|
So it is quiet in the irc. What exactly is needed for the twitter relay? I am idle in the chan but see no incoming messages.
|
|
|
|
Deepest apologies all. I got banned for the past two weeks for having a sig campaign and apparently spamming.  Anyway, everyone who has unanswered messages will be replied to in the next few days. And all those that have inquired about orders should be hearing from me soon too. Thanks for the support  No worries, good to see you back. I am still anxiously awaiting my bar, I know I will love it! |
|
|
|
Thank goodness for all the great Dev's we have participating in HAM growth. U included  I appreciate your support. Still working on the ncurses wallet, and hope I will have something good soon.  [/quote] QSL cards withCroatian babes. Now we are cookin' |
|
|
|
Hilarious Mexican pulp-fiction art aside, I haven't lost interest in the whole project. The implications of a solid OTA transmission protocol for cryptocurrency is very much needed, and hamradio is the perfect beta testing grounds  |
|
|
|
Ian and I wanna organise a Google talk meetup for the halving. Details to follow. Gone to town.
m
Please advise of time in location if it will be a public meeting, I will see if I can setup a talk account. |
|
|
|
Incredibly awful, but I had to see what it looked like:  |
|
|
|
|
Meh trading there makes no sense until they fix that as coinpr0n said. I still chug along on the multipool with spare hash, but have stopped any other trade there for now.
|
|
|
|
How about real goods or services?
Yes, there are already any number of perfectly good legit products and services here anyone can use. |
|
|
|
|
That escalated quickly. The whole selling of keys is really a childish thing, but it is stealing. Or at least I feel that way. Yes you can choose who to do business with quite freely. Vod has merely pointed out that the guy indeed sells a stolen product which is truly indisputable. If your conscience allows you to buy such items, then by all means do so. Dishonest people will continue to buy things from less-than-reputable sellers. Those that wish to do things above-board have a reference at the very least.
|
|
|
|
https://796.com/?lang=en 796 exchange is Pioneer Cryptocoin Derivatives Exchange. Bitcoin & Litecoin Futures & Up/Down Options Exchange since June 2013. Weekly, Quarterly & Daily Futures Contracts and Options of Various Timeframes Settle on BraveNewCoin Global Price Index. Be careful with them because they dont actually do support. They do like they do but you wont get an answer. I cant believe how stupid it is letting such a big income business be like that. They lost the coins but they have a system included that prevents this in the future. They collect hundreds of btc in a certain timeframe to put it into an insurance fond against this. But i dont know how trustworthy they are. I had the same question, though for leveraged trading in general. I created a list with all infos i found then: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=923547.msg10388615#msg10388615Thank you for that comprehensive list! I will try and throw a few bits in your tip jar soon. |
|
|
|
If the purpose of this thread was to start another pointless discussion about Baritus, mission accomplished. If the purpose was to get some ideas rearning what needs done, update your websites. Day in and day out incredible accomplishments (as many have touched on in this thread) are barely mentioned and don't even make it to the sadly static Digitalcoin and Digitalcoin Foundation websites. The wiki is very nice thanks to SimonTower, but everything else is really out of date. http://digitalcoin.co/services.phphttp://digitalcoin.foundation/projects/http://digitalcoin.foundation/news/This is what people first see when they start looking into Digitalcoin, and it doesn't make for a good first impression. Also, if you must lock down the forum, you should make it a little more clear what you're asking people to do, and you should remember that most people don't even know what irc is. TT My purpose wasn't to derail the thread, I was just genuinely curious as to whether baritus was still on the development team or not. I have not even bothered to do any research into DGC until I happened across this thread and it piqued my curiosity. I don't like to keep all my eggs in one basket so it is nice to check things out. |
|
|
|
I couldn't agree more. I know this will remain a hotly debated subject for some time to come, but the facts are far too compelling. And just way too convenient.
Hotly debated? Well it seems the tide has changed in the 1.5+ years I have been out of touch here. cosmoo seems to be his only staunch supporter left. I will drop into irc one afternoon and check out the pulse on your project. DGC was probably the first alt outside of namecoin I ever owned. |
|
|
|
The last I heard from the DGC Foundation was that Baritus was not involved but was considered a valuable friend and would remain behind the scenes while building his exchange.
So kenel, how about that clarification on Baritus and his involvement in the BS story?
