Bitcoin Forum
May 24, 2024, 09:01:07 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 [43] 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 ... 117 »
841  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Bitparking Litecoin Exchange on: August 01, 2012, 12:03:36 PM
Perfect. thanks guys. I will begin using it once again.
842  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: ATTN Litecoin GPU Miners - Scrypt support for cgminer on: August 01, 2012, 11:47:23 AM
...
Would it be possible that when in --SCRYPT mode that the units displayed are 100% in KH/s ? (GPU, Rig Summary/5s/AVG & API output ?)
Or, perhaps have the option to specify in the CMD line using something like [ --units khash] or [--units mhash] ?

As you probably have noticed, there is no space for the Kh/s in the upper row when you are in 1000 range Smiley
Mine shows Kh/s  

You sure about THAT ?



<EDIT>

My API Web App displays whatever it's fed and does so automatically (kh rather than the MH as I showed above)...
(although values are dynamic, units are static in the app and need to be changed....not a big deal)

843  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Bitparking Litecoin Exchange on: August 01, 2012, 11:25:23 AM
I just created an account with Chrome.... seems to work

Have you been able to successfully close your browser, begin a new session and log back in again ?
844  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Bitparking Litecoin Exchange on: August 01, 2012, 11:15:47 AM
I've added cumulative sums to the order list on the main page showing the total of LTC and BTC in the buy and sell orders. It clutters the interface a bit, I'm not sure if it'll stay. Let me know if you think it's useful or not.

I recall a problem with Google Chrome a while back, which is the main reason I was forced to stop using the exchange unfortunately.

I simply couldn't ever log in.....Is this fixed now ?
845  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: ATTN Litecoin GPU Miners - Scrypt support for cgminer on: August 01, 2012, 10:57:25 AM
I seem to be experiencing a problem with the new CGMiner 2.6.1-official that was not affecting 2.5.0.Scrypt_beta_ee

CGMiner now seems to be seeing cards at times as sick and the program crashes. It has happened to each of my miners at least once since I switched from the 'EE' Beta 2.5.0 yesterday, to 2.6.1 Official.

The last beta ('EE') seemed to run fine for multiple days, but I have yet to experience a SOLID 24 hours from 2.6.1-Official.....without a crash.

The 'EE' version, for reference...
win32: http://www.mediafire.com/?0yxa1cf35pk5q2i

Latest Commits included!

You know it's interesting, I'm in the middle of tracking down the cause of this exact issue for someone else. It turns out that the change to avoid flooding pools on longpoll means I limit outgoing connections - this means there is more likely to be a period a GPU is idle while waiting for work. Now what's interesting is that short periods of idle followed by huge bursts of activity again tend to make cards more unstable than running them flat out 100% of the time.  Some testing showed the cards needed to have their clocks decreased quite a lot to be able to tolerate this. So overclocking which was fine before suddenly becomes unstable. I'm experimenting with a feature I call no-idle which gives GPUs fake work to keep them busy to see if this improves stability, but it's still early stages. If you have more stability with the scrypt patched 2.5.0, then by all means go with that for now.

Could this problem simply be a bi-product of the switch to displaying MH/s while SCRYPT mining in 2.6.1 ?

In the 2.5.0 'EE' SCRYPT Beta, CGMiner displayed KH/s exclusively (GPU, Rig Summary/5s/AVG & API).
In 2.6.1, while SCRYPT mining, CGMiner seems to mix the 2 scales using KH/s for individual GPUs and then MH/s for Rig Summary/5s/AVG & API output.

Isn't this item the most significant difference that has changed from 2.5.0beta to 2.6.1official ? (for SCRYPT mining anyway).

Could the 'sickness' simply be a low value output in MH/s, causing CGMiner to panic ?

Would it be possible that when in --SCRYPT mode that the units displayed are 100% in KH/s ? (GPU, Rig Summary/5s/AVG & API output ?)
Or, perhaps have the option to specify in the CMD line using something like [ --units khash] or [--units mhash] ?

...Just a thought.
thanks again,
bitlane.


846  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: ATTN Litecoin GPU Miners - Scrypt support for cgminer on: August 01, 2012, 08:50:35 AM
I seem to be experiencing a problem with the new CGMiner 2.6.1-official that was not affecting 2.5.0.Scrypt_beta_ee

CGMiner now seems to be seeing cards at times as sick and the program crashes. It has happened to each of my miners at least once since I switched from the 'EE' Beta 2.5.0 yesterday, to 2.6.1 Official.

The last beta ('EE') seemed to run fine for multiple days, but I have yet to experience a SOLID 24 hours from 2.6.1-Official.....without a crash.

