Bitcoin Forum
December 07, 2016, 12:39:35 PM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.13.1  [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 ... 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 [177] 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 ... 744 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [1500 TH] p2pool: Decentralized, DoS-resistant, Hop-Proof pool  (Read 2032399 times)
Soros Shorts
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1457



View Profile
September 28, 2012, 12:25:22 PM
 #3521

Are BFL FPGA Singles the only type mining hardware that is currently not compatible with p2pool?

When I upgrade mine to "SC" Singles (hopefully in 2 months) I am expecting these to work with p2pool. Is that a reasonable expectation?
1481114375
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481114375

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481114375
Reply with quote  #2

1481114375
Report to moderator
1481114375
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481114375

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481114375
Reply with quote  #2

1481114375
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1481114375
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481114375

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481114375
Reply with quote  #2

1481114375
Report to moderator
1481114375
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481114375

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481114375
Reply with quote  #2

1481114375
Report to moderator
rav3n_pl
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1320


Don`t panic! Organize!


View Profile
September 28, 2012, 02:17:49 PM
 #3522

Are BFL FPGA Singles the only type mining hardware that is currently not compatible with p2pool?

When I upgrade mine to "SC" Singles (hopefully in 2 months) I am expecting these to work with p2pool. Is that a reasonable expectation?

Tell us when you will have them Smiley All this things are still a question mark even for BFL Tongue

1Rav3nkMayCijuhzcYemMiPYsvcaiwHni  Bitcoin stuff on my OneDrive
My RPC CoinControl for any coin https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=929954
My SatoshDice bot https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=897685
Aseras
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 658


View Profile
September 28, 2012, 02:39:48 PM
 #3523

V5 still seems to have problems with memory leaks, seems more to be an issue with how it talks to .7 bitcoin qt as when it happens, both start to consume HUGE amounts of memory. run_p2pool will start blasting lost connection messages or scrolling this message constantly

Quote
exceptions.ValueError: too many file descriptors in select()
2012-09-28 09:44:04.312000 > Unhandled Error
2012-09-28 09:44:04.312000 > Traceback (most recent call last):
2012-09-28 09:44:04.312000 >   File "run_p2pool.py", line 5, in <module>
2012-09-28 09:44:04.312000 >     
2012-09-28 09:44:04.312000 >   File "p2pool\main.pyc", line 781, in run
2012-09-28 09:44:04.312000 >     
2012-09-28 09:44:04.312000 >   File "twisted\internet\base.pyc", line 1162, in run
2012-09-28 09:44:04.312000 >     
2012-09-28 09:44:04.312000 >   File "twisted\internet\base.pyc", line 1174, in mainLoop
2012-09-28 09:44:04.312000 >     
2012-09-28 09:44:04.312000 > --- <exception caught here> ---
2012-09-28 09:44:04.312000 >   File "twisted\internet\selectreactor.pyc", line 104, in doSelect
2012-09-28 09:44:04.312000 >     
2012-09-28 09:44:04.312000 >   File "twisted\internet\selectreactor.pyc", line 40, in win32select
2012-09-28 09:44:04.312000 >     
2012-09-28 09:44:04.312000 > exceptions.ValueError: too many file descriptors in select()

eventually it'll use up all available ram and blow up.
jiyu_shi
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 78


View Profile
September 30, 2012, 04:16:02 PM
 #3524

I run p2pool, it returns

what's the red box means?

Thus, the miner works at normal speed, but accept is 0, p2pool's Local is also 0,
and there's no show at p2pool.info_active users
bitcoin-qt's datadir is at D:\bitcoin\

how to solve the problem?
thanks
forrestv
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 510


View Profile
September 30, 2012, 07:42:51 PM
 #3525

I run p2pool, it returns
...
what's the red box means?

