... funny, my post got deleted, thx it's still here.
wonder why ? did it hurt someone's private Feelings ?
No, you idiot. Its because you keep double-posting. This is the 4th time I've told you this. You must be pretty stupid to not be able to learn how the forum works. Read it in extra big font. Maybe it will sink into your dome better: If you have already written the last post in a thread (any thread):The next time a 1 watt lightbulb of an idea forms in that tiny cavern you call a brain, instead of writing a new post because you have to get it out of your dome and vomit it upon us innocents, add it to your last post by pressing the "edit" button.
If you can't understand this, perhaps you should try moving to Metanet. They'll take extra special care of an intellect as fragile as yours there, I'm sure. Especially if you pay them.Lol - it was a different topic - so thx for getting things through, that only you like - what a Little Boy ... cmon |
|
|
|
Oh no one protects KYC. This kind of monopoly. How can I trust my identity to an unknown person?
Oh - if you go totally dark, nobody can and will protect you. Only big criminal fishes want such and will Profit most of. If entire money paths would be tracable. many crime and corruption was not possible. Bitcoin can do that, small clean fishes should vote for IMHO |
|
|
|
I dont like eos or other illegal ICOs But Brock Pierce has some good points here https://youtu.be/ym3gk05iAQQFinally BitCoin can do all what we need Sufficient decentralized and full compliant Sigh - haters gonna hate - cannot fix that .. (shnupp) .. ... funny, my post got deleted, thx it's still here. wonder why ? did it hurt someone's private Feelings ? |
|
|
|
Metanet won't "kill" anything. Mainly because it will never exist. Besides, you guys enjoy trolling for free too much. C'mon just admit it, freche trolle. The metanet already exists And yes posting shit here is way too cheap. No wonder fxtroll is unable to find out the truth (or one need to spam truth more over for him) Bitcoin is a truth machine. But only on chain. 2nd layer and interfaces introduce just risks. SegShit and anarcho features are biggest risks such that never global bootstrapping can happen. Risk: it is soooo easy to shut btc down. |
|
|
|
lol it is hilarious seeing ppl trying to defend this traaaaaasssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssshhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh! HAHAHAHA
Bitcoin does defend itself - by pure design / economics SegWit / LN / whatelse is not sustainable |
|
|
|
|
This is an endless Loop for some private blokes - u can decide for yourself what you think bitcoin 'is'
We just say, derive it from the Original Definition - > Satoshi White Paper
it follows strictly
BSV is the Original Bitcoin -
- Triggers trolls, I know - cannto fix that
|
|
|
|
I think if I was ever to meet Satoshi Nakamota my biggest question would be, why have you not moved any of your Bitcoins. I feel like he has them spread amongst alot of wallets and not touched them to simply prove how hard it is to find a bitcoin key. I think he left alot millions simply to say if you find it keep it. "I will prove to you just how secure it really is"!
He left 2010 Maybe some tax issues got him to lock them up for 10y ? |
|
|
|
Good day Bitcoinland Nine four six five greenback bucks (Bitcoinaverage). Nine grand seems solid Flirting with nine and a half Go go Bitcoin go. - hot women are fun to look at sleep with
- cars should go fast be comfortable
- bitcoin is pretty neat
FTFY Hahaha, nutiboy needs to learn a lot  |
|
|
|
Too bad that almost all BSV transactions are being made by the same handful of addresses.
What? Are you saying they're... spamming to fake their transactions? Say it isn't so cause I need to believe! Given all the spam that disappeared from bitcoin once the block size battle was resolved it doesn't surprise me they'd do something like that. Define SPAM, especially on BitCoin where it costs fees to send txs. I ll give u a hint How about productive network capacity demonstration or real use. Spam happens on free internet, metanet will fix all that You've been here long enough to not be so clueless. https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Spam_transactionsThe network was being spammed to inflate the transactions in order to attempt to justify increasing the block size. And yes, it costs money and they were willing to do that. When they didn't get their way, miraculously they started bitcoin cash and the spam on bitcoin went away. Go figure. No, not spam again. Rather expensive pointing out / voting for having enough exzess capacity that is needed for exponential growing social networks. Yes, I m long enough here to get that Learn, ppl only change things for the good after they got hurt - or better, by figuring out where is better incentives
"A higher limit can be phased in once we have actual use closer to the limit and make sure it’s working OK."
"The current threshold is 200KB per block, or about 1000 transactions per block. I think it should be lowered to 50KB per block. That would still be more than 100 times the average transactions per block.
The threshold can easily be changed in the future. We can decide to increase it when the time comes. It's a good idea to keep it lower as a circuit breaker and increase it as needed."That's what Satoshi himself had to say about block sizes and "spam". Looks to me like he was more in favor of incremental changes as opposed to just opening it all up. So neither Bitcoin Cash or SV seem to have followed that direction. Neither has Bitcoin to be frank. But SV claiming it's the "original vision" is just laughable. Ugg, how much was the costs of fees sending a txs those early times? Ok, u get it now, for 0 costs - yes u need spam protection. The rest is a no brainer But good you had sth to laugh about, it may free up thinking |
|
|
|
Miners are running the show, the backbone, the creation of blocks, the verification of everything If they don't do all such, they might get orphaned and risk losing chunks of money or even entire long term investments. It is redicules to believe some reconciliation with thick clients (slow nodes) on RasPI piss would do anything good Watch this https://mobile.twitter.com/ZeroNoncense/status/1188187298652930049?s=20
Too bad that almost all BSV transactions are being made by the same handful of addresses.
