|
I wonder if it would be possible in the XC protocol to punish Xnodes that are on the same IP address (i.e. have a greater probability of running on the same machine).
If there is a choice between 25 Xnodes run on the same machine via VMs and 25 Xnodes that are redundant, spread out and decentralised I think we should be encouraging the latter?
|
|
|
|
Do you mind sharing a bit with me? I only need about 250 more for 1k XC, which would be awesome.
Dude, Mountaingoat, your posts in this thread...such wow. While we are on the subject, I could use another 650,000 XC. Help a XC brother out? Who wants to be a bro and send me 10% of all USD in circulation? I promise to pump XC up with it. |
|
|
|
Synechist said a while back that the trustless mixing is highly similar to "coinshuffle" but predates it. I think Dan had the ideas in place for a while. |
|
|
|
|
You'll need to pick several big winners back to back and re-invest your profits.
If first coin goes x10 then you make 10 btc
Second coin goes x5 then you make 50 btc
Third coin makes x4 then you make 200 BTC
That's risky though re-investing all your profits into one coin. Once you have 10 btc, it's better to spread your bets amongst several promising, cheap coins.
The only coin I ever made >100x return was on Litecoin because I bought it when it was a few cents. The problem is now any coin that is promising is given a high valuation immediately.
Also don't forget the bigger the amount of money you have the harder it is to make a huge gain. You can't put 50 BTC into a coin that has a 200 BTC market cap.
|
|
|
|
Bumping this for any new people trickling into the topic... XC has wildly ambitious designs that go beyond a bullet proof privacy platform. |
|
|
|
Is this system better than DarkCoin (which is not CoinJoin like many people believe)?
Has the DarkCoin mixing algorithm been made open source? |
|
|
|
Seems like the more XC advances the more haters come out of the woodwork. When XC overtakes litecoin gonna be a all out altcoin war.
That happened before with XC and DRK, people just went bat shit insane with FUD. Haha yeah I remember that. I wonder where XC would be now price wise if the DRK FUD hadn't happened. Long term thought it doesn't matter to me, the fundamentals of XC are solid and the tech is growing each week. I honestly believe the price could triple and we would still be undervalued. I'm proud to be an XC holder so early in the project. The privacy platform is just the beginning. |
|
|
|
On the 5th - an official says he is a team member. Which corroborates what I was told on the chat thread until I made this one.
On the 9th - it is told that he has not been a team member since he was taken off the website months ago.
Pardon my skepticism.
Regardless of whether Jasinlee was or wasn't a developer the fact is he isn't on the XC team anymore. OP isn't retarded and knows this - what does this say about the OP and his intentions here, if they are not already obvious. If they lied in their "official announcement" the it matters not what my "intentions" are. A - "He is a team member" (5th) B - "He has not been a team member since he was taken off website (months ago)" (9th) C - Either they lied that he "was" a team member on the 5th. Or they lied that he is no longer a team member. Hence I believe nothing. If others wish to believe/invest in a coin that has officials who lie (& can't even get their stories straight) that is their business. I've changed the topic to Team Member in light of all the requests (contrary to all the shit that's been said about me I try to be honest and I try to figure out the truth and change the OP to reflect that) Or D. Someone on the team made a mistake. It's a highly complex project with a large team of people. Bottom line is the XC lead developer has told you Jasinlee is not on the XC team anymore. Yet you refuse to accept this? The only reason you refuse to accept this simple obvious truth is because it will leave you with nothing to cry about. So you pretend like somehow there is a crazy conspiracy of Jasinee still secretly on the XC team?  You are just pissed you've lost money in something involving Jasinlee and are childishly lashing out at anything you can. I feel pity for you that you're a 28 year old man who is making these embarrassing posts, I assumed it was a 16 year old. |
|
|
|
On the 5th - an official says he is a team member. Which corroborates what I was told on the chat thread until I made this one.
On the 9th - it is told that he has not been a team member since he was taken off the website months ago.
Pardon my skepticism.
Regardless of whether Jasinlee was or wasn't a developer the fact is he isn't on the XC team anymore. OP isn't retarded and knows this - what does this say about the OP and his intentions here, if they are not already obvious. |
|
|
|
|
Regardless of whether Jasinlee was or wasn't a developer the fact is he isn't on the XC team anymore. OP isn't retarded and knows this - what does this say about the OP and his intentions here, if they are not already obvious.
Hence the title is completely incorrect.
To get further into it, the XC team have clarified that Jasinlee didn't contribute a single line of code to XC and Jasinlee received no funds from the XC team. He was potentially going to do work with XC in the future in partnership with Cache, which never came into fruition as it was a long term plan in the distant future.
|
|
|
|
|
Don't forget Dan gets insights into the closed source codebase of many competing coins. Think what he learns from that.
|
|
|
|
|
It seems that Jasin was brought on board with the intention of one day in the future being a developer. But things never progressed to the point where he started working on an XC/CACHE link. It was only ideas and concepts.
