Bitcoin Forum
March 19, 2024, 11:00:08 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 26.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Warning: One or more bitcointalk.org users have reported that they strongly believe that the creator of this topic is a scammer. (Login to see the detailed trust ratings.) While the bitcointalk.org administration does not verify such claims, you should proceed with extreme caution.
Pages: « 1 ... 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 [98] 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 ... 225 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [1200 TH] EMC: 0 Fee DGM. Anonymous PPS. US & EU servers. No Registration!  (Read 499428 times)
Math Man
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 150
Merit: 100


View Profile
February 26, 2012, 01:57:39 AM
 #1941

Everyone working properly now?  

Everything looks good from this end, all shares processed and stats should be in sync.  Servers appear stable and all is well...

While it was down, I made some mods to the getwork server that eliminated some resource hogging and unstable code related to long polling - if anyone notices problems with LPs, let me know, but it should work much better and faster now.  A long poll should hit as soon as a new block is broadcast on the network instead of a second or two later.  

Also, let me know how the drop outs after a block is solved work out now... I will keep an eye on it, but I can't always see it when a block solves, if I'm off killing people in BF3 Smiley  Block processing time seems to be between 3 - 6 seconds, down from a maximum of 6 minutes previously.


Nice work Inaba.
1710846008
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1710846008

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1710846008
Reply with quote  #2

1710846008
Report to moderator
Once a transaction has 6 confirmations, it is extremely unlikely that an attacker without at least 50% of the network's computation power would be able to reverse it.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1710846008
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1710846008

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1710846008
Reply with quote  #2

1710846008
Report to moderator
1710846008
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1710846008

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1710846008
Reply with quote  #2

1710846008
Report to moderator
1710846008
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1710846008

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1710846008
Reply with quote  #2

1710846008
Report to moderator
cyberlync
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 226
Merit: 100



View Profile
February 26, 2012, 02:06:51 AM
 #1942

Everyone working properly now?  

Everything looks good from this end, all shares processed and stats should be in sync.  Servers appear stable and all is well...

While it was down, I made some mods to the getwork server that eliminated some resource hogging and unstable code related to long polling - if anyone notices problems with LPs, let me know, but it should work much better and faster now.  A long poll should hit as soon as a new block is broadcast on the network instead of a second or two later.  

Also, let me know how the drop outs after a block is solved work out now... I will keep an eye on it, but I can't always see it when a block solves, if I'm off killing people in BF3 Smiley  Block processing time seems to be between 3 - 6 seconds, down from a maximum of 6 minutes previously.


Seems to work fine. The fixes/optimizations sound good, let's hope they work Smiley

Giving away your BTC's? Send 'em here: 1F7XgercyaXeDHiuq31YzrVK5YAhbDkJhf
greatwolf
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 230
Merit: 100


View Profile
February 26, 2012, 02:41:18 AM
 #1943

Everything seems back to order now on my end. Thanks Inaba! Smiley
hack_slash
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 16
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 26, 2012, 03:18:29 AM
 #1944

I've run into something odd--not sure if it's related to the recent changes.  Either yesterday or today, my total blocks found went from 8 to 9 (both on the "My Account" screen and the "Hall of Fame" screen), but there is no new block found for me listed in the "Block Stats" page.  If I go to the "My Found Blocks" page, it only shows 8 blocks (7 valid + 1 invalid).  I took a look at a few of the other account's links on the "Hall of Fame" page, and those added up correctly.

My EMC user name is cobracommander.

[EDIT: Just saw another discrepancy while looking through the "Hall of Fame" page.  ocminer is listed as having found 16 blocks there, but clicking the link shows 17 blocks for that account.]
Blackasaurus
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 56
Merit: 0



View Profile
February 26, 2012, 03:35:05 AM
 #1945

Glad your pool is back up Smiley thanks for the hard work!
Inaba (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260
Merit: 1000



View Profile WWW
February 26, 2012, 03:45:04 AM
 #1946

Yeah, the blocks found is off due to the recent block processing problem.  I need to go through and normalize the blocks found field on each user with the actual user who found the blocks.  A few people got counted twice (or more than twice), and some not at all. 

