1201
|
Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Ridiculous Transaction Times
|
on: March 26, 2016, 08:38:15 PM
|
Transaction times are not ridiculous, they're instant. How are they marked high priority? Did you calculate priority yourself?
As for dice sites, most required X confirmations before crediting.
|
|
|
1206
|
Other / Off-topic / Re: This is hilarious!!!!!!!
|
on: March 26, 2016, 03:02:54 PM
|
Indeed, lol, this is hilarious in ways I can't even describe! haha. They're ridiculous, I really do not get it what they mean with new money. PayPal is one of the biggest advocates of old money in modern days, saying otherwise is having visors in their eyes like racing horses... Good try.
|
|
|
1207
|
Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: IBM BLOCKHAIN? WHAT ABOUT BLOCKHAIN WILL IT BE DEAD ONCE IBM ANNOUNC THEIR CURRE
|
on: March 25, 2016, 07:42:32 PM
|
my worries is that ill be honest. i just think that one day all bitcoin developers moves to IBM or other ... and leave us like investors alone and btc will be dead then.
i believe blockhain is the priority and not bitcoin
they might steal bitcoin deveopers and bring thm on their site who knows... So that being said what's your opinion on blockstream? not reaally could you please tell me.
i dont really keen of searching but i know that there is something special with bitcoin so i just did some investment and thats it
but rally love to take your word so what makes bitcoin so special
The thing that makes it special in this case is it wouldn't die if devs started quitting.
|
|
|
1208
|
Economy / Gambling / Re: Video: Satoshi Dice
|
on: March 25, 2016, 07:38:47 PM
|
This is actually really great! Makes me remember those machines that were around when I was a little kid, but this time using Bitcoin! I wonder how he did that, what machine is powering it and how... Excellent project!
|
|
|
1211
|
Economy / Goods / Re: [WTS] WIFI Bitcoin And Altcoin Price Ticker Screen - afkdata.com
|
on: March 25, 2016, 03:14:38 PM
|
I was using these (think I made ~8 and shipped them) I am now using thesethe dimensions are there on the site you could mock up paper box and see size weird though, wonder if the resale of those 8 will be higher later because there rare.... Thanks for replying. Yes, only relied on pics for measurements, my bad. I'll consider ordering one.
|
|
|
1213
|
Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: In 2010/2011 Bitcoin was really exciting!
|
on: March 25, 2016, 02:37:32 PM
|
People used to talk about "losing sleep thinking about BTC all the time", and it wasn't just about money. We wanted to set people free.
In 2010/2011 Bitcoin was really exciting! Are you excited now about the Bitcoin project/economy? Why or why not?
What changed these days? The essence is still the same... The only difference is, more people come because money. But they soon realize what's this all about. People learn about Bitcoin and start looking around differently and see that they were blindfolded all their life and their financial freedom was nothing but an illusion. People see that banks were pretty much getting ready for the long con... We still want to set people free. Free from financial restrains and free from scams. I am still as excited about Bitcoin as I was around 3/4 years ago when I first heard about Bitcoin.
|
|
|
1215
|
Bitcoin / Armory / Re: Heads up for people planning to use Ubuntu 16.04
|
on: March 25, 2016, 12:57:23 AM
|
Downloaded Ubuntu and setting up a VM a few minutes after you posted, it's finishing installing now... I'm giving it a shot too to see what's up. Also want to check up on Ubuntu EDIT: Bitcoin Core 0.12 runs perfectly out of the box on the daily image I've downloaded from Ubuntu's website. I've downloaded the Core tar from bitcoin.org, which I assume is what most people do. Also tried adding the repository, which doesn't work, as expected. Armory however does not install from the deb, which I again assume is the way most people try to install it. EDIT2: downloaded the offline installer and did dpkg -i *.deb, errored out. Did apt-get install python2.7 and terminal requested me to do apt-get -f install, which I did and in the end it said "Armory installed successfully". So I'm having success with both Core and Armory too... Doesn't seem to be breaking any compatibility so far whatsoever (at least it installs, not sure if it runs fine ). Tried with Armory 0.93.3, BTW, can try later with the most recent test versions.
|
|
|
1217
|
Economy / Economics / Re: Rise of the megabanks
|
on: March 24, 2016, 05:40:34 PM
|
Yes, they really are bitcoin friendly. They are the only ones that will deal with the Exchanges - Kraken processes all it's European withdrawals through Fidor.
Part of the reason why good bitcoin exchanges haven't appeared in the UK is because the banks are refusing to deal with an business processing BTC. They figure if they block them, they'll die because it's too difficult to purchase BTC locally. And they're not entirely wrong about that.
