[1500 TH] p2pool: Decentralized, DoS-resistant, Hop-Proof pool

[lenny_]

During startup:

Code:

2012-10-03 02:27:51.800039     ...inserting 22449 verified shares...
2012-10-03 02:27:56.854010     ...done loading 22448 shares!
2012-10-03 02:27:56.854372
2012-10-03 02:27:56.854690 Initializing work...
2012-10-03 02:28:10.631818     ...success!
2012-10-03 02:28:10.632188
2012-10-03 02:28:10.632673 Joining p2pool network using port 9333...
2012-10-03 02:28:13.473353 > Unhandled error in Deferred:
2012-10-03 02:28:13.473845 > Traceback (most recent call last):
2012-10-03 02:28:13.474051 > Failure: twisted.internet.defer.TimeoutError: in ReplyMatcher
2012-10-03 02:28:16.303616     ...success!

Latest version from git b07f142a605adb09735c0a2c16621f57bb678c78

[rav3n_pl]

During startup:

Code:

2012-10-03 02:27:51.800039     ...inserting 22449 verified shares...
2012-10-03 02:27:56.854010     ...done loading 22448 shares!
2012-10-03 02:27:56.854372
2012-10-03 02:27:56.854690 Initializing work...
2012-10-03 02:28:10.631818     ...success!
2012-10-03 02:28:10.632188
2012-10-03 02:28:10.632673 Joining p2pool network using port 9333...
2012-10-03 02:28:13.473353 > Unhandled error in Deferred:
2012-10-03 02:28:13.473845 > Traceback (most recent call last):
2012-10-03 02:28:13.474051 > Failure: twisted.internet.defer.TimeoutError: in ReplyMatcher
2012-10-03 02:28:16.303616     ...success!

Latest version from git b07f142a605adb09735c0a2c16621f57bb678c78

See: https://github.com/forrestv/p2pool/issues/30

[lenny_]

Yeah, but It supposed to be fixed with bitcoind 0.7?

[mdude77]

I hereby retract my statement about p2pool not scaling properly when the pool hash rate is > 300g/h.  p2pool clearly had a good run not too long ago.

Then I rejoined.

So now I'm changing my statement.

p2pool doesn't scale properly when the pool hash rate is > 300g/h and I'm part of p2pool.

Sigh.

M

[rav3n_pl]

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=28402.msg1244616#msg1244616
Maybe bump work feeding to new protocol?

If no one noticed 95% of p2pool is on v5 Shame on last 5%

[Aseras]

OK did my part today, everyone else step up.

2012-10-05 04:13:23.468000  Pool: 371GH/s Stale rate: 7.5% Expected time to block: 9.8 hours
2012-10-05 04:13:24.793000
2012-10-05 04:13:24.793000 GOT BLOCK FROM MINER! Passing to bitcoind! http://blockexplorer.com/block/00000000000004ead2e21c87a0b8c381f8e4aa9d6982fc521808fdb42d184d4e
2012-10-05 04:13:24.793000
2012-10-05 04:13:24.890000 GOT SHARE! 6 2d184d4e prev 585422e7 age 45.91s

[sharky112065]

OK did my part today, everyone else step up.

2012-10-05 04:13:23.468000  Pool: 371GH/s Stale rate: 7.5% Expected time to block: 9.8 hours
2012-10-05 04:13:24.793000
2012-10-05 04:13:24.793000 GOT BLOCK FROM MINER! Passing to bitcoind! http://blockexplorer.com/block/00000000000004ead2e21c87a0b8c381f8e4aa9d6982fc521808fdb42d184d4e
2012-10-05 04:13:24.793000
2012-10-05 04:13:24.890000 GOT SHARE! 6 2d184d4e prev 585422e7 age 45.91s

Well, do more. 

[gyverlb]

The latest update today from git master changed something to the p2p connections. My node gets far less incoming connections.

See http://p2pool.bouton.name:9332/static/graphs.html

No adverse effect to report but if all nodes behaved like mine I guess there may be a problem.

[rav3n_pl]

The latest update today from git master changed something to the p2p connections. My node gets far less incoming connections.

See http://p2pool.bouton.name:9332/static/graphs.html

No adverse effect to report but if all nodes behaved like mine I guess there may be a problem.

