Fortunately, we have successfully retrieved a backup of our database and are working with regulators to develop a plan for fully refunding all users. This plan will be announced in the coming days.
Why you need to work with regulators though, I mean if you have the data already and I will assume that it also includes the email address of those affected users, you can simply send them an email or even tell them to go here in our community? We will provide an update on our reimbursement plan and schedule as soon as possible.
Thank you for your understanding.
I'm not directly affected by it, by maybe someone who has still funds will obviously welcome this good news. Hopefully, it will be ASAP, as there could be members here who still have a lot of funds to the tune of thousands of dollars in your platform. |
|
|
|
Oscar dela Hoya says that they are looking at AB, Teo and Haney as his next opponent.
Do you mean Adrien Broner, the 'About Billions' guy? I think his ranking isn't on par with Ryan, or we could say that he's past his prime. Maybe a matchup with Teo and Haney would be good for Garcia. However, if we're looking for an entertaining fight, Teo could deliver in that regard. So depends on this fight and then Ryan winning against Duarte. And the good thing is that their fight is just a weeks apart and with that, we will know the results and maybe next year we might see it.
One step at a time, he needs to achieve a successful comeback first. Hopefully, he'll train hard and not underestimate Duarte so that he can secure a win. Additionally, the victory needs to be impressive, especially since they are aiming for matchups against big names in boxing, all of whom are champions, except for AB. That will be an explosive fight, Haney vs Garcia, or Lopez vs Garcia, or even Haney vs Lopez. We have anticipated that this fight is going to happen at 135 lbs, but all of them outgrow that division so they move to 140 lbs. And now that Lopez has one of the belts, and then Haney chasing another one, Garcia fighting a dangerous fighter in Duarte and needs to win in order to have his name in the mix again. But then again, with his massive following, Ryan Garcia's name is one of the most hype regardless of what weight classes he will be in. That's why I think this fight is going to be made next year and it's going to be doable because of the huge money in the line. |
|
|
|
But the halving is still quite far away and if we believe that history will repeat itself then we are just in the pre-bull phase, not really into the bull season. I think what's going on is just Fomo with the news regarding ETFs being approved before January 2024. Therefore, it is likely that the market will react strongly if news about the ETF continues to be delayed by the SEC. Many people are Fomo and worried when they see the market rising sharply, but I think we should be careful and not be too subjective at the present time.
Because it has been below the price of 35K for a long time and now we have passed it, I can say that this is heading towards real bullishness even though the road map is still towards halving and we still have the possibility to buy before the increase continues. Regarding the ETF which is still pending, that is a big bonus that must be utilized to welcome other bulls into the market. Wanting to hold back as hard as he could, the bull's head couldn't be held back. Just to be fair, after getting above $37k the previous day, the price goes on another sea of red, at least all crypto does. Not sure what negative news has pull the market down to red right now, but it doesn't look good if we are a investor. Nevertheless, another good time to buy, no need to wait for the price to go further down. Just do DCA and we will all be good stacking bitcoin. As for the ETF, it's still pending as you have said, and the best time to speculate about a approval is next year. So hopefully, the price could bounce back again as everyone is waiting that at least this sort of bullish momentum will continue up to the end of the year. |
|
|
|
And talking about the IBF stripping him of the belt, this is what Crawford has to say, “Man, f--- the IBF! That’s what I say,” Crawford told a group of reporters after the Shakur Stevenson-Edwin De Los Santos weigh-in at T-Mobile Arena. “You know what I mean? F--- the IBF and they organization. I don’t give a f--- about, you know what I mean, the IBF. They stripped me damn near 2½ months after [I won] my title, not knowing what was gonna happen next. But it’s cool, though. I’m not mad at ‘em, you know? I got what I needed, and that was, you know, undisputed. And the rest is history. You know, I don’t care about none of that.” https://www.boxingscene.com/crawford-f-ibf-they-stripped-me-damn-near-2-months-i-won-my-title--179278Yeah, I think I will agree with what he says, he already accomplished what he needs to be done, to become undisputed at 147 lbs and the first man to do in 2 different weight class, 140 lbs and 147 lbs. And if they elevated Ennis as their regular champion, still there is the a big question whether he can call himself the true champion as he hasn't face the best in the division, either Spence or Crawford. |
|
|
|
Obviously Shakur is way below the 135 pounds limit. Nevertheless I don't see any problem with it. There's some trash talking during the face off, however, I understand that Edwin speak little English. But obviously, boxing has no language barrier, someone's ass gonna be whoop this weekend though.
