GAW / Josh Garza discussion Paycoin XPY xpy.io ION ionomy. ALWAYS MAKE MONEY :)

[politzer]

Excuse me! May someone tell me why Josh has to flee the country? If he did scam, how did he do it?

please see previous 1k posts

If it was supposed to happen to any scammer, %90 of members here in this site should have fled their countries.  

If you have a point you might want to make it soon (TM) before some less tolerant members pick you apart over the next 50 pages.

Well. I guess if I change the word "members" to "Devs" no one will do it. How about that?

WTF is that even supposed to mean?

Can you or can you not formulate a coherent post here? It's fine if you can't, Dave won't mind sharing his cardboard palace with you.

Who the hell is Dave? I am saying 90% of coin developers (devs) are scammer. Is it hard to understand?

[strangerdanger101]

Excuse me! May someone tell me why Josh has to flee the country? If he did scam, how did he do it?

please see previous 1k posts

If it was supposed to happen to any scammer, %90 of members here in this site should have fled their countries.  

If you have a point you might want to make it soon (TM) before some less tolerant members pick you apart over the next 50 pages.

Well. I guess if I change the word "members" to "Devs" no one will do it. How about that?

WTF is that even supposed to mean?

Can you or can you not formulate a coherent post here? It's fine if you can't, Dave won't mind sharing his cardboard palace with you.

Who the hell is Dave? I am saying 90% of coin developers (devs) are scammer. Is it hard to understand?

[Paul Revere]

Who the hell is Dave? I am saying 90% of coin developers (devs) are scammer. Is it hard to understand?

Click here to find Dave

[politzer]

Who the hell is Dave? I am saying 90% of coin developers (devs) are scammer. Is it hard to understand?

Click here to find Dave

He He  That was a good one.

[Paul Revere]

Who the hell is Dave? I am saying 90% of coin developers (devs) are scammer. Is it hard to understand?

Click here to find Dave

He He  That was a good one.

There is some extreme Co-Intelpro happening with this scam, so please weigh that into judging how people treat folks showing up in this thread with ambiguous statements.

[champbronc2]

Just chiming in to say hello the train wreck that Paycoin is LOL

[owlcatz]

Just chiming in to say hello the train wreck that Paycoin is LOL

Thanks but wrong forum, that'd be hashtalk. 

[strangerdanger101]

Trouble in paradise even for the mighty reaper

[drasted]

Anyone been looking at this thread
https://hashtalk.org/topic/31304/btc-is-coming
Many laughs to be had there

[siampumpkin]

Anyone been looking at this thread
https://hashtalk.org/topic/31304/btc-is-coming
Many laughs to be had there

More bullshit from Homero! Just another attempt to pump up his crappy shitcoin.

[coinits]

Anyone been looking at this thread
https://hashtalk.org/topic/31304/btc-is-coming
Many laughs to be had there

More bullshit from Homero! Just another attempt to pump up his crappy shitcoin.

I love this comment:

[Unacceptable]

WTH is this

http://forum.gethashing.com/t/ghcoin-mining-operation-shares-definition-batch-1/907/126

[jackbox]

WTH is this

http://forum.gethashing.com/t/ghcoin-mining-operation-shares-definition-batch-1/907/126

They were jealous of PayCoin.   

[alienesb]

WTH is this

http://forum.gethashing.com/t/ghcoin-mining-operation-shares-definition-batch-1/907/126

Old suckers looking for new ones.

[suchmoon]

WTH is this

http://forum.gethashing.com/t/ghcoin-mining-operation-shares-definition-batch-1/907/126

Old suckers looking for new ones.

B+ for technology, C- for pricing so far.

It's an interesting effort but I'm waiting to see what Hashnest is going to do with the S5 thing that's been sitting dormant on their home page for a while now. Somehow I doubt that reselling Bitmain's hosting can beat Bitmain's own offer.

[jimmothy]

WTH is this

http://forum.gethashing.com/t/ghcoin-mining-operation-shares-definition-batch-1/907/126

Old suckers looking for new ones.

B+ for technology, C- for pricing so far.

It's an interesting effort but I'm waiting to see what Hashnest is going to do with the S5 thing that's been sitting dormant on their home page for a while now. Somehow I doubt that reselling Bitmain's hosting can beat Bitmain's own offer.

Looks like a joke to me.

Here's what I've gathered so far:

- They are all unqualified to run any sort of cloudmining company.
- They are collecting money before owning any hashing power. (I ask for a mining address and cryberlizard shows me an address that hasn't touched any coins)
- They will rent and resell Bitmains cloudmining eventually/hopefully (why would anyone buy from them instead of directly from Bitmain??)
- They will be operating anonymously.
- They are throwing in gimmicks left and right. (free staking anyone?)

Overall I'd rate this:

Legitimacy: D-
Offer: F- (worse deal than amhash's offering 3 months ago)

[popejubs]

WTH is this

http://forum.gethashing.com/t/ghcoin-mining-operation-shares-definition-batch-1/907/126

Old suckers looking for new ones.

B+ for technology, C- for pricing so far.

It's an interesting effort but I'm waiting to see what Hashnest is going to do with the S5 thing that's been sitting dormant on their home page for a while now. Somehow I doubt that reselling Bitmain's hosting can beat Bitmain's own offer.

Looks like a joke to me.

Here's what I've gathered so far:

- They are all unqualified to run any sort of cloudmining company.
- They are collecting money before owning any hashing power. (I ask for a mining address and cryberlizard shows me an address that hasn't touched any coins)
- They will rent and resell Bitmains cloudmining eventually/hopefully (why would anyone buy from them instead of directly from Bitmain??)
- They will be operating anonymously.
- They are throwing in gimmicks left and right. (free staking anyone?)

Overall I'd rate this:

Legitimacy: D-
Offer: F- (worse deal than amhash's offering 3 months ago)

So 1/5 of the mining securities are owned by the "company", another 1/5 of the securities "allocated or sold" to staff members, and the rest of the securities are sold. Neat.

Doesn't seem like they're verifying where people live (like the US, for example) 

[suchmoon]

Legitimacy: D-
Offer: F- (worse deal than amhash's offering 3 months ago)

Hey, amhash is still the best paying cloud (not that it's saying much when there's like 2 legitimate contenders) out there despite their antique hardware

Attempting to get back on topic:

https://hashtalk.org/topic/31199/manners-matter/137
https://archive.today/lfOcD#selection-8852.2-8882.0

[jimmothy]

So 1/5 of the mining securities are owned by the "company", another 1/5 of the securities "allocated or sold" to staff members, and the rest of the securities are sold. Neat.

Doesn't seem like they're verifying where people live (like the US, for example) 

Here's cyberdexters response:

we fund the staking wallets ourselves and pass the staking rewards on to our members. Anything else would make it an "investment by the users that pays interest" which we have no plans in doing since this would make GHcoin a security.

So basically it's not a security according to his made up definition.

You are aware that we are not a cloud mining company, don't you? We're a community driven project who has decided to take mining into their own hands so that we the community control the power, own the hardware and have control over it. What more do you want?

And although it's a group of people coming together to operate a business, it's totally not a company.

Seems they have some top notch lawyers over there.

[Oldminer]

lol Homero...bit off a bit more than his intelligence could chew...

Anyone involved in GAW since like last November needs their head read. I just hope he gets caught for this mess and ends up in a cell with a nigga called Bubba with a BBC.