|
Shit, almost sold out already, waiting for bitcoin confs sux.
|
|
|
|
Looks like BitFunder had almost 1500 shares of AM traded, AND nearly 1000BTC, in the last 24hrs  EDIT! |
|
|
|
Hopefully something substantial comes my way - it's my first ever divs after all.  That's sad considering you were doing escrow for so many cheaper shares weeks ago  |
|
|
|
Got my satoshis as well, im curious to see what this dividend is
My bet is .0095 |
|
|
|
Another round of dividends?
Every Wednesday. |
|
|
|
Looks like BitFunder had almost 1,100 shares of AM traded in the last 24hrs |
|
|
|
While I agree standard P/E ratios are normally way out of whack from the "real world" when looking at bitcoin. That said I still think ASICMINER is heavily undervalued right now. The only reason I'm selling now is because I have to. (though 0.7 is too low, I'm selling at 0.75, but even that only begrudgingly... I wanted to sell at 1.0 or higher, which I feel is easily attainable). So all of you who are agreeing with me that the current price is a steal... Why don't you buy my shares at 0.75?  Too funny! |
|
|
|
BitFunder is way too awesome to let harebrained schemes like AMC ruin its reputation.  Ukyo, please pay DT, deprived, MPOE-PR, and TF to act as gatekeepers/benevolent dictators for you WRT new listings. I'm with you on this one. I'm not so sure all those people would actually help, but I do think a team/consultant/soft-release process is due. ThickAsThieves, and you want to be on the team or be the consultant. I agreed with iCEBREAKER because, yes, I am putting out the feelers to get a consulting group together. |
|
|
|
BitFunder is way too awesome to let harebrained schemes like AMC ruin its reputation. Ukyo, please pay DT, deprived, MPOE-PR, and TF to act as gatekeepers/benevolent dictators for you WRT new listings. I'm with you on this one. I'm not so sure all those people would actually help, but I do think a team/consultant/soft-release process is due. |
|
|
|
Its so strange seeing Lucif converted into a bull.
You can only swim against the current for so long |
|
|
|
More like T&A wizard.  |
|
|
|
|
That dip is what i call a goxtrap, when all their dynamic data freezes, including the suggested bid on their website, dragging price down til it unfreezes.
|
|
|
|
Dividends will be paid tomorrow as I am still waiting on confirms.
//DeaDTerra
|
|
|
|
|
Lucif, at first I thought you were a little nutty, but this thread has become pretty interesting, thanks!
|
|
|
|
We've seen that the issuers have not sold all the shares they intended to or announced earlier. Seems like they are using this scaled pricing as a way to gauge demand.
Dutch auctions (with price reserves and minimum sale requirements) are a much better way to achieve that. It allows the crowd to decide if the company is worthy to be listed, instead of an exchange deciding that.
Good companies will raise more money with Dutch auctions.
And it won't create a pyramid type of a situation that pump-and-dump creates - which is good for investors.
So why not use better systems for IPO launches? Overall, auctions seem better for good companies, for investors, and for the exchange. The only parties it hurts are bad companies.
I'm not sure that your first assumption is true though (that they are testing demand). It could be they are intentionally creating an "Early Bird" situation to grease the wheels, like I mentioned. With Dutch Auctions not being the standard, I think they could just as easily be a recipe for a failed IPO. If I were to IPO a business I would probably offer early bird pricing too. Or, pre-determined batch pricing (not sure if there is an official term for this), where you do like 25 price levels, and release all at once. For example, 1000 shares for X, 1000 for X(1.1), 1000 for X(1.2)... and so forth. I'm sure there are even better approaches to pricing IPO shares, and ways to mix these methods of pricing, but I do lean towards accommodating all types of investors to make a successful IPO. |
|
|
|
|
Looks like they are making some moves onto Ozcoin.
EDIT: Hmm, it was showing about 750,000 on Ozcoin (plus the 5.8gh on BTCGuild) a few minutes ago. Now, it's only at about about 200,000 at Ozcoin.
|
|
|
|
One more debatable topic is:
I don't think a company should set multiple IPO prices.
x shares at 0.0001
y shares at 0.0002
This just encourages pump-and-dump.
Playing devil's advocate here, but as long as uptake of IPO shares is sufficient, why would the issuer care if people flipped shares? I'm theorizing that the flippers act as fluffers to get an IPO snowballing into completion, thus play a helpful (or at least not harmful) role. |
|
|
|
This is NOT bickering and I did not take replying to someone else's post in the BitFunder thread lightly. I knew damn well someone would bring it up, but outside of your comment answered in the next paragraph, this has nothing to do with BitFunder. This is saving the fucking investors their money because noone has done any legwork or discussion on it anywhere. (Incidentally, I didn't even start the discussion here?!)
I don't recall seeing any "it's virtual" claims anywhere on BitFunder. (in fact, Ukyo has poked fun at btct.co for our legal efforts...) And do I have to create a sock now just so I can discuss glaring issues with securities without being second-guessed?
Not trying to rile you up man, nor am I saying AMC is due trust at the moment. I made my points, and yours float right beside them. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
