hi! is there any pool where i can mine? thanks
Looks like there are no pools. Official pool is broken. And will likely stay broken; the dev is now fully engaged in developing and promoting his latest revenue stream, SterlingCoin - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=721936.0. Cheers Graham |
|
|
|
A great majority of the coins do not compile from source or do not sync , a revised list will be posted later
I'd be hugely appreciative of a tersely-annotated version of the original list that indicates which ones won't compile / sync. From my perspective as a metadata nerd, that information would be very useful. Cheers, Graham |
|
|
|
It's unlikely that you'll get the most out of your investment while the web site is still full of crashingly obvious placeholder text, e.g. https://bitcoinauctions.net/buyer-protectionI recommend that before you go any further, you conduct a content inventory and ensure that the text and images have been tailored appropriately for the specific site context. This is bitcoin-land, people will check and I regret to advise you that at the moment, the primary signal emitted is “run away”. HTH Cheers Graham http://www.higginsandmacfarlane.net <- chops Edit, added support chops |
|
|
|
probs should add all the exchanges before the voting starts  plenty more, even missing the biggest ones (btcchina, btc38 etc) We keep an extensive (but not quite exhaustive) list on our in-ninja-launch web site: http://minkiz.co/exchangeIt doesn't include any launched in the last week or two (we're unashamedly slacking) Cheers Graham |
|
|
|
Here is the white paper ... please read it and PM me about any corrections Only had chance to skim it but it's clearly a cut above the usual effort. I've not been able to spot anything obvious that needs correcting. I'll read it in detail later. Good job. Good English, too, fwiw. Cheers Graham |
|
|
|
Please someone make available the general index of altcoins vs. BTC how it's been doing in the time of carnage. (over the course of a few weeks, and also since the dropping through the latest floor)
I would say 10-20 largest altcoins would be good for the index, but I also heard indices with established methodologies exist.
You mean something like this: http://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/views/filter-non-mineable-and-premined/But with a long-term chart of the top items? I mean a table where there's a certain startpoint (for example Sept 15, when the BTC latest fall started in earnest). Then it lists how the altcoins have done during the decline. There's some talk in XMR threads that it has performed poorly, but some also say that it is better than most. A factual comparison would be really good obviously!  I'm collaborating with a domain expert subscriber to this forum, working to develop something that would seem to broadly satisfy the requirement, the project's working title is "SandRaiser", btw. I've been engaged in backfilling the data, it needs a bit more work but I should have something for you to look at later today (TZ=BST). There are three indexes at the moment and a couple in speculative development : 1. FullMonty/+ - all altcoins with a calculable marketcap (very rough and ready, obv) 2. Key30/+ - top 30 coins by marketcap 3. NonMinables - an index of PoS-only coins. 1 & 2 are presented with and without LTC, hence the "/+" and have been balanced at August 23. 3 is balanced separately about a week ago (can't recall offhand). The arithmetic is based on the equations laid out in S&P maths tech PDF docIs this the kind of thing you had in mind? Oh, I'll chuck this in, as well - add a few facts to the mix, I posted it a few days ago in a separate thread, it may well have escaped your notice:  Cheers Graham |
|
|
|
Slim is definitely a typtical unsuccessful case,with new distribution way --POB ,without further development and marketing.
The Slimcoin dev and the community have been working together for the last six months to try and shake the bugs out of the implementation. Would have been premature to concentrate on marketing before the functionality was proven stable. 's got a good hook though - mine it in on a Raspberry Pi. I'm not sure whether Slimcoin will progress much further. It's put quite a strain on the dev; unstable network = many moaning and to cap it all, the seed nodes went offline while he was on family holiday and when they came back up, they staked before they could sync the blockchain, causing forks  I mean, it's gotta be tough, being on the sharp end of everyone else's self-interested expectations. People can get a bit over-focussed at times and can lose touch with the experimental nature of this entire cryptocurrency domain. Cheers Graham |
|
|
|
not infeasible ... reducing the number
Uh, no... The smart devs have switched to launching assets on platforms like NXT... The profits there are an order of magnitude greater than pumping alts. So you are saying that horses are in decline because of higher "community standards"... But, in reality, people are rapidly switching to big, fast cars. I'm saying “not infeasible” and “reducing the number”, that's as far as I go. I'm choosy about my semantics. The phenomenon is inarguably multi-factor and it is implausible that the effort had no effect whatsoever. I don't know about a mass defection of scamdevs to 2gen, doesn't fit the pattern. Cheers Graham Edit: corrected tense |
|
|
|
Why would the number of them drop? I still see brand new ones all the time that get anywhere from 50-800 BTC.
