Bitcoin Forum
December 07, 2016, 04:28:35 PM *
News: To be able to use the next phase of the beta forum software, please ensure that your email address is correct/functional.
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 ... 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 [93] 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 ... 226 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [1200 TH] EMC: 0 Fee DGM. Anonymous PPS. US & EU servers. No Registration!  (Read 461473 times)
kano
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 1932


Linux since 1997 RedHat 4


View Profile
February 06, 2012, 11:51:14 PM
 #1841

Back to the death blocks we go =/ inaba go kill some more people in BF3!
One thing I have been wondering about that discussion ...
These are the same computers that are mining right? (or wrong?)
If they are then BF3 is reducing the pool hash rate ... ... ... ... ... ... Tongue

Pool: https://kano.is BTC: 1KanoiBupPiZfkwqB7rfLXAzPnoTshAVmb
CKPool and CGMiner developer, IRC FreeNode #ckpool and #cgminer kanoi
Help keep Bitcoin secure by mining on pools with Stratum, the best protocol to mine Bitcoins with ASIC hardware
1481128115
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481128115

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481128115
Reply with quote  #2

1481128115
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
Inaba
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260



View Profile WWW
February 06, 2012, 11:57:16 PM
 #1842

Hah, yeah I guess they are... drops it by 1.6 GH/s.  I use a pair of 6990's to game.  It literally costs me money to game, jeez.

If you're searching these lines for a point, you've probably missed it.  There was never anything there in the first place.
Inaba
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260



View Profile WWW
February 07, 2012, 04:25:55 AM
 #1843

Just got done killin' and see, we solved a block!

If you're searching these lines for a point, you've probably missed it.  There was never anything there in the first place.
cuz0882
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 336



View Profile
February 07, 2012, 05:59:46 AM
 #1844

We could have shaved another minute off that!
iNs4nePT
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 25


View Profile
February 07, 2012, 06:18:42 AM
 #1845

No, there's not really any way to do that, as it would wreck past accounting.  It's actually a fundamental design issue (perhaps you could call it a flaw) suffered by most pools that use the worker paradigm.  I could possibly hide them permanently, but then you couldn't recreate a worker with that same name.

Just a thought, but maybe they could be marked as hidden and then renamed to something like hash(rand()) ?

1x HD6850 @ 250MH/s - Like digging a tunnel with a spoon (:
Under 1BTC: 1Ns4nePtxtRiRmnztqgoqdJqjzvETCJzi5
NetworkerZ
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 114


View Profile
February 07, 2012, 08:39:11 AM
 #1846

Ah yeah that I can fix... and should be fixed in about 5 minutes.


THX! It worked!

Greetz
NetworkerZ
village.idiot
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 271


View Profile
February 07, 2012, 07:35:38 PM
 #1847

Here I go again  Huh

ping us1.eclipsemc.com
PING us1.eclipsemc.com (208.110.68.114) 56(84) bytes of data.
^C
--- us1.eclipsemc.com ping statistics ---
12 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 11025ms

mickey@mickeyatwork ~ $ ping us2.eclipsemc.com
PING us2.eclipsemc.com (208.110.68.115) 56(84) bytes of data.
^C
--- us2.eclipsemc.com ping statistics ---
12 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 11014ms

mickey@mickeyatwork ~ $ ping us3.eclipsemc.com
PING us3.eclipsemc.com (208.110.68.116) 56(84) bytes of data.
^C
--- us3.eclipsemc.com ping statistics ---
12 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 11021ms

mickey@mickeyatwork ~ $ traceroute us2.eclipsemc.com
traceroute to us2.eclipsemc.com (208.110.68.115), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
 1  * * *
 2  ge-2-10-ur01.east.tn.knox.comcast.net (68.85.38.93)  15.391 ms  16.938 ms  18.150 ms
 3  te-8-1-ar01.bluelight.tn.knox.comcast.net (68.86.136.30)  19.393 ms  20.639 ms  22.264 ms
 4  xe-2-1-0-0-ar01.b0atlanta.ga.atlanta.comcast.net (68.86.136.18)  23.493 ms  24.756 ms  28.212 ms
 5  pos-3-7-0-0-cr01.atlanta.ga.ibone.comcast.net (68.86.93.205)  33.545 ms pos-3-8-0-0-cr01.atlanta.ga.ibone.comcast.net (68.86.95.197)  35.003 ms pos-3-5-0-0-cr01.atlanta.ga.ibone.comcast.net (68.86.93.125)  32.171 ms
 6  pos-0-4-0-0-pe01.56marietta.ga.ibone.comcast.net (68.86.87.138)  36.283 ms  25.703 ms  28.843 ms
 7  te4-2.ccr01.atl02.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.10.233)  26.367 ms  28.001 ms  28.105 ms
 8  te0-0-0-1.mpd22.atl01.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.3.145)  41.449 ms  41.504 ms  41.667 ms
 9  te0-3-0-6.mpd22.ord01.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.29.90)  33.939 ms te0-1-0-6.mpd22.ord01.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.29.82)  37.112 ms te0-3-0-6.mpd22.ord01.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.29.90)  34.443 ms
10  te0-1-0-2.mpd22.mci01.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.3.202)  57.520 ms te0-3-0-1.mpd22.mci01.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.7.165)  57.805 ms te0-0-0-3.mpd22.mci01.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.25.77)  59.070 ms
11  everest.demarc.cogentco.com (38.104.86.2)  54.451 ms  60.138 ms  57.155 ms
12  69.30.209.1 (69.30.209.1)  58.684 ms  50.549 ms  55.186 ms
13  * * *
14  * * *
15  * * *
16  * * *
17  * * *
18  * * *
19  * * *
20  * * *
21  * * *
22  * * *
23  * * *
24  * * *
25  * * *
26  * * *
27  * * *
28  * * *
29  * * *
30  * * *
Inaba
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260



