Bitcoin Forum
April 30, 2024, 05:34:05 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 [52] 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 ... 220 »
1021  Economy / Speculation / Re: FOR THE LOVE OF GOD DONT SELL YOUR BITCOIN on: June 12, 2016, 10:16:06 PM
How do you know that there are millions of chinese buying right now?

I'd say sell right now! So I can buy lower Grin
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-06-11/bitcoin-spikes-above-600-2-year-highs-sudden-massive-chinese-buying
Read this.

Interesting article, where is the deposits graphs getting its numbers? And it would also be interesting to see graphs from several exchanges pointing to times in which there was a surge in volume, interesting to compare graphs from Chinese and Western exchanges Smiley
1022  Economy / Speculation / Re: FOR THE LOVE OF GOD DONT SELL YOUR BITCOIN on: June 12, 2016, 09:16:03 PM
How do you know that there are millions of chinese buying right now?

I'd say sell right now! So I can buy lower Grin
1023  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: It's time to withdraw ! on: June 12, 2016, 12:12:59 PM
Take this friendly reminder and do withdraw... Withdraw always. Never leave anything anywhere, that's why Bitcoin exists: to help you keep your funds safely without trusting third parties... Smiley
1024  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: 10 billions USD market cap reached on: June 12, 2016, 12:10:00 PM
Great news for bitcoin community, what would be the feedback of the government with this?  Grin

Exactly the same...
1025  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: The shops that accept Bitcoin on: June 12, 2016, 12:08:47 PM
Bitcoin is slowly but surely getting into other countries, like countries on South America. You can check that on the marketplace section here, as an example.

And yes, stability takes part. Less stable countries tend to search for alternative currencies...
1026  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: BurtW arrested (update: charges dropped!) on: June 11, 2016, 08:01:56 PM
Wow that thread took a turn.  Legal?  Illegal?  Not even close.

I was trading Bitcoins.  I was operating under the assumption that what I was doing was not a business.  They claimed it was.  The regulations are very "clear" on this point:  if it is not a business I did not need a business license, if it was a business I needed a business license.

Now who decides if it is a business or not?  Regulations clearly state "whether is is a business or not is a matter of fact and circumstance".  OK, fine.  Then who is the decider of "fact and circumstance"?  In the US system the decider of "fact and circumstance" is the jury.

I claimed it was not a business, they claimed it was.  It is not illegal to claim it is not a business and technically they did nothing wrong in claiming it was a business. Both my attorney and the prosecutor stated that "this is a toss up".  They both knew and stated that it could go either way.  My claim might have been declared correct by the jury and I would have been acquitted of all criminal charges against me.  Of course their claim might have been declared correct and then I could have been sentenced to up to 5 years in prison and up to a $250,000 fine.

Now realize that even if my claim is declared correct by the jury this does not settle all the civil suits that have been filed against the property seized.  So even if the jury decided with my side (a 50/50 proposition according to both sides) I would still be facing up to an additional $100,000 in attorny's fees to prove my property was innocent in a totally separate civil court.

Faced with the option of taking this to trail and flipping a coin followed by additional expenses to clear my property on the one hand and just donating $40,000 in cash and $40,000 in Bitcoin to the federal asset forfeiture slush fund what would you do?

This had nothing to do with legal versus illegal.  Only an opinion of whether what I was doing was a business or not.

What should they have and would they have done if they did not think they could just walk away with the loot?

Send me a cease and desist letter explaining that they thought what I was doing might be a business and to get a fucking free license if I wanted to continue doing it.

All of this because someone thought you were running some kind of business... Your post really put things into perspective.

If this is a "matter of fact and circumstance", then everyone can be running a business, so let's seize everything. Or maybe nobody runs businesses, let's keep everything as it is.

The cease and desist letter would definitely be appropriate, I guess. Seems like legal/illegal is exaggeratedly open to police and justice's interpretation of the law (where the law should be clear in what is a business or not).
1027  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Why isn't Zimbabwe adopting Bitcoin? on: June 11, 2016, 07:43:16 PM
I guess bandwidth and technology there are probably really expensive and only available to a minority...
1028  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoin's Novelty Is Spent on: June 11, 2016, 07:40:19 PM
Yes, Bitcoin's core principles haven't changed much. That's why Bitcoin is still amazing technology.

Quote
Adding to the mystery, bitcoins hinge on tongue-twisting technobabble even most Wall Street pundits can't grasp.

