Bitcoin Forum
December 10, 2016, 07:03:51 AM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.13.1  [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 ... 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 [157] 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 ... 744 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [1500 TH] p2pool: Decentralized, DoS-resistant, Hop-Proof pool  (Read 2034456 times)
rav3n_pl
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1320


Don`t panic! Organize!


View Profile
August 05, 2012, 07:41:56 PM
 #3121

Not only 50BTC from reward but our full payout = reward+fee and 0,5% form this.
So it can be more than 0,25BTC.
Code:
The block reward (currently 50BTC) [b]and the transaction fees[/b] are combined and apportioned according to these rules:

1Rav3nkMayCijuhzcYemMiPYsvcaiwHni  Bitcoin stuff on my OneDrive
My RPC CoinControl for any coin https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=929954
My SatoshDice bot https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=897685
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
mdude77
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358


View Profile
August 05, 2012, 11:27:49 PM
 #3122

Is it coincidence that the highest pool hash rate in a long time coincides with the longest block in a month?  Going on 48 hours here...

M

MMinerMonitor author, monitor/auto/schedule reboots/alerts/remote/MobileMiner for Ants and Spondoolies! Latest (5.2). MPoolMonitor author, monitor stats/workers for most pools, global BTC stats (current/nxt diff/USD val/hashrate/calc)! Latest (v4.2) 
Buyer beware of Bitmain hardware and services.
forrestv
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 510


View Profile
August 06, 2012, 12:30:38 AM
 #3123

Just started using p2pool again today and I have a quick question. Does the --p2pool-node flag support DNS lookups or can it only do IP addresses? I have a friend nearby that I'd like to be always connected to, but he has a dynamic IP.

DNS lookups should definitely work. If they fail, P2Pool should print an error while starting up. A few of the bootstrap nodes, including mine, use domain names instead of IP addresses.

I changed my bitcoin-qt datadir to E:\Users\xxx\AppData\Roaming\Bitcoin\,

then run:
run_p2pool --datadir E:\Users\xxx\AppData\Roaming\Bitcoin -a myaddress

it returned:
run_p2pool: error: Bitcoin configuration file not found. Manually enter your RPC password.
If you actually haven't created a configuration file, you should create one at C:\Users\xxx\AppData\Roaming\Bitcoin\bitcoin.conf with the text:

server=1
rpcpassword=........

I of course had created the file at E:\Users\xxx\AppData\Roaming\Bitcoin\bitcoin.conf,
so what's the matter?

The problem was that P2Pool is looking on the C: drive, but your Bitcoin files are apparently on the E: drive? Anyway, you already solved it.

1J1zegkNSbwX4smvTdoHSanUfwvXFeuV23
ChanceCoats123
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 680



View Profile
August 06, 2012, 01:21:13 AM
 #3124

Is it coincidence that the highest pool hash rate in a long time coincides with the longest block in a month?  Going on 48 hours here...

M

I feel like my shares have bad mojo. Sad
joemde
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 45


View Profile
August 06, 2012, 10:16:30 AM
 #3125

Since the 2+ day block started my mean returned share rate only seems to be about 65% of expected in relation to local hash rate. Has anyone else seen something similar?
mdude77
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358


View Profile
August 06, 2012, 10:30:16 AM
 #3126

Since the 2+ day block started my mean returned share rate only seems to be about 65% of expected in relation to local hash rate. Has anyone else seen something similar?

The pool hash rate is regularly up above 300g/h now.  That'll make your piece of the pie (and mine) smaller.  Theoretically it should mean more regular blocks which will offset it.

Theoretically.

M

MMinerMonitor author, monitor/auto/schedule reboots/alerts/remote/MobileMiner for Ants and Spondoolies! Latest (5.2). MPoolMonitor author, monitor stats/workers for most pools, global BTC stats (current/nxt diff/USD val/hashrate/calc)! Latest (v4.2) 
Buyer beware of Bitmain hardware and services.
joemde
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 45


View Profile
August 06, 2012, 10:34:40 AM
 #3127

Since the 2+ day block started my mean returned share rate only seems to be about 65% of expected in relation to local hash rate. Has anyone else seen something similar?