View Profile WWW
February 07, 2012, 07:43:39 PM
 #1848

So it looks like the problem is here: 68.85.38.86

I'm not sure who owns that, probably comcast, but it appears that router has some weird routing loop going on when connecting to 208.110.68.0/24. 

traceroute to XXX.XXX.XXX.109 (XXX.XXX.XXX.109), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
 1  69.30.224.129 (69.30.224.129)  88.550 ms  88.537 ms  88.527 ms
 2  69.30.209.125 (69.30.209.125)  88.439 ms  88.444 ms  88.439 ms
 3  te0-3-0-4.mpd22.mci01.atlas.cogentco.com (38.104.86.1)  88.444 ms  88.443 ms  88.435 ms
 4  te0-4-0-5.ccr22.dfw01.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.46.214)  88.460 ms te0-2-0-5.ccr22.dfw01.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.80.105)  88.439 ms te0-0-0-0.mpd21.mci01.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.30.149)  88.365 ms
 5  te0-0-0-0.ccr21.dfw01.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.46.165)  88.400 ms te0-1-0-6.ccr21.dfw01.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.3.17)  88.393 ms te7-3.ccr02.dfw03.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.6.62)  288.283 ms
 6  te8-1.mpd01.dfw03.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.25.9)  288.304 ms  299.794 ms  299.780 ms
 7  be-10-304-pe01.1950stemmons.tx.ibone.comcast.net (173.167.56.165)  99.781 ms  99.781 ms be-10-204-pe01.1950stemmons.tx.ibone.comcast.net (75.149.230.149)  99.771 ms
 8  pos-2-4-0-0-cr01.dallas.tx.ibone.comcast.net (68.86.87.217)  99.754 ms  99.751 ms  99.721 ms
 9  pos-0-11-0-0-cr01.atlanta.ga.ibone.comcast.net (68.86.85.222)  99.766 ms  99.756 ms  99.745 ms
10  so-7-1-0-0-ar01.goodslettvll.tn.nash.comcast.net (68.86.90.190)  99.748 ms  99.747 ms  99.742 ms
11  ae-3-0-ar03.nashville.tn.nash.comcast.net (68.86.148.70)  99.946 ms te-9-4-ar01.bluelight.tn.knox.comcast.net (68.86.176.142)  99.952 ms ae-2-0-ar03.nashville.tn.nash.comcast.net (68.85.174.237)  99.849 ms
12  te-8-3-ur01.east.tn.knox.comcast.net (68.86.136.29)  99.865 ms  99.859 ms  99.842 ms
13  68.85.38.86 (68.85.38.86)  99.815 ms  99.805 ms  99.784 ms
14  * 68.85.38.86 (68.85.38.86)  99.748 ms *
15  * * *
16  * * *
17  * * *
18  * * *
19  * * *
20  * * *
21  * * *
22  * * *
23  * * *
24  * * *^C

If you're searching these lines for a point, you've probably missed it.  There was never anything there in the first place.
village.idiot
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 271


View Profile
February 07, 2012, 07:59:49 PM
 #1849

So the problem is with my ISP?

Okay I'll see if I can get them do do something.

Thanks
JayCoin
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 406


Crypt'n Since 2011


View Profile WWW
February 08, 2012, 02:49:07 AM
 #1850

Just completed a webpage for charting hash rate of my miners.  I set it up so anyone can enter their API and chart their own hash rate. Is anyone interested?  If there is a lot of interest I would like to get Inaba to set up the api so I could grab multiple users data in one HTTPS call.

Hello There!
freshzive
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 447


View Profile
February 08, 2012, 04:41:40 AM
 #1851

Using BTCMon (iphone app), workers on EMC that are over 1Gh/s report an order of magnitude lower speed than they should. i.e. a worker (cgminer) doing 1.24Gh/s reports on the app 1.24Mh/s. I'm not sure if this is something to specific to how EMC reports with API or if it's the app itself misreading something. Anyway, if it is on EMC's side, is it possible for you to fix?

