Bitcoin Forum
August 07, 2020, 12:46:05 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.20.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: How much of your corn do you plan on cashing out in the next massive bull run?
None - 22 (18.8%)
1-10% - 15 (12.8%)
11-20% - 14 (12%)
21-30% - 16 (13.7%)
31-40% - 5 (4.3%)
41-50% - 12 (10.3%)
51-60% - 9 (7.7%)
61-70% - 5 (4.3%)
71-80% - 4 (3.4%)
81-90% - 2 (1.7%)
91-99% - 3 (2.6%)
100% - 10 (8.5%)
Total Voters: 117

Pages: « 1 ... 24554 24555 24556 24557 24558 24559 24560 24561 24562 24563 24564 24565 24566 24567 24568 24569 24570 24571 24572 24573 24574 24575 24576 24577 24578 24579 24580 24581 24582 24583 24584 24585 24586 24587 24588 24589 24590 24591 24592 24593 24594 24595 24596 24597 24598 24599 24600 24601 24602 24603 [24604] 24605 24606 24607 24608 24609 24610 24611 24612 24613 24614 24615 24616 24617 24618 24619 24620 24621 24622 24623 24624 24625 24626 24627 24628 24629 24630 24631 24632 24633 24634 24635 24636 24637 24638 24639 24640 24641 24642 24643 24644 24645 24646 24647 24648 24649 24650 24651 24652 24653 24654 ... 27082 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion  (Read 21783890 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (148 posts by 37 users deleted.)
mindrust
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1876
Merit: 2061



View Profile
August 09, 2019, 08:15:43 PM
Merited by 600watt (2)

I want see that fucking eth below %3 dominance. That shitcoin needs to die. Send it back to $9 and I will be happy. It is One of those shitcoins I'll never invest, even for gambling purposes. (The other is bcash)
1596804365
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1596804365

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1596804365
Reply with quote  #2

1596804365
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1596804365
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1596804365

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1596804365
Reply with quote  #2

1596804365
Report to moderator
1596804365
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1596804365

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1596804365
Reply with quote  #2

1596804365
Report to moderator
Febo
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 2226
Merit: 1187



View Profile
August 09, 2019, 08:28:10 PM

reaching 70% dominance. on cmc, which was always rigged in favour of alts.

BTC dominance was always over 80% until the BCH split happened. From that moment on. Or better to say a bit before that, was always uncertainty. Not just BCH steal dominance but also ETH, which many considered as BTC version two. But it ended just as a platform to crowdfund founds with illegal securities.  And it seems it lasted for two whole years.
HairyMaclairy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1218
Merit: 1962


Degenerate bull hatter & Bitcoin monotheist


View Profile
August 09, 2019, 08:44:15 PM

reaching 70% dominance. on cmc, which was always rigged in favour of alts.

BTC dominance was always over 80% until the BCH split happened. From that moment on. Or better to say a bit before that, was always uncertainty. Not just BCH steal dominance but also ETH, which many considered as BTC version two. But it ended just as a platform to crowdfund founds with illegal securities.  And it seems it lasted for two whole years.

There was an explosion of ICOs at that time. The BCH fork wasn’t a driver.
dyask
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 854
Merit: 510


View Profile
August 09, 2019, 08:48:52 PM


Huh?  So you are trying to say altcoins have all the growth potential and Bitcoin is headed for an early grave? 
jbreher
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2828
Merit: 1488


lose: unfind ... loose: untight


View Profile
August 09, 2019, 08:53:03 PM

reaching 70% dominance. on cmc, which was always rigged in favour of alts.

BTC dominance was always over 80% until the BCH split happened. From that moment on. Or better to say a bit before that, was always uncertainty. Not just BCH steal dominance but also ETH, which many considered as BTC version two. But it ended just as a platform to crowdfund founds with illegal securities.  And it seems it lasted for two whole years.

There was an explosion of ICOs at that time. The BCH fork wasn’t a driver.

From end of 2017 Feb to mid 2017 Jun, BTC dominance plunged from over 85% to below 40%.
https://coinmarketcap.com/charts/#dominance-percentage

The beginning of 2017 is when blocks started becoming persistently full.
https://bitinfocharts.com/comparison/bitcoin-size.html

The loss of dominance was due neither to BCH nor ICOs. 'Twas the Blockalypse. Or more pecisely, Blockalypse I.
600watt
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2114
Merit: 1418



View Profile
August 09, 2019, 08:55:58 PM


Huh?  So you are trying to say altcoins have all the growth potential and Bitcoin is headed for an early grave? 

i am a mountainbiker. bitcoin and shitcoins are NOT on the same bike. eventhough i like the idea of this meme, while btc might as well be on a bike, alts are ants trying to cross a 1 mile wide scotch tape.
dyask
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 854
Merit: 510


View Profile
August 09, 2019, 08:59:19 PM

Buy bitcoin

The Japanese rendition of the story how a single man defeated an army of digital shitcoin scammers and became the richest man in the world with physical silver:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3rUb5dLO7-I

Well silver has turned out to be a pretty crappy investment.   When adjusted for inflation it is worth less now than its value 50 years ago.   Way less.   Not a hedge at all.   (Silver is about 1/8th the value now as it was in 1979)
dyask
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 854
Merit: 510


View Profile
August 09, 2019, 09:01:21 PM


Huh?  So you are trying to say altcoins have all the growth potential and Bitcoin is headed for an early grave? 

i am a mountainbiker. bitcoin and shitcoins are NOT on the same bike. eventhough i like the idea of this meme, while btc might as well be on a bike, alts are ants trying to cross a 1 mile wide scotch tape.