~BCX~
Okay, i seem to be the only person who cares about being rational and doesn't think baritus is a scammer (and yes, i lost dgc to cryptoave), SO i think that only adds to the credibility when i say he is NOT involved with DGC development. in fact I pm'd him about a week ago asking him to delete his old github and haven't gotten a reply yet. coming from probably the only person who ever defended him, i'll repeat he hasn't been involved with development whatsoever. DGC v3 is entirely new codebase implemented by Ahmed. so cool your shit bcx. really, i'd rather the original dev of DGC be known as a poor entrepreneur, rather than an outright scammer. the DGC he solicited for his exchange project came from willing investors, not from rigging the DGC network. if you're gonna spread shit, at least spread accurate shit. also, the amount of DGC he solicited was roughly 550k total, about the same amount dumped, so i don't believe there's any more coins left to dump, as if that even matters since his holdings, along with all other DGC ever distributed, were gained legally. people just want a public figure to roast when their investment in an overhyped environment turns sour. that's all conversations about him have ever been about. let's just forget about the guy and move on. the DGC network is clean, that is all that ever mattered and is the only thing worth discussing here. Yea were not going to agree there. Xawksaw, samson, techbytes and kenel helped in the creation of DGC V3. Baritus in my personal opinion is an outright scammer. No one in their right minds would say he isnt. Everyone lost a shit ton of DGC in cryptoave. That money was not gained legally at all. He claimed it was for CryptoAve an exchange that would be launched for DGC which barely stayed online at all. Its a non-existant service. So it is a scam. Also DGC was not overhyped at all. Infact the money that people gave towards the marketing of cryptoave and DGC. Which never happened. DGC was one of the most under marketed coins at a time that was critical for DGC. Ahmed I couldn't agree more. I know this will remain a hotly debated subject for some time to come, but the facts are far too compelling. And just way too convenient. |
|
|
|
Baritus wont ever be involved in DGC and its development EVER. (Atleast not while i'm around).
I'm completely agree with You. Well that is definitely good to hear. I have a lot of respect for ahmedbodi, and I have followed his work on other coins - including Myriad. I admit I was rather livid when the baritus thing occurred and probably sold my DGC a bit too hastily. For the record I did approve of letting BCX sort the whole issue out, but it seems he is ready to call a truce as well. Having the foundation publish a statement on the matter isn't too much to ask is it? |
|
|
|
|
Is baritus still involved in this coin at all? I guess whether or not I decide to reconsider DGC depends on that.
|
|
|
|
I forgot to ask (and sorry if I am asking in the wrong section IMZ!) if there is a market for goods and services for UNO? Hope you are having a great weekend in Australia! |
|
|
|
|
For your keystore to be all 1337 and all, you sure have a lot of issues with your shitty Joomla installation. Just sayin'.
|
|
|
|
Would urge you to reconsider your position on DGC. Good team, good guys, making a lot of progress What have you guys accomplished in the past ~2 years I have been out? Cliff notes please. There were some good folks I met in irc, but I had enough drama for one summer by the time cryptoave tanked. |
|
|
|
Where are all the Baritus fanboys now?
I remember catching a serious load of crap for calling him out for the scammer he is.
Any one still think he didn't steal the $30K worth of DGC?
~BCX~
Please remind me as I can't remember, who did he steal the coins from ? He ripped off the all the investors he solicited from to build his next time proven follow on scam, CryptoAve. I find it amazingly coincidental that an unknown "mystery employee" swipes $30K of DGC from Baritus personal stash in the damn near the same amount he raised from investors. Basically he used their money to fund CAVE and sold his personal coins at the same time. Any more questions? ~BCX~ I also dropped DGC after that fiasco, it was blatantly obvious what was going on. zakryze was kind enough to show a lot of us on irc some convincing blockchain proof. Coming on the heels of the Inputs "hack" it just didn't feel right. |
|
|
|
I find it laughable that you wish to report Havelock to badbitcoin.org like that means something.
The owner of badbitcoin openly supports the XPY/paycoin scam amongst others. The credibility of that site is precisely zero.
Maybe the idea is not worth a separate thread - but yes, of course, we should report havelock to badbitcoin. Not all people know which site is credible and which site has precisely zero credibility It might help some people to decide who is who in this dangerous crypto world. And the level of involvement of havelock in AMHash scam seems bigger than they take the responsibility for it. Btw, did they even apologize for this fiasco to their investors?  I think not.  This is precisely why people need to perform due diligence and research sites they do business with, and not just take the word of any Tom, Dick, and Harry that throws up a slick webpage. While it may be convenient to have a central solution such as badbitcoin, I believe it lures people into a false sense of security. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
