As promised we now have autoupdate for flycoin!!!! Simply download the following file and launch. It has an installer. The way it works: Install once. Every time you launch fly wallet it checks for an update, if one is available it will ask you if you want to update. If you say yes, it will update your wallet. Soon we will add wallet notifications were I will broadcast critical messages, such as updates, or status of exchange (up or down). Just more proof that flycoin is the most brilliant crypto ever created! www.bitcoinlasvegas.net/files/Fly-autoupdate.exeVegas Is there source code for this? Non-windows user and all. :/ If there isn't I will try decompiling if no one has objections. Also, Happy New Year to all! |
|
|
|
|
And of course there is always "sendmany" command in core.
|
|
|
|
|
I think I was in for exactly one week until the announcement. I announced the removal of my signature in this thread, I can go back and find the post in a bit.
|
|
|
|
Sorry guy's I can't support HAM on cryptsy any more. Some may want to trade on cryptsy but if we cant withdrawal I must inform our supporters that withdraws are not working any longer. 48 hours for a simple withdrawal is not an exchange I can support. Sorry for the bad news. Happy new years all..
Thus the need to wean the coin away from centralized exchanges and build around p2p trade models.  Had some great talks with our bitwizards. Sat project isn't dead. It's sad bro, we were so excited to get listed on cryptsy, but I just cant support our users being used as an exit coin for cryptsy. I have to let our supporters know, even if it hurts, hams don't rip off hams, sorry guys.. UNO is actually pushing this hard, not realizing how these things work. Fleeting popularity tends to do that folks though. Did anyone claim the outernet HAM yet? That actually gave me a great idea on how to make this work despite lighthouse data restrictions. |
|
|
|
Sorry guy's I can't support HAM on cryptsy any more. Some may want to trade on cryptsy but if we cant withdrawal I must inform our supporters that withdraws are not working any longer. 48 hours for a simple withdrawal is not an exchange I can support. Sorry for the bad news. Happy new years all..
Thus the need to wean the coin away from centralized exchanges and build around p2p trade models. Had some great talks with our bitwizards. Sat project isn't dead. |
|
|
|
I can not think of a single noteworthy coin. All altcoins seem to be useless vehicles to relieve naive persons of their Bitcoins. As Spoetnik said above, you will surely get this thread filled with coin shills that believe their coin is better because of a change in name or coin supply.  |
|
|
|
I understand things like this happen and no it isn't Mexxer's fault. I joined later in the campaign and only got a week in before this fiasco occured so I don't expect to see any return for my time. Likewise E-coin should not expect that I should consider using their services going forward.  |
|
|
|
Any ETA on the cryptopia wallet? I posted an address from there the other day during Vegas' Xmas giveaway. I'm building my own FLY server so it will be a few days before I can send/receive to it.
Im not sure whats going on with the guys at Cryptopia, they usually update within a few hours of me notifying them. I think they are away for a few days as Capnbdl has been in chat most of the day and has not seen them. Vegas Thanks for update. Still reading code, I usually rip out the parts I don't need (like GUI's and superfluous Windows code) before I compile. I like things light and fast  |
|
|
|
|
Any ETA on the cryptopia wallet? I posted an address from there the other day during Vegas' Xmas giveaway. I'm building my own FLY server so it will be a few days before I can send/receive to it.
|
|
|
|
Nothing from them yet?  They should at least let us know whether we can change our signatures... Euro_Stacka is quite slow in responding. As for the signatures, you can switch to another one once .Me along with him will decide whether to give a part payment or a full amount, i.e you later come back and finish the terms(days remaining) and then take the full payment, you will be informed, or in the worst case , no payment(highly doubt it might happen) I just removed mine yesterday since I thought they were suspending the campaign. I'm more than happy to put it back if they are going to continue to advertise via hero and legendary members. |
|
|
|
Interesting article, especially useful to those who need a primer on Bitcoin's block halving structure and what that might mean for the future. I was unaware that 100 nanometer miners were so close. A core idea is that Bitcoin mining will become distributed to consumers and happen at a loss, in return for some other useful service (perhaps heat). Here's a site that counts down the days to the next Bitcoin halving: http://www.bitcoinblockhalf.com/Since Uno moves off a Petahash slice of Bitcoin's mining power, we will of course watch what happens. If I do my math right, unless it's forked in the future Bitcoin's block reward will reach absolute zero at block 6930000, in about 125 years (give or take a decade). At block 6.93M, there will be zero rewards per block, not even 1 satoshi. So I guess Uno will have to carry Bitcoin for the next 175 years beyond that. (of course, btc transactions fees will carry the day for miners, so I am joking a bit here. But if Bitcoin fails to achieve wider adoption, merge mining rewards from alts like Unobtanium could play a more important role for miners in the future. Uno will continue to pay miners for the next 300 years).I was intrigued by this last comment - partly because I'm slightly sceptical about merge mining and also because the UNO reward is so low I really couldn't see it having a big impact and so I did a bit of calculating. Average BTC block reward from fees over the last 80 blocks (simply a number I