Shakur initiates the thrash talk and Delos Santos has his corner to translate for him, Shakur is just playing Shakur we know that he is always like that imposing his character and his will against opponents that he think he can beat, we hope De Los Santos will surprise him and not intimidated comes fight night, this is an exciting fight to watch because both fighters have a good record, but Shakur has too much experience against De Los Santos so I'm sure he'll come out the winner and could be a stoppage in the latter rounds. There could be some translations, but I don't know how effective could have been if they really understand each other perfectly. I still remember Broner giving Marcos Maidana a lot of trash talking but then during weigh-in but Broner face has no emotions because simply he don't speak English and so he doesn't understand what Broner is trying to say. But I do agree that with Shakur experience fighting high caliber boxers, it could be just like a tune up fight for him. And hopefully Frank Martin, his original opponent will be next for him so that we will see a almost level fight as Martin for me is a level up compare to Edwin. |
|
|
|
Looks like the NBA made the decision to suspend Draymond for 5 games for his choke on Rudy Gobert. Honestly, I was expecting at least a 6 game suspension, but the NBA is pretty lenient when it comes to fighting (in my opinion). Draymond has a long history of this though, so I would’ve liked to have seen him get a little bit longer of a suspension.
I think that's fair though, 5 games is enough for Draymond to be out and think about the consequences of his action if he really wanted to help the Warriors to be great again. He has a lot of technical fouls already and being a veteran, he should have known better that this kind of actions are not going to help them specially that they have been struggling as of late. Is that true that James Harden wanted out of the Clippers in just 5 games? or is this a rumor? That's a waste of money from the Clippers trying to get him or even in the part of Sixers to execute that trade because Harden wanted out of them. Anyhow, I don't think that this is true though, not defending Harden but maybe there are people just trying to create negative news about him. |
|
|
|
The real truth is that there’s no particular test to know if a project is scam. But you can pay attention to red flags when looking for what project to invest in (especially these new alts). One of which I’ve seen is when a project’s team members is not having any tangible or reputable background. Additionaly, check the use-case of the project, check what problem the token solves and how effectively it does that.
It's really very hard to identify scam projects very early but there could be red flags, a) developers doesn't want to show their faces or wanted to go anonymous, it could be, but they might be hiding on this reasons so that when they run off, no one will know them b) poor written whitepaper, maybe they are in a hurry to released it and perhaps just hire someone to write for them without checking the output. And then someone will call them about the copy whitepaper c) the design of their website is poor. Same with whitepaper, this scammers wanted to put up their website ASAP to show that indeed they are real. But if the website UI is poor and not appealing and you think that they are taking about millions but can't even create a good website that it looks like a 10 year old build it, then think again on investing on them. |
|
|
|
After a small correction which was seen by everyone who knows how Bitcoin works, the analyst at the top company like J.P. Morgan thinks the Crypto Rally, especially Bitcoin is done.
How can they be so bad at their profession? I don't have a finance degree and I was able to call the $26k to $40k to $30k like two months before it all happened.
What do you all think about this?
I would take everything JP Morgan will says about crypto or bitcoin in general. Haven't we have learn from the past? Remember Jamie Dimon statement about Bitcoin wayback in 2017? 6 years ago from today, the JP Morgan CEO said that Bitcoin is only used by "drug dealers and murderers" and he still does not believe in Crypto, yet we got mainstream adoption without him. We don‘t need institutions.
https://www.binance.com/en/feed/post/1227695So it's pretty obvious that they have their own intentions to create another FUD. But the good thing is that majority will not fall for it. Better just ignored this noises, when we goes on a bull run, they will obviously back pedalled again or we don't know just like what they did before, they could be simply accumulating and wanted to buy at a cheap price. |
|
|
|
Hallo people,
I bought some bitcoin at 26/27/30 and 31k. all profit so far, I am thinking about buying more, but is 35k te expensive to buy bitcoin?
