Doesn't look like they were camping for a 100x, either. Just luck, :p.
|
|
|
I'm really not sure what's the difference between impressions and unique impressions, based on the stats I've been getting... I mean, 2000 impressions and only 6 "unique" impressions? lol.
The only unique ones are those that haven't ever seen another A-Ads ad that day. So if someone visits Coindesk before your site, for example, Coindesk gets paid and you don't.
|
|
|
invest in gambling site bankroll and you will be happy with your profits ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Until you lose money. Doing this is not a guaranteed win. You are taking a pretty big risk, with multiple factors (someone cleans out bankroll, someone hacks site, owner closes down, etc.). im talking about investing in trusted gambling sites like moneypot or like that Ah, I see, like people that gave MtGox their money. Makes sense. who gave money to who? guy won and that's gambling but overall house always win (Means you always profit) I don't have the time to school you on the history of Bitcoin/cryptos, past events, current events, and future events that are already unfolding. You should really look into it sometime though -- your outlook is naive, at best.
|
|
|
invest in gambling site bankroll and you will be happy with your profits ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Until you lose money. Doing this is not a guaranteed win. You are taking a pretty big risk, with multiple factors (someone cleans out bankroll, someone hacks site, owner closes down, etc.). im talking about investing in trusted gambling sites like moneypot or like that Ah, I see, like people that gave MtGox their money. Makes sense.
|
|
|
invest in gambling site bankroll and you will be happy with your profits ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Until you lose money. Doing this is not a guaranteed win. You are taking a pretty big risk, with multiple factors (someone cleans out bankroll, someone hacks site, owner closes down, etc.).
|
|
|
Thanks for your feedback! But it's hard to justify using banners, which may or may not go to unique users, rather than using ads where they're counted regardless.
Is it really that hard? Think of it as of Bitcoin mining. Bitcoin miners don't know whether they are going to find a block now or not, but still they continue hashing and sometimes they find the block and get rewarded. In average miner's income is proportional to his/her share of the total hash rate. Similarly is in a-ads sometimes you get unique IPs and get rewarded, your income is proportional to your share of the total traffic. Most higher end networks (not BTC-related) offer passbacks. You set them so that if the advertisers have nothing to show from one network, they will pull from another. In a case like mine, they are then chained together with floors. It'd just be a nice feature to have, ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) .
|
|
|
Investing in mining using bitcoin is wise decision but not profitable even in long run as per present scenarios.
Uh, how is it wise if you lose money doing it? This is the stupidest thing I've heard.
|
|
|
I will try gambling at Gambit and devise a strategy that will work for me, with minimal loss and higher profits. I will test everything from Martingale, to auto bets and see if I get lucky. ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif) Using faucets can be a good way to get started, too. It's a great way to test theories without risking any real money.
|
|
|
signed up on the website looks cool ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) hope i win, also i noticed i have to wait 30 min after i sign up? why is that It could be because that you did an anonymous roll before you register on the site. Voting ResultVoting have ended with 100% voted for yes. Thank everyone for voting. I will contact an escrow - probably master-P - to hold the fund of 0.05 BTC. When is the drawing planned for now? The drawing will probably happen in the first week of November. I need to discuss it with the escrow as he or she will be the person who will send the prize. Sounds good! I'm looking forward to the first drawing (and many more after, hopefully!).
|
|
|
How would they work under your current system? for popunders you need to count every impression not just unique or the publisher is annoying there visitors for very little income!
I don't yet know how it would work, that's why I'd like to discuss it. Perhaps the visitor would receive a popunder only if 2 conditions are met: - the publisher enabled pop-under ad
- the visitor's IP is unique
Thus publishers must explicitly enable pop-under ads if they want to have them on their sites, visitor won't see pop-unders more than once per day and advertiser will receive only unique visitors. I like that idea for the pop-unders. And if you implement that, can you also set a way to use fallback/passback tags when a visitor isn't unique (for normal banners)? If you could do this, I'd absolutely return. But it's hard to justify using banners, which may or may not go to unique users, rather than using ads where they're counted regardless.
|
|
|
What happen if the ghs become 1.. is it still useable? Or need technician to fix it
I think after 1 ghs, your miner will still work some time then it will stop if you will not fix them by using a technician. I believe it runs until 4.99% health (where it would round down to 0 GH/s). But it's a lot better to keep it repaired.
|
|
|
IMO, as long as SWC can get their Android app out before Betcoin their traffic will come back. If not, I think the room may be in trouble. I know SWC is working hard to do so, and hope they can pull it off!