The community has been taking active measures to raise standards, it's not infeasible that the effort has been successful in reducing the number of low-quality offerings, a reduction reflected in the monthly tally. I didn't release this chart in August because I was concerned it might simply have been a transient dip but at the end of Sept it does now seem to be stabilising at a more modest level. The current level of launches is running about 60-70 a month, that's two a day on average. Might that count as “all the time”? If so, there's your answer. Cheers Graham |
|
|
|
The frenzy has diminished, as illustrated by this chart of number of altcoin launches per month since Jan 2013: (Data from DOACC https://github.com/DOACC)Thought there might be some broad interest. Cheers Graham [dynamic, interactive version on Minkiz home page http://minkiz.co (ninja launch)] |
|
|
|
Could you provide a few more details ... Sorry if it's an awkward question to answer at this stage
These are processes in development, at this point in time many details are done manually. Thanks for the clarification, much obliged. Cheers Graham |
|
|
|
2. This asset will also create some market buy support for Karma. One of the source of income of this asset is coin trading of Karma and NHZ coins.
3. A part of this asset will also be used to rent mining rigs to mine Karma to lend network support for Karma.
7. This asset will also compensate for funding needs of Karma services development and maintenance instead of continually running a donation call.
Could you provide a few more details on these three items? It's a bit sketchy atm - I'm interested in learning how these functions will be secured, managed and made accountable. Sorry if it's an awkward question to answer at this stage of the offer, I'm just trying to build an understanding of the likely shape of the revenue stream envelope and how it's anticipated to evolve over time. Cheers Graham |
|
|
|
Trolling by blog post, basically. FWIW, I didn't get far. It's not shy about advertising itself as an immature and ill-written polemic ... “This analogy is absolutely appropriate to characterize the many alternative cryptocurrencies modeled on Bitcoin”. That's a revealingly immature choice of wording and the reference here is to a dismissive trope, not an analogy. “altcoin communities can only whine for attention” <- this kind of gratuitous sneer is an insult to the reader's intelligence. I'm looking for reasoned argument but the author wants to lead me around by the nose. I stopped reading at this point. Cheers Graham |
|
|
|
for full proposed list of coins see the first post.
I processed and sorted the list, removing several duplicates and resolving some apparent ambiguities. If further additions could be appended to the list in the first post, that would help me keep this post up to date. For convenience, I've added hyperlinks from the coin name to either a bcttalk thread or a cctalk thread. I've also created a hyperlink from the trading symbol to the corresponding (public, unique) DOACC entry (in order to keep the posting size inside the limit, the DOACC link is frustratingly but necessarily mediated via a more concise Minkiz db id). “No row was found for one() ['Ncoin', 'NX']” <- this one defeated me, any hints? HTH Cheers Graham |
|
|
|
A dynamic version of the chart is available ...
... to anyone to render for themselves. The data is retrieved from DOACC via SPARQL queries (posed of a Fuseki-mediated localhost endpoint). A javascript package ( sgvizler) handles the posting of the query and generates the charts directly from the SPARQL results, all straightforwardly expressed in HTML. This is the incantation for the above chart with the verbatim SPARQL query highlighted in green ...
<div class="row">
<div class="ui segment">
<h2>Altcoin launches since Jan 2013</h2>
<div id="ex"
data-sgvizler-endpoint="http://localhost:3030/doacc/query"
data-sgvizler-endpoint_output="json"
data-sgvizler-query="PREFIX doacc: <http://purl.org/net/bel-epa/doacc#>
SELECT DISTINCT ?incept (COUNT(?node) as ?coins)
{
?node doacc:incept ?incept .
FILTER(?incept > '2012-12'^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>) .
FILTER(?incept < '2014-10'^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>)
} GROUP BY ?incept ORDER BY ?incept"
data-sgvizler-chart-options="title=Altcoin launches since Jan 2013|legend.position=none"
data-sgvizler-chart="google.visualization.LineChart"
style="width:720px; height:365px; border:1px solid black; display: inline-block;"></div>
</div>
</div>
It just needs a change to the SPARQL query and a call to google.visualization.PieChart (marked in red) to get the frequency data for the current month for protection schemes, plotted as a pie chart:
<div class="row">
<div class="ui segment">
<h2>Current proportions of coin distribution and ledger protection schemes</h2>
<div id="ps"
data-sgvizler-endpoint="http://localhost:3030/doacc/query"
data-sgvizler-endpoint_output="json"
data-sgvizler-query="PREFIX doacc: <http://purl.org/net/bel-epa/doacc#>
PREFIX skos: <http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#>
SELECT DISTINCT ?label (COUNT(?node) as ?coins)
{
?node doacc:protection-scheme ?ps .
?ps skos:prefLabel ?label
} GROUP BY ?label ORDER BY ?coins"
data-sgvizler-chart-options="title=Protection schemes"
data-sgvizler-chart="google.visualization.PieChart"
style="width:520px; height:365px; border:1px solid black; display: inline-block;"></div>
</div>
</div>
For a graph showing the distribution schemes, just replace doacc:protection-scheme with doacc:distribution-scheme, change the title and that's it, job done.  Now, that's what I call Web 3.0. Cheers, Graham |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