My point is there is a lot of ways to take that image and many of them aren't positive for Bitcoin.   
600watt
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2114
Merit: 1418



View Profile
August 09, 2019, 09:02:09 PM

reaching 70% dominance. on cmc, which was always rigged in favour of alts.

BTC dominance was always over 80% until the BCH split happened. From that moment on. Or better to say a bit before that, was always uncertainty. Not just BCH steal dominance but also ETH, which many considered as BTC version two. But it ended just as a platform to crowdfund founds with illegal securities.  And it seems it lasted for two whole years.

There was an explosion of ICOs at that time. The BCH fork wasn’t a driver.

From end of 2017 Feb to mid 2017 Jun, BTC dominance plunged from over 85% to below 40%.
https://coinmarketcap.com/charts/#dominance-percentage

The beginning of 2017 is when blocks started becoming persistently full.
https://bitinfocharts.com/comparison/bitcoin-size.html

The loss of dominance was due neither to BCH nor ICOs. 'Twas the Blockalypse. Or more pecisely, Blockalypse I.

why did i know you couldn´t resist to post here... ?   full blocks are ok. fee market is ok. shitcoins are not ok. and bch/bsv... oh dear... i guess they solved the full blocks problem. a blockchain no fucker is using will not have full blocks...
600watt
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2114
Merit: 1418



View Profile
August 09, 2019, 09:06:19 PM

69.9 on CMC


i will empty the other half of this great bottle of rum if we hit 70% tonight.
fillippone
Hero Member
*****
Online Online

Activity: 784
Merit: 3763


I worship Caffeine


View Profile
August 09, 2019, 09:12:04 PM
Merited by 600watt (1)

69.9 on CMC


i will empty the other half of this great bottle of rum if we hit 70% tonight.

I am going to buy some corn to get the dominance there so you won’t feel guilty when emptying that bottle.
You can thank me later.
Now I am going to buy that 0.1% world bitcoin...
bkbirge
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 868
Merit: 433



View Profile
August 09, 2019, 09:16:44 PM

More China news...
https://cointelegraph.com/news/digital-yuan-weapon-in-us-trade-war-or-attempt-to-manipulate-bitcoin
zhekinsp
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 882
Merit: 126


★777Coin.com★ Fun BTC Casino!


View Profile
August 09, 2019, 09:22:27 PM


Huh?  So you are trying to say altcoins have all the growth potential and Bitcoin is headed for an early grave? 
Nah! You don't get it right!

Bitcoin is going to crush the altcoin soon only the ashes will be left in future.
bkbirge
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 868
Merit: 433



View Profile
August 09, 2019, 09:25:24 PM

And this is why most people ignore you when you mention bitcoin, fly by night outfits like this do not serve bitcoin evangelism very well...
https://cointelegraph.com/news/texas-securities-watchdog-shuts-down-craigslist-crypto-scammer
ssmc2
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1946
Merit: 1037


View Profile
August 09, 2019, 09:25:45 PM

Who's ready for the weekend pump?!

 Grin
El duderino_
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1134
Merit: 3972


#STAYinsideSTAYdrunk *the dude*


View Profile
August 09, 2019, 09:26:07 PM

via Imgflip Meme Generator
El duderino_
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1134
Merit: 3972


#STAYinsideSTAYdrunk *the dude*


View Profile
August 09, 2019, 09:27:59 PM
Merited by bones261 (2)

via Imgflip Meme Generator
JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2338
Merit: 3029


How much alt coin diversification is needed? 0%?


View Profile
August 09, 2019, 09:29:46 PM
Last edit: August 09, 2019, 09:40:38 PM by JayJuanGee

reaching 70% dominance. on cmc, which was always rigged in favour of alts.

BTC dominance was always over 80% until the BCH split happened. From that moment on. Or better to say a bit before that, was always uncertainty. Not just BCH steal dominance but also ETH, which many considered as BTC version two. But it ended just as a platform to crowdfund founds with illegal securities.  And it seems it lasted for two whole years.

There was an explosion of ICOs at that time. The BCH fork wasn’t a driver.

From end of 2017 Feb to mid 2017 Jun, BTC dominance plunged from over 85% to below 40%.
https://coinmarketcap.com/charts/#dominance-percentage

The beginning of 2017 is when blocks started becoming persistently full.
https://bitinfocharts.com/comparison/bitcoin-size.html

The loss of dominance was due neither to BCH nor ICOs. 'Twas the Blockalypse. Or more pecisely, Blockalypse I.