Is Betcoin making an android app?! That's actually amazing news if only because perhaps it will light the fire under these guy's asses (9 months for a beta-version poker app is a little on the slow-side, amiright?). I've had trouble getting betcoin to work on my linux desktop but I'm going to check them out again if they're finally adding android. They said they're doing Android and iOS but, like SWC, there is no ETA. So could be a month. Could be years, ![Tongue](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/tongue.gif) .
|
|
|
Bjorn say in chat if not much participate in wager war it not continue this too bad. No many gamblers in btc just many posters in gamble section. Btc need user and businesses this sad state for bitcoin and for good site. Need big priced btc rise attract users or else this stagnate.
We may just take a little break and if players would like to see Casino WARZ and the side betting return then we can warm up another fight. Still a little over a week left to participate everyone, come win an Ipad, earn cashback, and possibly more if we win this battle! When you say participate, do you mean in the betting on the war itself, or on the sites?
|
|
|
Well I planned on hiring a few programmers to get the biggest issues out of the way, Coinstore API support for coin integration, security issues, Mechanim issues with new models, animations, and GUI menus. Thats not really alot to do and shouldn't cost no more than the funding I've asked for. There isn't really a game design document, most of this has been layed out in my head since August of 2014 of how I can design Chain of Conflict to be a better game, I have a system worked out for the players to earn already, much similar to how Ignatius has handled HYPER/Coin2 integration to the vast amounts of FPS games that already exist. The only difference is, unlike these other FPS games that are well known already, CoC is being designed around crypto, from the premium store to the way players earn. Even the security systems have been thought out to deter players wishing to use an aimbot to try and steal from the game. Rghmodz will be on this as well, if he still wishes to do so. We have been discussing security measures and the like, how to stop hackers at the game level and at the Coinstore level. The game, even after all the basic functions have been implemented for the coins, shopping and security, will continue to be developed and I encourage everyone to learn Level Design and 3D modeling in Blender, we could always use player made maps. The time frame I can give you is sometime a month or 2 after the programmers have been hired. As of now it is just a single player demo in very early Alpha stage, I've decided to halt the RPG til I learn more of how one is setup and I have switched back to developing the FPS, it keeps bugging me inside that its not done, and I plan to see it finished one way or another. Also I announced Bitcoin support along with tons of screenshots of v.16 that isnt released yet: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1216878.0 Thanks for all the info! Is the RPG going to be a 3D one (Unity3D) as well? And is CoC planned to be a player vs. player game (like CS:GO) or player vs. NPCs game (like where you infiltrate bases and such)?
|
|
|
the first thing is to not reuse addresses. rather, generate a new address every time
Well with a lot (if not all) wallets that you use, the wallet generates a new address each time you receive bitcoins to the previous address... so that's already implemented. I'm not aware of any that do that. Can you name some? Xapo, Circle, Coinbase, Blockchain.info, MultiBit, Bitcoin QT, Electrum, (I know I'm missing a lot here) definitely don't. Well I personally use breadwallet for iOS... I know for a fact this wallet does, but have used blocktrail in the past as well that did it... I have just assumed that all wallets changed the wallet address after each transaction had been received? That's definitely the exception, rather than the norm. Some, like Coinbase, will make a new one when you send a transaction, but not when you receive one. Well in that case, if you use Android, I would suggest you look into getting blocktrail (I think blocktrail is supported by Android)... Regardless, this thread does seem to go off tangent very quickly haha. But blocktrail seems to be a very secure wallet, while offering that service. I just prefer bread because it connects directly to the blockchain network. I think it's actually on topic. Different addresses for each received transaction is a huge thing. Is Bread the one that does dynamic fees, too?