I plan on doing that soon, I just wanted to make sure everything is stable before poking at it with a stick. Smiley


If you're searching these lines for a point, you've probably missed it.  There was never anything there in the first place.
cuz0882
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 392
Merit: 250


View Profile
February 26, 2012, 05:06:49 AM
 #1947

cgminer shows a pool not providing work fast enough message when the network finds a block. I have not paid much attention though, not sure if it means anything yet.
Inaba (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260
Merit: 1000



View Profile WWW
February 26, 2012, 05:12:42 AM
 #1948

That's normal and a deficiency in cgminer... I've not found a pool that it doesn't say that on now and again.  CGminer is just really aggressive and if it doesn't get it's way it has a tantrum Smiley  Otherwise, it's a pretty good kid.


If you're searching these lines for a point, you've probably missed it.  There was never anything there in the first place.
cuz0882
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 392
Merit: 250


View Profile
February 26, 2012, 05:42:37 AM
 #1949

I was going to ask you, are you running 5970's on linux? I thought I would test out bamt since since wireless is working with it now, but over-volting does not work on linux. Are you flashing your cards?
Math Man
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 150
Merit: 100


View Profile
February 26, 2012, 08:25:59 AM
 #1950

I was going to ask you, are you running 5970's on linux? I thought I would test out bamt since since wireless is working with it now, but over-volting does not work on linux. Are you flashing your cards?

Not that you asked me, but all of my video cards are 5970s on Linux (LinuxCoin+SmartCoin). 

You can definitely control the voltage on 5970s with AMDOverdriveCtrl.  I use it to undervolt.  However, I do not know about overvolting.  My MH/s per watt ratio starts dropping above 875MHz using stock volts.  Overvolting would only decrease that ratio for me and add excessive heat.  You might have different results though.
kano
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4438
Merit: 1794


Linux since 1997 RedHat 4


View Profile
February 26, 2012, 12:01:33 PM
 #1951

That's normal and a deficiency in cgminer... I've not found a pool that it doesn't say that on now and again.  CGminer is just really aggressive and if it doesn't get it's way it has a tantrum Smiley  Otherwise, it's a pretty good kid.


Actually, the correct answer is to watch your hash rate after an LP (get a good cgminer monitoring tool)
If the rate isn't dropping, then it doesn't matter, cgminer is expecting more than it needs.
If the rate drops at all, yes blame the pool for "not providing work fast enough"

Pool: https://kano.is - low 0.5% fee PPLNS 3 Days - Most reliable Solo with ONLY 0.5% fee   Bitcointalk thread: Forum
Discord support invite at https://kano.is/ Majority developer of the ckpool code - k for kano
The ONLY active original developer of cgminer. Original master git: https://github.com/kanoi/cgminer
cuz0882
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 392
Merit: 250


View Profile
February 26, 2012, 12:42:22 PM
 #1952

I was going to ask you, are you running 5970's on linux? I thought I would test out bamt since since wireless is working with it now, but over-volting does not work on linux. Are you flashing your cards?

Not that you asked me, but all of my video cards are 5970s on Linux (LinuxCoin+SmartCoin). 

You can definitely control the voltage on 5970s with AMDOverdriveCtrl.  I use it to undervolt.  However, I do not know about overvolting.  My MH/s per watt ratio starts dropping above 875MHz using stock volts.  Overvolting would only decrease that ratio for me and add excessive heat.  You might have different results though.
I think it sets the max voltage at stock 1.049, probably the same with 5870s. I've had pretty good luck with 1.100, 870mhz clocks, most stay under 70c unless the sun hits them. I only get stable clocks between 800-830 on stock voltage, 875 would be impressive.
Inaba (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260
Merit: 1000



View Profile WWW
February 26, 2012, 03:41:15 PM
 #1953

Quote
Actually, the correct answer is to watch your hash rate after an LP (get a good cgminer monitoring tool)
If the rate isn't dropping, then it doesn't matter, cgminer is expecting more than it needs.
If the rate drops at all, yes blame the pool for "not providing work fast enough"

Well, see that's why it throws a tantrum.  CGMiner can/should differentiate between the two distinct problems and provide a different message. 

