escobarr
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 29
Merit: 0
|
|
May 26, 2017, 06:56:02 PM Last edit: May 26, 2017, 07:21:07 PM by escobarr |
|
worth a shot...@vern plz contact me I want my coins back lol
haha I don't get how he just decided to leave all this I mean he's own family and ignore all these years with them and just go to another country. I hope he comes back and be like here is the money I want my family back my life back and my reputation back...really 30m dollars probably can pay people money back and still have some left for him & family.
If he had ethics and values..
|
|
|
|
fakecryptsynagger
|
|
May 26, 2017, 07:51:09 PM |
|
worth a shot...@vern plz contact me I want my coins back lol
haha I don't get how he just decided to leave all this I mean he's own family and ignore all these years with them and just go to another country. I hope he comes back and be like here is the money I want my family back my life back and my reputation back...really 30m dollars probably can pay people money back and still have some left for him & family.
If he had ethics and values.. Vern choose MGTOW life . man go their own way ( pro life hahahahah ) stealing customer's money & crypto If you lost altcoin . one guy responsible for that vern vern vern
|
|
|
|
Gleb Gamow
In memoriam
VIP
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1145
|
|
May 26, 2017, 11:16:50 PM |
|
Only users can withdraw users funds. BitJohn: Hackers, on the other hand, can access our cold wallets on a whim, but what are the chances of that happening on my and Mullick's watch?
|
|
|
|
RoomBot
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2338
Merit: 1130
|
|
May 26, 2017, 11:50:30 PM |
|
worth a shot...@vern plz contact me I want my coins back lol
haha I don't get how he just decided to leave all this I mean he's own family and ignore all these years with them and just go to another country. I hope he comes back and be like here is the money I want my family back my life back and my reputation back...really 30m dollars probably can pay people money back and still have some left for him & family.
If he had ethics and values.. He has such YUUUGE family values that he has TWO FAMILIES! On 2 different continents. impressive.
|
|
|
|
spamsucks
|
|
May 28, 2017, 01:18:54 PM |
|
I don't get how he just decided to leave all this I mean he's own family and ignore all these years with them and just go to another country. I hope he comes back and be like here is the money I want my family back my life back and my reputation back...really 30m dollars probably can pay people money back and still have some left for him & family.
He has a man whore he went to live with. While he was married, he could not resist the temptation to do the ghey thing... and found the perfect man to spend his life with...
|
|
|
|
sirazimuth
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3570
Merit: 3638
born once atheist
|
|
May 29, 2017, 02:11:00 PM |
|
what i dont understand is why the US does request china to catch small vern? i mean they easily could like the snowden case had shown. or all the cryptsy customers could fund private headhunters to hunt him in china directly only 10000 customers pay 100$ and we have a 1mio reward on his catch China has no extradition treaty with USA, afaik
|
Bitcoin...the future of all monetary transactions...and always will be
|
|
|
vancefox
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1033
Merit: 1005
|
|
May 29, 2017, 11:39:16 PM |
|
Still looking for craptsy coins? Thought everyone took it as a loss by now...
|
This space not for rent...
|
|
|
Gleb Gamow
In memoriam
VIP
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1145
|
|
May 30, 2017, 03:32:31 AM |
|
what i dont understand is why the US does request china to catch small vern? i mean they easily could like the snowden case had shown. or all the cryptsy customers could fund private headhunters to hunt him in china directly only 10000 customers pay 100$ and we have a 1mio reward on his catch China has no extradition treaty with USA, afaik So, how does one live the US to become a full time citizen of China?
|
|
|
|
vancefox
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1033
Merit: 1005
|
|
May 30, 2017, 03:42:38 AM |
|
what i dont understand is why the US does request china to catch small vern? i mean they easily could like the snowden case had shown. or all the cryptsy customers could fund private headhunters to hunt him in china directly only 10000 customers pay 100$ and we have a 1mio reward on his catch China has no extradition treaty with USA, afaik So, how does one live the US to become a full time citizen of China? Ask the Kushner family... They know how to get someone from China to the US rather easy... https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/columnists/2017/05/17/president-kushners-company-touts-visa-scam/328744001/I'd guess they know how to reverse the process too... for a small investment of course...
|
This space not for rent...
|
|
|
|
Gleb Gamow
In memoriam
VIP
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1145
|
|
May 30, 2017, 03:55:17 PM |
|
"Have you seen a tall white man with small cock who talks alike a pussy?"