The 'EE' version, for reference...
win32: http://www.mediafire.com/?0yxa1cf35pk5q2i

Latest Commits included!
847  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Repost : A Message to the Litecoin Group From Danny Maddox in San Francisco on: July 31, 2012, 09:27:52 PM
It looks like after an oddly 'in-common' 3 day rest period (away from this forum) BOTH DannyMaddox as well as BitcoinEXpress managed to make their ways back here to check up on us all.

What you may first notice is, after being informed of the ODD times for a 'family Man' to be online, especially considering both users were always online as well as away at the same time (as the users were made aware of a few times...lol), the screenshot below shows their returns to be approx 10 hours apart...a very nice attempt to show us that they are not the same person...



Although the BitcoinEXpress account never managed to get any new posts, comments or rebuttals up, it was odd to see the DannyMaddox account attempt to get it's original post deleted. That same post is the reason I am continuing this inquiry, as it contained some very disturbing information and I along with many others here are interested in getting to the bottom of things, especially the claims that were made in regards to a BOMB THREAT and CHILD WELLFARE ENDANGERMENT.
Together we can all help to ensure that the user(s) responsible for both the Bomb threat as well as the threat against Mr.Maddox's daughter will not go un noticed.

Sadly that post was deleted. Thankfully there was a complete second thread that quoted the post 100% and I will again quote it here for posterity.



I apologize in advance for such a long post but I think it will explain a few things. I would have posted in your main forum but I discovered I am limited to posting only here in the novice section.


On Thursday morning I started getting bombarded with lots of Facebook messages and friend request from a quite a few people that I didn't know. Like most people would do I ran an antivirus software scan thinking I had an FB virus or something. The next day I received three very strange rambling calls at my place of work and on the fourth time what sounded like a middle aged man made some statement about messing with people's money and that I probably shouldn't  start my car from too close a distance. After the previous third call I activated our system's record function and the entire fourth call was captured. The SF police upon hearing the playback dispatched a bomb squad and determined the call to be a hoax after spending an hour examining my car, nonetheless a Felony Terroristic Threat charge is being investigated.  All the detectives will tell me is that the phone number was positively identified to a person in another state and they are moving forward with charges via the FBI. That same person apparently acquired what they thought was my cell phone number but reached my 11 year old daughter instead. The things he said to her are beyond deviant especially when said to an 11 year old. A different police jurisdiction is handling that issue but it appears to be the same individual.

Earlier this morning Friday I accepted a friend request from one of the many received  since Thursday and the person explained to me what was going on, pointed me to this forum and I have spent most of the day trying to grasp what a cryptocurrency program is and catching up on the history of this. After doing a little digging on the persona known here as BCX or Bitcoin Express and claiming to be a woman named Kaley Wu I possibly can shed a little light on this and hopefully convince you people that you have the wrong person and will voluntarily stop terrorizing me, my family and quit harassing my co-workers.  My name is Dan Maddox, I am from San Francisco and I have two children, an 11 year old daughter whose mother died when she was 1 year old from an aggressive form Hodgkin’s  Lymphoma and 3 year old son with my current wife.

Ten years ago before we were married my current wife, an Asian woman was stalked to the extremes by a guy she never met but had corresponded with a few times via email when she still lived in the Philippines. After this guy completely turned bizarre in his emails my wife stopped responding to him and he didn't take well to it. He sent more than 100 unanswered emails, but eventually he stopped. She didn't hear from him at all for almost two years till she started corresponding with me as apparently he was monitoring her emails because he had her password. This guy cyber terrorized us both after we were married  from early 2005 to mid 2009. His name name is Paul Holcomb and he is from Punta Gorda, Florida originally. I have no idea where he lives now. This guy is a highly skilled network and security engineer so faking IP's, VPN and cracking security isn't an issue for him. He has a fixation with Asian women and has setup numerous Asian women profiles in the past to harass us. He has numerous times cracked our emails, Facebook and many other online accounts.

Mr. Holcomb's preferred method of terrorization is using the internet as a weapon. In 2009 only after legal action against his hosting provider was I able to get a blog taken down that was being penned in my wife's name and persona. Just like here on Bitcointalk Forum, it was a drawn out personal war against a passionate group of people that drew a retaliatory response in a very big way. He set everything up in mine and her name so it could be tracked back to us. This person has also posted on numerous anti-semantic and hate group boards as me and has triggered retaliatory responses from other groups in the past. It is happening again. In all cases above the police are unable to conclusively tie anything concrete to him so nothing ever happens. He was arrested in Los Angeles in 2009 but never charged.

Kaley Wu is a fake persona.  Kaley Wu has mimicked my educational history as I did attend Baylor earning a Business Degree and an MBA in Marketing from Stanford.  I am an Online Marketer, Adwords Specialist and I know squat about programming. I don't have the expertise to engage in crypto anything much less your program here.