This is good Grin
1029  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: bitaddress.org on: June 11, 2016, 05:19:30 PM
Hi,
with bitaddress.org, off line, I can generate a bitcoin address with private key.
where is a offline service, from private key to bitcoin address???
 Huh Huh Huh


You can have bitaddress offline by downloading from their GitHub (direct link for the most recent offline file). You can find both links on the bottom of their page.
1030  Economy / Gambling / Re: Diggit.io | Over Dice? | Brand new game! | 800+ BTC Invested! | 1% Edge on: June 11, 2016, 04:14:55 PM
CryptoFuture's account is still in use. His last login was on the 8th, so he's probably still reading all these messages. I find it odd that someone who had the opportunity to run a legit and profitable gambling website sent it all down the drain. I hope he can still honor the last withdrawals and simply shutdown everything, or sell the code to someone reputable.
1031  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: BurtW arrested (update: charges dropped!) on: June 11, 2016, 04:11:38 PM
With the current mindset, if authorities somehow find someone with "tainted" coins on an address they control, they'll immediately have their heads at stake and their property seized...

As a legit Bitcoin user, this worries me a lot. I don't have to pay for the mistakes others make... But that looks like the future we're heading towards to.

But what Burt did was illegal, and yet I find myself sympathising with him, and not with self-proclaimed "legit" users. Why is it that otherwise intelligent people do not understand the difference between "illegal" and "immoral"? How can people who have understood and used Bitcoin for years not recognise that Bitcoin's very existence cuts right to the heart of that issue? I'm sorry unamis, I like your posts, but I have to say this. Where does the assumption come from that all laws are moral?

I think what Burt did would be illegal if we were talking about fiat currency. But since my knowledge on American law is pretty low, I might be wrong. If what Burt did was illegal, then they probably wouldn't "agree on disagreeing" that it wasn't a business. Or at least, they shouldn't.

Maybe I have a too optimistic vision on laws and justice around the world.

You have a valid point in saying that Bitcoin cuts to the heart of the issue, but I think Bitcoin is far from legal, or illegal. It is also far from immoral. It is a bit above rules and laws.

I guess I have no extra arguments and don't really have anything else to add to this thread at this moment... Your post got me thinking a bit Smiley
1032  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: BurtW arrested (update: charges dropped!) on: June 11, 2016, 03:54:01 PM
Agree with the two previous posts.

When I was arrested the prosecution asked that I be incarcerated without a bond hearing for the maximum time allowed under the Patriot act, six days.  One of the reasons for this pre-bond hearing incarceration was to make sure I did not move my funds before they had a chance to find them.  They were very concerned that I might move my Bitcoins out of seized wallets on seized computers before they had a chance to find them all and move the Bitcoins to their own wallet.

ASSIDE:  I found out later that their wallet was a Trezor that they had seized in another case.

The judge initially granted the prosecution's request for a six day hold before the bond hearing.  My attorney, after getting his mandatory $50,000 cash retainer, did successfully argue this and I was given a bond hearing and got out on bond after only four days and three nights in jail.  I assume I would have survived another few days being bored to death in solitary confinement but it would have totally sucked.

By the time I was released on bond they had found and had moved most of my Bitcoins, the Bitcoins I was holding for my non-tech savvy parents, and some other Bitcoins that were not mine (was holding for a friend until he got his own Trezor).

The question remains on whatever happened for them to still have that seized Trezor device.

Using fund movements as evidence was to be expected. After all, those who don't owe anything to anyone supposedly have nothing to fear... But I think that should be contemplated in the law. After all, the funds are at risk, so it's comprehensible to move them.

That piece on Desert Snow is pretty interesting, just finished reading it... It's odd that a system like Black Asphalt runs freely online.
Not only that but they give out awards to their students and LEO will use these awards on their resumes.

https://www.desertsnow.com/pages/view/6

Now most of the stuff they have to do and seize to get the award could be argued as "a good thing" but this requirement:

Quote
*QUALIFIED INCIDENTS / SEIZURES:
US Currency – Successful forfeiture of more than $5,000

is a little bit shady.

As for the phone, let's imagine that the phone is seized and you manage to get the funds there moved after the phone being seized, is it valid in the eyes of the law comparing the transaction timestamp on the blockchain to the time when the seize occurred?

As for giving them the password or the moved funds... Shouldn't it be "and" instead of "or"? Because you can give them the password after the funds have already been swept.
Yes, they will look at the time of the move relative to the seizure.

They (Homeland Security) are not as bright as they are made out to be on TV but not quite as stupid as you might want them to be.

Yeah, I've read about these awards on the article, it looks like they give bragging rights to those who have it. Setting a goal on seized funds is indeed a bit odd. Goals should be set on seized funds that were proven to come from illicit activities.

