It never will be. Dogecoin is just a meme coin, don't expect any super fundamental characteristics for rapid growth from it. Elon Musk uses this coin for speculation and now there is another pumping of the price, then it will fall anyway, but now is the period, when it is necessary to give faith in market participants, so they buy DOGE. I repeatedly met on a forum statements about $1 for DOGE this year. It certainly won't happen, and don't get your hopes up.

I could at least speculate that ETH, with its mighty ecosystem, might get ahead of bitcoin, though that's very unlikely, but coins like DOGE will never do that. They have no utilitarian features, no ecosystem, nothing.

Astar performed very well last month. Those who had time to buy this year, in the first 3 months, got a good profit. in addition Astar recently updated ATH, reaching 30 cents. I think this is a young project and this coin has potential, so I have no questions about this investment in your portfolio. But Acala Token is definitely a bad investment.

Give it up, the market is now losing capitalization, NFT, Metaverse, GameFi, P2E tokens are now in the risk zone. NFT has no bottom and they can fall indefinitely and never grow again.  Moreover you have no experience, you will definitely lose money with it, it made sense to invest in NFT at the beginning of 2021, then all projects were growing in price and became popular very fast. Now that the hype has passed, don't expect it all to happen again. NFT is the new ICO of 2017. And those who tried to invest in ICOs after 2017, they almost all lost money.

Invest better in projects that have an ecosystem and some real products.

Pretty good portfolio. But why no bitcoin? As important an asset as ETH, for example. I also stick to the idea that a portfolio, for diversification, should have at least 10 different coins. The only thing I don't support in this portfolio is Acala Token. In my opinion, it is a very risky investment, the project has lost 98% of its value and is more like another scam that is not worth the money or attention.

Of course, as in any pyramid, at the expense of the influx of new users. Remuneration is paid from the cash flows that come into the project from the registration of new participants and the marketplace, because participation is not free and you need to buy sneakers, that is, you need initial investments to make money. That's at the expense of them, and formed the rewards for other participants.

This thing is not eternal and sooner or later, as with any pyramid scheme, there is not enough money for everyone and it can turn into a scam.

Я ж говорю не об обсуждении одной и то же новости в разных топиках, я веду речь о дублировании одной и той же новости в разных топиках. Да ещё и если посредством копипаста. Именно о дублировании (подчёркиваю).

Чуть выше я высказал своё мнение:

Join DOGE after the plunge? Probably the most common mistake investors make when everything has already happened, for some reason they decide to buy. They should have bought yesterday or at the weekend, but not now, when the coin is up almost 25%.

What makes you think the growth will continue? Now this news can quickly come back and DOGE will be forgotten again. I'm not sure that we'll grow up to 70 cents now. If everything was so obvious, what would prevent you from buying coins at 12 cents?

Вот мы сейчас и пытаемся прийти к общему знаменателю, так сказать  

А одна и та же новость у нас может обсуждаться в куче разных топиков. Дело именно в том, как изначально подаётся эта новость: если это практически одинаковый копипаст, то моё мнение, что более поздний пост должен быть удалён. А если одна и та же новость подаётся с оригинальными комментариями, то такие посты можно оставлять. Ну, это моё мнение.

То есть у нас в разделе теперь новое локальное правило, что дубли новостей в разных топиках мы не удаляем?

Например, вот такое:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1755415.msg59971861#msg59971861

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5315886.msg59973001#msg59973001

В начале топика указаны контактные данные автора топика. Вы можете обратиться по ним. Кстати, он там так и пишет, типа обращайтесь по указанным контактам, в определённое время. Плюс, вы всегда можете зайти в профиль и посмотреть когда тот или иной пользователь (в том числе и автор топика) последний раз присутствовал на форуме. Автор топика последний раз появлялся на форуме 10 марта сего года. Стало быть живой

I wasn't talking about the fact that they have no use cases, I was talking about their utilitarianism. From the point of view of usefulness, NFTs, in my opinion, do not carry any utility. Games are just an element of entertainment. Games change each other very quickly, so as soon as the game loses popularity, these NFTs that are used in games will also lose popularity. The Game-Fi industry is rapidly developing and is filled with a large number of projects, many of which will soon go into oblivion forever. Do you want to invest in NFT, the value of which depends on the popularity of the game? A dubious investment.