1)   jbreher's arguments above should serve as evidence that there is still a decent amount of stubborn hopium regarding the presentation of a bitcoin is broken narrative, even if using various misreprsentations and faulty inferences from the presented evidence.

2) spammer BIG blockers like to conveniently forget how much resources they were pumping into spamming BTC's blockchain in mid to late 2017 and more intensely for about two months in December 2017 and January 2018 in order to attempt to provide facts for their narrative that bitcoin is broken due to high transaction fees and slow transaction times.  It was a costly endeavor for them, and may have paid off in some ways, but also in mid January  2018 it became somewhat apparent that the amount of resources they were spending to spam the bitcoin blockchain was likely not paying off as much as it was costing, including providing incentives for quasi-rogue white knights in bitcoin to launch lightning network way earlier than any of the more prominent folks in BTC were advicing.. and the spam attack was creating more emergency like conditions in bitcoin, but then suddenly those spam attacks stopped in late January 2018 - causing BTC fees and transaction times to come back down to more normal levels.  Of course, BIG blocker nutjob and BTC naysayers still want to use this as their "factual" narrative, but here in jbreher's case, of course, he wants to distract by trying to claim that there were full blocks dating back to early 2017... and even if that were somewhat true, who fucking cares, because the implementation of segwit in August 2017 and its further adopted use in bitcoin had brought a decent amount of additional relief onto bitcoin's main chain.

reaching 70% dominance. on cmc, which was always rigged in favour of alts.

BTC dominance was always over 80% until the BCH split happened. From that moment on. Or better to say a bit before that, was always uncertainty. Not just BCH steal dominance but also ETH, which many considered as BTC version two. But it ended just as a platform to crowdfund founds with illegal securities.  And it seems it lasted for two whole years.

There was an explosion of ICOs at that time. The BCH fork wasn’t a driver.

From end of 2017 Feb to mid 2017 Jun, BTC dominance plunged from over 85% to below 40%.
https://coinmarketcap.com/charts/#dominance-percentage

The beginning of 2017 is when blocks started becoming persistently full.
https://bitinfocharts.com/comparison/bitcoin-size.html

The loss of dominance was due neither to BCH nor ICOs. 'Twas the Blockalypse. Or more pecisely, Blockalypse I.

why did i know you couldn´t resist to post here... ?   full blocks are ok. fee market is ok. shitcoins are not ok. and bch/bsv... oh dear... i guess they solved the full blocks problem. a blockchain no fucker is using will not have full blocks...

Scumball scammer fuckers and child molesters are using bcash variants.    The weather channel is using bcash variants too, and it is proposed that maybe ethereum scumbags are going to use bcash variants too, since kriptokitties broke them down... So soon they will have a certain kind of cyber/make believe pussies ontop of those BIG ASS bcash block variants too... NOT sure if they will fill it up with all that important stuff, but just saying.

The remainder of the peeps including normal fuckers and everybody else is using bitcoin and will most likely continue to use bitcoin, since bitcoin is not broken and also bitcoin has strong foundational principles that are likely to continue to allow bitcoin to scale as we go... with ongoing decent attempts at fee incentives too, that attempt to discourage spamming with bullshit nonsense, like the weather or cryptocats.
JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2338
Merit: 3029


How much alt coin diversification is needed? 0%?


View Profile
August 09, 2019, 09:31:37 PM

Buy bitcoin

The Japanese rendition of the story how a single man defeated an army of digital shitcoin scammers and became the richest man in the world with physical silver:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3rUb5dLO7-I

Well silver has turned out to be a pretty crappy investment.   When adjusted for inflation it is worth less now than its value 50 years ago.   Way less.   Not a hedge at all.   (Silver is about 1/8th the value now as it was in 1979)

Upon performing some complex math, I have approximated that 1979 was 40 years ago    - not 50 years ago. 

You're welcome.
realr0ach
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 924
Merit: 311


#TheGoyimKnow


View Profile
August 09, 2019, 09:39:53 PM

his racism and hate to this forum. everyone quoting him is helping this fucked up retarded arsehole wanker.

Do you want total war?
Pages: « 1 ... 24554 24555 24556 24557 24558 24559 24560 24561 24562 24563 24564 24565 24566 24567 24568 24569 24570 24571 24572 24573 24574 24575 24576 24577 24578 24579 24580 24581 24582 24583 24584 24585 24586 24587 24588 24589 24590 24591 24592 24593 24594 24595 24596 24597 24598 24599 24600 24601 24602 24603 [24604] 24605 24606 24607 24608 24609 24610 24611 24612 24613 24614 24615 24616 24617 24618 24619 24620 24621 24622 24623 24624 24625 24626 24627 24628 24629 24630 24631 24632 24633 24634 24635 24636 24637 24638 24639 24640 24641 24642 24643 24644 24645 24646 24647 24648 24649 24650 24651 24652 24653 24654 ... 27082 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!