ALERT!!!BTCs obtained from "hacker" selling altcoins are in the move.
4 transactions(24 BTCs) came out yesterdayFourth(last) transaction came out of Belize"Hacker" used Tor ,but I sucessfully found his Bitcoin network exit nodes in Nederland 185.38.14.215 and more important 62.45.122.228
Coins are moved to address
1NHu8rMmMPezBX3uQEjtSCtFLRrVtGQYnnhttps://www.walletexplorer.com/wallet/fa618e6ed487073a?from_address=1NHu8rMmMPezBX3uQEjtSCtFLRrVtGQYnnAll points that "hacker" has moved BTCs to his wallets in Nederland (Cryptsy servers were too in Nederland)
Are these the hacker coins from that address paul posted i.e. the fabled 13,000 stash?
If not and its cryptsy coins is it possible that the receivers now have proper control and are moving?
These BTCs are from wallet where hacker put BTCs he obtained from selling stolen altcoins of Cryptsy on different exchanges.
Last transactions he made yesterday - he used TOR trying to conceal them,but in fact just by following blockchain txs you can find exit nodes.Cant conceal blockchain.
All his exit nodes were in Nederland.
One more detail - I carefully studied how he transmitted transactions and Iam sure it is not ordinary desktop BTC wallet,but specialized version used by exchanges,but it is not multisignature.
Well done. What makes you think its not an ordinary desktop BTC wallet? I assume it the frequency and split of the transactions which makes it program like nature on the movements. I.e. time delays exact split amounts etc. We all know its paul vernon or someone in cryptsy that did the stealing.
What i can't for the life of me understand is why are they moving the altcoin sell funds and not the stolen btc funds. Those just don't move but its the biggest cash cow. Its defying logic. Is he hoping he can move sold altcoins and nobody will notice?
If those btc go to a china exchange its almost definite that its paul. No other reason.
I wonder if these findings can be submitted to an exchange alliance to prevent any acceptance of the coins or freeze them when they come in.
The way how hacker BTC wallet is automatically branching transactions is the same I saw at Cryptsy, Bittrex,BTC-e. Withdrawal requests are grouping and transmitting one by one in each new mined block.
Why hacker did not move stolen BTCs first? Good question.
Unlikely to the other hackers,this hacker does not trust Bitcoin mixers,but was absolutely convinced that is perfectly safe to sell stolen altcoins sending them directly to the exchanges for almost a year.He was right,nobody from Cryptsy did not react and stop him.
He does not want to use mixers and probably he is not sure that BTC exchanges wont take his Bitcoins if he try to move them from huge stash,so he moves BTCs obtained from selling altcoins.
From monitoring his transactions,he uses TOR(which is useless for this purpose), splitting and sending BTCs in small amount to his numerous BTC wallets on different servers,mimicking mixers.From there he puts them in different sites for one more mixing round.Intersetingly,all his TOR exit nodes are in Nederland.
I performed one more thing.I did temporal analysis of his wallet.Through monitoring the time he did transactions,it can be easily viewed in what time zone he is,when he sleeps,works.All point that he lives in East Coast of US.
Today he took additional 10 BTCs, 35 BTCs for 2 days ~ $15500 or 6 months Vern alimony.
Dissapearing of Bitebi9 and starting moving BTCs at the same time? - maybe it is not coincedence at all - Vern is trying to cut expenses,cash shortage,plus he is paying best lawyer in Florida for scam cases and it is not cheap for sure.