I studied this project in more detail and so far, personally, it all evokes bad associations with HYIPs, matrices and pyramid schemes. That is, to register in the project, you need an initial investment. Doesn't it remind you of anything?  

You have to buy sneakers in the app, and they are not a small price. See for yourself: https://whattonews.ru/goto/https://magiceden.io/marketplace/stepn

The next thing that reminds you of the connection to pyramid schemes and gambling is the levels to be pumped up. There are 30 levels in total and the higher the level, the more tokens are paid out.

That is, if you actively use the application those sneakers you buy, they will pay off in 1.5-2 months, only then you will earn.

This also requires experience and analytical skills. There are a huge number of new projects coming out, especially in periods of hype. Are you suggesting that you invest in everything just because it is a new project? New projects are even more dangerous than what famous people advertise. Because celebrities advertise already promoted projects which have a capitalization, and new projects often have nothing besides a smart contract address and a website.

It does not take much money to invest in new projects, for example. Because even an investment of $300 can easily turn into $30,000 in a few months, but to find such a project, you will need to study a lot and identify exactly the worthwhile product.

I once read a strategy of beginner, he was planning to find new projects and invest $100 for each, hoping that some project will exactly catch a haip and bring him x1000, covering remaining losses. In the end he didn't find any such project and invested his money in a pile of garbage.

I've already seen some calculations somewhere on the forum regarding this estimated price. And they are unrealistic. Although I see a lot of negative responses, my answer would not be original either. No, SHIB at 0.1 is insane. I take it you want to see SHIB at 10 cents? That's even crazier than SHIB at 1 cent.

SHIB is now capitalized at $13,167,601,641 and the value of 1 token is $0.00002396. Do you want SHIB at 0.1? Just multiply the capitalization by a factor of 4100. That's how much money this project would need for that price.

Do NFT tokens have any utility? Of the projects you listed that have already grown, what utility do they represent? NFTs are just collection items, I don't see any utility in them. If you want to invest, don't choose NFT, these tokens tend to depreciate very quickly. Let's say, NFT is very easy to buy, but very hard to sell. Now there is a lull in the altcoin market and a bearish trend is coming, now all these NFT projects can depreciate very quickly.

Realistically, such a project can be absolutely any of the thousands of projects. Why? Because every investor who invests in even the most useless shiatcoin believes that it will grow 100 times in the near future. So all the projects that you will see here, from an investment point of view, will look like a game of roulette. Do your own investigation, projects-gems are not easy to find, and you certainly won't find them in the forum comments.

And why should they beat fiat currencies? In general, I often see various arguments about how cryptocurrencies should replace fiat money. Personally, I am of the opinion that cryptocurrencies do not need to try to replace fiat; central banks are unlikely to ever allow this. They are already creating solutions for this in the form of CBDC tokens, a centralized currency whose issuance will be controlled by the central banks themselves.

Cryptocurrencies may well live and develop in parallel with fiat. For example, investment assets like real estate, gold or bonds have no goal to replace fiat, they exist together with fiat and do not pretend to be money.

Since cryptocurrencies are still used more as an investment asset than as a currency to pay for goods and services, they do not need to replace fiat currencies as an investment digital asset.

Yes, it could encourage people to be more active, and that is the positive side of this whole business model. The negative side will be, as always, the desire of various scammers to just make money off of all this hype. Everything new attracts scammers who launch dubious projects with dubious tokens and try to speculate on fresh ideas. I've already seen one of such projects on this forum, which just borrows an idea and doesn't offer anything original, but just engages in copying.

The most important thing is to return to form without investing in all sorts of pacifier projects that masquerade as this fresh business model. My guess is that there could be a lot of such pacifier projects in the near future.

And how do you imagine long-term investing in general? If you invest in a coin, you can't be guided by the fact that no one knows whether there will be growth or not, you just believe based on your own analysis. Otherwise, what is the point of investing at all if you are not sure for yourself personally that this coin will have growth. I've done my own research and made my own decision, I'm not imposing it on anyone. As they say, DYOR.

The early bitcoin investors couldn't be sure bitcoin would grow to these values either, but they still invested and believed and waited patiently. They had their own internal motives for such behavior.

And if any investment is approached the way you describe, then it doesn't make sense for anyone to hold coins at all in the long run. However, they do.

Here is what theymos writes about this in this thread :


I think what he is referring to is the e-mail at the time of the break-in, not the very first e-mail address. Because the e-mail can change many times over the course of your time on the forum.