GAW / Josh Garza discussion Paycoin XPY xpy.io ION ionomy. ALWAYS MAKE MONEY :)

[siampumpkin]

Hopefully GAW is on the list contacted by the SEC in this article.

https://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/sec-sends-inquiry-letters-hundreds-bitcoin-companies-unregistered-securities/

[1714690452]

1714690452

[1714690452]

1714690452

[1714690452]

1714690452

[1714690452]

1714690452

[1714690452]

1714690452

[Paul Revere]

Josh took his morning Dump. Open your mouths wide MORONS! Ya like that? More coming soon™!



Getting real hard to feel sorry for any effing morons who still dump money into this con-man's pocket.

[Mashugina71]

Thanks mofo. Snarfed coffee all over my monitor lol

[Fargo]

Thanks mofo. Snarfed coffee all over my monitor lol

Lol I did the same, that picture was quite scary.

[NewJerseyJess]

Looks like someones trying a final pump https://hashtalk.org/topic/31436/honors-program-update/187

[Paul Revere]

Mr. PayCoffee is officially on the HT Ban Watch: https://hashtalk.org/topic/31505/gaw-miners-sale/35



S4's so nice you get to pay for them twice!! LMFAO! Thread archive: https://archive.today/4oFkD

And here is Homero Paycoining people right to their faces and getting called out as a TROLL!! I am putting djCarlos on the Full Heisenburg watchlist. This poor guy is a pint of rot-gut whiskey away from a machine gun in the trunk and heading for GAW HQ: https://hashtalk.org/topic/31516/pay-coin-20/44 Thread archive: https://archive.today/Ne6Os

[coinmaster222]

6 days ago my young son transferred 120+ xpy from Cryptsy to paybase never to get to his wallet


Hash   cce15689f4ec2fcdbff70403cd02fff5d7764132452968535354c0186da83c12
Block Height   58695 (5133 confirmations)
Block Date/Time   2015-02-05 21:42:06
Total Output   120.58451 XPY
Fees   0.004 XPY

so 6 days later he gets this answer

I apologize for the delayed response.I have gone ahead and escalated this ticket to the devs  to further assist you.Please bare in mind that this could take some time to look into.I will reply back to  this ticket once I receive any information from the devs.
Take some time it has took 6 days already and a blind man can find out from the blockchain where his coins are,but then again its Gaws devs we are talking about as much use as a blind man

[Bourbon44]

6 days ago my young son transferred 120+ xpy from Cryptsy to paybase never to get to his wallet


Hash   cce15689f4ec2fcdbff70403cd02fff5d7764132452968535354c0186da83c12
Block Height   58695 (5133 confirmations)
Block Date/Time   2015-02-05 21:42:06
Total Output   120.58451 XPY
Fees   0.004 XPY

so 6 days later he gets this answer

I apologize for the delayed response.I have gone ahead and escalated this ticket to the devs  to further assist you.Please bare in mind that this could take some time to look into.I will reply back to  this ticket once I receive any information from the devs.
Take some time it has took 6 days already and a blind man can find out from the blockchain where his coins are,but then again its Gaws devs we are talking about as much use as a blind man

Note that "bare" was used.  As in to uncover, be exposed, barren, nothing in the pot.  Not "bear" which would mean to hold. 

I think customer service is trying to tell you something.

[coinmaster222]

Bad enough he rips of miners/adults but to rip off kids is just pathetic he should be ashamed of hinself

[TracerX]

6 days ago my young son transferred 120+ xpy from Cryptsy to paybase never to get to his wallet


Hash   cce15689f4ec2fcdbff70403cd02fff5d7764132452968535354c0186da83c12
Block Height   58695 (5133 confirmations)
Block Date/Time   2015-02-05 21:42:06
Total Output   120.58451 XPY
Fees   0.004 XPY

so 6 days later he gets this answer

I apologize for the delayed response.I have gone ahead and escalated this ticket to the devs  to further assist you.Please bare in mind that this could take some time to look into.I will reply back to  this ticket once I receive any information from the devs.
Take some time it has took 6 days already and a blind man can find out from the blockchain where his coins are,but then again its Gaws devs we are talking about as much use as a blind man

Note that "bare" was used.  As in to uncover, be exposed, barren, nothing in the pot.  Not "bear" which would mean to hold. 

