[2020-09-15 15:10:50] Console window quick edit disabled
[2020-09-15 15:10:50] Miner version: 0.5.1
[2020-09-15 15:10:50] Windows version: 10.0 build 14393
[2020-09-15 15:10:50] Service WinRing0_1_2_0 running
[2020-09-15 15:10:50] MSR tweaking enabled
[2020-09-15 15:10:50] CPU0 : AMD Ryzen 5 3600 6-Core Processor [L3:32768 KB][L2:3072 KB][L1:192 KB] | Family 23 Model 113 Stepping 0 |
[2020-09-15 15:10:50] Algorithm/s: randomepic+yescryptr16 [0.85%]+[0.85%]
[2020-09-15 15:10:50] Gpu mining: disabled
[2020-09-15 15:10:50] Cpu mining: enabled
[2020-09-15 15:10:50] Huge-pages: enabled
[2020-09-15 15:10:50] HW-Aes: available
[2020-09-15 15:10:50] Starting init of worker threads
[2020-09-15 15:10:51] Worker thread0 : CPU [1]
[2020-09-15 15:10:51] Worker thread1 : CPU [1]
[2020-09-15 15:10:51] Worker thread2 : CPU [1]
[2020-09-15 15:10:51] Worker thread3 : CPU [1]
[2020-09-15 15:10:51] Worker thread4 : CPU [1]
[2020-09-15 15:10:51] Worker thread5 : CPU [1]
[2020-09-15 15:10:51] Worker thread6 : CPU [1]
[2020-09-15 15:10:51] Worker thread7 : CPU [1]
[2020-09-15 15:10:51] Worker thread8 : CPU [1]
[2020-09-15 15:10:51] Worker thread9 : CPU [1]
[2020-09-15 15:10:51] Worker thread10 : CPU [1]
[2020-09-15 15:10:51] Worker thread11 : CPU [1]
[2020-09-15 15:10:51] Worker thread12 : CPU [1]
[2020-09-15 15:10:51] Worker thread13 : CPU [1]
[2020-09-15 15:10:51] Worker thread14 : CPU [1]
[2020-09-15 15:10:51] Worker thread15 : CPU [1]
[2020-09-15 15:10:51] Worker thread16 : CPU [1]
[2020-09-15 15:10:51] Worker thread17 : CPU [1]
[2020-09-15 15:10:51] Worker thread18 : CPU [1]
[2020-09-15 15:10:51] Worker thread19 : CPU [1]
[2020-09-15 15:10:51] Finished init of worker threads
[2020-09-15 15:10:51] 6 CPU core/s - 12 threads detected
[2020-09-15 15:10:51] Using 10|10 thread/s for CPU mining
[2020-09-15 15:10:51] Node 0 total memory: 6794 MB
[2020-09-15 15:10:51] CPU extensions detected : AVX2|AVX|SSE42|SSE2|AES|SHA|BMI2
[2020-09-15 15:10:51] Thread 0 MSR values set
[2020-09-15 15:10:51] Thread 1 MSR values set
[2020-09-15 15:10:51] Thread 2 MSR values set
[2020-09-15 15:10:51] Thread 3 MSR values set
[2020-09-15 15:10:51] Thread 4 MSR values set
[2020-09-15 15:10:51] Thread 5 MSR values set
[2020-09-15 15:10:51] Thread 6 MSR values set
[2020-09-15 15:10:51] Thread 7 MSR values set
[2020-09-15 15:10:51] Thread 8 MSR values set
[2020-09-15 15:10:51] Thread 9 MSR values set
[2020-09-15 15:10:51] Thread 10 MSR values set
[2020-09-15 15:10:51] Thread 11 MSR values set SRBMiner-MULTI.exe --multi-algorithm-job-mode 3 --disable-gpu --algorithm randomepic;yescryptr16 --pool epic.icemining.ca:4000;stratum-eu.rplant.xyz:7057 --wallet **************;*********************************** --cpu-threads 10;10 --password ****;****** --retry-time 5 --extended-log --log-file srbminer.log And there found the failure. Your cpu has 12 threads and you are try to use 20 threads. Not possible. change cpu-threads in 6;6 or 5;5 or lower. This is not a dualminer or something similar. You cannot mine 2 different algos on 1 core. you can mine 2 different algos on 2 different cpu cores. |
|
|
|
Ok, miner just stop to generate shares without any errors, but continue to load processor (randomepic+yescryptr16). Last few minits from log: [2020-09-15 14:24:23] json_send[0][246]: {"id":"685","jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"submit","params":{"height":607320,"job_id":0,"nonce":13263913708700985062,"pow":{"RandomX":[0,0,27,171,139,116,36,168,81,229,254,155,162,251,58,209,172,123,196,85,152,131,215,205,9,30,255,103,29,170,72,92]}}}
