[∞ YH] solo.ckpool.org 2% fee solo mining USA/DE 255 blocks solved!

[shminer]

Somebody is trying hard to hit that block today!
Looking at the hashrate

[1714202403]

1714202403

[1714202403]

1714202403

[1714202403]

1714202403

[1714202403]

1714202403

[1714202403]

1714202403

[MouseMiner]

{"runtime": 2904658, "lastupdate": 1524059038, "Users": 856, "Workers": 1616, "Idle": 491, "Disconnected": 132}
{"hashrate1m": "24.3P", "hashrate5m": "22.6P", "hashrate15m": "21.4P", "hashrate1hr": "15.9P", "hashrate6hr": "8.96P", "hashrate1d": "6.75P", "hashrate7d": "5.45P"}
{"diff": 17.3, "accepted": 665721748858, "rejected": 6576455135, "bestshare": 507283998493, "SPS1m": 259.0, "SPS5m": 258.0, "SPS15m": 258.0, "SPS1h": 257.0}

 

[saeed2ir]

hi
does pool just dont show information of worker for gpu miner or pool completely reject their shares

[Mikestang]

gpu miners are a waste of time, this pool does not allow them.

[swanny88]

As you can see he must of had a rental going.   Hashrate was at 356Th at time of block

Because nobody has 26 S9s?

no, because people were saying was a 14Th solo miner that hit the block, and as you can see hes at 0 hashrate, so yeah pretty much a rental 

It could of been a fail-over from another pool.  I have my miners to fail over to this pool and randomly mine from time to time during failures.

[MouseMiner]

{"runtime": 3108606, "lastupdate": 1524262986, "Users": 870, "Workers": 1370, "Idle": 478, "Disconnected": 50}
{"hashrate1m": "3.98P", "hashrate5m": "9.94P", "hashrate15m": "10.3P", "hashrate1hr": "6.99P", "hashrate6hr": "5.1P", "hashrate1d": "5.74P", "hashrate7d": "5.79P"}
{"diff": 25.8, "accepted": 992695115118, "rejected": 9066865708, "bestshare": 1030790923203, "SPS1m": 196.0, "SPS5m": 197.0, "SPS15m": 197.0, "SPS1h": 197.0}

Bestshare means that one or the worker(miner) has reached the bestshare of 1030790923203. If any worker(miner) goes above this number his/her share will show as new bestshare.
And when this number matches the current difficulty. It means Bingo.
Thanks

[MouseMiner]

Someone just found a block.  
16GsNC3q6KgVXkUX7j7aPxSUdHrt1sN2yN
Keep it up... please write some words to keep everyone motivated.
Thanks

[-ck]

Code:

[2018-04-21 16:01:08.817] Possible block solve diff 14431499523259.867188 !
[2018-04-21 16:01:08.876] BLOCK ACCEPTED!
[2018-04-21 16:01:08.885] Solved and confirmed block 519311 by 16GsNC3q6KgVXkUX7j7aPxSUdHrt1sN2yN
[2018-04-21 16:01:08.885] User 16GsNC3q6KgVXkUX7j7aPxSUdHrt1sN2yN:{"hashrate1m": "1.38P", "hashrate5m": "1.31P", "hashrate1hr": "1.24P", "hashrate1d": "1.27P", "hashrate7d": "1.23P"}
[2018-04-21 16:01:08.885] Worker 16GsNC3q6KgVXkUX7j7aPxSUdHrt1sN2yN:{"hashrate1m": "1.38P", "hashrate5m": "1.31P", "hashrate1hr": "1.24P", "hashrate1d": "1.27P", "hashrate7d": "1.23P"}
[2018-04-21 16:01:08.886] Block solved after 1107906701788 shares at 28.9% diff

https://btc.com/0000000000000000001381004f0bf7b0578189d6853cd8af5098994095213e38

[ComputerGenie]

Dafuq is an "Eobot"? 

[-ck]

Dafuq is an "Eobot"? 

It's a btc.com fuqup.

[ComputerGenie]

Dafuq is an "Eobot"? 

It's a btc.com fuqup.

blockchain.info has the same tag 

[-ck]

Dafuq is an "Eobot"? 

It's a btc.com fuqup.

blockchain.info has the same tag 

So someone fuqed up the API they all use. Maybe they recognise eobot from the generation transaction address - perhaps eobot is mining on solo and there's conflict; there certainly is a lot of cash going into that address that solved it, some blocks that weren't found on this pool even.

[CryptoBuddha]

please write some words to keep everyone motivated.
Thanks

The chances that you will die tomorrow are higher than that you will find a block tomorrow if you are a home miner.
Motivation is my second name)))

[thedreamer]

Dangit, I was hoping it was my that hit. 

On another note, on the new block my highest share is 13374840390.69748, yet the bestshare on the pool stats screen is 3229902326.
With the previous block when my bestshare was high, it properly was shown on the solo pool stats as highest until someone took it.
This time it's quite off.

[ComputerGenie]

Hello are GPU miners suitable for this pool?

GPU miners are not suitable for Bitcoin in any pool, because 2014 is over.

[thedreamer]

Someone just found a block.  
16GsNC3q6KgVXkUX7j7aPxSUdHrt1sN2yN
Keep it up... please write some words to keep everyone motivated.
Thanks

Is that a solo mining pool or something. Look at those earnings.

Also how can blockwithholding from rentals like nicehash be proven or tracked?

[wavelengthsf]

Also how can blockwithholding from rentals like nicehash be proven or tracked?

You can't prove or track it unless you can see the logs of (1) each share submitted by the miners, and then to (2) NH, and then to the solo pool.

Since 1 & 2 are opaque, you can't see what they say the share diff is.

[-ck]

Also how can blockwithholding from rentals like nicehash be proven or tracked?

You can't prove or track it unless you can see the logs of (1) each share submitted by the miners, and then to (2) NH, and then to the solo pool.

Since 1 & 2 are opaque, you can't see what they say the share diff is.

The only ones that would have enough data to monitor for block withholding is nicehash and they'd have to keep track of every miner's share count and block finds and report the data - this is NOT a big task. As this should be nicehash's responsibility, especially considering the fee they charge, I think they're not providing an adequate service. No one has held them accountable for it and have been blindly buying hashes from them. The miners providing the hashrate stand to gain by block withholding as they get paid regardless of whether blocks are found or not, yet it is in their favour to keep bitcoin difficulty down. Buyer beware.

[thedreamer]

So how do miners then do block withholding?

[-ck]

So how do miners then do block withholding?

That's something I'd rather not educate people on how to do.