Thus, the miner works at normal speed, but accept is 0, p2pool's Local is also 0,
and there's no show at p2pool.info_active users
bitcoin-qt's datadir is at D:\bitcoin\

how to solve the problem?
thanks

The red box isn't unusual.. It just means that querying bitcoin for something timed out, but unless it's happening all the time, it's harmless.

Local may be displayed as 0 if you're mining to a non-default address, because you've set your miner's username to a Bitcoin address. This isn't recommended - instead you should use P2Pool's -a option. If you need to use the username way, you can look at the graphs on http://127.0.0.1:9332/ to get some information.

1J1zegkNSbwX4smvTdoHSanUfwvXFeuV23
rav3n_pl
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1320


Don`t panic! Organize!


View Profile
September 30, 2012, 09:14:54 PM
 #3526

V5 still seems to have problems with memory leaks, seems more to be an issue with how it talks to .7 bitcoin qt as when it happens, both start to consume HUGE amounts of memory. run_p2pool will start blasting lost connection messages or scrolling this message constantly

eventually it'll use up all available ram and blow up.
Version: 5.0-3-g7585a1c
Node uptime: 3.639 days Peers: 10 out, 1 in
Not see any excessive memory usage.

1Rav3nkMayCijuhzcYemMiPYsvcaiwHni  Bitcoin stuff on my OneDrive
My RPC CoinControl for any coin https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=929954
My SatoshDice bot https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=897685
forrestv
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 510


View Profile
September 30, 2012, 09:21:11 PM
 #3527

V5 still seems to have problems with memory leaks, seems more to be an issue with how it talks to .7 bitcoin qt as when it happens, both start to consume HUGE amounts of memory. run_p2pool will start blasting lost connection messages or scrolling this message constantly

eventually it'll use up all available ram and blow up.

Aseras, running p2pool with the --debug option and sending me the log might help. It looks like it's leaking sockets for some reason..

1J1zegkNSbwX4smvTdoHSanUfwvXFeuV23
jiyu_shi
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 78


View Profile
October 01, 2012, 05:43:30 AM
 #3528

I run p2pool, it returns
...
what's the red box means?

Thus, the miner works at normal speed, but accept is 0, p2pool's Local is also 0,
and there's no show at p2pool.info_active users
bitcoin-qt's datadir is at D:\bitcoin\

how to solve the problem?
thanks

The red box isn't unusual.. It just means that querying bitcoin for something timed out, but unless it's happening all the time, it's harmless.

Local may be displayed as 0 if you're mining to a non-default address, because you've set your miner's username to a Bitcoin address. This isn't recommended - instead you should use P2Pool's -a option. If you need to use the username way, you can look at the graphs on http://127.0.0.1:9332/ to get some information.

I'd already use -a [address], and miner's username was a norml word, not an address.
Another, my GPU is HD6470M which has only ~30Mh/s speed, is it too slowly to get an accept?
http://127.0.0.1:9332/ shows nothing--even no pool speed and other users' speed, but the graphs shows my speed and pool speed.
Mobius
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 957



View Profile
October 01, 2012, 07:54:34 AM
 #3529

I run p2pool, it returns
...
what's the red box means?

Thus, the miner works at normal speed, but accept is 0, p2pool's Local is also 0,
and there's no show at p2pool.info_active users
bitcoin-qt's datadir is at D:\bitcoin\

how to solve the problem?
thanks

The red box isn't unusual.. It just means that querying bitcoin for something timed out, but unless it's happening all the time, it's harmless.

Local may be displayed as 0 if you're mining to a non-default address, because you've set your miner's username to a Bitcoin address. This isn't recommended - instead you should use P2Pool's -a option. If you need to use the username way, you can look at the graphs on http://127.0.0.1:9332/ to get some information.