[2020-09-15 14:24:24] json_receive[0][73]: {"id":"685","jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"submit","result":"ok","error":null}
[2020-09-15 14:24:24] CPU result accepted [393ms][0]
[2020-09-15 14:24:29] json_receive[1][636]: {"id":null,"method":"mining.notify","params":["d278","e76f08ddb592438c1d4d8ba00641ed5124ce2c4494c5fb637429f764a46d716c","01000000010000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000ffffffff4d02af62046fa4605f08fabe6d6d00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000100000000000000","0f706f6f6c2e72706c616e742e78797a00000000020000000000000000266a24aa21a9edd569dece71b510717aa44fef8d1b2cac74e4e20d24feaf541e81ceb72004301680cc0003000000001976a91488d5378e77ed4b8c0d9c1ccf2ccfcdebfe49497288ac00000000",["51cbd87429ba1559314e547a5878dd8449e1784696d5ee76239cfae4832b0187"],"20000000","1d0b6df7","5f60a46f",true]}
[2020-09-15 14:24:29] New job received [d278], block height 25263[1]
[2020-09-15 14:24:36] json_receive[0][977]: {"id":"Stratum","jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"job","params":{"algorithm":"randomx","block_difficulty":[["cuckoo",925173],["randomx",402405965],["progpow",1141197364249]],"difficulty":[["cuckoo",4],["randomx",240000],["progpow",1000000000]],"epochs":[[607060,608060,[189,249,241,239,124,69,63,137,6,70,101,111,111,105,48,107,89,145,41,190,155,76,30,247,211,142,31,43,92,3,63,89]]],"height":607320,"job_id":1,"pre_pow":"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","xn":"b812"}}
[2020-09-15 14:24:36] New job received [1], block height 607320[0]
[2020-09-15 14:24:37] [0][randomepic]
[2020-09-15 14:24:37] CPU: 6043.80 H/s
[2020-09-15 14:24:37] Total: 6043.80 H/s
[2020-09-15 14:24:37] [1][yescryptr16]
[2020-09-15 14:24:37] CPU: 0.00 H/s
[2020-09-15 14:24:37] Total: 0.00 H/s
[2020-09-15 14:25:01] json_receive[0][977]: {"id":"Stratum","jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"job","params":{"algorithm":"progpow","block_difficulty":[["cuckoo",925173],["randomx",406299384],["progpow",1141197364249]],"difficulty":[["cuckoo",4],["randomx",240000],["progpow",1000000000]],"epochs":[[607060,608060,[189,249,241,239,124,69,63,137,6,70,101,111,111,105,48,107,89,145,41,190,155,76,30,247,211,142,31,43,92,3,63,89]]],"height":607321,"job_id":0,"pre_pow":"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","xn":"b812"}}
[2020-09-15 14:25:01] New job ignored [0], block height 607321[0]
[2020-09-15 14:25:01] Redirecting jobs from algorithm 1 to algorithm 0 workers
[2020-09-15 14:25:22] json_receive[0][977]: {"id":"Stratum","jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"job","params":{"algorithm":"randomx","block_difficulty":[["cuckoo",925173],["randomx",406299384],["progpow",1134306013231]],"difficulty":[["cuckoo",4],["randomx",240000],["progpow",1000000000]],"epochs":[[607060,608060,[189,249,241,239,124,69,63,137,6,70,101,111,111,105,48,107,89,145,41,190,155,76,30,247,211,142,31,43,92,3,63,89]]],"height":607322,"job_id":0,"pre_pow":"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","xn":"b812"}}
[2020-09-15 14:25:22] Allocated 2048 kB in large-page memory[0]
[2020-09-15 14:25:22] Allocated 2048 kB in large-page memory[0]
[2020-09-15 14:25:22] Allocated 2048 kB in large-page memory[0]
[2020-09-15 14:25:22] New job received [0], block height 607322[0]