|
|
|
Help Support Chain of Conflict because it will support Coin2, HYPER, and BitcoinAs stated above Chain of Conflict needs YOUR help!! In order for this game to become a reality and move from the production phase we have begun to seek crowdfunding. We now have a social outreach of over 536,000+ people!!! If we wish to receive the funding we need to hire more programmers to help finish the project, we MUST meet our goals. Chain of Conflict aims to be the first game of its kind, a first person shooter, designed to work with cryptocurrency flawlessly, to pay the player based on their skill, and to be able to self sustain itself based on the premium shop in the game. There are special bonus perks such as the Coin2 Bio-Blaster($10 donation~ see image below) for donating. This comes with 5000 rounds(5 C2 Bio-Sludge Cartridges) and a Super-Shot Barrel(Limited Availability). The Super-Shot Barrel is what makes this perk unique. ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FxR9yI46.png&t=663&c=bSe5RnbQgm5UAw) This game has been in production with just myself since November of 2014, and a few other versions of it were created prior to this(those other versions were shelved due to programmer issues.), I have used some assets from those other versions in the current development. A large map was created using the original village stage from Alpha version 0.05. The village along with other more modern buildings, are still in production at the time of this writing. Though there is a demo, it requires the download of the Unity3d Web Player plugin. Support Chain of Conflict and help it reach out to more people in Social Media![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FzHriW9s.png&t=663&c=MmDnCQ-VEAKp7w) Please any support is better than none, lets make this happen!!! I'm actually kind of surprised you're just asking for $5k. What is the time frame you're looking at if it's successful? And do you have a game design document?
|
|
|
the first thing is to not reuse addresses. rather, generate a new address every time
Well with a lot (if not all) wallets that you use, the wallet generates a new address each time you receive bitcoins to the previous address... so that's already implemented. I'm not aware of any that do that. Can you name some? Xapo, Circle, Coinbase, Blockchain.info, MultiBit, Bitcoin QT, Electrum, (I know I'm missing a lot here) definitely don't. Well I personally use breadwallet for iOS... I know for a fact this wallet does, but have used blocktrail in the past as well that did it... I have just assumed that all wallets changed the wallet address after each transaction had been received? That's definitely the exception, rather than the norm. Some, like Coinbase, will make a new one when you send a transaction, but not when you receive one.
|
|
|
I can't login to the site. It says "Please check the captcha." but there is no captcha in the page. It didn't load. I refreshed several times.
same goes for me, its like been almost 2 weeks i got this kind msg. Hmm, try clicking this link instead: http://www.minerfarm.com/login#tologinThat's the only way it will load for me. If I'm just on the login page, it won't work. For some reason, the #tologin makes it work.
|
|
|
Problem for BB is their low max. win 42 times lower than at PRC. This high max win allow players to bet 200 BTC at once, like this. ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.gyazo.com%2F6b9fa22e341d55c523974a0689f69a46.png&t=663&c=qKt3sDV18b5msA) Yeah, it's a definite limitation, and not something I see changing in the near future ![Sad](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/sad.gif) I think having a ~1000 BTC bankroll, with ~10 BTC wins is a sort of sweet spot in terms of catering to most players vs liability Although technically MP would support that bet if the person was willing to play with a ~9.2% house edge (not that anyone sane would do that) While this does put MP at a limitation, I personally like how it is. 1% is a good risk style for me. BUT... I do wonder if running a PRC-style system may work as well. They allow the investors to do offsite investing (like Just-Dice). So I can put in 10 BTC and run 10x Kelly, and my "investment" would be 100 BTC. If that 100 BTC lost 10 BTC, I'd be bankrupted (since it'd be 10-10=0). Not sure if I'm explaining this well enough but it allows the investors to take more of a risk, without affecting the risk of other investors.
|
|
|
Looks like litecoininvest went back up. Hopefully that means HFLTC's acquisition of it went smoothly
What is HFLTC? I hope next days LitecoinInvest return online ;-) Our Fund buy it.
Its a security thats listed on litecoininvest Ahhh, thanks. So essentially one of the companies listed purchased the site.
|
|
|
|