This person as Kaley Wu has tried numerous times over the past year to get me to accept a friend request and I still had one pending, so I accepted it which allowed me to look around their account. I was able to see and screen shot this person's whole account. It is entirely mind boggling to the level this person has created a fake account with more than 80 friends that are indeed real people and seem to interact with her from time to time. Close examination of the wall history shows that no one knows her too well but chats with her quite often about the kind of things you would in a public social setting with nothing really too personal. I spent a lot of the day looking up all 85 of "her" friends and found 3 that I could tie back to this forum definitely and three others possibly. I will be contacting the three I identified via the private message function of this forum.

As someone who has an analytical eye and an outsider looking in, I am amazed that people as smart as you all are were so fooled by this person. Kaley Wu claims to have been one of the earliest coin miners but only registered on this forum in June 2011. Internet research easily shows bitcoins and mining have been around since 2009. Why a first time appearance in 2011 on the main forum? I spent all day literally, the last 14 hours of my life sifting through this trying to understand it all. None of it makes sense as to why this person is a pseudo celebrity here. Since Mr. Holcomb is indeed a highly skilled technical person I do believe that he has an interest in this, but when the relationship turned combative, he stoked it to the explosion point so he could further use it to harass me and my family. Paul Holcomb might have attacked your coins, but Kaley Wu sure as heck didn't. I have no idea where the several photos of the very pretty woman in her FB came from but I doubt her name is Kaley Wu. I certainly don't think this girl even knows about it.

I am asking you people to please stop terrorizing me and my family. One person is definitely going to jail. I can assure you that when a major city's police department responds with a bomb squad they're not going to drop it. When someone calls an 11 year old girl sitting in a public school summer program and threatens to rape her in the most violent way possible because supposedly her father was messing up there online program and the teacher listened in, that isn't going to be dropped either.

Of the three I have positively identified from Kaley Wu's Facebook, one of you lives in Miami and works for a Twitter Vendor, One of you works as an IT Sys Admin in Los Angeles and one of you works for Google. Two of the three possible identified lives in Melbourne, Austraila and one in Phoenix, Arizona.

Personally I would like for this to end right here. Please remove my personal information from the forum and quit harassing me, I did nothing to you. As a professional marketing executive with an MBA and a person that has quite a successful history with startups and major online companies I can assure you that this type of behavior being so well documented and Google indexed in a publicly accessible forum is powerfully devastating to your startup venture and will make serious investors run. Please don’t allow Mr. Holcomb to damage your program any further by tricking what I think is a good group of people into making silly mistakes in the heat of passion. Your anger is wrongfully misdirected and causing real world pain to innocent people.

I suspect since Mr. Holcomb's game has now been played and he has been exposed both to me and the community here, he will simply evaporate. That is his usual modus operandi. Once again I ask that this community here on the Bitcointalk Forum please leave and my family alone.

Sincerely,
Dan Maddox
San Francisco, California
daniel.maddox560@gmail.com


So, with this information now here again for all to continue reading, I would ask that the members of the community please help in the tracking down of.... and possible apprehension of, the person(s) responsible for these blatant and malicious attacks on and against Mr.Maddox and his family.

If we all band together, we can and will make a difference.

Show your support today.
848  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: ATTN Litecoin GPU Miners - Scrypt support for cgminer on: July 31, 2012, 09:05:43 PM
solo mining : No suitable long-pool found for pool http://192.168.0.100:9332

¤¿¤

Another way to take advantage of CGMiner's MANY features is to add multiple pools, or even a single secondary pool when solo mining, as CGMiner will take it's Long Polling queue from a backup pool in your config and apply it to solo mining from BitcoinD.

...just a thought, not that it really matters for solo mining though.
849  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Statement about the suspect of recent Bitcoinica hack on: July 31, 2012, 08:25:09 PM
If ZouhTong is not a real person...WHO did Matthew from Bitcoin Magazine interview in that Video for Bitcoinica ?

http://bitcoinmagazine.net/10-questions-with-zhou-tong/

WTF ?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=43861.0

http://bittalk.tv/?p=105
850  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Bitparking Litecoin Exchange on: July 31, 2012, 03:49:35 PM
Very nice. Another LTC exchange can definitively help.
851  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] Litecoin - a lite version of Bitcoin. Launched! on: July 31, 2012, 02:33:31 PM
Is there any way to query the API for transaction categories ? ($bitcoin->listtransactions->category)

I want to display an array of either IMMATURE or GENERATE blocks in my WebMonitor App from Solo Mining and I have literally exhausted EVERY option that I can think of, only to fail.

I have been over the Bitcoin API Docs from top to bottom...and unless I missed something, I simply can NOT find anything that will work, as I have tried everything.

Any ideas ?

Anyone ?
852  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] Litecoin - a lite version of Bitcoin. Launched! on: July 30, 2012, 11:45:13 PM
Is there any way to query the API for transaction categories ? ($bitcoin->listtransactions->category)

I want to display an array of either IMMATURE or GENERATE blocks in my WebMonitor App from Solo Mining and I have literally exhausted EVERY option that I can think of, only to fail.