[2020-09-15 14:25:22] Allocated scratchpad [CPU worker 9][H]
[2020-09-15 14:25:22] Allocated scratchpad [CPU worker 3][H]
[2020-09-15 14:25:22] Allocated scratchpad [CPU worker 8][H]
[2020-09-15 14:25:22] VM created [CPU worker 9]
[2020-09-15 14:25:22] VM created [CPU worker 8]
[2020-09-15 14:25:22] VM created [CPU worker 3]
[2020-09-15 14:25:22] Allocated 2048 kB in large-page memory[0]
[2020-09-15 14:25:22] Allocated scratchpad [CPU worker 0][H]
[2020-09-15 14:25:22] Allocated 2048 kB in large-page memory[0]
[2020-09-15 14:25:22] VM created [CPU worker 0]
[2020-09-15 14:25:22] Allocated scratchpad [CPU worker 2][H]
[2020-09-15 14:25:22] VM created [CPU worker 2]
[2020-09-15 14:25:22] Allocated 2048 kB in large-page memory[0]
[2020-09-15 14:25:22] Allocated scratchpad [CPU worker 1][H]
[2020-09-15 14:25:22] Allocated 2048 kB in large-page memory[0]
[2020-09-15 14:25:22] Allocated scratchpad [CPU worker 7][H]
[2020-09-15 14:25:22] VM created [CPU worker 1]
[2020-09-15 14:25:22] VM created [CPU worker 7]
[2020-09-15 14:25:22] Allocated 2048 kB in large-page memory[0]
[2020-09-15 14:25:22] Allocated scratchpad [CPU worker 6][H]
[2020-09-15 14:25:22] VM created [CPU worker 6]
[2020-09-15 14:25:22] Allocated 2048 kB in large-page memory[0]
[2020-09-15 14:25:22] Allocated scratchpad [CPU worker 4][H]
[2020-09-15 14:25:22] Allocated 2048 kB in large-page memory[0]
[2020-09-15 14:25:22] VM created [CPU worker 4]
[2020-09-15 14:25:22] Allocated scratchpad [CPU worker 5][H]
[2020-09-15 14:25:22] VM created [CPU worker 5]
[2020-09-15 14:25:24] json_receive[1][636]: {"id":null,"method":"mining.notify","params":["d279","e76f08ddb592438c1d4d8ba00641ed5124ce2c4494c5fb637429f764a46d716c","01000000010000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000ffffffff4d02af6204a6a4605f08fabe6d6d00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000100000000000000","0f706f6f6c2e72706c616e742e78797a00000000020000000000000000266a24aa21a9edd569dece71b510717aa44fef8d1b2cac74e4e20d24feaf541e81ceb72004301680cc0003000000001976a91488d5378e77ed4b8c0d9c1ccf2ccfcdebfe49497288ac00000000",["51cbd87429ba1559314e547a5878dd8449e1784696d5ee76239cfae4832b0187"],"20000000","1d0b6df7","5f60a4a6",true]}
[2020-09-15 14:25:24] New job received [d279], block height 25263[1]
[2020-09-15 14:25:36] json_receive[0][977]: {"id":"Stratum","jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"job","params":{"algorithm":"randomx","block_difficulty":[["cuckoo",925173],["randomx",405146916],["progpow",1134306013231]],"difficulty":[["cuckoo",4],["randomx",240000],["progpow",1000000000]],"epochs":[[607060,608060,[189,249,241,239,124,69,63,137,6,70,101,111,111,105,48,107,89,145,41,190,155,76,30,247,211,142,31,43,92,3,63,89]]],"height":607323,"job_id":0,"pre_pow":"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","xn":"b812"}}
Post your config or commandline!!!! I see 4 algoīs in your log. For me it looks like he use all cores on all algoīs. |
|
|
|
Another useless video from vosk  Video Title: Are the Nvidia 3000 Series the BEST GPUs for MINING EVER?! RTX 3070, 3080, and 3090 HASHRATES And then? You talk about some leaks or expected hashrates from other sites. Why you donīt do your own research? How much time you spend on producing this video? 16min? |
|
|
|
Hey Sxemini Hey Lolliedieb The issue I'm having is that with the current Awesome Miner setup, EQUI144_5, ZEL, and EQUI192_7 do not get the --pers parameter added to the generated comandline.
