Loyce is right.

Go to Tools->Preferences, change Base unit from mBTC to BTC and try to make the transaction using BTC as denomination.

Even more, you should be able to set the fee to 1 sat/vByte, which should get your transaction confirmed before tomorrow morning. But first change to BTC, since you were sending too low amount to the casino.

_______________________________	___________________________________________
Bitcointalk-Nutzername: NeuroticFish	Preis 31. Dezember 2023 um 23.59.59 MEZ: 48512 $

Ich wollte gerade eine Schätzung im Bereich von 65000$ machen, aber ich fürchte, die Weltwirtschaft wird das im Jahr 2023 möglicherweise nicht zulassen.

Danke 1miau für die Einladung und deine Großzügigkeit!
Viel Glück euch allen!

That website is owned by bcashers, who, last time I've checked, were still trying to convince the world that their altcoin is the true bitcoin.
This being said, simply I don't trust their news are always correct/good.
So I'd recommend looking for other news sources too.

I will add some possible entries to "the list":
https://defidive.com/news?filter=bitcoin
https://bitcoinmagazine.com/

And for the actual info (not news) on bitcoin:
https://bitcoin.org/
https://learnmeabitcoin.com/
https://en.bitcoin.it/

This can be used by the new IFNs poping up like mushrooms. Some of them use virtual cards (too). The most known is Revolut, but it really depends on what country your residence is in. (I don't know which of them support well the online casinos and sportsbooks, that's up for your further research).
Plus, from what I know, even Google Pay/Apple Pay hide your card/bank information, exposing actually a virtual card (I don't know how or if it can be used online, not that much experience in that).

However, as the others said, why don't you just use the online services that accept bitcoin/crypto? This should be much safer and better.

This looks easy, but can also be, at times, extremely difficult, tricky and with a great potential for troubles.
I wish you best of luck and may all the trades you'll be escrowing be nice and smooth!

Some voices are not convinced that everything can be properly turned off, see https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5377997
And, in your case at least, the point it to not turn everything off and use it as every day smartphone, isn't it? And that's, by far, much riskier.

Am vrut sa-l folosesc (din nou) nu demult si nu mergea. Fiind foarte aproape de sarbatori, am crezut ca e o problema temporara. Imi pare rau ca a disparut de tot...
Mersi de actualizare.

Prediction 1: $17,544.39
bech32 address: bc1q5cl9jwt8wkg6h3e38axkedhla8lq69m45tnd6y

Multumim de invitatie 1miau, mutumim pentru generozitate si tie si celorlalti sponsori (Lakai01 si poate in timp si altii), si, multumim Gazeta pentru postare.
O sa ma uit un pic mai tarziu sa particip 

---

Multumesc de intelegere. Am inceput o noua discutie pe aceasta tema aici: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5433465
Te invit acolo si chiar te rog sa iti spui parerea. Cred ca o astfel de discutie poate sa clarifice un numar mare de neclaritati.

Nu sunt mare utilizator de monede alternative si nici nu mai fac day trading de foarte multi ani, dar, avand in vedere ca subiectul a aparut in legatura cu niste oferte platite de testare, poate ca nu ar strica o mica discutie/dezbatere (aici, in locul portivit) pe tema portofelelor de monede alternative, in mod special a celor construite ca extensie de browser.

Deci... principalul portofel in discutie ar fi Metamask.
Eu, cum fug de Ethereum si de Tokenurile create in acest "ecosistem" (mi se pare inutil de complicat sistemul cu gas fee, plus ca in putinele dati cand am avut nevoie de tranzactii cu tokenuri ETH e fost scump), nu am folosit Metamask niciodata (am preferat MEW impreuna cu Portofel Hardware). Asa ca voi lasa pe altii sa isi dea cu parerea despre utilitatea lui.
Mie mi s-a parut intotdeauna riscant, nici nu m-am simtit niciodata comfortabil cu plug-in de browser sa fie portofel (desi ci WAVES avusese asta la inceputuri), dar in zilele de relativ inceput ale Bitcoin au existat plug-in-uri de browser (in general de afisare de pret) care au furat bani frumosi, deci prefer sa le evit.

Mai adaug si ca monedele alternative, fiind mult mai volatile si mai riscante decat Bitcoin, am inceput sa le evit din ce in ce mai mult (cu mici exceptii).


