Bitcoin Forum
May 06, 2024, 12:10:10 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 [344] 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Martin Armstrong Discussion  (Read 646796 times)
blinder007
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 18
Merit: 1


View Profile
March 09, 2020, 06:57:27 AM
 #6861

Nobody in the financial services sector goes to jail for loosing money. You get prosecuted if you misrepresent facts like performance records, actual performance, or just outright defraud your clients.

And that MA did and got sent to jail for.  What he did proves he is a liar, thief, and he has a sick personality.By not taking resposability for losses he made for his clients,and even trying to hide them,  shows he has a terrible character.   Do not trust this guy. He is bad. You get ZERO VALUE from him for your money. Buyer stay away!!!

Crook  of the Month: Martin Armstrong
Martin Armstrong: Miserable Trader and Former Ponzi scheme Operator Lies about His Terrible Track Record.
He claims to have been “self-taught”. I suppose he taught himself how to cheat investors because he certainly never learned how to trade commodities, as evidenced by the massive trading losses he suffered.
The district court sentenced Armstrong to sixty months imprisonment and three years supervised release, and ordered him to pay $ 80 Mio in restitution to sixty defrauded customers.
As part of his guilty plea, Armstrong entered a sworn allocution admitting to and describing his crime. In his allocution, Armstrong admitted that between 1992 and 1999, he sold promissory notes issued by Princeton Economics subsidiaries (“Princeton Notes”) to investors, mostly Japanese corporations.
Armstrong through his agents, represented to the investors that the proceeds from the sale of the Princeton Notes would be held in accounts at Republic New York Securities and that those accounts “would be separated and segregated from Republic’s own accounts and would not be available to Republic for its own benefit.”
According to Armstrong’s allocution, after he suffered “some millions of dollars of trading losses”, he decided “not to disclose to investors that ….  Substantial losses had been experienced in this trading of futures. And we did not disclose it.” Armstrong also admitted that his concealment of his losses went beyond non-disclosure: “letters were sent by my company to investors concerning how much money was in fact in the accounts assigned to them. I … did send out those letters, even though  I knew the amounts in the accounts were less than the letter stated.”

And that are the facts.
"Governments are good at cutting off the heads of a centrally controlled networks like Napster, but pure P2P networks like Gnutella and Tor seem to be holding their own." -- Satoshi
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714997410
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714997410

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714997410
Reply with quote  #2

1714997410
Report to moderator
dow_wizard
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 16
Merit: 1


View Profile
March 10, 2020, 04:45:24 AM
 #6862

A rumor in Florida is that Martin Armstrong tested positive on coronavirus. Supposedly Mr. Armstrong has mild symptoms right now but his condition can be exacerbated by syphilis he contracted during the last WEC.
over45
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 99
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 10, 2020, 05:40:42 PM
 #6863

You Armstrong bashers are just embarrassing yourself with your childish and misinformed posts.  But we expect nothing less from the garbageman and peanut gallery. 
s29
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 184
Merit: 8


View Profile
March 11, 2020, 02:26:33 PM
 #6864

This week turning pt in many markets
Coronavirus non issue

Minor monthly bearish elected only. Not in Nas or SPX
Likely see a new low in March but 24000 to mid 24000s support. if 24,680 hold on monthly will head back up to test highs by may/ June

Trade well

Is that really what Armstrong said? Roll Eyes Armstrong's downplaying of the Coronavirus didn't age well, since European equities already became a bear market.
unwashed
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 53
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 11, 2020, 03:54:26 PM
Last edit: March 12, 2020, 01:17:32 PM by unwashed
 #6865

This week turning pt in many markets
Coronavirus non issue

Minor monthly bearish elected only. Not in Nas or SPX
Likely see a new low in March but 24000 to mid 24000s support. if 24,680 hold on monthly will head back up to test highs by may/ June

Trade well

Is that really what Armstrong said? Roll Eyes Armstrong's downplaying of the Coronavirus didn't age well, since European equities already became a bear market.

I assume he means the month of Feb. Just to clarify Feb 2020 closed at 25,409.36. Right now it's 23,960, close to a 2,000 pt drop. Also Feb gaped down and is an outside reversal month to the downside, The gap was enough for me to lighten up the load.  
truth727
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 28
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 12, 2020, 03:24:06 AM
 #6866

quiet in here lets kick it up a notch.martins call on the ecm is making me bank boys. his latest private blogs wow just wow.  Grin
Alex-11
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 133
Merit: 0


View Profile WWW
March 12, 2020, 11:37:57 AM
 #6867

MA on Feb. 02th on the private Blog

Quote
The Dow peaked precisely with the ECM, which often warns of a reasonable correction in the 20% range is possible.