Not sure here, too what happens in AM, but there are two ways of using this algos. Either --algo or --coin. If you still can use --coin you can use --coin ZEL to configure ZelHash + right personalization and --coin AUTO144_5 for --algo EQUI144_5 with --pers AUTO (aka pool selection). If --pers is not passed forwards that seems to be an issue with awesome miner / a bit too tight template / not giving the opportunity to add custom parameters outside of their template. If so that will be interesting for the next algos I am adding, because they will add quite a lot custom params  Not mentioning yet which it will be  I tried using --pers AUTO, at the comandline, but lolMiner returns the following error... Error: Personalization string (--pers) need to have 8 characters. Ok, just thought I'd try something stupid, and added four underscores in front of the AUTO argument, and it worked - although with 100% rejection rate. Have fun! =8^) Is this only a profitswitching problem? Because i have no problems mining 192_7, 144_5 or beamhashIII with lolminer You must set the --pers string in the pool config.
In the Properties of your Pool in Awesome Miner, where you specify URL and worker name, you will also find the field "Personalization string". If you fill in "BgoldPoW" here, Awesome Miner will add "--pers BgoldPoW" when you start lolMiner.
If this doesn't work, can you please send me a few screenshots? Thanks!
Yes patrike this is working. Whilst adding the personalization string to custom pools is easy enough, (and works fine), I haven't found a satisfactory way of adding it to the default preset profit switching pools. So, the question is, "How do I add the correct personalization strings to the preset profit switching pools?" Also, see my previous reply to Patrike, where I describe a problem that occurs when I try using the preset pools in conjunction with my custom pools. Have fun! =8^) Go to online services and looking for your pool,click edit and add the pers string ^^ |
|
|
|
Hey Lolliedieb The issue I'm having is that with the current Awesome Miner setup, EQUI144_5, ZEL, and EQUI192_7 do not get the --pers parameter added to the generated comandline.
Not sure here, too what happens in AM, but there are two ways of using this algos. Either --algo or --coin. If you still can use --coin you can use --coin ZEL to configure ZelHash + right personalization and --coin AUTO144_5 for --algo EQUI144_5 with --pers AUTO (aka pool selection). If --pers is not passed forwards that seems to be an issue with awesome miner / a bit too tight template / not giving the opportunity to add custom parameters outside of their template. If so that will be interesting for the next algos I am adding, because they will add quite a lot custom params Not mentioning yet which it will be I tried using --pers AUTO, at the comandline, but lolMiner returns the following error... Error: Personalization string (--pers) need to have 8 characters. Ok, just thought I'd try something stupid, and added four underscores in front of the AUTO argument, and it worked - although with 100% rejection rate. Have fun! =8^) Is this only a profitswitching problem? Because i have no problems mining 192_7, 144_5 or beamhashIII with lolminer You must set the --pers string in the pool config.
In the Properties of your Pool in Awesome Miner, where you specify URL and worker name, you will also find the field "Personalization string". If you fill in "BgoldPoW" here, Awesome Miner will add "--pers BgoldPoW" when you start lolMiner.
If this doesn't work, can you please send me a few screenshots? Thanks!