I have been over the Bitcoin API Docs from top to bottom...and unless I missed something, I simply can NOT find anything that will work, as I have tried everything.

Any ideas ?
853  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: ATTN Litecoin GPU Miners - Scrypt support for cgminer on: July 30, 2012, 11:38:56 PM
I am extremely happy with the auto-tune.

With only having to specify --shaders/Intensity and having the rest done seems to have each of my cards running at their best.

It's also nice to be running CGMiner again, as Reaper was a pile o'crap in comparison. I never realized how much garbage I was submitting when solo mining.
My luck has greatly improved now, as the blocks are rollin' in even better than before.

Thanks Con. Great Job.
You're most welcome. I wish I could have made it better at getting the settings right itself, but the nature of the tuning with different GPUs, different system RAM and different OSs just doesn't lend itself to anything meaningful. I'm very aware of how much grief this will give us all on the forums as new people try litecoin mining and ask the same questions and run into the same problems over and over, which is why I wrote a fairly extensive readme to get them started. However I know hardly anyone reads documentation...

Well, I am running 5770s, 5830s, a lone 6950 and a bunch of 7970s and can summarize by saying that although the few lower end cards may be just-on-par, or perhaps slightly under... the 6 & 7xxx series cards MORE than make up for them.

Again, thanks.
854  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Repost : A Message to the Litecoin Group From Danny Maddox in San Francisco on: July 30, 2012, 11:35:30 PM
I guess at this point, it's safe to conclude that this will NEVER be resolved.

With both DannyMaddox as well as BitcoinEXpress having left the forum a couple days ago (both on the 28th) and have still not returned, I think we can safely assume that all of our suspicions were justified in simply assuming they were in fact THE SAME PERSON.

I have however become aware of a new BitcoinEXpress 'character' in that of a new member that I had the pleasure of reading posts from in the BTC-e chatbox.

It's comforting to know that even though BitcoinEXpress is gone, the masterfailedmind itself is not lost.
855  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: ATTN Litecoin GPU Miners - Scrypt support for cgminer on: July 30, 2012, 11:28:51 PM
I am extremely happy with the auto-tune.

With only having to specify --shaders/Intensity and having the rest done seems to have each of my cards running at their best.

It's also nice to be running CGMiner again, as Reaper was a pile o'crap in comparison. I never realized how much garbage I was submitting when solo mining.
My luck has greatly improved now, as the blocks are rollin' in even better than before.

Thanks Con. Great Job.
856  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: [POLL] Should BCX get banned on: July 29, 2012, 09:24:28 AM
God, BCX might step up to the next level of BS claiming he's Satoshi next.

Well, he did tell me that "I would shit myself if I knew who he REALLY was" ....so perhaps he IS Satoshi, along with the other 6 personalities.
857  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: BitcoinEXpress is a scammer on: July 29, 2012, 08:50:51 AM
If one person of medicore means could destroy the Litecoin blockchain, you didn't actually have an investment. You were just speculating you would have a chair when the music stopped.

As it turns out, Litecoin is not so vulnerable as you have been claiming. Perhaps if you understood better what you purchased, you would not have panicked.

Isn't it also fair to remember that when the proposed attacker publicly informs all of the newbie users of his intentions and what the resulting outcome could be, along with advice to MOVE/SELL whatever coins that they are not interested in loosing........ is it really the new user's fault's in the end ?

Of course, this is all alleged and hypothetical, as these threats may or may not have been made from either an imaginary person, a hacked account, or a lunatic.
858  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: [POLL] Should BCX get a SCAMMER tag? on: July 29, 2012, 08:46:41 AM
Gentlemen. I am a firm believer in the fact that you are clearly underestimating his ability to activate one of his other personalities.

Sure, you can BAN BitcoinEXpress.....but what about DannyMaddox, Laney and Kaylee Wu ?

....Calgon, take me away.....
859  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: [POLL] Should BCX get banned on: July 29, 2012, 08:44:20 AM
Is it humanly possible to have credibility as a negative number?

BCX credibility = -50

I think it's a direct relationship based on your REAL IDENTITY.....but varies inversely with the amount of imaginary people one might have living inside their head.
It has also been said that sexual ambiguity is known to have a negative impact on the results as well.
860  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Who is your favorite Litecoin Super Villian so far? on: July 29, 2012, 04:56:13 AM
Could BitcoinEXpress more accurately be considered THE SUPER VILLAIN due to allegedly being responsible for bringing up to 6 separate personalities to life ?......then claiming that I, myself, was at least 3 of them...all in an effort to undermine him/her as part of MY master manipulator plans ?
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 [43] 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 ... 117 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!