I'd already use -a [address], and miner's username was a norml word, not an address.
Another, my GPU is HD6470M which has only ~30Mh/s speed, is it too slowly to get an accept?
http://127.0.0.1:9332/ shows nothing--even no pool speed and other users' speed, but the graphs shows my speed and pool speed.

use http://127.0.0.1:9332/static/
jiyu_shi
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 78


View Profile
October 01, 2012, 04:25:42 PM
 #3530

it is a notebook with HD6470M, just works for test.
miner and p2pool seems work normally, but the accept is only 9 which has worked for 20 minutes.
CG option: -g 1 -v 2 -w 128 -I 6


and static shows 0 shares and 0 DOA


so why? is the GPU too poor to fix p2pool?
Krak
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 591



View Profile WWW
October 01, 2012, 04:44:14 PM
 #3531

it is a notebook with HD6470M, just works for test.
miner and p2pool seems work normally, but the accept is only 9 which has worked for 20 minutes.
CG option: -g 1 -v 2 -w 128 -I 6
http://img.aalun.com/di/PRR5/1.png

and static shows 0 shares and 0 DOA
http://img.aalun.com/di/AAAP/2.png

so why? is the GPU too poor to fix p2pool?
As it says in the p2pool window, you'll only get a share every ~23 hours. The shares that are showing as accepted in cgminer are the diff-1 pseudo shares that p2pool uses to track your hashrate.

BTC: 1KrakenLFEFg33A4f6xpwgv3UUoxrLPuGn
jiyu_shi
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 78


View Profile
October 01, 2012, 04:54:08 PM
 #3532

it is a notebook with HD6470M, just works for test.
miner and p2pool seems work normally, but the accept is only 9 which has worked for 20 minutes.
CG option: -g 1 -v 2 -w 128 -I 6
http://img.aalun.com/di/PRR5/1.png

and static shows 0 shares and 0 DOA
http://img.aalun.com/di/AAAP/2.png

so why? is the GPU too poor to fix p2pool?
As it says in the p2pool window, you'll only get a share every ~23 hours. The shares that are showing as accepted in cgminer are the diff-1 pseudo shares that p2pool uses to track your hashrate.
so, it means the HD6470M had not completed just only 1 true share for 20 minutes? if it works more than 23 hours, I will get gain?
Krak
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 591



View Profile WWW
October 01, 2012, 05:09:11 PM
 #3533

so, it means the HD6470M had not completed just only 1 true share for 20 minutes? if it works more than 23 hours, I will get gain?
More or less, yeah.

BTC: 1KrakenLFEFg33A4f6xpwgv3UUoxrLPuGn
rav3n_pl
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1320


Don`t panic! Organize!


View Profile
October 01, 2012, 10:36:39 PM
 #3534

so, it means the HD6470M had not completed just only 1 true share for 20 minutes? if it works more than 23 hours, I will get gain?
More or less, yeah.
Miner is reporting diff1 shares, p2pool need much higher (diff >500) share to pay.
If p2pool tells you that "expected time to share" is 23hrs it is possible to NOT get payd all day long, even two when mining 24/7. 35MH is just not good enough.

1Rav3nkMayCijuhzcYemMiPYsvcaiwHni  Bitcoin stuff on my OneDrive
My RPC CoinControl for any coin https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=929954
My SatoshDice bot https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=897685
mdude77
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358


View Profile
October 02, 2012, 12:33:52 AM
 #3535

Why am I seeing this repeatedly in my console? 

Code:
2012-10-01 20:31:14.959000 Sending 0 shares to 92.251.166.251:58565

Not "all the time", but I see it regularly.  Here's another set:

Code:
2012-10-01 20:32:32.820000  Pool: 374GH/s Stale rate: 9.3% Expected time to block: 9.1 hours
2012-10-01 20:32:34.529000 Sending 0 shares to 92.251.166.251:58565
2012-10-01 20:32:41.169000 Sending 0 shares to 92.251.166.251:58565
2012-10-01 20:32:43.630000 Sending 0 shares to 92.251.166.251:58565

M

MMinerMonitor author, monitor/auto/schedule reboots/alerts/remote/MobileMiner for Ants and Spondoolies! Latest (5.2). MPoolMonitor author, monitor stats/workers for most pools, global BTC stats (current/nxt diff/USD val/hashrate/calc)! Latest (v4.2) 
Buyer beware of Bitmain hardware and services.
forrestv
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 510


View Profile
October 02, 2012, 08:28:40 PM
 #3536

Why am I seeing this repeatedly in my console? 