Today the -20% has been achieved.


https://i.imgur.com/ZirXk4W.png

Trolls, it's your turn  Grin
etoimene
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 64
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 12, 2020, 11:45:30 AM
 #6868

I think we will overachieve a bit.
Traxo
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 568
Merit: 703



View Profile
March 12, 2020, 11:50:47 AM
Last edit: March 12, 2020, 12:02:25 PM by Traxo
 #6869

MA on Feb. 02th on the private Blog

Quote
The Dow peaked precisely with the ECM

No, it didn't peak precisely with the ECM, regardless of what MA claims. Or rather, if you want to consider ECM date a "peak", then drop was 3%, not 20% until the next peak which was some weeks after the ECM. I believe we already discussed it some pages ago in-between the Socrates-advertisement posts. I think @s29 pointed it out in form of an image, so I guess find that.

Quote
which often warns of a reasonable correction in the 20% range is possible.
 
"often", "warns" - ambiguous again. You could never know what he meant then when you read it, only now in hindsight.  
Why was he so insecure if he's always 100% correct as he claims?  
Again, you shills are welcome to post your opened trades in real-time when you attempt to interpret Armstrong's writing, instead of digging up his old posts in hindsight and then claim he somehow predicted it.  
It's been months and not a single proof of anyone interpreting anything correctly in real-time, so obviously that trend is going to continue.
Traxo
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 568
Merit: 703



View Profile
March 12, 2020, 02:20:36 PM
 #6870



Ohhh yeah funny joke hehehehehehe. Haha, get it?  
Lol, obviously Marty would never write a computer program solely to scam others *wink wink* hehehehe
AnonymousCoder
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 580
Merit: 17


View Profile
March 12, 2020, 02:37:48 PM
Last edit: July 20, 2021, 05:56:17 PM by AnonymousCoder
 #6871



Ohhh yeah funny joke hehehehehehe. Haha, get it?
Lol, obviously Marty would never write a computer program solely to scam others *wink wink* hehehehe

hehehe, good joke.

There is no evidence he would ever do this. Has never done this before.

Would only be available to WEC attendees for a monthly fee for testing and released five years later.

Or sold out after three hours like his book at amazon.com that only he himself could buy.




Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for that reason but he has not changed.

Read this blog starting here to find out more about computerized fraud.


See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog.
trulycoined
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 85
Merit: 8


View Profile
March 12, 2020, 04:56:17 PM
 #6872

I will leave this here:

MA explained the 2020.05 "turning point" would be inflationary:

"But generally, the next wave of the ECM business cycle should be an inflationary one."
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/armstrongeconomics101/ecm-armstrongeconomics101/the-next-cycle-in-the-ecm-beginning-january-2020/

"The killing of Soleimani... is the precursor to the turn in the ECM which is due January 18, 2020. This should contribute to the inflationary cycle ahead."
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/world-news/war/iran-the-cycle-of-war/

"This next wave should be inflationary."
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/armstrongeconomics101/ecm-armstrongeconomics101/the-great-alignment-2020/


Wrong. Again. Right on schedule! As always, whatever MA/Socrates "forecasts" - ALWAYS do the opposite, and you will have winning trades.

US CPI Inflation Rate


truth727
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 28
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 12, 2020, 05:39:13 PM
 #6873

thats better woof woof kick it up feed em trolls. but yes another great call by martin. and his insight on repo is great. i urge people not to be jealous so of us like to make bank others like to talk. me i listen to martin and make bank. Roll Eyes
MA_talk
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 226
Merit: 10


View Profile
March 12, 2020, 06:48:16 PM
 #6874



Martin Armstrong
The Falsifier

As observed countless times, our Charlatan-in-Chief cannot handle the truth so he has to manipulate it to fit his narrative.

Wikipedia is no exception. Here is the proof by means of two recent examples:

Crude Oil Prediction


Original version at 16:26, 18 February 2020 (click link below to review):

Martin Armstrong

Quote
In July 2014 Armstrong incorrectly predicted that crude oil prices would rally into 2017 in line with his war models.[12] At the time of this prediction, the crude oil futures price was USD105.53, and it declined below USD40.[13]

Falsified version with prediction reversed at 11:18, 10 March 2020 (click link below to review):

Martin Armstrong

Quote
In July 2014 Armstrong rightly predicted in which he said "..oil peaked intraday in 2009 but the highest yearly close came in 2011. [12] At the time of this , the crude oil futures price was USD105.53, and it declined below USD40.[13]


October 2015 "Big Bang" Prediction


Original version at 16:26, 18 February 2020 (click link below to review):

Martin Armstrong

Quote
According to an editorial in The Guardian, Armstrong incorrectly predicted that a sovereign debt crisis, or "Big Bang" as he called it, would begin on 1 October 2015.[11]

Falsified version with prediction reversed at at 11:51, 10 March 2020 (click link below to review):

Martin Armstrong

Quote
According to an editorial in The Guardian, Armstrong incorrectly predicted that a sovereign debt crisis, or "Big Bang" as he called it, would begin on 1 October 2015. However, the writer of the news article has misinterpreted the prediction as a sudden market crash like in 2008 global financial crisis, rather the prediction of the sovereign debt crisis is in a long term decline in the bond market and the global economy has been declining since 1st October 2015, therefore Armstrong prediction is been proven correct. [11]

These are just two samples. There is more.
In the Wikipedia edit history, we even find his (click) St. Petersburg, Florida IP address (look for 12:47, 28 January 2020‎ 2603:9000:9a06:4700:d504:4f98:c4b5:be8).