Thanks Smiley

Inaba
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260



View Profile WWW
February 08, 2012, 05:01:10 AM
 #1852

JayCoin: I will be happy to setup whatever makes it easier to aggregate the data, just let me know what you need specifically.

freshzive: I don't have an iPhone, so I'm not sure what it's doing (or not doing exactly) but I can change/add to the API to make it easier for applications like that to pull the data, I just need to know what is the best format to do.

Right now, the API returns the data in GH/s or MH/s by default depending on your speed.  However, you can disable this and only return MH/s or only return GH/s by adding either gh=Y or mh=Y do the end of the http GET call.  mh=Y will only return MH/s, so even if you have a 2 GH/s miner, it will read 2000 MH/s instead of 2 GH/s, the same goes for gh=Y, which will read .2 GH/s for a 200 MH/s miner. 


If you're searching these lines for a point, you've probably missed it.  There was never anything there in the first place.
stiftmaster
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 246


View Profile
February 08, 2012, 02:20:16 PM
 #1853

On the Block Stats Page I see 59,72% luck
Clingman88    165904        14:51:47     01:41:56    711147        59.72%

when I click on Clingman88 stands there -48,45%
510    165904    2012-02-08 14:51:47    01:41:56    711147    -48.45%

What´s the different?

./stiftmaster
Inaba
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260



View Profile WWW
February 08, 2012, 02:24:41 PM
 #1854

Hmm, I need to update that page. It uses the old calculation of +/- % instead of 0 - 100% that the block stats page uses.  Basically they are the same number, just expressed in different ways. 

The blocks stats page is saying 59.72% of the blocks are longer than this one.

Your found blocks page is saying it is 48.45% under difficulty.

If you're searching these lines for a point, you've probably missed it.  There was never anything there in the first place.
GenTarkin
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1918


View Profile
February 09, 2012, 12:14:05 AM
 #1855

Inaba, go kill more people in BF3, we need this 10hr block to solve!

GenTarkin's MOD Kncminer Titan custom firmware! v1.0.4! <--- CLICK HERE
Donations: bitcoin- 1Px71mWNQNKW19xuARqrmnbcem1dXqJ3At || litecoin- LYXrLis3ik6TRn8tdvzAyJ264DRvwYVeEw
JayCoin
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 406


Crypt'n Since 2011


View Profile WWW
February 09, 2012, 01:45:57 AM
 #1856

Just completed a webpage for charting hash rate of my miners.  I set it up so anyone can enter their API and chart their own hash rate. Is anyone interested?  If there is a lot of interest I would like to get Inaba to set up the api so I could grab multiple users data in one HTTPS call.

Here is a link to my webpage for tracking your hashrate. I put my API here to show an example. More graphs and features will follow.

http://serason.com/projects/emccharts/?api=jaycoinapi&method=hashrate

Hello There!
Inaba
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260



View Profile WWW
February 09, 2012, 02:16:16 AM
 #1857

Very nice - what are you using to generate the charts?

If you're searching these lines for a point, you've probably missed it.  There was never anything there in the first place.
JayCoin
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 406


Crypt'n Since 2011


View Profile WWW
February 09, 2012, 03:18:37 AM
 #1858

Very nice - what are you using to generate the charts?

Thanks.

I am using the Flot plugin for Jquery.

I was thinking that you could set up an api where I can send a request with POST data in a variable called 'bulk_users'.  The data would be JSON encoded as follows.

{"users":[{"api":"user1api","action":"userstats"},{"api":"user2api","action":"userstats"},{"api":"user3api","action":"userstats"}]}

would that work?

Hello There!
village.idiot
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 271


View Profile
February 09, 2012, 06:31:04 PM
 #1859

So it looks like the problem is here: 68.85.38.86

I'm not sure who owns that, probably comcast, but it appears that router has some weird routing loop going on when connecting to 208.110.68.0/24. 

Comcast said they had to turn off something to do with smart packets.

Now I'm back to mining and it's good to be getting some warmth from my rig under my bench. Grin
cyberlync
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 226



View Profile
February 09, 2012, 07:18:34 PM
 #1860

I'm still having issues with server communication. It seems that whenever we solve a block, I cannot communicate with the servers for a few minutes, tried all the servers, us1/2/3, tried various miners, kernels and internet connections. While it's not a problem for the most part, there is the problem when we solve a fast block, it can be very possible for me not to be able to submit any shares. My connection works fine for everything else, so I think it might be something to do with me connecting to the US servers from Europe, and when we solve a block, and new work has to be distributed, the fact that I'm in Europe, might be reason why I can't come through the "congested" route. At least that is my idea, been watching it happen every single time we solve a block now, this did not occur at my previous pool (MMC).

Giving away your BTC's? Send 'em here: 1F7XgercyaXeDHiuq31YzrVK5YAhbDkJhf
Pages: « 1 ... 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 [93] 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 ... 226 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!