So... Having no regulation on Bitcoin "is bad", but the blockchain is a good source for information regarding transactions? How good is blockchain evidence in court?

Maybe someone should stop thinking about things like BitLicense and start thinking on how to properly seize and punish those who use cryptocurrencies for illegal activities and a way to protect those who are wrongly arrested and/or investigated.

As we all know, everyone eventually ends up with "tainted" coins on their wallets, just like we all end up having fiat coins and bills that were used in illegal activities. With the current mindset, if authorities somehow find someone with "tainted" coins on an address they control, they'll immediately have their heads at stake and their property seized...

As a legit Bitcoin user, this worries me a lot. I don't have to pay for the mistakes others make... But that looks like the future we're heading towards to.
1033  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: BurtW arrested on: June 11, 2016, 02:34:53 PM
That piece on Desert Snow is pretty interesting, just finished reading it... It's odd that a system like Black Asphalt runs freely online.

As for the phone, let's imagine that the phone is seized and you manage to get the funds there moved after the phone being seized, is it valid in the eyes of the law comparing the transaction timestamp on the blockchain to the time when the seize occurred?

As for giving them the password or the moved funds... Shouldn't it be "and" instead of "or"? Because you can give them the password after the funds have already been swept.

The "good" news end up being the fact that you can eventually get out of this (if your money is innocent, of course, and you have funds for an attorney...)

I've also read that the company who makes these things gets a commission from seized funds, which I find rather "odd"...
Quote
http://boingboing.net/2016/06/09/oklahoma-cops-can-use-scanners.html
ERAD Group will receive a 7.7 percent cut of all funds seized via the card readers.
meaning whether innocent or guilty you're 7.7% worse off the moment the card is swiped
and if found guilty later in court. the police get to keep the other 92.3% unless you can prove the funds not guilty.

I interpret that in a different way: 100% of your funds are swiped/seized, 7,7% goes to the company who made these readers, 92,3% goes to the police, and if eventually you manage to prove yourself your money not guilty you get those 92,3% returned. That's what I understood, at least.
You are both saying basically the same thing.  Fixed typos there.

However, I actually believe that if you do manage to prove your funds are innocent you will get them all back and the government would take the 7.7 loss or get it back from the vendor.

Once they do finally decide to give you back what they decide to give you back you do get it back.

The real loss to you would be the $50,000 in attorney's fees it will cost you to get it back.

Well, thanks for fixing the typos, English isn't my native language, so I guess I was a bit "lost in translation" there Smiley

I don't see any government taking a loss. They would just take it back from the company, for sure. Those cases are probably contemplated on their contracts. And giving back 100% of funds if they're not guilty is the right thing to do in the middle of this mess.
1034  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: BurtW arrested on: June 11, 2016, 01:44:48 PM
Read about that on zeroday's thread... My doubt is, how does that seize the funds from a card without needing a PIN?
they can take funds from prepaid debit cards because its not a registered account.
Quote
http://boingboing.net/2016/06/09/oklahoma-cops-can-use-scanners.html
But the scanners can only retrieve funds from “open loop” prepaid debit cards (Visa and American Express offer them, as do other providers). Any “debit cards attached to a valid checking account or valid credit cards cannot be processed”
remember prepaid card is different compared to bank account debit card

I thought these cards had a code too in order to be used, that's why I was questioning it. I've never used cards like these, honestly.

I've also read that the company who makes these things gets a commission from seized funds, which I find rather "odd"...
Quote
http://boingboing.net/2016/06/09/oklahoma-cops-can-use-scanners.html
ERAD Group will receive a 7.7 percent cut of all funds seized via the card readers.
meaning whether innocent or guilty your 7.7% worse off the moment the card is swiped.
and if found guilty later in court. the police get to keep the other 92.3%

I interpret that in a different way: 100% of your funds are swiped/seized, 7,7% goes to the company who made these readers, 92,3% goes to the police, and if eventually you manage to prove yourself not guilty you get those 92,3% returned. That's what I understood, at least.


yep store bitcoins on your phone with a phone keypad lock.
store your private keys at home in a way that they wont find it if they raided your house.
then when they are trying to bruteforce the phone hopefully you or a relative can move the funds making the old private keys useless

other advice if your using a online wallet app on your phone. set up 2 accounts.. if ever asked to log in to display balance. only log into the account with least funds, should you be in a threatened situation where they wont back off unless they move funds in your presence,making you unable to move funds secretly

The thing is, if you get your home raided, they will find everything, as we've seen with BurtW, but yes, best to try and store it safely at home, or somewhere else.