How is that consistent with his own bashing of Wikipedia?

See link below:

Wikipedia: Fake News & Propaganda – A Tool of the Deep State?

You Be the Judge.




Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for that reason but he has not changed.

Read this blog starting at page 273 to find out more about computerized fraud.


See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog.


That's terrific materials that you find.  Great job on catching Armstrong falsifying in the act.
MA_talk
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 226
Merit: 10


View Profile
March 12, 2020, 06:50:09 PM
 #6875


Just a flu, as Armstrong said,

https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/international-news/disease/why-exaggerated-nonsense-on-flu/

https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/international-news/disease/coronavirus-still-appears-to-be-normal-virus/

Such a great call?  Oh, he is never "wrong".
over45
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 99
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 12, 2020, 06:56:14 PM
 #6876

Quote
"But generally, the next wave of the ECM business cycle should be an inflationary one."
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/armstrongeconomics101/ecm-armstrongeconomics101/the-next-cycle-in-the-ecm-beginning-january-2020/

"The killing of Soleimani... is the precursor to the turn in the ECM which is due January 18, 2020. This should contribute to the inflationary cycle ahead."
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/world-news/war/iran-the-cycle-of-war/

"This next wave should be inflationary."
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/armstrongeconomics101/ecm-armstrongeconomics101/the-great-alignment-2020/

I think I'm beginning to understand why the bashers hate Armstrong.  Sheer ineptitude on their part.  If you don't think inflation is on the rise - you aren't paying attention.  The coronavirus, drop in the stock market and oil is not a trend - it is an event.  We are setting up for inflation the likes none of the children here have seen before.  Just today the FED said they would do an ADDITIONAL One TRILLION in repo.  Connect the dots and learn to understand what is being said.  DB is at critical support.  We are in inning 2 of a most dangerous game and only folks like Armstrong really understand what is going on.  The children here have likely lost their shirts.  They are impatient & naive and it shows.
CaymanJack
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 49
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 12, 2020, 07:16:27 PM
 #6877

Quote
"But generally, the next wave of the ECM business cycle should be an inflationary one."
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/armstrongeconomics101/ecm-armstrongeconomics101/the-next-cycle-in-the-ecm-beginning-january-2020/

"The killing of Soleimani... is the precursor to the turn in the ECM which is due January 18, 2020. This should contribute to the inflationary cycle ahead."
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/world-news/war/iran-the-cycle-of-war/

"This next wave should be inflationary."
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/armstrongeconomics101/ecm-armstrongeconomics101/the-great-alignment-2020/

I think I'm beginning to understand why the bashers hate Armstrong.  Sheer ineptitude on their part.  If you don't think inflation is on the rise - you aren't paying attention.  The coronavirus, drop in the stock market and oil is not a trend - it is an event.  We are setting up for inflation the likes none of the children here have seen before.  Just today the FED said they would do an ADDITIONAL One TRILLION in repo.  Connect the dots and learn to understand what is being said.  DB is at critical support.  We are in inning 2 of a most dangerous game and only folks like Armstrong really understand what is going on.  The children here have likely lost their shirts.  They are impatient & naive and it shows.

Obviously you're not paying attention. Even your great sage said the REPO injection are not QE.

https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/markets-by-sector/interest-rates/repo-disinformation/
over45
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 99
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 12, 2020, 07:30:16 PM
 #6878

The Repo is not QE.  How hard is that to understand?   
CaymanJack
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 49
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 12, 2020, 07:40:14 PM
 #6879

The Repo is not QE.  How hard is that to understand?   

Then why did you even bring it up when talking about inflation?
MA_talk
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 226
Merit: 10


View Profile
March 12, 2020, 10:04:45 PM
Last edit: March 13, 2020, 12:44:39 AM by MA_talk
 #6880

The Repo is not QE.  How hard is that to understand?  

Then why did you even bring it up when talking about inflation?

I know why.  Because over45 is a paid troll, and Armstrong is never "wrong", because
he said that repo is not inflationary, AND
then repo IS inflationary, AND
there is no conflict, but

you just don't put the two posts side-by-side for the naives to realize that he is a con artist, similar to his said ECM date that

it's on October 7th, 2015
https://web.archive.org/web/20190210014758/https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/writings/1999-2/the-business-cycle-and-the-future/

AND it's on October 1st, 2015
https://web.archive.org/web/20170514145217/https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/world-news/did-world-war-iii-start-on-the-precise-day-of-the-ecm/

AND it's accurate "down to the day" as the previous URL says.

But you don't tell the naives that October 1st is NOT the same as October 7th.

Armstrong just counts on people forgetting all the wrong BS that he said, and only remember the few "good" calls out of several thousands that sticks in their memory.

That is his "AI" Socrates, An Idiot.



Pages: « 1 ... 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 [344] 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!