Yes patrike this is working. |
|
|
|
iam newbie about mining and started to build a rig, i wanna buy some sapphire cards and iam little confused is it worth to give an extra 35 $ for Sapphire Pulse Amd Radeon RX 580 8G OC 256 Bit GDDR5 11265-05-20G
or does is it make sense to buy Sapphire Pulse AMD Radeon RX570 8GB 256Bit GDDR5 Lite 11266-75-20G
what i see is the clock speed s about rx 580 pulse is 100 mhz higher than rx 570 pulse ,how much difference does is it make in hashrates ,
, whats the real deal about this cards ,can anybody help who know about this cards ... thanks
Makes no difference in eth mining.Take the RX 570 |
|
|
|
I am having issues where the balance page does not add up correctly - for example, I have 4 litecoin addresses and it shows all 4 with their correct balances however - the total omits one of the balances and thus is wrong.
this issue comes and goes - and with different coins at different times - in an hour the above may be reflected correctly and my bitcoin balances will be wrong instead.
Thanks for the report. I've identified the scenario. If you have multiple addresses and the check for one of them fail, the failure will not be indicated in the user interface. The last balance for the address will still be displayed, but no longer part of the total. I will correct this in the next release, to indicate if there was a failure and let the total value assume the last known balance for the address that failed once. After this change, you will always see the total balance correctly. it seems to error now on anything with more than 2 addresses  No, on my balance all good. have many coins with 4 or more addresses, and all fine. Patrike, is it possible to add a graphical coin price and difficulty change for 24h, 7 days and 30 days? i think it could be a nice feature. |
|
|
|
miner software optimization might get 3090 to 150mhs...hopefully  No, Eth is memory bound, 3080 and 3090 have the same memory type and speed so the minor difference we will see would be due to 320 vs 384bit bus width. And this isnt on-die HBM, dont expect 90+ on anything. 1080 is 35mhs 1080ti is 50mhs that's 42.8% difference between 1080 and 1080ti, both gddr5x 3080 is 100mhs (there is a post that says 115mhs at 300w) if you do the math of adding 42% of 3080 to 100mhs that's 142mhs. now nvidia says 3090 as titan like(they phased out titan, this is the new titan), if 3080ti is not released yet, then 3090 is better than 3080ti if 3090 is better than 3080ti, then 150mhs is not impossible. XD you cannot add 42% and say "yes thats the hashrate" XD And a screenshot say nothing. Wait i make a screenshot with 2000mh hashrate for the 3070, you believe this? you will see, 3080 nothing more than 70mh. In the past, much people say AMD RX5700 will reach 70 or 80 mh, but what is the fact? LOL dude, 1080 and 1080ti are old hehehe ... screenshots are for the ones who didn't see the hashrate yet  LOL dude read my post again. I edited. I know that, and what will you say me with your sentense? You say there is screenshot with 115mh. Where? There is screenshot from a table. So i make screenshot from a table, where i write 2000mh per card, you believe this? |
|
|
|
miner software optimization might get 3090 to 150mhs...hopefully No, Eth is memory bound, 3080 and 3090 have the same memory type and speed so the minor difference we will see would be due to 320 vs 384bit bus width. And this isnt on-die HBM, dont expect 90+ on anything. 1080 is 35mhs 1080ti is 50mhs that's 42.8% difference between 1080 and 1080ti, both gddr5x 3080 is 100mhs (there is a post that says 115mhs at 300w) if you do the math of adding 42% of 3080 to 100mhs that's 142mhs. now nvidia says 3090 as titan like(they phased out titan, this is the new titan), if 3080ti is not released yet, then 3090 is better than 3080ti if 3090 is better than 3080ti, then 150mhs is not impossible. XD you cannot add 42% and say "yes thats the hashrate" XD And a screenshot say nothing. Wait i make a screenshot with 2000mh hashrate for the 3070, you believe this? you will see, 3080 nothing more than 70mh. Example: 2080ti 616 GBps can do 52mh RTX 3070 512 GBps are around 83% from 2080ti so hashrate 43mh but i think the 30x0 is a bit faster so it can do 45mh RTX 3080 760 Gbps are around 123 from 2080ti so hashrate 63mh but i think the 30x0 is a bit faster so it can do 65mh In the past, much people say AMD RX5700 will reach 70 or 80 mh, but what is the fact? |
|
|
|
Hi Patrik,
I have a question. I have a few rigs left with nVidia GTX 1080 Ti's and MSI Afterburner and wanted them switching finally to the native overclocking like my other RTX rigs.
