|
1281
|
Economy / Securities / Re: BitFunder - Lets grow together! A request to all users - https://bitfunder.com
|
on: June 01, 2013, 05:18:39 PM
|
BTCT has a value analysis page where your estimated profits are shown for each asset based on average buying price and current price.. It would be great to have that here too.. its a real help sometimes..
I agree, but please note that BTCTC's analysis page does have its limitations. Importing shares and transferring shares can distort your values. Even when you sell shares, the resulting portfolio value is a bit distorted, if I recall correctly. |
|
|
|
|
1284
|
Economy / Securities / Re: ASICMINER: Entering the Future of ASIC Mining by Inventing It
|
on: June 01, 2013, 04:25:11 AM
|
People have been asking for a website for months.
Has FriedCat ever replied something about that ?
It might not have been directly about a website, but I recall FC saying some words suggesting that AM leaves opportunity for distributors to make any kind of service they want to. In other words, AM doesn't need a website, but if you want to but wholesale, and sell retail, go for it. Make your own website, sell their boards, etc. Or maybe I'm making this up... |
|
|
|
|
1285
|
Economy / Securities / Re: ASICMINER: Entering the Future of ASIC Mining by Inventing It
|
on: May 31, 2013, 08:55:08 PM
|
Average AM hashrate for last 6hrs is 30.57TH
Where did you get that? Looking at the asicminercharts website - it shows 25.27 and /live/ shows 25.20? Did I miss a place to bookmark? It was the bottom chart on the /live/ page. At the time, no other chart was loading. Now, it's the only chart not loading... |
|
|
|
|
1286
|
Economy / Securities / Re: ASICMINER: Entering the Future of ASIC Mining by Inventing It
|
on: May 31, 2013, 08:45:58 PM
|
Like every 4 days, this thread focused on something that MUST happen with ASICMINER. What's next?
It's Evolution TAT Evolution  (And well looking around the forum think we have someone who can make a decent website if the main team is busy) I could, but I won't. That's AM's job, and surely they will make it happen when they are ready  |
|
|
|
|
1287
|
Economy / Securities / Re: BitFunder - Lets grow together! A request to all users - https://bitfunder.com
|
on: May 31, 2013, 08:35:58 PM
|
Wee exchange is a deal-breaker for me, always has been, always will be.
Beyond that, I have no idea because I'm not using a site on which I do not trust the security. When I recently got an email that the system had failed to register med for two month because I have non-English characters in my name, I got all the evidence I need that the site is developed by amateurs, and I've seen enough professionally developed money systems fail to stay miles away from anything that looks, acts, and smells like amateur hour and doesn't give me an immedate sense of security.
.b
Man, you really love jumping to conclusions based on nearly arbitrary data... |
|
|
|
|
1290
|
Economy / Securities / Re: ASICMINER: Entering the Future of ASIC Mining by Inventing It
|
on: May 31, 2013, 05:43:21 PM
|
very very good point... someone just needs to take the initiative. Looks like AM/Friedcat have enough to worry about for now... someone can just set an example and away they go. I would jump on this if I had the skills/resources
I would personally pledge 1 btc towards a fund to produce an official storefront / website. We are shareholders after all, no reason we have to put this burden on friedcat. I propose we setup an address with John K. to serve as a website fund. We then put out a RFP for one of the many bitcoin enthusiast html geeks to produce an official site endorsed by friedcat. Features it should have: 1) Hosting of the official shareholder list with tools to make managing share purchases easier for freidcat (i'm thinking an existing shareholder could post his auction and the results could (with approval) transfer share ownership) 2) An official storefront for the masses to purchase upcoming ASIC hardware. 3) A Built in voting mechanism. It should be easier for friedcat to propose something and receive shareholder feedback. 4) ?? Agree! I would do this to be a part of spread the AM love and work with AM, but I'm sooooo swamped. Like, get it done or bad things happen swamped. Otherwise I'd be coding a prototype now. Someone go do it! There is no need to pledge personal coins for features, AM has plenty revenue coming in, and a team of demonstrably intelligent people mapping out their future. |
|
|
|
|
1292
|
Economy / Securities / Re: BitFunder - Lets grow together! A request to all users - https://bitfunder.com
|
on: May 31, 2013, 03:24:31 PM
|
Random thoughts:
I think that WeExchange is providing a significant barrier to new users, but as an existing user I don't mind it.
