Martin Armstrong Discussion

[Alex-11]

... discredited

This rather applies to AnonymousCoder (or hater). He has been thoroughly discredited in his previous blog posts about the rise of Gold in June/July 2019 time frame where he completely missed the Socrates Indicators which have correctly predicted the rise of Gold during that uptrend.
Furthermore, the "sceptics" here in this forum keep ignoring that it's "stupid" (in the words of Armstrong) to to trade short to mid term , solely on MA's private blog posts.

[1714643585]

1714643585

[s29]

You need to start thinking for yourself Armstrong is not the type to hold your hand.

exactly. it was mentioned several times in this forum (on on Martin's blog) to not solely rely on the SOC private blog commentary

What a nonsense.

This thread clearly has exposed that Armstrong has done a wide range of wrong predictions and even blatant lies on his Public Blog, his Private Blog, his Socrates computer, his Arrays, without even acknowledging one mistake. And let's not forget that he is a convicted conman.

Of course, he does so many predictions and statements that he's right from time to time (also Socrates can be right as an after-the-fact Captain Hindsight computermodel), but for someone who calles himself "The Forecaster" (or at least gave permission to use this specific title for his biopic film), he's wrong too many times.

Armstrong's con-tactics are also exposed by covering both sides, using (imaginary?) fanmail, using (woolly) dramatheatrical statements to juice things up, asking excessive amounts of money for his services, Armstrong and staff ignoring difficult questions, etc.

[Alex-11]

...

as usual, if you don't know what to say, just change the topic and talk about random things that come to your mind.

[s29]

...

as usual, if you don't know what to say, just change the topic and talk about random things that come to your mind.

What? I'm answering ontopic on your statement You just took a personal jab on me.

[Alex-11]

What a nonsense.

well, you've started first 

[dibley8899]

   is Alex's IP address in Florida lol?

Back to Marty and hes worth Billions you know but he really wants your US$15  even though he wants to save the world. As for the worldwide offices these will just be people on commission for collecting payments in the Middle East usually.

Regarding climate change you could probably watch it on youtube Adapt2030 before Marty has time to post it.

The turning point on the ECM is this coming January which is a low? yet stocks are supposed to put in a high?   hmmmmmm

[dow_wizard]

Martin Armstrong and Socrates are fraud. Martin Armstrong will steal your money.

[DanB1]

... discredited

This rather applies to AnonymousCoder (or hater). He has been thoroughly discredited in his previous blog posts about the rise of Gold in June/July 2019 time frame where he completely missed the Socrates Indicators which have correctly predicted the rise of Gold during that uptrend.
Furthermore, the "sceptics" here in this forum keep ignoring that it's "stupid" (in the words of Armstrong) to to trade short to mid term , solely on MA's private blog posts.

Alex; Talking about Gold, what about MA's 1% rule?
The so called bullish monthly reversal was elected by more than 2%, Gold went straight up but we have never seen it return to the reversal (1362.5) in the 3 months after the election.

[Alex-11]

Alex; Talking about Gold, what about MA's 1% rule?
The so called bullish monthly reversal was elected by more than 2%, Gold went straight up but we have never seen it return to the reversal (1362.5) in the 3 months after the election.

I haven't verified the 1% rule, so I can't comment on the validity of it.
In general , my understanding is that there is nothing in Socrates that is always 100%.  You have to factor in that things are not always going in accordance with the handbook.  Trades can go wrong  and that's why one still needs a stop-loss.  However, for a 1% rule to make sense, of course there needs to be a certain reliability in that rule.
To estimate whether the 1% rule might apply in a certain situation, the Array and the reversals that come next should also influence the chances of a 1% pull back.  E.g. if there is a  large reversals gab after the elected reversal and/or no weekly / daily reversals are there, then the chances are higher that there won't be a pull-back because of the lack of resistance.
As I said, I've not verified the 1% rule, but I think this could give you an idea when there might be no pull-back.