Deci.. cred ca e mai bine sa isi dea si altii cu parerea, care chiar au si folosit asemenea scule. @ltcrstrbrt ?

* Este chiar atat de bun/util/facil Metamask?
* Se poate folosi in siguranta cu portofel hardware, sau ce masuri de siguranta (a banilor) sunt recomandate?
* ...

It is, but it was discussed and it's a very bad idea (read below). Plus, it makes the phone unnecessarily more expensive for people not needing that feature, hence not good for business.


Unless that monkey also steals you (or a picture of you) or your finger, or the last items you've had your fingerprints on.
No. Phone security is weak and "the monkey" may move your money out before you even notice the phone is missing.

----
And about your initial question, I think hat Samsung had ideas in that direction, but a quick search has only revealed this topic (2021) and this one (2019) on the matter.

You have a valid point about the length. But this is meant to be a bidding war game, isn't it? So without a tiny bit of bidding war, it cannot be a proper review.
And if you pay attention, all the people bidding in game 32 are from the campaign, so it's not that far from bitbollo's "take a group of friends" thing

Some ideas (not all may be good).

1. Learn to configure yourself cold storage. Especially for Bitcoin it's easy.
2. Look for DYI hardware wallets, see the DYI part of this topic. Still, most may be Bitcoin only.
3. Get somebody trusted on the forum buy you a Nano S Plus, take it off the original box, send you only the device (you can find data cable without others' help) and ask him to put it into a box with other USB sticks, maybe it goes unnoticed.
4. Get somebody trusted from a neighboring country buy it for you and then go in person to take it.

This is my review for Satoshi Auction (part of this campaign).

---

Chapter one: some thoughts while exploring the website and the game.

First contact: looking up the rules and also a little into actual and older games. And the first bid.

I will not say much about the UI, such a game doesn’t really need a too sophisticated one, still, a nicer UI (i.e. more colors, maybe some animation) should make the website more appealing for the potential players.
...But maybe it’s already in the ToDo list. For now it looks more like a proof of concept than actual place for gambling/having fun.

The rules are not clear.
There’s “the prize” and there are bids. But:
* maybe I need one more coffee, but I needed to read the rules twice to see that all the bids (OK, 98% of them) become part of the prize, being added to ther starting 10k satoshi
* it’s not clear what could be the minimum bid, and I would not be surprised some will try to send even amounts smaller than the dust transaction; it could help to state a minimum
* it doesn’t state what happens if I make a bid, then I send again from the same address (is it added to my bid or is it another one / is the input that matters or the address?); this should be cleared, else some may try and abuse this (with or without success, equally bad) -- LE / update: from following the game, only the inputs are counted as bids; somebody has tried to deposit a small amount from same address and it was not added to his max bid // this clearly needs to be stated
* deadline is not clear – is it the last block when I can send or it’s the last block when it has to be taken into account. That’s 6 blocks difference, if I understood it right.
* what is “confirmed block height”? - one more thing that would be needed into the documentation: a clear definition of terms (I understood later, you work with current actual block height–6 to address the 6 confirmations, still, I recommend documenting better).
* Since the closing times for a game were getting close to an end, I was afraid to bid (because of not 100% clear block rules); luckily somebody else's bid was about to get confirmed and I waited to bring the (too) generous time blocks increase. Then I've made my bid.

Second day and following the game...

* I am not sure how can somebody win this game against one or more determined opponents. Of course, it’s good for the bank, as fees, but maybe a hard limit could spice up the game. Maybe even a hard limit as time, not as block number (just imagine if we’d play for time… my first confirmation for my first deposit came after ~45 minutes )
* after the first counter-bets people are already complaining that each new bet makes the game too much longer and I agree, it kinds spoils the fun, maybe the blocks increase after each bid should be lowered?
* since we cannot realistically expect people bid really big amounts, maybe the 6 blocks confirmation is a bit of overkill… just saying…
* I think that my (first) bid was credited only after 7 confirmations, but maybe I didn’t read the (block) numbers right
* automatic refresh of the auction page could be nice, at least after a confirmation of a related deposit is detected.
* I think that even a smaller bid prolongs the game with 144 blocks. I strongly believe that this is a bug, not a feature.
* I've made some bids on another games too, I see no good reason bidding more and more and making game 32 end forever.