What? Are you saying they're... spamming to fake their transactions? Say it isn't so cause I need to believe! Given all the spam that disappeared from bitcoin once the block size battle was resolved it doesn't surprise me they'd do something like that. Define SPAM, especially on BitCoin where it costs fees to send txs. I ll give u a hint How about productive network capacity demonstration or real use. Spam happens on free internet, metanet will fix all that You've been here long enough to not be so clueless. https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Spam_transactionsThe network was being spammed to inflate the transactions in order to attempt to justify increasing the block size. And yes, it costs money and they were willing to do that. When they didn't get their way, miraculously they started bitcoin cash and the spam on bitcoin went away. Go figure. No, not spam again. Rather expensive pointing out / voting for having enough exzess capacity that is needed for exponential growing social networks. Yes, I m long enough here to get that Learn, ppl only change things for the good after they got hurt - or better, by figuring out where is better incentives |
|
|
|
Just looked that up, quite a long read. And yes, the UK does not charge an annual tax for property (land) like Austria (for example) does.
We limeys do pay Council Tax which is banded based on property value, however. Where would Satoshi go then, when in Australia such a tax exists? |
|
|
|
I don't know... Satoshi can be dead by now, for sure. It could be Dave Kleiman, it could be someone else.
It wasn't dave or hal or anyone else on your suspected list, even though it seems some of the people early on thought it was hal doing a funny. It doesn't really matter who he was, it was very clear on topic If you do not understand what BitCoin is about, there is the white paper and the code Satoshi has delivered in a very good and clear purpose. If you still don't get it, just push back and learn, but don't alter it and call it still BitCoin |
|
|
|
Too bad that almost all BSV transactions are being made by the same handful of addresses.
What? Are you saying they're... spamming to fake their transactions? Say it isn't so cause I need to believe! Given all the spam that disappeared from bitcoin once the block size battle was resolved it doesn't surprise me they'd do something like that. Define SPAM, especially on BitCoin where it costs fees to send txs. I ll give u a hint How about productive network capacity demonstration or real use. Spam happens on free internet, metanet will fix all that
THEYMOS HELP! CLOSE THIS TROLL'S TOPIC! LOOK WHAT ARE THEY DOING
Quickly, the only coin which can scale, we cant have that, Hell, No.  Sayonara BTC was nice knowing you, but things to do and places to go. Next one Ethereum another sitting lame duck. Yes. The only use case for lame ducks I know is: Hodle it for a while and eat it, Peking style |
|
|
|
In this topic, complete freedom of speech and anarchy
Except for the 303 comments you have deleted  Might as well just keep deleting them dude. Theymos isn't going to close my thread, but you can delete my comments from this one. U wanna have some overview about how many ( not only of mine) posts got deleted by just arguing pro on chain scaling and against introducing technical debt like Segshit or 'privacy features' into the original protocol? Many sane legends have left this place also because of censorship
Did you somehow forget your dev is crypto's biggest patent troll?
Apparently being a fraud and a conman wasn't low enough for him.
On a frozen, locked down protocol design, there is no dev needed That's funny. Just yesterday you said there was still work to be done in "unfuckening" the protocol. Sounds like you're gonna need a dev for that. Telling ppl to trust into devs is the fraud,
Especially if its your dev. Slowly u might get that, sure there is refactoring needed Most due to the shit that got injected by devs having no clue what BitCoin was designed to do. But all such things are cleaning and scaling tasks, so that after Genesis release we have TCP/IP like state of protocol stability, and all BSV apps will be smoothly running after for many years without any fear of getting 'deved out of functioning' by insanity |
|
|
|
"You can not patent code. You can only patent an invention which is implemented in your code. An invention is a new and unique way of doing something. Most of all, it must be something nobody did before. If anyone used the same technique which you describe in your patent, that's called prior art and invalidates your patent. So trying to get a patent on something somebody else invented and implemented in code would be futile. ..."
No shit. Relevance? Did you somehow forget your dev is crypto's biggest patent troll? Apparently being a fraud and a conman wasn't low enough for him. On a frozen, locked down protocol design, there is no dev needed Telling ppl to trust into devs is the fraud, BitCoin is fine, complete and functional as delivered BSV is compliant and honest with that. No ppl needed in such, only trolls do name calling and circlejerk proof of crap to sell their bags |
|
|
|
Ich will ja nicht stänkern, aber wo sind eigentlich die IOTA Shills hin? wobei... eignetlich will ich schon stänkern...Alle bei Google um den neuen "Quanten-PC" zu feiern? LoL, beides wird net funktionieren |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