In Afterburner the first line is "Core Voltage (%)". I have set this on all cards to +100.
In AM in the GPU overclocking panel I cant find such "Core Voltage (%)". Its only the "Core voltage limit" in the lower advanced section, but I think this setting means I set the real numbers directly, like 1075 mV or 1040 mV or so.
In the GPU Clocking Profiles I can find the same "Core voltage limit (mV)" and "Core voltage boost (mV)". But none of them affect the first line in Afterburner. Is it possible somehow in AM to set that "Core Voltage (%)" to a number between +0 to +100? Without, the hashrate is lower and I really like that option.
Thanks for the answer!
Hi Joseph and thanks for your question. I'm not aware how to set Core Voltage (%) like MSI Afterburner. On nVidia 2000-series it isn't supported at all. On the 1000-series nVidia will enforce a number of limits the voltage anyway so you will never get 100% higher voltage even if configured. This is why the nVidia drivers mainly focus on the "Core voltage limit" these days. What kind of voltage behaviors do you get when you set it to +100% compared to 0% in MSI Afterburner? How does that compare to setting a voltage limit in Awesome Miner instead (at keep the setting in MSI Afterburner at 0%)? Hey Patrik, the Core Voltage (%) is just a very small boost, maybe 1% or so with +100. But I really like that option. It will boost the hashrate a little bit with just a bit higher voltage, but the GPU clock stays at the same number. If I just increase the voltage to the same value, the hashrate will be lower. So I have to increase the core clock too to match the higher hashrate. But if the card is already running with the highest clock, I cant increase it any higher. Thats my observations to that setting. Its nothing big here, but a few more cents per hour per card could be worth asking you  But if its not possible to edit that setting with the native overclocking, it will be no problem. The native OC is one of the greatest tools inside AM. So keep up the great work! Set Core Voltage Limit to your predicted voltage makes more sense. Cards overclock or underclock automatically |
|
|
|
Beyond me why you let a guy with 600 comments lock the thread. Delete the account for doing that.
Yes i donīt understand, why people can create topics and close it immediately. Closing threads by threadstarter must be available first after 24 hours or something like this. |
|
|
|
One of my machines (specifically a 1070 eight card rig) keeps having an intermittent issue where AwesomeMiner says "interface offline" but the machine is still working fine. I uninstalled and re-installed the remote agent and the problem keeps occuring. Any ideas? No firewall / anti-virus / etc running. Windows 10 ver 2004. I have three machines and only this one is having this particular issue. Thanks! https://i.ibb.co/WtcyXLL/interface-offline.jpgWindows rig? Change network properties from public to privat. |
|
|
|
Hi Patrik,
I have a question. I have a few rigs left with nVidia GTX 1080 Ti's and MSI Afterburner and wanted them switching finally to the native overclocking like my other RTX rigs.
In Afterburner the first line is "Core Voltage (%)". I have set this on all cards to +100.
In AM in the GPU overclocking panel I cant find such "Core Voltage (%)". Its only the "Core voltage limit" in the lower advanced section, but I think this setting means I set the real numbers directly, like 1075 mV or 1040 mV or so.
In the GPU Clocking Profiles I can find the same "Core voltage limit (mV)" and "Core voltage boost (mV)". But none of them affect the first line in Afterburner. Is it possible somehow in AM to set that "Core Voltage (%)" to a number between +0 to +100? Without, the hashrate is lower and I really like that option.
Thanks for the answer!
