Believe it or not but it would actually be better not to become "big" on btce. Notice Litecoin - they are actually trying to move people AWAY from btce and onto a "less anonymous" exchange (because coinbase wont take litecoin until litecoin has big volume on a not-anonymous exchange). Even the litecoin subreddit has taken btce off their siderbar.

HOWEVER.

In terms of the speculative price of Blackcoin it would be amazing and would give us lots of pumps I am sure,

Someone asked the admin in btc-e chat recently and he said "no". Check the trollboxarchive for it.

"A broken clock is right twice a day" 

Once again you can't address anything I say.

I will let the readers judge my comments and decide whether to invest in un-faircoin.

I wonder if we could get a story on coindesk? They seem to accomodate stories about most alt currencies with big followings. We could mention:

1. Broken into the top 10 coins by market capitalisation
2. 10 second transaction times
3. Partnering with coinkite
4. Multipool concept
5. First pure proof of stake coin based on the bitcoin protocol
6 ?

From coindesk.com:

News tips and pitches

You can email any news tips, press releases and stories to us at news@coindesk.com.

if we got a story on there it would be great exposure. Plus we could submit it to reddit and get the Blackcoin army to upvote it on r/cryptocurrency etc

Bro Bitcoin was just an example. If we had distributed Litecoins the last two years based on google analytics the system wouldn't work for hopefully obvious reasons.

I actually have no problem with people owning lots of Faircoin. My issue here is:

1. Calling it faircoin when it's clearly not faircoin.
2. Bashing other coins for not being "fair" despite point number 1.
3. 100% premine and a distribution method which is centralised, requires trust and most likely was massively gamed

Let's call a spade a spade here.

You strengthen my argument by not being able to respond to my points. Thanks

Are you naive? You do realise that a single wallet owned by a single person can contain hundreds of addresses?

If anything that makes it MORE likely that the dev has a shit ton of the coins. Steps:

1. Create a shit ton of accounts
2. Send premined money to each of these accounts
3. Really these accounts all belong to one person but look like they belong to other people

Blackcoin distribution compares extremely well to any other proof of work mined coin which can be mathetically verified independently. It's nonsense comparing that to a method where some dude randomly gives away coins however he wants. You are comparing a method which is decentralised, verifiable, AND CANNOT BE GAMED, vs a method that requires complete trust, is centralised, cannot be verified, can be gamed and in all probability has been gamed.

This is how a real faircoin should be done:

1. ZERO premine
2. Proof of work mining period to distribute the coins fairly
3. No shadiness

That coin already exists and it's called Blackcoin. The true faircoin.

To repeat myself, there is nothing to stop the developer creating a shit ton of accounts and simply assigning himself the coin. That is a fact.

Comparing a google analytics report to proof of work mining is ridiculous.

Why don't we just stop mining Bitcoins on ASICS and just dish out new Bitcoins based on google analytics? lmao.

You're lucky that too many people don't understand the basics of crypto and will just buy any old rubbish. But please do me a favour and stop shouting out from the rooftops about the fairness of Faircoin, the hypocrisy is shocking.

How about stop swearing and try to articulate your side? Is that possible? Obviously not since you can actually argue with what I just said.

Lets compare the two methods:

1. A single person holding all the money and giving it out to people using a method that can be gamed and involves TRUSTING that person

2. People using mathematics (mining) and the blockchain, to distribute the coins out in a way that cannot be gained, which is decentralised and involves zero trust.

The irony is Faircoin is actually the LEAST fair coin out of most of the coins on here. Unfortunately a lot of people just buy coins based on a pump and don't do their research and get burned. Reason: premined coins by the dev NEVER go far in this community. Look at MINT to see what I am talking about, it;s almost identical to Blackcoin and yet it's daily trading volume is pathetically small, and they both launched around the same time. Pre-mined coins get the worst reputation.

How do you know how much the developer owns of Faircoin? He could create a thousand accounts and have assigned him 50% of all Faircoin.

If however he had used proof of work mining to distribute the coins (Blackcoin or almost any other coin) he wouldn't have been able to do this.

Quit the bs?

FAC is 100% premined you noob. Let me spell that out to you, that means the person who created FAC owned every single FAC that ever existed. He then gave it out to people using a method that can't be checked. Compare this with Bitcoin that uses the global consensus of the blockchain that anyone can independently verify and proof of work mining as a way of FAIRLY distributing the coin in a manner which cannot be GAMED.

Fair coin is actually one of the LEAST fair coins out there. We might as well go back to the government printing out money and giving it out to people randomly.

Sweet!

For people who missed it I believe moolah tweeted saying if we hit 50BTC worth of BC trading today they will add us to the full set of features they offer.

Zeta is a troll, as confirmed by reading through his comments. Ignored  

That's because with all of those coins they are mineable by proof of work mining meaning tons of newly mined coins get dumped on the market everyday!

Compare that with Blackcoin! No dumping of GPU mined coins. The coin supply has been 74 million for weeks.

We're number 10 on coinmarketcap.com!

We broke into the top 10! 

Great work guys.

+1.

FAC is 100% premined! Don't compare that trash to Blackcoin.

Buy FAC and make the developer who "gave out" the FAC coins to everyone rich LOL.

I see this as inevitable. It's simply a matter of time.

10 second transactions + partnership with coinkite for point of sale terminals in shops make this a winner.

Then you factor in it's pure proof of stake meaning there won't be millions of dollars of electricity wasted mining everyday and it seems from a marketing perspective Blackcoin is going to kick all manner of butt.

I'll be coming back to quote this when we breeze past DOGE 

12,000 seems a sensible floor. Something I am paying attention to is the 24 hour trading volume at Mintpal. Generally at the height of a Blackcoin pump we touch 1000BTC... sometimes higher. Dumping has also been minimal over the last 6 hours, in terms of no monster dumps of eg 50 BTC worth of Blackcoin in 5 minutes.

Can't wait to see where we get to by the middle of summer.

Everyone can see in the topic that I personally donated $100 worth of coins towards that campaign and I can tell you I am extremely happy with the press release. And I said this when we were still in the 9500 price range. IconicExpert also went way above and beyond what I expected in terms of promoting it here and getting people in the topic excited.

The press release is great for Blackcoin SEO (search engine optimisation). We have a reputable financial website like yahoo finance publishing about Blackcoin. Long term the more high quality sites we can get writing about Blackcoin the better.

Please stop spreading rubbish and FUD in our blackcoin topic. Ultimately it makes no difference though, we've had trolls from back since 2000 satoshis and we've kept climbing