Welcome to my ignore list.
Damn, some assholes can totally ruin a topic!!!
Goes into my ignore list too. Spammer shithead. |
|
|
|
They're not using a single address. They're using different address for each user. The address assigned to me was different from what you've mentioned. And BTW, I don't have a LBC account, still I received the spam. |
|
|
|
|
I don't have localbitcoins account but I still received the phishing email. The deposit address is different from OP (not ending with 'ievD'), so they're sending different deposit addresses to everyone.
I've received some other phishing BTC investment scam emails in past too. Not sure how they got my email address.
|
|
|
|
|
Received the refund on Bittrex. However I see that we're planning to move further although we didn't raise the minimum.
But wouldn't it be easier to move forward with whatever BTC was raised, instead of returning all the investment and moving forward with zero funds?
|
|
|
|
Bytecoin Updates to 1.0.7.1, Enhances Network StabilityToday Bytecoin has been updated to v.1.0.7.1. This release is mainly devoted to enhanced network stability and simplewallet improvements. There have been several reports on Bytecoin Wallet not being able to sync after the latest release. Today's update resolves any issue that could arise. We urge you to update your daemons and Wallets to the most recent version.Apart from the mentioned improvements, today's release also defines the internal Fusion Manager interface which will be responsible for fusion transactions. The latter is the special type of zero fee transactions designed for optimizing users wallets. In layman terms, the process will be similar to changing a number of coins into a smaller number of larger banknotes. It will decrease the size of the ordinary transactions, allowing greater flexibility and higher anonymity level. Fusion transactions are scheduled for release v.1.0.8, which is coming out next week. The wallet on the website for download is still v1.0.6.1. What's up with v1.0.7.1 ? |
|
|
|
Can anyone tell me where is the wallet.dat located for the Neos wallet? I don't think its in the normal %appdata% location, any help appreciated  I think its easier to pull the wallet.dat file and install a new wallet on another computer and put the wallet.dat file back. I just need to access the Neos in the wallet so I can transfer it to the exchange. Many thanks It should be there as usual: C:\Users\ username\AppData\Roaming\Neos-2.1\neos-data (assuming you're on v2.1) Normally the "appdata" folder is hidden by default in Windows, so just make sure it's visible. |
|
|
|
|
It's good to see that people are finally taking the legal route.
This forum is full of thread from people having multiple issues with iGot related to KYC verification, withdrawals and deposits. iGot is probably sitting on millions from such customers, disallowing them to withdraw the funds for one or other reasons.
|
|
|
|
....I dont know what to do, i was searched their numbers, I cant find any number to contact them...
They deliberately don't give you an easier way to contact them. They don't WANT you to contact them. The only way to ask support is to submit a ticket. Lessons learnt: Stay away from iGot. |
|
|
|
No one staking.
i'm staking, but need 1 more confirm to release already staked coins.
I am also staking (last time I checked was on 12th). Just fired up the wallet again, mostly synced (2 hours of blocks left). Then it will start staking again I hope. |
|
|
|
|
This is interesting.
Following.
|
|
|
|
|
I just noticed this today when I didn't receive a notification to a transaction on one of my addresses.
Sad to see it go.
OP, can you let us know why the service was shut down if that's OK with you? If you don't want to, that's fine. It's totally your call.
|
|
|
|
Finally, *panting* counting and setting the payment amount for both signature campaigns done. Avatar campaign to go... While I don't support the idea of them leaving the forum and campaigns, I hope it was a well-thought decision.
I have been part of many signature campaigns but DaDice has been the best I've been in. Thanks for that!
Though the campaign is over, I will still keep wearing the signature.
lol, it is fine. You don't need to wear the sig. Thanks  I know. I don't need to, but I want to! |
|
|
|
|
While I don't support the idea of them leaving the forum and campaigns, I hope it was a well-thought decision.
I have been part of many signature campaigns but DaDice has been the best I've been in. Thanks for that!
Though the campaign is over, I will still keep wearing the signature.
|
|
|
|
Turquoise Ice, Lake Baikal, Russia 
|
|
|
|
Coblee has the answer, an elegant and simple fix... "CT: Can you explain why Litecoin is ‘immune’ to the spam attack? CL: The fix implemented in Litecoin is just to charge the sender a fee for each tiny output he creates. For example, in this specific attack, the sender is charged one fee for sending to 34 tiny outputs of 0.00001 BTC. With the fix, that fee would be 34 times as much. So it would cost the attacker a lot more to perform the spam attack. The concept is fairly simple: the sender should pay for each tiny output he/she creates." This simple fix should really work in my opinion. Let people pay for each and every output they create, no matter how tiny the output amount is. This is a sure-shot way of making sure it doesn't come cheap to spam the network. And since the tiny outputs will be accompanied by sizable fees, miners too will have a reason to process such transactions without putting unnecessary delays on them. |
|
|
|
....
They were all drained, so, I know it was from this computer or from a backup of this wallet.
....
You mentioned wallet backups. How many backups did you make and where did you store them? You know where I'm heading: If you stored the wallet backups away from your computer (cloud storage, email drafts etc.), there is a possibility that someone got access to your wallet and used it to transfer funds. In that case they don't necessarily have to gain access to your computer. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