Your other advice is a pretty good one.
1035  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: BurtW arrested on: June 11, 2016, 11:49:35 AM
From the document, it doesn't look like this was from simple face to face transactions using localbitcoins... it looks like he was somehow involved with running an exchange.
Yes, I was charged for simply trading Bitcoins on localbitcoins.com.  It did not matter that it was face-to-face or that it was for cash.  They claimed my trading activity on localbitcoins.com was a business.  I claimed it was not a business.  After about $300,000 and several months of negotiations by my attorney we basically agreed to disagree on whether it was a business or not and they agreed to drop all the criminal charges against me and all the civil charges against all my stuff they had seized for a one time donation to their civil asset forfeiture slush fund.

BTW the cops have always been able to and motivated to ask you if you have any cash in the car when they stop you.  If you say yes and they think it is "too much" cash they can just take if from you without any charges being filed.  It is then up to you to prove that the cash they took from you is totally innocent of any criminal activity.  If you can prove that your cash is innocent then they might give it back to you.

I just saw that they now have a new weapon in their war on the people:  not only can they seize any cash you happen to have on you they can now take all the value off any type of pre-paid card you happen to have on you or in your car:

http://boingboing.net/2016/06/09/oklahoma-cops-can-use-scanners.html

Nice.

Now you have to prove your pre-paid Appplebee's or Amazon card is innocent of criminal activity in order to get your money back!

It won't be long before they can take your phone from you during a traffic stop and see if you have a Bitcoin wallet on your phone.  If you do they will then confiscate your phone and you will have to prove your Bitcoins are innocent (and your phone is innocent) before they will consider giving your phone and Bitcoin wallet back to you.

When they arrested me they took my phone, all of my Bitcoins, all my computers, etc.  It was only after they dropped all the civil charges against my stuff - and I paid them the donation of cash and Bitcoins they squeezed out of me - that I got my phone and wallet back.



Read about that on zeroday's thread... My doubt is, how does that seize the funds from a card without needing a PIN?

I've also read that the company who makes these things gets a comission from seized funds, which I find rather "odd"...

As for the phone with Bitcoins, they risk ending up with a wallet without any funds when they eventually get to be able to spend them.
1036  Economy / Trading Discussion / Re: LONG TERM BITCOIN BUYERS on: June 10, 2016, 10:26:04 PM
I'd have to agree with some users and say that long term is at least 10 years...
1037  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: [Seriously] How can I explain Bitcoin to a grandma or grandpa? on: June 10, 2016, 10:22:38 PM
You can start telling them that it is a virtual currency. They'll probably reply you that it doesn't exist, or that they don't believe it, or they'll ask you to explain them better. Most elderly people are now familiar with ATM's, credit cards and some with online banking too. So it's easy to tell them that Bitcoin is like an ATM. Your money is just a number in a screen. The difference is, the number on the ATM screen belongs to the bank and the number on the "Bitcoin screen" belongs to you and only you.
1038  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: ? How To Respond To Someone Who Is Anti Bitcoin ? on: June 10, 2016, 10:05:28 PM
I just reply them something along the lines of "good luck with fiat and your bank" and be on my way. No time for toxic, uneducated and arrogant people in our short lives.
1039  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [MOTO] Motocoin PROOF-of-PLAY [NEW BOT] Human Mineable -Play Game to Mine- 1yr+ on: June 10, 2016, 04:36:39 PM
Bot Download
Download the bot here then replace the motogame executable with the downloaded one. To start the bot, click the "Play to Mine" button in the "Play" tab of the wallet. The bot was compiled by ElvenArcher and the source code is included in the download.

Source code doesn't seem to be included, just the .exe. Where's the source code?
1040  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Estimate the minimum TX fee to get a tx into thr blocks 420,000 or 420,001! on: June 10, 2016, 03:13:32 PM
theres over 2million bitcoiners.. so you are right. we wont see many(compared to entire community) people do it.. but we could easily see a couple thousand people do it. and knowing the average transaction is ~500bytes the block would be full with just a couple thousand transactions,

Nothing new here, not hard to fill the block Cheesy

but what would be a bit of comedy is if a pool SPV mines a block and gets to solve the 420,000 block before the 2 minutes are up where they would usually start adding transactions. meaning its a 'empty block'

alot of people will be upset if the halving block had no transactions in it and all the "messages" ended up in the next block

Well, too bad Smiley It's a "risk" that people face. It's also possible that blocks 419999 and 420000 are mined a second apart... Pretty much anything can happen, thus why I think not many people will really be bothered to point their transactions to the halving block.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 [52] 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 ... 220 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!