Third day

* Game 32 has ended, expectedly, I've lost 
* My other games ended and my strategy paid off, I've shared the win with somebody else instead of fighting for it. The coins soming in have unconfirmed parent, maybe this could be optimized.

---

Chapter two: something between an actual review and conclusions

The website looks more a proof of concept than the actual game. The UI needs to be nicer. The documentation lacks clarity and also some things are missing (eg minimum amount to bid or what happens attempting to make smaller bids than the current max or when attempting to "add to a bid").

The gameplay is simple, but it can last forever, especially between determined players with big wallets. I guess that this is the aim, but I don't know if this will actually ever happen.
For now the game is somewhat boring and the lack of adrenalin may not make it appealing enough for the gamblers (and if it's so for small ones, the big ones won't come either). It's nice to try to win, but it can easily become a game of "who give up first or forgets to bid more". I advise fine tuning and decreasing the times in a way or another.

Also a determined person could just try to collect all the new games as long as there’s not too much interest from the potential players. Hence I think that there should not be so many new games or, I don't know, something to be done to limit the use of this game as some sort of (fat) faucet.

Unless some big change is done in the gameplay I fear that there won't be too many players willing to bid more than the house's prize, hence for now it looks like the house is always losing. Not good for the owner.


PS. I could add images and say what the others also said in the days while completing this, but imho that doesn't make much sense, so I stop here.

Helping the Ukrainians is usually a very nice gesture. But this.... no...
Stolen money is stolen money, no matter it is (or not) from some Dark Web mostly used (or not) by Russians. And sending that (stolen) money to a certain charity has the potential to also taint the name of that charity.

War is awful. But if the "good side" too starts doing questionable actions.. it can end up to be seen as bad as the aggressors.

I would not let this aside. OP is certainly somebody wanting to harm, no matter what, no matter he is unable to even comprehend the rules (because, let's get serious, this is not a newbie).


Actually I've done a tiny bit of research and it's about avatar campaign. And it's, by far, not uncommon to privately invite a couple of higher ranked users (eg members of CM campaign) for such campaigns. Still, it's the first time I see somebody (temp)banned for this. Whether he mass spammed or not, I don't know and I don't want to jump to conclusions without facts.
And even if it's one such PM, it is a problem, I won't deny the obvious, but I am almost sure the temp ban hurts him enough to not do this in the future.

However, your actions on this matter and the way of seeing all this don't picture you in a "Peace enthusiast" 

Scuze, imi scapase dilema voastra legata de acest subiect...


Nu m-ar mira ca pentru ei sa fim niste borfasi care au bani din droguri (nu asta era singura utilitate a bitcoin?) si deci meritam sa ni se puna cizma in gura.
As fi extraordinar de surprins sa vad deschidere de la ei in acest domeniu atat de devreme (devreme pentru Romania, nu pentru bitcoin).


S-ar putea sa se intample mai repede, iar asta doar la presiunea UE care probabil va cere destul de curand o legislatie unitara in domeniu.

Din punctul meu de vedere BSC este mai centralizat si mai prost decat ETH. BSC are sens doar pe/pentru Binance si shit-tokenurile aferente. Nu m-ai convins si daca doresti o discutie pe aceasta tema te invit cu drag sa faci alt topic (eventual in Altcoins (Monede Alternative)) si sa ma convingi acolo 
Sper sa ma intelegi ca nu vreau sa blochez discutia, ci dimpotriva, doresc sa aiba spatiu mai corect in care sa se desfasoare.

It is. At least that's what mempool.space FAQ is saying. First it puts Fulcrum between the original Electrs and Blockstream's, and also tells:




You made me read a little more into Fulcrum and the official documentation writes about "~40GB disk space for mainnet BCH (slightly more for BTC)", which should be much less than I've expected. For that I do have space, hence I've just configured it for local use and fired it up. Let's see how it goes.

Blockchain is a special format of storing data. A special type of database, very good for decentralized and trustless use because, especially if built in the way Bitcoin's blockchain is done, they will not allow modifying data from the past.
The rest of info, especially details on what does Bitcoin's blockchain store and how, will be there in the links already provided by others.