Their no time you purchase a bitcoin that's expensive, what I really want you to understand concerning bitcoin is that the price will continue to increase, so therefore the price of bitcoin increase and when you purchase as the price increased their is every tendency that the price may increase more than what it was before, so that's while I said that theirs no time you purchase a bitcoin that the price never be expensive from my understanding of cryptocurrency, so therefore bitcoin price should not make you not to purchase more of bitcoin, because two things are involved into cryptocurrency investment especially bitcoin, neither you lose in your investment or you gain in your investment. Yeah, there are no right or wrong time to buy, and just like what we have seen in the price today, we are somewhat in the high $35k and I think this is still a good buy in my opinion. Just look at the long term price prediction. Not saying that it will happen or the prediction will be spot on, nevertheless, if it hits more than $100k in the next bull run, it will definitely be a good win for us. So just buy when you think that you can afford it, not forcing yourself because you wanted to buy. You should understand that this should be for the long term and that's why we all just invest what we can afford to lose, just saying. Maybe it looks like expensive today, but as I have said, when we are in a bull run, we will have a massive spike in price making you a good profit. |
|
|
|
Your parents are very rich and they have made a will while they are still alive Your parent is disinheriting you on the ground on one of the laws in our country about disinheritance that When a child or descendant leads a dishonorable or disgraceful life; because of gambling but they have not proven that you are a chronic gambler and you think you are a responsible gambler. Do you have a case here on the ground that it is not proven that you are a chronic gambler and have not lost a fortune in gambling, can you appeal this case in court to make the will invalid and get your part in the inheritance? Here in our country, you cannot disinherit your heirs as long as the heir does not violate what's stated in the law about inheritance and they just used the quoted message as their ground. What's your take on this and what do your country's laws say about this? I don't know what the laws in my country with regards to inheritance or what not. But obviously if you are the child then maybe you can file a case on court and fight it out and proved that you didn't live a dishonorable or disgraceful live. And the question is, since your parents are gone now, who will decide if you live that kind of live? So it's better to make an appeal, to the parents though, it's just weird to see this in their last will. But maybe they just don't want to give their money to their kids if they chooses the wrong path in life and that is the lessons that the parents wanted to partake to their kids, even if they are no longer in this world. |
|
|
|
I am a discipline and a responsible gambler but tend to quit gambling somedays.
I think I am going to be missing the whole fun of it but if I would find it difficult keeping total off it, I have thought of going around the gambling grounds (gambling tables) with a logical lucrative planning to taking advantage over the gambling tables though am not gonna be a partaker in the gambling anymore.
How do I take advantages over the gambles while I am not gambling anymore?
I tend to invest in the gambling. How?
At my visits in the gambling grounds, I will be lending my funds to the losers who has run out of funds and willing to bet more if they have more money.
I tends to make this a deal with interest charges with concrete agreement to be secured and I will be opened to also accepting collaterals.
I verily know that I will succeed more of the inexperienced and those gamblers who doesn't have gambling budgets including those who can't take control over their gambling emotions
So you want to give loans? not just to gamblers? Well in offline or traditional based casinos, I know that this is somewhat like a norm. There is someone, at least I know a old lady, who are inside the casinos and giving loans to gamblers that he knows and with a huge interest and a with a collaterals. But in online? Not sure though, have you seen the Scam Accusations board? I mean there are members here, who even have a good reputation, making a loan of of course he will get it since he is a good and standing member of the community. However, there are cases that the individual suddenly disappear with a $1000 loan + interest that he defaulted. |
|
|
|
Fighters that we think are going to be underdogs are underdogs come Sunday it will be regular boxing day, where the favorites will dominate or even knock out the underdogs but I'm hoping for a very different scenario, like a huge upset or the underdogs putting up a valiant effort even thought they lose by decision, one case here is the Ngannou - Fury recent fight where we all thought its another favorite underdog scenario, but Ngannou putting a major surprise.
I hope to see this happens in any of the fight this Sunday, just a gallant effort from the underdogs is already good.