Hi Joseph and thanks for your question. I'm not aware how to set Core Voltage (%) like MSI Afterburner. On nVidia 2000-series it isn't supported at all. On the 1000-series nVidia will enforce a number of limits the voltage anyway so you will never get 100% higher voltage even if configured. This is why the nVidia drivers mainly focus on the "Core voltage limit" these days. What kind of voltage behaviors do you get when you set it to +100% compared to 0% in MSI Afterburner? How does that compare to setting a voltage limit in Awesome Miner instead (at keep the setting in MSI Afterburner at 0%)? On Nvidia Cards, i use core voltage limit and it works very nice. I can set Power Limit to 100% and set core voltage limit, result is: stable gpu frequenz, stable energy output, no jumps up and down any more, hashrate stable. I donīt know why all other people decrease the power limit, on amd cards no one do this. |
|
|
|
Have you seen this page? Have you seen information, screenshots or anything else that can prove the hashrate? They only speculating and nothing more. And to the rest. Stop posting anything from Red Panda Mining, one of the biggest noobs in the crypto space. |
|
|
|
Initialize diagnostics (5000)
Starting Diagnostics (30s). Awesome Miner version: 8.0
OS: Microsoft Windows 10 Enterprise LTSC 2019 64-bit
AMD driver version: 20.4.2
AMD OpenCL Platform ID: 0
GPUs: RX 5700 XT
Microsoft VC++ 2013 runtime installed: Yes
Microsoft VC++ 2015 runtime installed: Yes
Microsoft VC++ 2017 runtime installed: Yes
Microsoft VC++ 2019 runtime installed: Yes
Starting Mining Software
Setting up Miner Engine. Instance: 1
Engine Type: TeamRedMiner, Auto Download: True, EnginePath: , Subtype: Disabled, CustomExecutable:
Properties: (WindowMode: ConsoleFormat, EngineType: TeamRedMiner, IsProfitMiner: False)
====================================================================================================
C:\Users\Vladimir\AppData\Local\AwesomeMiner\teamredminer-v0.7.9-win_1\teamredminer-v0.7.9-win\teamredminer.exe -a ethash -o eu1.ethermine.org:4444 -u setof.5 -p x --api_listen=0.0.0.0:4028
====================================================================================================
Mining Engine Process started, PID: 1840
> Team Red Miner version 0.7.9
> Only stratum+tcp and stratum+ssl URLs are supported. Use option --help for usage.
====================================================================================================
Unexpected exit of mining software. Possible cause: Incorrect configuration or crashing software
Diagnostics completed
Please open the Properties for your mining pool. Update the URL to: stratum+tcp://eu1.ethermine.org:4444 without [Awesome Miner] https://ibb.co/zJngbqkPlease try to put your wallet address in the field "Worker name" instead - leave the "Wallet address" field empty. It's a bit different from pool to pool if they expect the wallet to be provided as waller or worker. Wallet is missing in the command line. Ethermine needs a wallet, workers only optional. |
|
|
|
Anyone have a clue about Ampere vs Big Navi on RandomX?
Both will suck compared to CPUs. Big Navi will suck even more due to lack of native support for RDNA2 in xmrig. XMRig have native support for Ampere? Or how do i understand you post? |
|
|
|
New ETH Pill scam. They call it now Project Morpheus, but same stupid hashrates which are not possible to achieve. Now they lock thread at start, so no one can warn other members. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5274291.0MODS I DONīT KNOW WHY YOU NEED SO MUCH TIME TO DELETE MALICIOUS THREADS.
|
|
|
|
Dude first i dont owned this and secondly i have confirmed from my friends about these miners. And When the miners arrive i will post the pic here. Any news about this new miner? XD |
|
|
|
okay 2x amd 5600 = 550 usd to 600 usd mining eth you get 77-82 mh burns under 230 watts in total at the wall. 1x nvidia 3070 cost 600 burns under 180 watts in total at the wall so it saves 50 watts or 1.2 kwatts a day. lets pretend it saves 2 kwatts a day that is 20 cents at 10 cent power 30 cents at 15 cent power. and I think it will do 65 to 70 mh. Seems like a push compared to 2 of these. https://www.newegg.com/msi-radeon-rx-5600-xt-rx-5600-xt-gaming-mx/p/N82E16814137571?With the right settings, the 5600xt goes to 85w at 42mh. so you can get 80 - 84 mh with 170watts at the wall and i think the 3070 makes around 45mh max and nothing more, memspeed is not much faster and the cores does not matter. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