Code:
2012-10-01 20:31:14.959000 Sending 0 shares to 92.251.166.251:58565

It's just a peer requesting a share you don't have, potentially on purpose to measure ping times: http://forre.st:9332/pings

1J1zegkNSbwX4smvTdoHSanUfwvXFeuV23
lenny_
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 953



View Profile
October 03, 2012, 01:31:39 AM
 #3537

During startup:
Code:
2012-10-03 02:27:51.800039     ...inserting 22449 verified shares...
2012-10-03 02:27:56.854010     ...done loading 22448 shares!
2012-10-03 02:27:56.854372
2012-10-03 02:27:56.854690 Initializing work...
2012-10-03 02:28:10.631818     ...success!
2012-10-03 02:28:10.632188
2012-10-03 02:28:10.632673 Joining p2pool network using port 9333...
2012-10-03 02:28:13.473353 > Unhandled error in Deferred:
2012-10-03 02:28:13.473845 > Traceback (most recent call last):
2012-10-03 02:28:13.474051 > Failure: twisted.internet.defer.TimeoutError: in ReplyMatcher
2012-10-03 02:28:16.303616     ...success!

Latest version from git b07f142a605adb09735c0a2c16621f57bb678c78
rav3n_pl
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1320


Don`t panic! Organize!


View Profile
October 03, 2012, 06:33:27 AM
 #3538

During startup:
Code:
2012-10-03 02:27:51.800039     ...inserting 22449 verified shares...
2012-10-03 02:27:56.854010     ...done loading 22448 shares!
2012-10-03 02:27:56.854372
2012-10-03 02:27:56.854690 Initializing work...
2012-10-03 02:28:10.631818     ...success!
2012-10-03 02:28:10.632188
2012-10-03 02:28:10.632673 Joining p2pool network using port 9333...
2012-10-03 02:28:13.473353 > Unhandled error in Deferred:
2012-10-03 02:28:13.473845 > Traceback (most recent call last):
2012-10-03 02:28:13.474051 > Failure: twisted.internet.defer.TimeoutError: in ReplyMatcher
2012-10-03 02:28:16.303616     ...success!

Latest version from git b07f142a605adb09735c0a2c16621f57bb678c78
See: https://github.com/forrestv/p2pool/issues/30
Smiley

1Rav3nkMayCijuhzcYemMiPYsvcaiwHni  Bitcoin stuff on my OneDrive
My RPC CoinControl for any coin https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=929954
My SatoshDice bot https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=897685
lenny_
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 953



View Profile
October 03, 2012, 10:01:35 AM
 #3539

Yeah, but It supposed to be fixed with bitcoind 0.7?
mdude77
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358


View Profile
October 04, 2012, 12:03:30 AM
 #3540

I hereby retract my statement about p2pool not scaling properly when the pool hash rate is > 300g/h.  p2pool clearly had a good run not too long ago.

Then I rejoined.

So now I'm changing my statement.

p2pool doesn't scale properly when the pool hash rate is > 300g/h and I'm part of p2pool.

Sigh.

M

MMinerMonitor author, monitor/auto/schedule reboots/alerts/remote/MobileMiner for Ants and Spondoolies! Latest (5.2). MPoolMonitor author, monitor stats/workers for most pools, global BTC stats (current/nxt diff/USD val/hashrate/calc)! Latest (v4.2) 
Buyer beware of Bitmain hardware and services.
Pages: « 1 ... 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 [177] 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 ... 744 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!