People are paying to have a good fight so I hope we'll see something unexpected come Sunday
Yup, at least they will give us a good fight as most probably the underdog will lose here as Stevenson is a clever boxer and him being the loser is a slim possibility. I'm hoping that De Los Santos would engage and take the fight to Shakur because if not, this could become a snore feast as the latter is more of a counter-puncher.  Bookies predict that this would end up in a decision so i'm really hoping that this would not be a boring fight. Yes, it will be more exciting if Edwin will go and engage and not just talk about it but in the actual fight he is not doing it. However, he hasn't face a opponent as clever or having that high boxing IQ like Stevenson. So it's good to bet that this fight might not go to distance as Stevenson might break Delos Santos in the middle to championship round. But in any case anyone from Dominican Republic wanted to support their boy and to make history, then yeah, why not go for it and see how Edwin will do and win it for his country and make history. However, for experience bettor, as you have said, it could be a dominant win by Stevenson and uses his counter to negate what Delos Santos can offer and then the fight going into distance like a snore feast. |
|
|
|
It was always obvious that Harden was the issue, since Rockets period as well. I mean in normal cases, like for example with Dame and all, I understand players being upset and wanting out, because he played over a decade there and they did not build a good team around him, and that looks like there was no desire by the team to win anything, they are happy to just spend as little as possible and make the team worth go up thanks to inflation, NBA getting more popular means their team worths more and they are happy owners. However, Rockets was never like that, all those calls about them getting Howard, getting CP3, getting Westbrook, and him still wanting out and not getting anything with that team was obvious. That famous 27 shots missed in a row was the demise of Harden, ever since that day, he never went back to being a star player, he just became a cry baby that wanted things all the time without actually giving anything back for getting what he wants. A player may want to get traded, but if he keeps making teams pay for him, and he doesn't do anything for them, then why would any team want him again?
And this could be the last straw on James Harden, if the Clippers didn't go to the playoffs, or at least relegated to 6th spot in the West and then have to go to a play-in just to make the playoffs, then we know who should be the problem with the Clippers. They are just started to have a season with their big 3 of Kawhi, Paul George and then Westbrook. Unfortunately, the management decided to get James in return and they lost a good defensive player in Nic Batum, who can also shoot 3 in crucial minutes. Just because Harden wanted to go to Clippers that Steve Ballmer gave in to the request and think that Harden is a good addition. Harden has a history already and the teams should learn from it. Now the curse is on the Clippers right now, they've lost a bunch of future picks as well so for now we can definitely say that the risk is not paying off. I believe that the biggest example of why Harden is not good for teams would be how Sixers are doing right now. It's been very few games so I am not saying those are the ones that matters the most, but they are leading the eastern conference right now, and they are 8-1 and that should show you how Harden is not all that helpful. Imagine you have a "star" player in your squad, and you do better without him than you did with him, would you still consider that player a star player? And we can say that there are no pressure on the shoulders of the Sixers right now, they are the hottest them and defeating their opponents by 5 points or more. And the biggest winner in the trade? It's Maxey, just score a career high recently and he is showing why he should be considered as their main point guard. It seems that he had matured already and that's why he is showing his best game as a Sixer. I personally would stop considering that player as a star player. In 2016 or in 2018 this Clippers squad would have been insanely good, everyone was great, but when we are talking about 2023, these are all has been that used to be good but no longer good at all, they are not even remotely good. The squad is also lacking size, they are all "guards" if you think about it, sure PG and Kawhi could be considered wings, but still no Power Forward at all, a pure small ball line up.
Just bad chemistry, they get Kahwi after winning the ring with the Raptors, but after that it went downhill for Leonard as he suffered injuries after injuries as a Clippers. And the same can be said as well to PG, if I'm not mistaken, they only did reach the 2nd round of playoff as his best with the Clippers. |
|
|
|
I don't know though, but it seems that there are no trash talking so far leading up to the fight. On the contrary, even Benavidez Sr is giving all praises to Demetrius Andrade as one if not the best fighter that his son is going to praise. A Olympian and held belts in 154 lbs and 160 lbs.
I think the target though of the Benavidez is Canelo Alvarez. But we will see, hopefully if they win here, Canelo might give him the title shot that they wanted for so long as it seems that Canelo is avoiding them and just hiding on the reasons of Alvarez doesn't want to fight another Mexican.