[AnonymousCoder]

The 1% rule is just an excuse for the fact that Socrates period end is rarely aligned with the actual wave of the market. So when you have some volatility that is actually worth trading, then the reversal system just gets in the way. The system is so rigid and stupid!

At the end of the day, the user is the system and there is no way that one cold build a robot that trades based on this Socrates contraption. That alone is the proof that there is no value in it.

Armstrong supporters are discussing these things as if they were some kind of science. Ridiculous. These rules are just gimmicks. Try to trade based on it a hundred times. You will be broke whether you follow the rules strictly or not. Because there is no accuracy in the rules. Nobody here has been able to prove that it works. The majority of people confirm that it doesn't work. The discussion is dead.



Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for that reason but he has not changed.

Read this blog starting here to find out more about computerized fraud.


See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog.
.

[Alex-11]

The discussion is dead.

yes boss.
sure boss!
 

[s29]

What a nonsense.

well, you've started first  

"What a nonsense" was just an introduction to a larger answer where I explain why what you stated is nonsense. Instead you just post pointless oneliners to take cheap jabs at people here.

[Gumbi]

... discredited

This rather applies to AnonymousCoder (or hater). He has been thoroughly discredited in his previous blog posts about the rise of Gold in June/July 2019 time frame where he completely missed the Socrates Indicators which have correctly predicted the rise of Gold during that uptrend.
Furthermore, the "sceptics" here in this forum keep ignoring that it's "stupid" (in the words of Armstrong) to to trade short to mid term , solely on MA's private blog posts.

Alex; Talking about Gold, what about MA's 1% rule?
The so called bullish monthly reversal was elected by more than 2%, Gold went straight up but we have never seen it return to the reversal (1362.5) in the 3 months after the election.

In June Gold elected its monthly bullish at 1362 and 4 others the last at 1392.7 which it tested in July/

[AnonymousCoder]

After years of being online, Socrates numbers still don't add up:

You may experience delays and discrepancies

That is the original text as of today - nothing as changed.

And Gumbi and Alex11, you are still making claims about the accuracy of this system back in June?

Don't be surprised if you are ridiculed.

You better get a computer programmer to fix Socrates before you raise your heads here.

Nobody is interested in your meaningless talk. Did you not notice?


Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for that reason but he has not changed.

Read this blog starting here to find out more about computerized fraud.


See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog.

[Alex-11]

- nothing as changed.

Well, regarding Socrates features that's wrong. The text is still there, but the arrays have been fixed lately.

[AnonymousCoder]

Well, that's wrong. The text is still there, but the arrays have been fixed lately.

After years of being online, Socrates numbers still don't add up:

You may experience delays and discrepancies

That is the original text as of today - nothing as changed.

And Gumbi and Alex11, you are still making claims about the accuracy of this system back in June?

Don't be surprised if you are ridiculed.

You better get a computer programmer to fix Socrates before you raise your heads here.

Nobody is interested in your meaningless talk. Did you not notice?


Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for that reason but he has not changed.

Read this blog starting here to find out more about computerized fraud.


See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog.

[etoimene]

 but the arrays have been fixed lately.

What exactly has been fixed?

[Alex-11]

before it was mostly impossible to identify turning points via the aggregate row. They were jumping back and forth or were "locked" to a certain column.   The other rows were fine.
The aggregate row is now also working as expected.

[s29]

Thank you for exposing MA.

I read MA's blog for almost 10 years and was one of early subscribers to Socrates. I canceled my subscription earlier this year because of terrible trading results.

Martin Armstrong is a fraud and you will lose money following his advice.

Armstrong's 2019 in a nutshell:

[Gumbi]

@s29

funny but we didn't elect a yearly bearish reversal on the S&P 500 at the end of 2018. Armstrong never said no new highs only no new highs on a sustainable basis and the rally we are in currently in is not sustainable according to the energy model on the monthly level as well.

Armstrong is calling for quite a significant pullback going into 2021 if we do in fact make a high in January 2020 in line with the ECM.