I think customer service is trying to tell you something.

I think Josh maybe the only person left in the building, folks.

[Mr Felt]

Question: is there a roster of the current dev team somewhere w/ their credentials?  Seems like a pretty basic thing for a company like this to have on their website (e.g., one trying to revolutionize payments).  What experience do these dev-folks have?  What experience do the devs and other professionals have in the highly regulated and long-existing payments industry?

[vizique]

Question: is there a roster of the current dev team somewhere w/ their credentials?  Seems like a pretty basic thing for a company like this to have on their website (e.g., one trying to revolutionize payments).  What experience do these dev-folks have?  What experience do the devs and other professionals have in the highly regulated and long-existing payments industry?

Actually, no.

Why offer up your staff security, especially when dealing with payments. Full disclosure is not always smart or appropriate. I know I wouldn't release all my staff info to a forum of anonymous people. Think about it.

Whichever way you want to spin it, there are many legitimate reasons why opacity works. Security is as good as any,

[Paul Revere]

Question: is there a roster of the current dev team somewhere w/ their credentials?  Seems like a pretty basic thing for a company like this to have on their website (e.g., one trying to revolutionize payments).  What experience do these dev-folks have?  What experience do the devs and other professionals have in the highly regulated and long-existing payments industry?

Actually, no.

Why offer up your staff security, especially when dealing with payments. Full disclosure is not always smart or appropriate. I know I wouldn't release all my staff info to a forum of anonymous people. Think about it.

Whichever way you want to spin it, there are many legitimate reasons why opacity works. Security is as good as any,

Bull. People engaged in honest commerce have nothing to fear and everything to gain by being transparent. Criminals have much to fear and everything to lose by being transparent.

P.S> There is a good Pussyfight going on HT right now: https://hashtalk.org/topic/29195/making-a-plan-to-buy-xpy-together-when-the-time-is-right-who-is-in/953




Who will win? Hard to say who is the biggest pussy on HT right now, quite the Battle Royal!

[CoinFire]

Hopefully GAW is on the list contacted by the SEC in this article.

https://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/sec-sends-inquiry-letters-hundreds-bitcoin-companies-unregistered-securities/

They weren't then.

[bananafana]

Question: is there a roster of the current dev team somewhere w/ their credentials?  Seems like a pretty basic thing for a company like this to have on their website (e.g., one trying to revolutionize payments).  What experience do these dev-folks have?  What experience do the devs and other professionals have in the highly regulated and long-existing payments industry?

Actually, no.

Why offer up your staff security, especially when dealing with payments. Full disclosure is not always smart or appropriate. I know I wouldn't release all my staff info to a forum of anonymous people. Think about it.

Whichever way you want to spin it, there are many legitimate reasons why opacity works. Security is as good as any,

Bull. People engaged in honest commerce have nothing to fear and everything to gain by being transparent. Criminals have much to fear and everything to lose by being transparent.

Are you kidding? Very, very few companies make a roster of their technical staff public, for all sorts of good reasons that have nothing to do with breaking the law.

[Paul Revere]

Very few companies are asking for investments based on what their technical staff can supposedly produce. If that is what you are selling, then you need to list this staff, otherwise it is all bull.

How are those GAW investments going for ya, by the way, banana?  

[Mr Felt]

Question: is there a roster of the current dev team somewhere w/ their credentials?  Seems like a pretty basic thing for a company like this to have on their website (e.g., one trying to revolutionize payments).  What experience do these dev-folks have?  What experience do the devs and other professionals have in the highly regulated and long-existing payments industry?

