found proof?

After any god is proven, next is the Tooth Fairy.

I can confirm that the Tooth Fairy is real. I've found a dollar under my pillow on multiple occasions. Does that mean that God has already been proven?

if that was true than everybody believe god but no science can prove that .it like a spiritual thing

Quote from: qwik2learn on October 21, 2017, 05:35:55 PM

Quote from: Astargath on October 21, 2017, 02:32:44 PM

There are a ton of ''viable'' hypothesis, so what? Why would you chose some hypothesis when there are already scientific theories that just work better. You are not proving anything here.

Prove it. Prove that parapsychological research is explained better by theories not involving Orch OR and survival. Since the tests can be replicated it should be easy to prove that the mind cannot influence matter, as you claim.

Quote from: Astargath on October 21, 2017, 02:32:44 PM

''Theories that support this idea are: Orch OR and survival.'' Orch OR is not a theory, is a hypothesis and I don't see how it directly supports magic but whatever, again and you know this, there is no scientific theory about any of what you mention.

Not true, you are making shit up again. Orch OR is a theory, it makes testable predictions, thus it is a theory. While mainstream theories assert that consciousness emerges as the complexity of the computations performed by cerebral neurons increases, Orch-OR posits that consciousness is based on non-computable quantum processing performed by qubits formed collectively on cellular microtubules.

Survival is a hypothesis, it is useful in explaining the evidence of parapsychology, the two are related and have strong explanatory power. The same cannot be said for mainstream materialist theories. I posted my evidence, so where is yours? You cannot claim that your preferred theory is better without citing evidence for it.

A review of Orch OR theory:
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1571064513001188
Connecting QM to the survival of the personality and other parapsychological research:
http://www.near-death.com/science/evidence.html#a22
http://www.near-death.com/science/evidence.html#a14
http://www.near-death.com/science/evidence.html#a23
Tests that you refuse to address or even look at, yet you claim to have a better theory? Prove it!
https://www.quora.com/Is-telekinesis-scientifically-true/answers/17777933

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orchestrated_objective_reduction ''is a hypothesis that consciousness in the brain originates from processes inside neurons'' Again, not a theory.

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1571064513001188
Hahahaha, Referred to by
Deepak chopra, the guy who says each atom has consciousness??

The official ESA [Physics Dept.] stance is that this is not currently supported.

http://www.skepticforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=21877

Quote from: Vod on October 22, 2017, 11:45:19 PM

Quote from: BCEmporium on October 22, 2017, 01:03:07 PM

That would be pretty boring though. What would people argue about if we suddenly found proof?

After any god is proven, next is the Tooth Fairy....

...with the Easter Bunny and Santa Claus shortly thereafter...

Quote from: sirazimuth on October 22, 2017, 11:34:01 PM

Quote from: skillink on October 22, 2017, 04:22:11 AM

Thanks for showing us what you look like ^^^ while you scoff at the proof for the existence of God.

Cool

Quote from: Flying Hellfish on October 23, 2017, 01:42:37 AM

Quote from: skillink on October 22, 2017, 04:22:11 AM

Your religion teaches incest??

Can you even stop to think for just one second what would have happend to the gene pool if our species was inbreeding for centuries (let alone millenniums...)

There aren't any humans.

Among all 7.4 billion people on earth, there are millions of evolutionary and devolutionary mutations at work right now. Those who have such mutations aren't human. When they mate, they have children who are only partially mutated the way that they are. Then they die, and their pure mutation is lost.

What is incest? There is more incest going on right now than there ever was at the time of Adam and Eve.

Just think. If evolution happened, some mutated critter, who was just a tiny bit different than his fellows, mated with a non-mutated critter, to form children who carried the mutation only part way. Then that non-mutated critter died, and left his now imperfect mutation in his kids, so that they destroyed the mutating ability altogether.

The whole idea of evolution is about as stupid as you can get. If it worked at all, we would have dozens, or hundreds, or thousands, or millions of different kinds of intelligent, reasoning, human-like species all around us. But we don't. We only have two:
1. People who believe in God, and;
2. People who don't believe in God.

Cool

in my opinion this is not entirely correct

God exists in you heart. He not far then you can push you hand.
He is the best friend ever.

Quote from: PORN_coin on October 23, 2017, 09:07:33 PM

in my opinion this is not entirely correct

Quote from: legenduim on October 23, 2017, 09:09:45 PM

God exists in you heart. He not far then you can push you hand.
He is the best friend ever.

But where is the scientific proof, one way or the other? Read the OP.

Cool

Quote from: BADecker on October 23, 2017, 08:53:23 PM

Quote from: sirazimuth on October 22, 2017, 11:34:01 PM

Quote from: skillink on October 22, 2017, 04:22:11 AM

Thanks for showing us what you look like ^^^ while you scoff at the proof for the existence of God.

Cool

dude can you read? the comment I responded to mentions adam and eve nonsense.
It says nothing about scoffing at your imaginary ~~god~~ magic sky fairy and complete lack of proof thereof.
Though yeah, I do indeed scoff at your invisible sky daddy and proud of that.. so thanx for pointing that out bud!
I look like that yes! Funny joke yes! ..(well my 9 year old laughed at it anyway) Cool

You will never find a proof that god exists, you just have your belief and that is enough

God is not bound by science. Science is limited and there are even things happening in this world that has no explanation in science so how can science explain God. If a small brain of human beings which claims that science got it all was created by God how then can it explain God?

Science is man-made , but what science itself says is not man-made. As like that, God is man-made but what it actually means is not man-made. What you want is talk about in this topic is about a man-made thing in artificial way. That is not very intelligent dear.
Please get that human is dumber than you imagine. If you doesn't agree with me then count the lives that were chopped due to 'man-made God'.