The pool hash rate is regularly up above 300g/h now.  That'll make your piece of the pie (and mine) smaller.  Theoretically it should mean more regular blocks which will offset it.

Theoretically.

M


Yea I get that however ...... your local client should still return a local share rate that is reflective of your local hash rate should it not?
rav3n_pl
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1320


Don`t panic! Organize!


View Profile
August 06, 2012, 10:41:48 AM
 #3128

We need change in LTC p2pool:
All links address/block form http://abe.liteco.in/ to http://explorer.litecoin.net/

1Rav3nkMayCijuhzcYemMiPYsvcaiwHni  Bitcoin stuff on my OneDrive
My RPC CoinControl for any coin https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=929954
My SatoshDice bot https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=897685
organofcorti
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1960


Poor impulse control.


View Profile WWW
August 06, 2012, 11:10:07 AM
 #3129

The pool hash rate is regularly up above 300g/h now.  That'll make your piece of the pie (and mine) smaller.  Theoretically it should mean more regular blocks which will offset it.

Theoretically.

M


Yea I get that however ...... your local client should still return a local share rate that is reflective of your local hash rate should it not?

There's a lot of variance, explained here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=18313.msg1057860#msg1057860

Bitcoin network and pool analysis 12QxPHEuxDrs7mCyGSx1iVSozTwtquDB3r
follow @oocBlog for new post notifications
joemde
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 45


View Profile
August 06, 2012, 11:20:43 AM
 #3130

The pool hash rate is regularly up above 300g/h now.  That'll make your piece of the pie (and mine) smaller.  Theoretically it should mean more regular blocks which will offset it.

Theoretically.

M


Yea I get that however ...... your local client should still return a local share rate that is reflective of your local hash rate should it not?

There's a lot of variance, explained here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=18313.msg1057860#msg1057860

Ok I understand that there is variance, but it seems that variance in my particular instance is rather high ~20% or more. Should I be alarmed or do you think it will work itself out over time?
organofcorti
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1960


Poor impulse control.


View Profile WWW
August 06, 2012, 11:23:32 AM
 #3131

The pool hash rate is regularly up above 300g/h now.  That'll make your piece of the pie (and mine) smaller.  Theoretically it should mean more regular blocks which will offset it.

Theoretically.

M


Yea I get that however ...... your local client should still return a local share rate that is reflective of your local hash rate should it not?

There's a lot of variance, explained here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=18313.msg1057860#msg1057860

Ok I understand that there is variance, but it seems that variance in my particular instance is rather high ~20% or more. Should I be alarmed or do you think it will work itself out over time?

Did you read the post? Your variance is well within the 95% confidence interval.

Bitcoin network and pool analysis 12QxPHEuxDrs7mCyGSx1iVSozTwtquDB3r
follow @oocBlog for new post notifications
joemde
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 45


View Profile
August 06, 2012, 11:29:24 AM
 #3132

Yea I did read it. I apologize for the question but I am clearly not anywhere in your league when it comes to statistics, probability and math. I just keep thinking I need to fix something but I can't find anything to fix. Thank you for taking the time to point me to your explanation.

Edit: Additionally your explanation seems to indicate that the lower your local hash rate the larger the variance is likely to be as reported by P2Pool. I have ~12 GH/s local rate and am only seeing ~10 GH/s reflected in shares although local rate reported by P2Pool is in line with the ~12 GH/s rate.
organofcorti
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1960


Poor impulse control.


View Profile WWW
August 06, 2012, 11:34:12 AM
 #3133

What's your hashrate? I misread the posts and thought it was 300Mhps, but that was the 300Ghps of the pool. If you post your hashrate I'll figure out the the probability of that sort of variance occurring in future.