So they're Bitcoin friendly when an exchange hires their service in order to transfer funds resulting from selling Bitcoin... I see Definitely a good way for them to have clients. If I owned a bank, I'd definitely be friendly with whoever can bring cash flow from legal businesses. I assume banks rejecting to serve Bitcoin related services are afraid that Bitcoin is suddenly ruled to be illegal or aren't really looking for money (which is odd). Bitcoin is legal in the UK- the govt has explicitly said so. So the UK banks are being difficult mainly because they fear bitcoin as competition, not for reasons of legality. Like I said, as long as we have to pay taxes in fiat, we need banks. So support the bitcoin friendly ones! Yes, Bitcoin is legal, and even if it was illegal, no government can stop blocks from being mined... But UK banks sometimes have to wire money to other places where legality might be challenged or at least activities related to Bitcoin might be question because of misendeavors by a few community members. Banks will eventually be replaced. At least that's what we're all here aiming for. So it's fair that they see us as competition. What I cannot understand is why they don't take the profits before they fall, just like Fidor. So at least my second option remains, banks are simply not looking for money, which I find odd. Their loss, our gain. But yes, we do need banks like Fidor, for now As for supporting banks... No, I've had enough of that. Everyone I know that supported banks has either lost all his money or on the brink of losing it.
|
|
|
1218
|
Economy / Economics / Re: Rise of the megabanks
|
on: March 24, 2016, 05:18:43 PM
|
Yes, they really are bitcoin friendly. They are the only ones that will deal with the Exchanges - Kraken processes all it's European withdrawals through Fidor.
Part of the reason why good bitcoin exchanges haven't appeared in the UK is because the banks are refusing to deal with an business processing BTC. They figure if they block them, they'll die because it's too difficult to purchase BTC locally. And they're not entirely wrong about that.
So they're Bitcoin friendly when an exchange hires their service in order to transfer funds resulting from selling Bitcoin... I see Definitely a good way for them to have clients. If I owned a bank, I'd definitely be friendly with whoever can bring cash flow from legal businesses. I assume banks rejecting to serve Bitcoin related services are afraid that Bitcoin is suddenly ruled to be illegal or aren't really looking for money (which is odd).
|
|
|
1219
|
Bitcoin / Wallet software / Re: Best wallet for keep bitcoin SAFE
|
on: March 24, 2016, 05:13:54 PM
|
Every wallet is a good wallet to keep Bitcoin safe. There are no known vulnerabilities in the most widely used wallets. Things just depend on how you protect yourself and how much you get used to the wallet you use. No point in using an extremely secure wallet in a compromised security or using a very secure wallet that you don't know how to operate in order to fully secure it or a wallet you don't find handy to use. I'm obviously already excluding web wallets, for reasons stated above Maybe its time you stop using web wallets and try desktop wallets such as Electrum, which are much safer than any web wallet. Actually this has been suggested a lot but no body seem to listen.
I don't get this either... What is everybody's fascination with web wallets. I can understand if people want to keep $20-$50 in BTC on an android wallet in case they have the chance to buy a hamburger with bitcoins or something. But other than that, all your coins should be securely stored (IMHO) OP: the two safest options are paper wallets and hardware wallets (and maybe offline wallets), followed by desktop wallets (like core, multibit HD, electrum). Web wallets are not safe, no mather which one you chose! Oh people will start to listen... After they lose some BTC using a web wallet! The only way to safely store your balance is in a wallet you can put your hand on. I.E. a desktop wallet, harware wallet, or paper wallet. I'm still a noob and trying to get up to speed. I've been using Armory with a paper backup. I'm searching around for a new wallet as it seems as if Armory may be having troubles. (I want to full research things before the proverbial sh!t hits the fan.) Am I missing the point about using a wallet like Armory? I thought that worked as a cold storage and that all you needed to do was to keep the blockchain up to date by running it once a week or so? I also don't get it what's so good about web wallets when you have better and as fast wallets where you store keys yourself As for Armory, it is a really, really good wallet software, but it is a bit advanced (I assume you're a new user, since you state you're a noob). Despite this, it's not impossible to start with Armory. You just have to try it and read about it. It may have a steeper learning curve but if you master Armory you're pretty much ready to use Bitcoin securely. It works as cold storage if you have it on an offline computer and a watch-only wallet on an online computer. They do, if you have a spare iDevice that you don't connect to the Internet, lol for online wallet i used blockchain with enabling 2factor authentication by telephone number . never lost bitcoin or get hacked or freezed .
This is not correct. 2FA on a web wallet doesn't guarantee you won't get your funds freezed.
|
|
|
1220
|
Economy / Economics / Re: Rise of the megabanks
|
on: March 24, 2016, 05:02:07 PM
|
Good to see that these guys have their bumps every now and then... But still, their growth is impressive. And we're the ones blindly fueling it. We must stop it by educating people in order to switch to Bitcoin, or a similar cryptocurrency in the future. These guys fill their pockets with our money and then fade away, some without any repercussions to their acts. This has happened before, and it will happen again. Time to give people back what's already theirs. I'll start by listing a bitcoin friendly bank in Europe: Fidor bank.
Are they really Bitcoin friendly? Bank + Bitcoin in the same sentence doesn't even match.
|
|
|
|