And as we can see XC team have responded by removing any link with Jasin.
So what's the damn problem??
Correct me if I'm wrong.
|
|
|
|
Btw, theymos who is the forum admin posted a while back: If you ask someone to leave your topic and they keep posting, they will be banned. PM me in such cases.
If the trolling doesn't stop after the statement has been issued I suggest you bear the above in mind Teka. |
|
|
|
The volume was about 2-300 BTC a day on Poloniex for a few weeks, as was well documented on this forum. To say nobody has made money on it, and quoting an average price is absurd, especially from someone regularly using market terms and speaking about XMR as if it was an exciting investment opportunity.  As you can see from the chart, there has been quite a large gulf between high and low. The volume today is being quoted as $120k (which I believe is about average for the last month). The market cap is quoted as $6,3m, which is quite a bit higher than the $2m it it was valued at in May. http://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/monero/So either people have made a bundle, or the trading has been fake. I agree. OP is plain wrong on that point. Market cap though is determined by coin quantity too which has increased massively since May. Even if price did remain the same, the market cap still would have increased significantly. On the first exchange you could buy/sell XMR on the price was hovering around 10. But the trade volume was low. It's around 40 now. That 4 times increase is a nice gain but pales in comparison to what I have made off other coins that I bought early that went on to be winners. The point OP is trying to make is the coin is fairer than most coins. |
|
|
|
|
This entire subforum is a cesspit of greed, jealousy and hate.
Every coin I have been involved with in recent months (XMR, XC and BC) have all had to withstand substantial FUD and smear campaigns.
|
|
|
|
Arlyn/teka/Dan, can we seriously considered banning these people talking about jxxxxx ? Not even going to mention the name. This is getting really annoying and distracting.
We should have a definitive post somewhere in this topic about the Jasin situation. Any "new" accounts that pop up and spam FUD, first time they post we link them to it, any future posts on the topic - delete. Any existing fudders on the Jasin issue - delete all their posts to do with it. |
|
|
|
rdnkjdi should be banned from posting in here in my opinion. I'd already noticed over the last week that anything he says is just constant negativity. Then just now I noticed his topic here - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=770801.0 where he is encouraging everyone not buy XC and other rubbish. Because Jasinlee has pissed him off in some way he's conducting a smear campaign against XC. Ive read this thread daily since it started. And I can tell you that rdnkdji has never had anything positive to say. He tries to hide his troll with semi legitimate questions every now and then, but don't be fooled, he's pure troll. You hit the nail bang on the head there. |
|
|
|
|
Go home Doge, you are drunk
|
|
|
|
rdnkjdi should be banned from posting in here in my opinion. I'd already noticed over the last week that anything he says is just constant negativity. Then just now I noticed his topic here - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=770801.0 where he is encouraging everyone not buy XC and other rubbish. Because Jasinlee has pissed him off in some way he's conducting a smear campaign against XC. |
|
|
|
People need to stop being dumb and selling.
I am wondering why they are doing that.
i dont agree with you on that one. if you are going to hold until there is a billion dollar market cap you dont need more than 10k xc to see what most of the world would consider tremendous wealth, but if you dont spread out the coins amongst more investors than you will never see the billion dollar market cap to start with. lets be honest about it, an anonymous easy to use communication platform is worth a billion dollars. but unless there are 100 million people using it it is not even worth worth a few million dollars until the idea has been patented and is made marketable, therefore we need to get all of cryptoland involved before this idea is made mainstream outside of XC's control, or xc will just be a speculators toy and dan might as well have just worked for the CIA or google. Gotta agree with you here. Hoping the big push planned with Rev3 will bring this. Anyone know if the huge BTC bounty for cracking the anon is still planned to happen with Rev3? Gotta think that will open eyes and be huge news in the crypto world. It Is indeed 100 BTC  that official??? No it is not official the Bounty is official the amount is suggested by me. I think everyone of the top 100 can donate 1 BTC after the 10-20X increase in price that there will be with Rev3 so we can make the Bounty 100 BTC.. think about the free advertising we will get.. HUGE Good plan. the suggestion of 100 BTC certainly just got my attention and will surely do the same for the rest of cryptoland! I honestly think it's a bit large and the community will struggle to raise those funds. 10 BTC is more than adequate. That's several thousand free dollars if someone can crack it - plenty of incentive. I know the bigger the amount the more attention, i just want to keep expectations realistic before we run away with this 100 BTC idea. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
