I'm a little confused, I think you probably misspelled "fiat money", or by mistake you wrote bitcoin instead, am I right? Because besides fiat money I can't think about any other "endless crashing garbage", and I'm trying hard eh, but no, nothing else comes up to my mind  

Praticamente, ancora una volta, stanno facendo di tutto per ritardare le operazioni di recupero. Però in teoria a questo punto non ci sono più ulteriori documenti da mandare, no? Quindi possono far passare qualche altro giorno, poi sarei curioso di vedere cosa faranno 

Probably it's just a coincidence but I noticed as well that it's not the first time that Saylor says he bought a ton of bitcoins and, after a few hours, the prices has a correction. I can't explain why and I don't think there is any kind of manipulation, maybe it's just bad luck...

Those two points are a major cause in my opinion. I would also add that buying a bitcoin is not exactly a straight forwarding thing to do since usually you have to open an account on an exchange, send the documents, wait to be verified, transfer the money and then decide where to store them. Many times when you explain to people all these steps, a lot of them immediately think it's too much effort. 

That is very noble of him! I always wondered what people with that much money could do, this is probably the best answer! At this point I also wonder if he is going to leave something to his (future) kids, lately more and more wealthy people don't want to spoil their kids leaving them millions and millions of dollars.

What do you mean? How can any government tax someone over money they lost? They tax the gains, if you have lost money than there is no gain, so of course you are not going to pay. Otherwise it would be like asking for tax money to a business that when bankrupt, how are they supposed to pay? And especially, why should they?

It's possible that some wallets in the future will require a KYC process. Anyway talking about Blockchain.com, just stay away from that exchange/wallet, I've read so many stories of people who found their wallet locked for "security reasons" and despite all the documentation they sent, they wouldn't unlock the wallet. I wouldn't put any satoshi there, and for sure I wouldn't give them my personal details.

Could you please remind me in what year MtGox scammed its users? Many things changed in the meantime, and all the exchanges that scammed usually were minor exchanges, sometimes located in secondary countries (I remember one in Turkey for example). Of course everyone can believe what he wants to believe, if you think that Coinbase or Binance will scam their users, you are totally free to think it. But again, I don't see a single reason for them to do it.

Ti passo in privato il mio address BTC così mi puoi rimborsare il pc che sto lanciando fuori dalla finestra dopo aver letto il tuo post

I never bought bitcoin from an ATM and probably I won't do it in the future either. High commissions, personal informations, very high spread... If you want to try just for fun it could be ok, but if someone has a little experience I really don't see the point unless you absolutely need some satoshi and that's the only feasible way.

Lasciamo stare va, che quando penso che hanno salvato certi giornali con i soldi pubblici invece di lasciarli fallire come sarebbe stato giusto fare mi sale un nervoso...

Chiunque abbia un minimo di conoscenza delle criptovalute capisce immediatamente che questa proposta non ha senso. Immaginate la quantità di dati che gli exchange dovrebbero processare ogni singola volta che qualcuno fa un nuovo deposito/prelievo considerando la quantità di coin/token e wallet che ognuno può comprare ed utilizzare, sarebbe una mole di lavoro enorme che già si aggiunge al KYC, che non capisco perché a questo punto sembrerebbe che non sia più sufficiente, vorrei capire perché. 

Tra l'altro io vorrei capire perché all'UE faccia così schifo qualsiasi cosa che riguarda l'innovazione ed il futuro. Potenzialmente potrebbero attrarre capitali esteri, creare posti di lavoro, invece no, fingiamo di essere fermi al 1800.

Nel frattempo nel Regno Unito, libero dal peso dell'UE, il ministro della finanza dichiara che punta a far diventare il Regno Unito un hub internazionale per le criptovalute: https://twitter.com/financialjuice1/status/1510979717024915464?s=21&t=HGeph-SztX_qHxW69yinTg

This is going to impact only the Indian cryptocurrency market that, with all due respect, it's not very important. We survived the actual ban from China, not for bitcoin only but for mining as well, having or not having India won't change things, I just feel sorry for the Indian people.

Yes and no, mainly because someone who is going to buy bitcoin at an ATM probably is going to get only a few hundred dollars, not big quantities. And as far as I remember those ATM don't have very good prices but again, if you buy only $100-200 you won't even notice that.

Let's not forget that bitcoin was created a little more than 10 years ago, so we're talking about a very short time frame. And many people don't get approved by banks to open a bank account, so sooner or later someone will them about bitcoin and how to easily transfer money without needing a bank approval.

I'm not sure about the second option for a country like India, I try to explain myself better: a EU citizen for example can easily go to another country within the EU without needing a permit/visa; people in the US can go to another US state with different rules; I'm not sure if Indian people can actually move somewhere else as permanent resident without a visa. Of course it all depends on the amount of money we're talking about, $100k for example may look like a lot of money but in reality in many countries that's nothing. If we're talking about several millions than it's a totally different story.   

I've read many stupid things about bitcoin and cryptos, but here we just got to another level. Those people have no idea what hodling means.

Personally I highly doubt I'll ever buy bitcoins from an ATM but it's nice to see that other people can do it, maybe some of them will buy just out of curiosity. And another thing: if there are people/companies that keep investing money in these ATMs, it means that they are getting a good feedback!

Probably it would be a lot uncertainty to the whole crypto world because many people would be scared that he could start to sell his bitcoins. And if bitcoin suffers, the whole crypto ecosystem suffers as well. I don't really see any reason for Satoshi to show up again, it's clear why he chose to disappear.

Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies are one thing, digital payments another, just think about PayPal for example, that has been created several years ago. And even more than moving money around bitcoin gave people the consciousness that they can be their own bank, they can actually own their money without relaying on anyone else. That's for me the biggest lesson I've learnt with bitcoin.

Tienici aggiornati! Ti auguro davvero che tu possa venirne a capo a forza di insistere, sperando che non facciano qualche porcheria chiudendo il tuo caso senza particolari motivazioni. Assurdo comunque che un sito relativamente famoso come Blockchain.com faccia cose del genere e sia ancora in piedi...