It's pretty obvious that Benavidez badly wants Canelo because it's not only all the Super Middleweight titles are at stake here, but another title that is at stake here, and also a big title is the title of the greatest Mexican fighter, I believe Canelo Alvarez already achieved that and Benavidez wants to take that away. And Canelo doesn't want this to happen, I'm sure Canelo is hoping that Andrade can upset Benavidez. That is what I'm trying to say, Benavidez and his camp, really wanted Canelo, but Alvarez as of this time doesn't want to give Benavidez his dues and just hiding on a lot of excuses. But in order to put pressure on Canelo, he needs to win this one again in a knockout or at least should be very convincing that Canelo might give him a shot on all of his belts and no longer hide on his "doesn't want another Mexican" fight. And if Benavidez wins convincingly Canelo has no excuse not to fight Benavidez, the boxing organizations and the boxing community will demand it, and if this happens I have a feeling that this is going to be the biggest Mexican fight since the Barrera - Morales fight, it is a fight for Mexico's pound for pound fighter, and the Mexican boxing community will be a thrill to have this fight happen.
100% agree on this, Maybe Canelo is afraid of David Benavidez and just hiding on excuses. But I doubt it though, but in any case, Benavidez should continue to fight and shows what he got and take that 0 of Andrade. That era though is very different, all Mexican great boxers really proved their point by fighting each other. |
|
|
|
In the immediate future, we can completely trust the speculation about this cycle until it breaks. Although I also agree with this speculation, I do not believe that this can remain like this forever because it will become easy to predict and those who know about it will take full advantage of this opportunity.
Because I'm becoming more and more friendly with bitcoin, I think I will always accumulate more bitcoin because after the next 10 years, or even the next 20 years, what I have will simply be bitcoin with no tie to fiat.
And that's what make this market very attractive to speculators, and so far the 4 year cycle hasn't been broken yet. After the block halving, give it a year or two we will see that it will have a big growth, which we call bull run and then we will reach ATH. So yeah, those smart investors are taking full advantage of that cycle and I haven't heard investors questioning the 4 year cycle as well. I guess it will have to continue, or it will continue unless the cycle broken. And I doubt that it will be broken though as the halving is scheduled every 4 years and making the supply more scarce and this where the brilliance of the design of Satoshi is revealed and that's why many investors are into bitcoin ecosystem. |
|
|
|
I watched Jake Paul’s newest YouTube video and there was some mention by him that he’s not trying to secure paydays anymore and that’s why this opponent is who he is. He’s trying to fight pros with more experience so he can continue learning and moving towards a legitimate title fight. That explains why he’s fighting a guy who is currently employed as an Uber driver.
And that is what he is really saying all along even at the start of his exhibitions match career. He is a big guy and fighting at CW but it doesn't mean he can just go fight a pro boxer and steam roll on them and then governing bodies will give him a good rankings. It's not that easy and looking at how he is late to chase his boxing dreams. But nevertheless, he is pursuing it so we have to gave it to him because not going to be an easy road. So slowly he is picking fighters like August, to really get as much experience as he can and maybe in the next fight he will be looking for a tougher opponent or at least a high tier boxer. |
|
|
|
Figures like this are good to write down to remind us why BTC can sell off early before its done with the full gain. People who have been holding this entire year want to cash out some of their gains which is totally natural. That harsh pullback does not mean its the new lower price, no price is an absolute truth that cannot be disputed its only correct in that moment to match buyers and sellers together.
I think they have every reason to sell off specially if they needed some money or if there is a emergency. But for me, I will stick to what I do best, that is to hold as long as I can and long for the long term. The bull run is just around the corner, I know it's next year, but we don't that time flies very fast in crypto market. So it's better to have a patience and not sell impulse selling. Most obvious inaccurate prices is when people rush to sell at any price, so fear events do this and often it will correct back up also hence the V formation on a chart. I reckon we can get 30k now and it'd be ok still, I will surprised with no proper pullback at all theres always some kind of test in a healthy bull run.
