|
I know not everyone can keep $1500+ worth of btc in a wallet ready to go but knowing that Avalon may open up batch#3 orders are you filling up a wallet right now with ample funds to make a purchase when it is available? You can only pay with bitcoin it seems and if a lot of people do not have enough coin available some times it takes 2-4 days to get into an wallet. I'm very interested in the Avalon's of course because they are the real thing, not some idea or farse but I'm not sure how to hold the funds. I'd love to buy $1500 worth of bitcoin and stick it in a wallet right now, but in just a few days that could drop to $1200 very easily. Hard to do when it is pinned to a dollar amount, right?
|
|
|
|
thanks for the report. I fixed that bug in git.
I will make a 1.7.1 release this week-end, that fixes the bugs reported during this week.
Makes me a little weary to use the client if the bugs are right in front of me. This is a BETA, right? |
|
|
|
|
If you can't import your satoshi wallet with the armory then why does the armory rely on the satoshi client to even run? Why would I want to deal with another program on top of another that already works? I'm a little confused here on what this client is then if it can't run by itself and solely relies on another client. Is that correct?
Because I'm trying out new clients and this was one of them.
|
|
|
|
|
Someone wanting to get/buy FPGA devices at that time maybe had some "inside" info that no one else had?
|
|
|
|
|
The armory runs on top of the Bitcoin.org client right? Is there a way to import my wallet.dat file into the Armory client?
|
|
|
|
|
When I run Electrum 1.7 on my Windows x64 bit machine it loads a DOS screen that looks like a debug window or something. What's this window for and do you know what these errors are?
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "C:\PROGRA~2\Electrum\gui\gui_lite.py", line 969, in update
self.update_completions()
File "C:\PROGRA~2\Electrum\gui\gui_lite.py", line 1006, in update_completions
completions = completions + self.wallet.aliases.keys()
AttributeError: Wallet instance has no attribute 'aliases'
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "C:\PROGRA~2\Electrum\gui\gui_lite.py", line 969, in update
self.update_completions()
File "C:\PROGRA~2\Electrum\gui\gui_lite.py", line 1006, in update_completions
completions = completions + self.wallet.aliases.keys()
AttributeError: Wallet instance has no attribute 'aliases'
|
|
|
|
|
I have a question about why you backup your wallet with Electrum when all you need are your seed words to restore your wallet?
Computer crashes. All is lost. I do have my seed words. I setup new computer. Install Electrum and enter my seed words in. My wallet is restored. I don't need to restore my wallet from a backup, right?
Thanks
|
|
|
|
Avalon only, you could probably buy one from someone who has it, but those who are willing to sell will ask top dollar  Top dollar would be at least 20k. |
|
|
|
Im not on the app just viewing it through the browser. Im sure the mobile version of the site is more basic
It works great for me on win7 with mozilla. When I used blockchain.info months ago I always had problems sending coin out that was in my account. I brought it to their attention and they just told me to come here. Now that I see so many more people are having similar issues I'm glad I stopped using them. I've responded to several very similar threads on here and just basically responded with that since I stopped using blockchain I've had less issues overall. Still working out some small kinks, but that's just finding the right wallet. |
|
|
|
Ive had a couple of btc in my blockchain account for over 24hrs and it keeps saying insufficient funds when attempting quick send saying my available balance is what ot was before getting the btc yesterday? Used it loads never hassle and now this?
I've had issues along the same exact line with blockchain and they just told me to come here for help. They didn't want to help me at all, so I stopped using them for anything. I now have less problems and issues 10 fold with moving coin around once I took blockchain out of the picture. Don't be fooled by the nice cool looking interface. Try to use another wallet for a little while and you'll eventually see you will have less issues. |
|
|
|
Ok so sorry for another thread but heres my problem exactly:
I did a transfer for 3.6 btc on friday, coins gone in no problem thought id let them sit there a few days until I needed them.
Now when I try to send funds to another wallet, it says there are insufficient funds? Even though the total btc in top right hand corner says 3.85 btc it still says everytime (insufficient funds, available balance 0.022774 or there abouts as if the 3.6 btc I bought on friday are not even there? But the total in corner says its there?! So I thought how about adding 10 quid to it through another transfer? Did that, it added to the total in top corner and it added to the total available funds in the error message? Yay I now have 0.32 btc to spend, awesome. Help me people please im just a poor boy from a poor family spare him his life for some Btc
???xx
The more I stay away from Blockchain the less problems I have. |
|
|
|
If I wanted to order from a company whose actually shipped something to someone, are there any choices other than avalon, who doesn't seem to be accepting orders right this moment?
Avalon is the only company that has shipped anything and you are correct. They are not taking pre-orders anymore unlike another company that hasn't stopped taking pre-orders from day 1 and yet has to release even a working prototype yet. |
|
|
|
That would be a nice one liner for Blockchain to post on their buy/sell page then. Making their users aware of this. I guess they expect every to know everything about everything. Doesn't matter now, I stopped using their service and went back to old reliable. My local wallet.