happened to grab off an explorer no science to it) is 0.21435357 BTC Current UNO reward per block 0.00781250 UNO Number of UNO blocks per BTC block: 3,46 (very roughly, averaged over 100 UNO blocks, again what I could easily grab from an explorer) Current exchange rate: 0.00379849 BTC value of UNO block reward: 0.00002968 BTC value of UNO block reward per BTC block - 3.46 x 0.00002968 = 0.00010268 BTC So (unles I have made a mistake) the Bitcoin transaction fees are already over 2000 times more valuable than the UNO block reward, averaged per BTC block*. * As an aside I don't know how merge mining works in detail but I assume the UNO blocks are going to be randomly "won" so won't necessarily go to the miner that happens to win that BTC block. So unless UNO increases in value massively I'm not convinced it will have a significant effect. I have noticed this as well. The merge mining implementation is easily filtered too btw. Good eye with your maths.  |
|
|
|
Any chance that e-coin would give some payment to the current participants? I know that we did take our chances with the escrow. I have contacted him regarding this , I wouldn't have my hopes high though, considering the campaign was already unsustainable for them. Apologies again, for any inconveniences . I for one lost my faith in bitcointalk escrows, only person I'm sticking with as an escrow(if possible) is shorena This was a letdown for me, but I was only a week in so not a horrible loss I guess. I agree shorena would be a trustworthy escrow for such things. As Mitchell said in the other thread, you can't blame staff or anyone, this is just how things work sometimes. :/ EDIT: will remove signature and leave feedback later when I can post from non-mobile. |
|
|
|
Well damn, and just when I joined up too. I'll give him a bit, but is there a link to discussion on him exit scamming? |
|
|
|
BitKingdom.org is a trusted global community centre
Trusted by whom? Whenever you need financial help millions of BitKingdom community members will offer you the help you need, with no requirement for you to pay it back.
The website was set up (under WiG naturally) in August 2015, barely four months ago. You get less than 1,000 visits a day and the majority of them come from Vietnam and Malaysia. millions of BitKingdom community members BitKingdom has nothing to do with helping the community, only helping itself at the community's expense, by dangling an absurd carrot of 1% per day for doing nothing. Apart from sending your money to a random BTC address and then waiting for a 'cycle' to complete. The only cash/profit generation of this scheme is the charge of 0.01 BTC that you have to pay for the privilege of giving your money away. A pale imitation of Mavrodi's ongoing MMM shit, BitKingdom will probably scam a large number of naive/greedy/stupid people who will then complain very loudly. Agreed. The only "Poverty" that might get ended here is OP's ... those that choose to whizz away their BTC on this scam deserve to lose it. |
|
|
|
|
This is a straight-up ponzi based on the old gifting club scam. Also you posted this in the wrong section.
|
|
|
|
You blockstreamers are truly beneath contempt at this point. I urge anyone to have a look at this discussion if you are in any doubt that bitcoin is being taken over by private interests. I also encourage people to read the discussion. It wasn't one sided (e.g., you can see luke-jr NACKed wait, what?). The funniest part was some XTer came in under the handle gladoscc pretending to support blockstream "signing off" on blocks. If any of you XT dead enders are or know gladoscc, let him know that was some Grade A trolling. gladoscc used to be TradeFortress iirc. Well known scammer yes. It's clear as day who you want to side with in this story. The rap sheet of most current XTards is long and tainted with numerous stories of scams and sociopathic conduct. Hearn Cypherdoc and his pussy posse Anarchystar & The Bitcoin Phoundation DeathAndTaxes Roger Ver JStolfi Lambie I know I'm missing a whole lot here.  + Just about anyone that comes here from that echo-chamber called reddit. You know, the ones crying censorship because they are too stupid to make a new thread. |
|
|
|
You blockstreamers are truly beneath contempt at this point. I urge anyone to have a look at this discussion if you are in any doubt that bitcoin is being taken over by private interests. I also encourage people to read the discussion. It wasn't one sided (e.g., you can see luke-jr NACKed wait, what?). The funniest part was some XTer came in under the handle gladoscc pretending to support blockstream "signing off" on blocks. If any of you XT dead enders are or know gladoscc, let him know that was some Grade A trolling. gladoscc used to be TradeFortress iirc. |
|
|
|
In regards to Core attempting to censor Coinbase, you can follow the discussion here and decide for yourself what side you want to be on: https://github.com/bitcoin-dot-org/bitcoin.org/pull/1178I am happy that I am on the side of decentralization and freedom, which is what the original vision of Satoshi represented. Core is moving more towards the ideology of centralized control and authority, I do not think that Satoshi left just to allow some other group to exercise centralized authority and control over the protocol. Bitcoin is meant to be free, Cores opposition to the freedom of choice and their continued attempts at censorship only reveals the weakness of their position. You really can't keep Satoshi's name out of your mouth heh. Too late, it has been removed: https://github.com/bitcoin-dot-org/bitcoin.org/commit/7d1cdd94651461ff13ad4ed10b05b2374690fac2  |
|
|
|
|
I just made this one this morning in response to coinbase deciding to run XT nodes: 1xtsuxjEwEPGJahbHTntLTZwoqnFV5SQx
The "jEw" part of it was entirely coinidental but hilarious nonetheless.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