Actually, no.

Why offer up your staff security, especially when dealing with payments. Full disclosure is not always smart or appropriate. I know I wouldn't release all my staff info to a forum of anonymous people. Think about it.

Whichever way you want to spin it, there are many legitimate reasons why opacity works. Security is as good as any,

Bull. People engaged in honest commerce have nothing to fear and everything to gain by being transparent. Criminals have much to fear and everything to lose by being transparent.

Are you kidding? Very, very few companies make a roster of their technical staff public, for all sorts of good reasons that have nothing to do with breaking the law.

How would you know whether you're dealing with a scammer, then?  maybe not every security or developer person on staff needs to be disclosed, but there should be some folks w/ verifiable credentials involved or advising on cryptography, payments, economics, etc. We know the bitcoin and dogecoin developers, for example, along w/ their professional credentials.  why would anyone accept anything less from these bozos?

[bananafana]

Very few companies are asking for investments based on what their technical staff can supposedly produce. If that is what you are selling, then you need to list this staff, otherwise it is all bull.

Dude. Stop and think for just a few seconds. LOTS AND LOTS of companies are tech companies and tech companies asking for investments are asking for investments based on what their technical staff can supposedly produce. That's one of the more inane things you've ever posted. VERY FEW of them post a public roster of their technical staff. There are very good reasons that they don't do this.

How are those GAW investments going for ya, by the way, banana?  

I never gave GAW a penny. How about you?

[bananafana]

Question: is there a roster of the current dev team somewhere w/ their credentials?  Seems like a pretty basic thing for a company like this to have on their website (e.g., one trying to revolutionize payments).  What experience do these dev-folks have?  What experience do the devs and other professionals have in the highly regulated and long-existing payments industry?

Actually, no.

Why offer up your staff security, especially when dealing with payments. Full disclosure is not always smart or appropriate. I know I wouldn't release all my staff info to a forum of anonymous people. Think about it.

Whichever way you want to spin it, there are many legitimate reasons why opacity works. Security is as good as any,

Bull. People engaged in honest commerce have nothing to fear and everything to gain by being transparent. Criminals have much to fear and everything to lose by being transparent.

Are you kidding? Very, very few companies make a roster of their technical staff public, for all sorts of good reasons that have nothing to do with breaking the law.

How would you know whether you're dealing with a scammer, then?  maybe not every security or developer person on staff needs to be disclosed, but there should be some folks w/ verifiable credentials involved or advising on cryptography, payments, economics, etc. We know the bitcoin and dogecoin developers, for example, along w/ their professional credentials.  why would anyone accept anything less from these bozos?

I was just responding to the idiotic idea that the only reason a company wouldn't publish a roster of their technical staff is if they were engaged in criminal activity.

In GAW's case, if they have anyone on staff you can safely bet that they don't have credentials worth bragging about. It wouldn't surprise me if they have no dev staff left any more and have outsourced what tiny bits of development that have occurred to the sort of third-world developers who do simple web development for five bucks an hour.

Not publishing a roster means a lot less than the fact that they've done no development of any significance since paycoin/paybase was released. A little integration with APIs from other web sites, such as stripe and gyft. A "vault" mockup and a "validation" form that doesn't seem to do much. Stock charts on paybase. Anything I'm forgetting? And they had at least a few devs in early January. For the more recent stuff, a mediocre dev with a little website experience and no crypto experience could have done it all in a few days, maybe a couple of weeks if they're very new at it.

Has Josh even promised anything lately that would take any dev power? He's trying to get the community to do the work. He's got "team xpy" doing whatever they're doing to try to salvage some value out of their investments. The buyback, in the unlikely event it actually happens, doesn't require any significant software dev.

Everything that's going on, and everything he's promising, is consistent with GAW having little or no significant development staff.

[Paul Revere]

@ Banana: So you spend all this time on a forum sticking up for a scammer dirtbag and you have no financial interest in doing so?