Nope, nothing there. Version: 5.0-14-g42ef991
http://rav3n.dtdns.net:9332/static/graphs.html
Looks normal to me.

[gyverlb]

The latest update today from git master changed something to the p2p connections. My node gets far less incoming connections.

See http://p2pool.bouton.name:9332/static/graphs.html

No adverse effect to report but if all nodes behaved like mine I guess there may be a problem.

Nope, nothing there. Version: 5.0-14-g42ef991
http://rav3n.dtdns.net:9332/static/graphs.html
Looks normal to me.

Look at the version running on my node (5.0-67-gf8fbc82)...

[gyverlb]

The latest update today from git master changed something to the p2p connections. My node gets far less incoming connections.

See http://p2pool.bouton.name:9332/static/graphs.html

No adverse effect to report but if all nodes behaved like mine I guess there may be a problem.

Connections are coming in slowly. Looking at the week graphs, previous node restarts were followed by a faster increase in incoming connections.

I'm not sure if it's a fluke or if a recent change is designed to produce this results but as I said, no actual adverse effect to report.

[rav3n_pl]

How it is possible, that BTC nodes are in 98% on v5 and LTC nodes only 40%? Cmon!
Compiled on win32 latest git (5.0-14-g42ef991), downloadable from my skydrive:
http://sdrv.ms/NtmDt5

[Subo1977]

is it planned to add "ASIC Features" like Stratum or so to p2pool?

[louisBSAS]

After 3 months solid - Back to bitminter    (and fees)

Now they will only solve 1 block every 2 days -  (I tend to have that affect).

If blocks increase - feel free to donate and I will stay away!

[rav3n_pl]

After 3 months solid - Back to bitminter    (and fees)

Now they will only solve 1 block every 2 days -  (I tend to have that affect).

If blocks increase - feel free to donate and I will stay away!

Do you admit that you holding all blocks you found?

[louisBSAS]

After 3 months solid - Back to bitminter    (and fees)

Now they will only solve 1 block every 2 days -  (I tend to have that affect).

If blocks increase - feel free to donate and I will stay away!

Do you admit that you holding all blocks you found?

Well, I found 4 blocks in three months and got the little finder's fee for each - nice feature.  I really like the idea of P2Pool, but got tired of lowering intensity (speed) in order to decrease stales and the like.  I get 0.5 Gh/s more on the other pool (cranked at -I 13)

No,  I wouldn't know how to hold blocks. I just characteristically have bad L*ck

Anyway, my P2Pool payout amount will dwindle to nothing in the next 18 hours, after which you can expect tons of cha-chings.

[Red Emerald]

After 3 months solid - Back to bitminter    (and fees)

Now they will only solve 1 block every 2 days -  (I tend to have that affect).

If blocks increase - feel free to donate and I will stay away!

Do you admit that you holding all blocks you found?

Well, I found 4 blocks in three months and got the little finder's fee for each - nice feature.  I really like the idea of P2Pool, but got tired of lowering intensity (speed) in order to decrease stales and the like.  I get 0.5 Gh/s more on the other pool (cranked at -I 13)

No,  I wouldn't know how to hold blocks. I just characteristically have bad L*ck

Anyway, my P2Pool payout amount will dwindle to nothing in the next 18 hours, after which you can expect tons of cha-chings.

Well we are at 122% 7-day luck, so I guess your plan worked lol.

[sharky112065]

After 3 months solid - Back to bitminter    (and fees)

Now they will only solve 1 block every 2 days -  (I tend to have that affect).

If blocks increase - feel free to donate and I will stay away!

Do you admit that you holding all blocks you found?

Well, I found 4 blocks in three months and got the little finder's fee for each - nice feature.  I really like the idea of P2Pool, but got tired of lowering intensity (speed) in order to decrease stales and the like.  I get 0.5 Gh/s more on the other pool (cranked at -I 13)

No,  I wouldn't know how to hold blocks. I just characteristically have bad L*ck

Anyway, my P2Pool payout amount will dwindle to nothing in the next 18 hours, after which you can expect tons of cha-chings.

Well we are at 122% 7-day luck, so I guess your plan worked lol.

Oh crap! Someone mentioned the L word... 

[c_k]

is it planned to add "ASIC Features" like Stratum or so to p2pool?

I am wondering the same thing 

[HostFat]

@forrestv
Can you give your opinion about this idea?
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=115036.0