Bitcoin network and pool analysis 12QxPHEuxDrs7mCyGSx1iVSozTwtquDB3r
follow @oocBlog for new post notifications
joemde
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 45


View Profile
August 06, 2012, 11:35:40 AM
 #3134

Post above edited to include local vs reported hash rates.
organofcorti
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1960


Poor impulse control.


View Profile WWW
August 06, 2012, 11:47:47 AM
 #3135

Any idea what difficulty you've been submitting shares at (on average)?

Bitcoin network and pool analysis 12QxPHEuxDrs7mCyGSx1iVSozTwtquDB3r
follow @oocBlog for new post notifications
racerguy
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 271


View Profile
August 06, 2012, 12:09:14 PM
 #3136

with my 5770 my expected payout varies between 0.02 and 0.08btc's, I'd say your variance is pretty normal unless you have 50ghash on your own.
organofcorti
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1960


Poor impulse control.


View Profile WWW
August 06, 2012, 12:28:21 PM
 #3137

Edit: Additionally your explanation seems to indicate that the lower your local hash rate the larger the variance is likely to be as reported by P2Pool. I have ~12 GH/s local rate and am only seeing ~10 GH/s reflected in shares although local rate reported by P2Pool is in line with the ~12 GH/s rate.

I don't think this is variance. The pool is seeing the same hashrate as you are locally, which means it's getting all the shares you think it is. Are you including DOA and sharechain orphans in your figures?

For future reference, at 12 Ghps your 95% confidence intervals for daily average hashrate variations are about +/- 8% at  D400 and +/- 10% at D600.

You should see much less variance than many (smaller) miners. 10Ghps, or a 16% lower average daily hashrate, should occur 0.032% of the time at D600 and 0.0012% of the time at D400.

Bitcoin network and pool analysis 12QxPHEuxDrs7mCyGSx1iVSozTwtquDB3r
follow @oocBlog for new post notifications
joemde
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 45


View Profile
August 06, 2012, 01:12:20 PM
 #3138

Edit: Additionally your explanation seems to indicate that the lower your local hash rate the larger the variance is likely to be as reported by P2Pool. I have ~12 GH/s local rate and am only seeing ~10 GH/s reflected in shares although local rate reported by P2Pool is in line with the ~12 GH/s rate.

I don't think this is variance. The pool is seeing the same hashrate as you are locally, which means it's getting all the shares you think it is. Are you including DOA and sharechain orphans in your figures?

For future reference, at 12 Ghps your 95% confidence intervals for daily average hashrate variations are about +/- 8% at  D400 and +/- 10% at D600.

You should see much less variance than many (smaller) miners. 10Ghps, or a 16% lower average daily hashrate, should occur 0.032% of the time at D600 and 0.0012% of the time at D400.


I didn't think the returned share rate was correct as it has persisted for more than 48 hours. I just had a power supply fail so maybe that had something to do with it although I can't reason out exactly how if the rig WAS running and each card was accepting shares normally. But I will probably never know. Possibly with that rig and its cards out of service if my current returned rate doesn't go down there is a real likelyhood that it was the culprit.

Thanks for the responses ....
ChanceCoats123
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 680



View Profile
August 06, 2012, 11:39:47 PM
 #3139

Ooooh! I must have found the latest block. Cheesy I got my extra .25 + fees and such.  Cool
iongchun
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 76


View Profile
August 07, 2012, 08:51:04 AM
 #3140

Ooooh! I must have found the latest block. Cheesy I got my extra .25 + fees and such.  Cool

If you do merged mining, check if you get the 50 + fees NMC too  Smiley

Bitcoin: 1NFMpJUW7sTKmnVKj12MxhPvCvzAKQ5gUV
Namecoin: N5Tnt3JyMeizsoAFAZDr7CSxjzDtPSisK8
Mining with P2Pool. Graph. Blocks.
Pages: « 1 ... 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 [157] 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 ... 744 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!