If ever there will be a pull back, I'm seeing like $32k will be like the price that we are going to see if there is a huge sell off that is coming. On the other hand, the price seems to be very steady though, we went almost $39k, corrected to $36k and now we are in the mids $37k. So there's a lot of movement that the chance to go to $30k-$32k might be slim at this point. |
|
|
|
Though loss for Bucks. Especially when it was Giannis' career night. He couldn't break his career high record, he was too tired in the last period. Bucks could only score 8 points in last 7 minutes, besides last 3-point which is meaningless. Pacers played the ending better and won. Turner and Mathurin helped Haliburton for this win. Mathurin made a career high with 26 points.
I haven't watched Damian Lillard with Bucks jersey yet but I could imagine how good they would be without injuries. I also liked Pacers tonight but I guess Sixers and Celtics are in better shape than these teams in the East.
54 big points for the big fella, unfortunately it was not enough as the Pacers is very though with Haliburton as their leader specially that dagger 3 that put them up with 1 point and then they played hard defense of Giannis. Also Giannis touch the ball, they are putting a lot of pressure on him, yeah he was really tired putting that huge numbers and then he didn't got any help except for Middleton. They really missed the services of Dame here, it could be a different outcome if he might be in the game. Giannis might not get that 54 points though, but what's important is that they needed a win to keep them at least at the top of East. And with their lost and Hawks winning, they are tied with them 5-3 apiece. |
|
|
|
What a hot discussion here  Do you think we need a rematch? Why not make another poll? Even though Fury won in a split decision, I dont think there should be a rematch. The problem was not because Ngannou is so good and can fight with champions on equal level, but simply because Fury underestimated him. If they would have a rematch I dont think that Fury is going to be so passive and slow. Because in that fight he did not show any footwork and tactics. He was rather straightforward. There were no tricks from him. He was only better at talking before the fight. I agree that we could use a new poll, but I disagree that there shouldn't be a rematch. So the only argument is that we can assume that Fury underestimated Francis and he would surely destroy him in a rematch? By that logic, why do we have any fights at all, why not just make assumptions on who would defeat who Fury himself admitted that he came properly prepared and did not underestimate Ngannou's skills, so there's no reason not to believe him. He will fight with Usyk anyway, so there's no need he can't fight Francis again after that. I think the exceptionally good performance of Francis put a dent in entire boxing as a sport, so it's in everyone's interest to have Fury proving to the world that he can do better than the first time around. Maybe I saw different interview, but in mine Fury told that due to there were no videos of Ngannou real boxing fights, they did not know what to expect. All the knew Ngannou has speed and power. Not much to build tactics on. Well, if on October 28 we saw prepared Fury, who fully understood what to expect from Ngannou, then no doubt he would have huge troubles against Usyk. My offer if Fury should have a rematch was more addressed to those who say that Ngannou won  But in general I would love to see fight against Usyk, then against Ngannou. Well there is video of his fights in MMA, at least the striking aspect is clearly shown there. So they could used it as a basis for them to gauge how good Ngannou will be as a boxer. For me they really underestimated him as he is a MMA fighter. And I do think that Fury is just saying post fight that Francis is good or even a difficult fight that Usyk (obviously he is down playing Usyk here). Nevertheless, its a rude awakening for the champion and he is very lucky that the judges give him the win here. I know that there is a continuing debate as to who win this fight. But it's clear to me that Fury didn't prepared or trained very hard in this fight, he is just saying that he did after the beatings that he got so somewhat stroke his ego and not to hurt. |
|
|
|
Welcome to the forum mate. It seems like you made the ANN thread in some hurry. You had the option to make the ANN thread attractive and filled with accurate informations, but this ANN thread lacks design, and it’s very dull to see. Basically it seems very unprofessional. But upon checking the site, I found that the site is really designed well. The site supports multiple languages and the color combination also looks impressive. Just need to update the ANN design here and the site has the capability to become really big. Hope you will consider my suggestions OP.
Right, it just shows that the OP or at least the people behind this casino is not very familiar on how to properly promote a site here. We understand it though, but as least with the comments from more experience gamblers, they could go back and edit this thread with more information and of course made a significant improvement in the design. They can either hire some professional members to make it for them. But first, welcome to the community, and second just listen to those comments above me. This is just constructive criticism and you shouldn't take it negatively. So consider those suggestions and for sure you might gain some gamblers to your platform. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