Additionally why do you need a separate tool to do that?  Isn't that built into the display already?

If you're searching these lines for a point, you've probably missed it.  There was never anything there in the first place.
kano
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4438
Merit: 1794


Linux since 1997 RedHat 4


View Profile
February 26, 2012, 09:05:28 PM
 #1954

Quote
Actually, the correct answer is to watch your hash rate after an LP (get a good cgminer monitoring tool)
If the rate isn't dropping, then it doesn't matter, cgminer is expecting more than it needs.
If the rate drops at all, yes blame the pool for "not providing work fast enough"

Well, see that's why it throws a tantrum.  CGMiner can/should differentiate between the two distinct problems and provide a different message. 

Additionally why do you need a separate tool to do that?  Isn't that built into the display already?
Unless you are really bored and like watching numbers while waiting hours for many LPs to happen, a reliable graph of that is going to show if a pattern exists.

Pool: https://kano.is - low 0.5% fee PPLNS 3 Days - Most reliable Solo with ONLY 0.5% fee   Bitcointalk thread: Forum
Discord support invite at https://kano.is/ Majority developer of the ckpool code - k for kano
The ONLY active original developer of cgminer. Original master git: https://github.com/kanoi/cgminer
stevegee58
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 916
Merit: 1003



View Profile
February 26, 2012, 09:16:18 PM
 #1955

I've been experimenting with the Eclipse pool and noticed something funny.  The FAQ says there are no fees but the "Cash Out" button on the Account part of the web site says, "A 10% fee has been already been deducted from the displayed total." when I hover over it.

Are there no fees or is there a 10% fee?  I'm not going to PayPal, just my BTC wallet.

You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
cuz0882
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 392
Merit: 250


View Profile
February 26, 2012, 10:00:47 PM
 #1956

I've been experimenting with the Eclipse pool and noticed something funny.  The FAQ says there are no fees but the "Cash Out" button on the Account part of the web site says, "A 10% fee has been already been deducted from the displayed total." when I hover over it.

Are there no fees or is there a 10% fee?  I'm not going to PayPal, just my BTC wallet.
There is no fee for using the pool, if you want your btc converted to usd with paypay there is a fee.
SiegeBreaker
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 26
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 26, 2012, 10:13:49 PM
 #1957

I've been experimenting with the Eclipse pool and noticed something funny.  The FAQ says there are no fees but the "Cash Out" button on the Account part of the web site says, "A 10% fee has been already been deducted from the displayed total." when I hover over it.

Are there no fees or is there a 10% fee?  I'm not going to PayPal, just my BTC wallet.
There is no fee for using the pool, if you want your btc converted to usd with paypay there is a fee.

The paypal fee just covers paypal costs. There is also a fee on any unconfirmed funds to give Inaba some protection against any of the unconfirmed funds being from a block that ends up being invalid.
stevegee58
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 916
Merit: 1003



View Profile
February 26, 2012, 10:27:01 PM
 #1958

So is there some point where I can take BTC payment to my wallet without the 10% fee?

You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
rjk
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 448
Merit: 250


1ngldh


View Profile
February 26, 2012, 10:27:48 PM
 #1959

So is there some point where I can take BTC payment to my wallet without the 10% fee?
After 120 confirmations.

Mining Rig Extraordinaire - the Trenton BPX6806 18-slot PCIe backplane [PICS] Dead project is dead, all hail the coming of the mighty ASIC!
stevegee58
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 916
Merit: 1003



View Profile
February 26, 2012, 11:11:38 PM
 #1960

OK, I was just being my usual impatient self.  I'll wait for the "Pay Me" button to appear when my balance becomes confirmed.

Having the "Pay Me" button visible but grayed out would be more intuitive than having it invisible like it is.  I was left wondering when/how to collect my mined BTC.

You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
Pages: « 1 ... 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 [98] 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 ... 225 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!