Options fees are way too high. 2.5% is much more fair and might even bring higher revenues. I think 10% deters a lot of people from participating in options trading.
Show sales of options on a graph like sales of stock.
No trollbox please.
The 10% fee only applies to the premium amount. Simply reduce the premium and inflate the strike price instead if you want to manage your fees better. |
|
|
|
|
1294
|
Economy / Securities / Re: [HAVELOCK] ASICM, a New Micro-share ASICMINER Passthrough!
|
on: May 31, 2013, 02:07:41 PM
|
They are installing an upgraded trade engine at the moment. Thanks for that thought it was down again that was fast XD Upgrade took about 5 minutes to complete yesterday around 5PM EST.. The new trading engine is now in place.. orders will usually get processed before the ajax-drive page reloads... Upon placing orders, there will now be a "Recent orders (last 60 seconds)" box that appears right between the buy/sell forms and the bids/asks list, that way you can see that your order was a) placed, and b) possibly already filled. The orderbook page also refreshes via ajax every 20 seconds... (yes, we're working on a websocket to provide live updates too.. just want to finish the API first) Love it! |
|
|
|
|
1295
|
Economy / Securities / Re: BitFunder - Lets grow together! - https://bitfunder.com
|
on: May 31, 2013, 02:02:20 PM
|
|
Glad to see this thread, and I really hope people chime in.
I use almost all of the exchanges, so I am already intimately familiar with the differences.
1. For me, Weex is a non-issue. I see it as a bonus layer of security that is no more inconvenient than BTCTC's manual withdrawals.
2. Trading fees are a bit high for new users, but I trade enough to where I have a high Tier and it's less of an issue for me.
3. BTCTC has some subtle, yet very useful little features, like bolding the Ask/Bid when it's me that represents that order; showing full market data within the My Portfolio page, etc. But I also LOVE Bitfunder's live order books.
4. Personally, I hate bots, and I think they deter humans from making more frequent orders, possibly making them zero sum for volume. However, I understand the need for APIs. If bots started to get out of hand on BF, I know I'd trade less.
5. Notifications, yes please, but not high priority for me.
6. Direct BitFunder coin accounts would be very useful, and could coexist with Weex really. I think the barrier with Weex is that many people have trouble with creating their accounts, mostly due to confirmation emails getting lost in limbo/spam. You have already implemented direct Litecoin compatibility, why not Bitcoin too?
7. A chatbox on a stock exchange would be interesting for sure. I'd love to see it, but worry about what degree of moderation would be required. Not sure if this degrades the professionalism of the site...
I probably have more I could think of, but I'll let the thread live a little first. I need to think about some of the things Havelock has that might be worth comparing.
|
|
|
|
|
1300
|
Economy / Securities / Re: [BTCTC][[ASICMINER-PT]] - Public trading of ASICMINER shares
|
on: May 30, 2013, 02:53:10 PM
|
1. I didn't accidentally click twice, it was an honest limitation of the software that led to the error. It has been resolved and should never happen again.
I didn't say accidentally or that it was your fault. Based on the timing and other posts, it appears to me that the btct.co website said that the first dividend payment was cancelled, so 7 minutes later you did it again and then the first one did actually go through and wasn't cancelled? I'm assuming that the limitation you refer to that has been resolved is this incorrect processing of a payment when it reports cancelled? Anyway, have you and burnside worked out how to get back the funds from the erroneous dividend payment? Yes and yes |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