|
|
|
|
|
TheTommyD
|
|
June 01, 2017, 06:59:07 PM |
|
1,683 people submitted claims as of the May 17, 2017 claim deadline. "The price of Bitcoin on November 1, 2015 was approximately $330.00 per Bitcoin. On May 24, 2017, the price of Bitcoin was approximately $2,943.00 per Bitcoin. While it is understandable that Cryptsy users would like to enjoy the benefit of that staggering increase, the Cryptsy Defendants, and not this Settlement, has precluded them from doing so. In the context of this Settlement, the valuation date is of no moment because, as explained earlier, the value of the claims exceeds the available Settlement Funds, whether using a valuation date in November 2015 or May 2017 and, therefore, either valuation date will yield the same result. In other words, the pro rata distribution will be the same based on the type and amount of cryptocurrency held regardless of the valuation date employed. Moreover, the Settlement provides a fair and reasonable valuation method and corresponding date. The valuation method recognizes what a recognized loss amount should have been when Cryptsy stopped servicing clients. On November 1, 2015, Cryptsy effectively stopped allowing users to buy, sell, or trade cryptocurrencies. Therefore, Class Members are being treated equally for where their portfolios stood on that day. This valuation is not intended to be an estimate of, nor indicative of, the amount that Class Members might have been able to recover after a trial. The proposed valuation plan was designed to fairly and rationally allocate the net settlement proceeds across the universe of cryptocurrencies traded at Cryptsy, not act as an insurer as to the price fluctuation of any one particular cryptocurrency." http://cryptsyreceivership.com/v1/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Response-to-Objections-to-Settlements.pdf
|
BTC: 1DEj5mbjoYXqvRKfoS4yqtdvSKHpQ4hFLu
|
|
|
Gleb Gamow
In memoriam
VIP
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1145
|
|
June 01, 2017, 11:21:16 PM |
|
1,683 people submitted claims as of the May 17, 2017 claim deadline. "The price of Bitcoin on November 1, 2015 was approximately $330.00 per Bitcoin. On May 24, 2017, the price of Bitcoin was approximately $2,943.00 per Bitcoin. While it is understandable that Cryptsy users would like to enjoy the benefit of that staggering increase, the Cryptsy Defendants, and not this Settlement, has precluded them from doing so. In the context of this Settlement, the valuation date is of no moment because, as explained earlier, the value of the claims exceeds the available Settlement Funds, whether using a valuation date in November 2015 or May 2017 and, therefore, either valuation date will yield the same result. In other words, the pro rata distribution will be the same based on the type and amount of cryptocurrency held regardless of the valuation date employed. Moreover, the Settlement provides a fair and reasonable valuation method and corresponding date. The valuation method recognizes what a recognized loss amount should have been when Cryptsy stopped servicing clients. On November 1, 2015, Cryptsy effectively stopped allowing users to buy, sell, or trade cryptocurrencies. Therefore, Class Members are being treated equally for where their portfolios stood on that day. This valuation is not intended to be an estimate of, nor indicative of, the amount that Class Members might have been able to recover after a trial. The proposed valuation plan was designed to fairly and rationally allocate the net settlement proceeds across the universe of cryptocurrencies traded at Cryptsy, not act as an insurer as to the price fluctuation of any one particular cryptocurrency." http://cryptsyreceivership.com/v1/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Response-to-Objections-to-Settlements.pdfCorrect me if I wrong, but isn't it on record that myriad users of Cryptsy were indeed able to liquidate their positions via the help of staff on chat after Nov 1, 2015?
|
|
|
|
spamsucks
|
|
June 02, 2017, 12:52:36 AM |
|
1,683 people submitted claims as of the May 17, 2017 claim deadline. "The price of Bitcoin on November 1, 2015 was approximately $330.00 per Bitcoin. On May 24, 2017, the price of Bitcoin was approximately $2,943.00 per Bitcoin. While it is understandable that Cryptsy users would like to enjoy the benefit of that staggering increase, the Cryptsy Defendants, and not this Settlement, has precluded them from doing so. In the context of this Settlement, the valuation date is of no moment because, as explained earlier, the value of the claims exceeds the available Settlement Funds, whether using a valuation date in November 2015 or May 2017 and, therefore, either valuation date will yield the same result. In other words, the pro rata distribution will be the same based on the type and amount of cryptocurrency held regardless of the valuation date employed. Moreover, the Settlement provides a fair and reasonable valuation method and corresponding date. The valuation method recognizes what a recognized loss amount should have been when Cryptsy stopped servicing clients. On November 1, 2015, Cryptsy effectively stopped allowing users to buy, sell, or trade cryptocurrencies. Therefore, Class Members are being treated equally for where their portfolios stood on that day. This valuation is not intended to be an estimate of, nor indicative of, the amount that Class Members might have been able to recover after a trial. The proposed valuation plan was designed to fairly and rationally allocate the net settlement proceeds across the universe of cryptocurrencies traded at Cryptsy, not act as an insurer as to the price fluctuation of any one particular cryptocurrency." http://cryptsyreceivership.com/v1/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Response-to-Objections-to-Settlements.pdfCorrect me if I wrong, but isn't it on record that myriad users of Cryptsy were indeed able to liquidate their positions via the help of staff on chat after Nov 1, 2015? I dont know if it counts. You had to be blowing one of the staff and telling everyone that there was no problem before you would be able to sell... so in all senses that "handjob crew" was working for it. Guss you can call it payment for some service rendered... you know who you are.
|
|
|
|
BagHolder010
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 283
Merit: 250
Best IoT Platform Based on Blockchain
|
|
June 02, 2017, 11:31:13 AM |
|
Lets see this from a different view please.