And where are you going to go for support and to complain when your local wallet requires the same fees and has the same problems trying to send the entire balance? This is an issue that happens on all platforms. I'm currently using Multibit and I asked for help there as well and they didn't point me to a random forum. I've been communicating with them via email and they understand what I'm talking about and have noticed what I mean. If you don't know or understand what I mean mostly you'll chalk it up to I don't know what I'm doing. Having said that there isn't much more to say about it. No current platform out there can successfully list the exact amount of "spendable" bitcoin with the deducted transaction already taken out. This "is" the issue. |
|
|
|
If you should blame anyone, look here Blame anyone on what? You still haven't explained anything you are saying. I know, I'm a fool for even responding to this, it is hard to control. This is a bitcoin forum and you are hiding being a newly created account because you are a coward to post under your real username. Then you post and talk about me. I didn't think I was that popular. If you want to promote me for free and waste your time and energy talking about personal people on a bitcoin forum then keep on going. I'll be happy to entertain and I'm %100 positive all people will become so bored they'll never read anything you ever post again. Trust me, my life is quite boring bro but if you want to me escalate me up on pedestal and popularize me I'm all for it! Trust me on this one, if I don't respond to your posts no one will except the young kids that thrive on social media drama on a bitcoin forum. If my life is interesting to you then dude you must really have a VERY boring life. Sorry about that. |
|
|
|
HELLO NEW BRUNSWICK!!! Prepare to gorge yourself..
lol Im up in sussex havn't been down by rutgers in the longest time. Are the grease trucks still there?
Been a long time for me too. I visited the grease trucks myself and always grabbed a FAT DARYL. |
|
|
|
At the moment the fee in multibit is a flat fee which isn't the "right" way to do it.
In general the fee depends on several factors - if you search the forum you'll see what i mean.
I think in Armory Alan has an option to specify 'all' in the amount field which means "just send everything I've got and deduct the fee you generate". That is probably the best approach.
The fees generally in multibit need beefing up (This also opens the way to rework the UI to do multisend).
I'm coming from a system that sets up a sale order then within a certain amount of time (like 10-15 minutes) I have to give this order the exact amount of btc or the order expires. If I'm even .01 short, no good. Once I send that btc out and it is short I won't see it for a while. This is why I would like to know the exact amount of btc I can send out, not just ALL. If I can't get the exact number of btc minus the fee then I'll need to figure out something else or come up with a better plan. Thanks |
|
|
|
I can't reconcile the short term, because I'm a long term thinker, and on that basis I can only suggest BFL is the more sustainable choice.
Money where my mouth is, I bought two 60gh/s units in the past week.
Just this past week? I guess if you don't mind you may get back that $2666 or whatever it was in 12+months then you are good to go. I'm just guessing it will take one year to get your money back. I hope I'm wrong for you and it takes less. |
|
|
|
As much as you are crazy, this is probably true. The money I got back from my BFL refund I may just buy an Avalon batch#3 if it is not too long away. Considering I will receive that Avalon months before my BFL order.
Not if you believe LJR https://twitter.com/BFL_News/status/312746688253157377That's just another UNofficial opinion. For some reason everything with BFL is UNofficial. Don't they have an official on anything? Even the guys that work there are UNofficial. No one will believe anything until they have it in their hands I guess. I'm hoping for the best, so everyone can get to mining away. |
|
|
|
Another check arrived Now 5-for-5 on flawless sales. Keep up the good work. I've transferred many times right to my bank via ACH and has always worked out great. Sorry if I'm prying, I'm just curious, why are you requesting a check when you can DD via ACH? Privacy? I don't really know. It seemed like the easiest option at the time of my first sale, and now it's just inertia: my details are already in the system. I don't plan on fixing what's not broken, either  Ok, thanks for answering. I really was just curious. Like I said, I've used the ACH method many times and has always been deposited directly into my bank account in about 3 days. |
|
|
|
Hi btctrada,
I've had a look at your screenshots - replied by email.
Ever get back to my issue or check out the screen shots I sent you? Hi opentoe, Sorry - should have posted earlier. I have been looking today at the code that shows the balance in the header and the code that does the validation before the send to see if there was some sort of discrepancy. I could not see any difference in how they calculate the balances. I have added in more logging to the validation code so that it logs directly: + the estimated balance + the available balance + the amount you are sending + the fee + the total amount it wants to send (should always be amount + fee but I log it anyhow). That will mean (after the next release) I will have a bit more data to go on when your bug manifests itself. I think we are at the stage now in MultiBit where the bugs occur *sometimes* or with particular sorts of transactions so they are a bit trickier to track down. Can you make it show the exact available amount of BTC the user can spend WITH the transaction fee already deducted? Instead of having the user trying to figure it out and then even after doing the math still doesn't work? Just like I did myself, deducted the transaction fee and I was still unable to send that amount. Thanks |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
