At least the thread is not self-moderated. That makes them way more honest than the ones who censor theirs... not that it doesn't mean it is both shit and probably a scam.

But at least you can post to that effect on their thread and they would not censor it.

The others, also shit and also scams, simply delete the inconvenient posts.

Hopefully people learns fast...

Currently, assuming the ICO reaches it's minimal goals, the BRO operation is being priced at (around) 18 million dollars, roughly the value of Peercoin.

I believe it is optimistic enough.

You guys made a very poor offer that most wouldn't even remotely want as presented:

-- No one knows who you are, any of you.

-- You as for money, not much but some, with not even a remote guarantee that anything will actually be delivered.

Just because people are left with no options it doesn't mean they would take what looks like way worse than doing nothing...

Here's how you do this when you really want to do it:

-- We are going to work on reviving PESA for 2 months and we require full support from the community. Price of PESA is 100 SAT. If we get the price to 1,000 sat in 2 months time, the community will donate to us 5 million pesa. 10% of which, 500,000 will be donated now as a good will gesture and kept in escrow by the top holder, Jake the Panda. If we get the price to 2,000 sat or beyond, 6 months, additional 5 million PESA will be donated to us by the community.

How about that?

If you deliver, you will be handsomely compensated; if you don't, you wont. That's incentive. That's how thinks get done.

The Terms and Conditions need to be amended to reflect the new Terms and Conditions.

@ Jay

You haven't answered my previous questions:

1.- Will there ever be no more than the 10 million bergstake that is offered in the ICO?

2.- Will these 10 million be enough to secure the network?

Thanks.

For people who want to stay informed and not following idiotic, irresponsible nonsense like the one this individual just posted: Here, from the horse's (Federal) mouth: http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-drop/n-14-21.pdf

Edit to add:

So we are as clear of ignorance as we possibly can, the IRS, which is a Federal organization enforced by the FBI, can and do do this too: http://cointelegraph.com/news/112814/irs-seizes-assets-on-suspicion-only-bitcoin-could-be-next

Let me see here... anonymous devs (actually a screen tells you it is the management ()... self-moderated thread... I'm going to run real fast, not walk...

And it is the cause of the low price also... furthermore, some of us maybe even blaaaack! gay for sure... Oh the horror, the horror...

I don't know anything about your project at all so It would be quite frivolous if I'd say anything else about it other than the facts that you are anonymous and your thread is self-moderated are, in my opinion, reasons more than enough to run, not walk.

Given those, I will follow my own advice and stay as far away from your project as I can.

Soory but no. There's only one reason for self-moderated forums: censoring what you dont like to read or others to read. You cannot be "a little free". Either are or are not. Here, you are not.

The  "financial motivation" is here alright: to scam people. That's the only one.

But i'm done. Over and out.

That's what you choose to believe; you will find out soon enough though. From where I stand, self-moderated + dev anonymity = run as fast as you can.

It is not jus "an issue"; it's THE issue.

There are other institutions already on top of it, like the IRS (Internal Revenue Service), already with Federal Laws in place, which insists in knowing how many, EXACTLY, in digital coins you have to tax you on it.

In my opinion the only incentive should be to get in at the ICO price before if sells out. That should be enough of an incentive. Coming in the first of the 100th should be completely irrelevant, as long as there's supply.

It isn't a matter of convenience for investors, it is a matter of reaching objectives for the issuers of the ICO.

That's a new one. Last time I believe you were pretending I was IE...

And to think that you would have had 4 times as much money as you have if you would only have listened...

But everyone gets what he deserves, some times...

Obviously I am on the other side of that fence. In my favor that only minimal investment has come so far, I believe in part because people need time to get their minds around the entire concept, perhaps do some research of gaming sites, accumulate BTC, etc. Although I am aware that this project is different, Ethereum did not put any pressure in time and the money came flooding. So did for SuperNET. I am quite convinced that adequately presented to the crypto community this will be fully subscribed before the original ICO period is over. People should be rushed by the fear not to be on time to benefit from the IPO price because people would buy all available coins/bergstake, NOT because the devs need a quarter of a million dollars to finish a working platform.

I could be wrong, of course

-- I believe you should extend the "bonus price" of 1BTC = 6,000 BRO + 6,000 bergstake until the end of the ICO.  After that, the market will determine the price of BRO.

-- Since there very limited specific information, I am going to assume that there will be only 10 million bergstake, ever. Now, Jay is that enough to keep a safe network operational? If it will be safely operational, I would reduce the bergstake to 500,000 BRO per year to keep it interesting in term of % of interest (5% on average), not be a deal breaker for the small investors and reduce the inflation rate of the coin.

-- But I still believe this is rushed, horribly timed and although I am aware that significant investment in time, perhaps minimum guarantees and work has already been done, there are still too many loopholes, chief among which is a testable working platform, at least on Alpha state. Other considerations such a permits and insurance should also be contemplated. The sheer magnitude of the project deserves such considerations, especially expectying the quite generous valuation you are giving to the whole project.

Just my opinion.

So back to the old (no Black Hand this time around, ah?) stomping grounds after, as fully predicted, going to the singles... and staying there, I  see.

Maarx and Vizique out... no more PR contracts I imagine...

Interesting... no, not really.

That would be much better IMO. But where does the interest come from?

Same as NEXT then. It is a problem because small investors will get minimal benefits from bergstake.

Yes, a MUCH longer period than that. At least 7 days (many people is paid at the end of the month).

And after this re-structuring I don't have clear at all what the amount of total coins will be. Lets try to figure it out with one scenario by which the 1000 BTC is reached within the first 7 days. That means 6 million coins and software fully funded. Then what? Lets also assume that the other 4 million coins are also sold. What is left? 2.5 million for developers, etc.? and 7 million for promotions, bounties, etc. Total 19.5 million plus 1 million more for bergstake, 20.5 million by the end of the first year. That's just 10% of the total coins... which will be owned by Breakout Gaming? Am I getting this correctly?