Vernon run away and loling at this Cyrptsy workers loling at this because there is nothing against them Vernon's Ex-wife took 250k and loling at this Lawyers taking 33.33% and loling at this We look at this and get scraps crying at this
and the most typed word in these 13 pages is THIS IS FAIR THIS FAIR THIS IS FAIR
"Importantly, had the value of cryptocurrency gone the other way, deceasing in value, the current objections be without support. And, in such event, and if the valuation date had been the current date, as the Objectors propose, then Class Members might have objected because the Settlement did not lock in the perceived value of the cryptocurrency as of the date Cryptsy shut down and before the market went south."
No! just NO if it went south the number of claimants would go from 1687 to 16 ONLY because it won't be worth the hassle but IT WENT UP, if my grand grad grandfather 300 years ago bought a land with 2 CENTS if it's mine now would I sell you my land for 2 cents or 1,000,000 ?
|
|
|
|
spamsucks
|
|
June 02, 2017, 04:23:13 PM |
|
Lets see this from a different view please.
Vernon run away and loling at this Cyrptsy workers loling at this because there is nothing against them Vernon's Ex-wife took 250k and loling at this Lawyers taking 33.33% and loling at this We look at this and get scraps crying at this
and the most typed word in these 13 pages is THIS IS FAIR THIS FAIR THIS IS FAIR
"Importantly, had the value of cryptocurrency gone the other way, deceasing in value, the current objections be without support. And, in such event, and if the valuation date had been the current date, as the Objectors propose, then Class Members might have objected because the Settlement did not lock in the perceived value of the cryptocurrency as of the date Cryptsy shut down and before the market went south."
No! just NO if it went south the number of claimants would go from 1687 to 16 ONLY because it won't be worth the hassle but IT WENT UP, if my grand grad grandfather 300 years ago bought a land with 2 CENTS if it's mine now would I sell you my land for 2 cents or 1,000,000 ?
Agreed about the people laughing all the way to the bank... As the cryptsy employees received paychecks consisting entirely of stolen funds... but that isnt the issue here... When you look at the argument thats being made, the point is this: No matter what the currency WOULD be worth now, the funds are set. For example: 100 dollars is all that's left to take from the remains of craptsy. 100 people have an equal claim to the money (I know this isn't correct as some people had .2 and others had 2 BTC but for math sake... bear with me) Each person has 1 share (or the fraction of a share as explained above) 1 share = 1 dollar If you think your 1 share is worth more than the 1 dollar offered, where should they get it from? Each share cannot be worth more than whats left. you cannot claim that your share should be worth 5 dollars because the value of the stolen goods is higher now. If you don't agree with the settlement, you are free to sue Vern, and I am sure you would win. But you will never collect anything. The goods are gone. There is no place to get more money from. The funds are going to get split evenly by the amount held at the time of closing. If there is a more fair way to do it, let us all know. Yes, the lawyers are gonna take a cut. 30% it looks like. but whatever left over will be split up based on what you had.
|
|
|
|
RoomBot
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2338
Merit: 1130
|
|
June 02, 2017, 04:39:09 PM |
|
Lets see this from a different view please.
Vernon run away and loling at this Cyrptsy workers loling at this because there is nothing against them Vernon's Ex-wife took 250k and loling at this Lawyers taking 33.33% and loling at this We look at this and get scraps crying at this ?
All true except for maybe the jilted wife who lost her mansion and husband, and now has to raise Perv's kids alone...
|
|
|
|
Gleb Gamow
In memoriam
VIP
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1145
|
|
June 02, 2017, 05:14:16 PM |
|
Lets see this from a different view please.
Vernon run away and loling at this Cyrptsy workers loling at this because there is nothing against them Vernon's Ex-wife took 250k and loling at this Lawyers taking 33.33% and loling at this We look at this and get scraps crying at this ?
All true except for maybe the jilted wife who lost her mansion and husband, and now has to raise Perv's kids alone... Since when did a non-ugly Asian women still capable of spreading her legs start fearing about raising her kids alone? Quasi-successful Dude staring at a quarter of a million dollars in Asian chick's bank account: I can eat that! Hell, I might even fuck the kids since they're not biologically mine, probably an easy task to accomplish given that their real dad was a perv. Hell, I'm welling to bet that the Asian chick will sit back and watch while she plays with her toys set on high. Life is good!
|
|
|
|
dunja22
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 41
Merit: 0
|
|
June 02, 2017, 06:58:04 PM |
|
off course now it says we only get the value of our account from 2 years ago, if we get any, this lawsuit is totally worthless
so what was that guy from MT.Gox saying, he could almost pay everyone back? so paying back in meaning, the value from back then, the criminals only get better from this.
they don't even have a plan.
by the way all servers were deleted right? so that means there is nothing. and no ex employee or anyone knows anything.
we could all have been millionaires, even bigvern, but he chose the fastest way to the milliones.
|
|
|
|
|