Bitcoin Forum
November 05, 2024, 03:29:53 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 810 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 824 825 826 827 828 [829] 830 831 832 833 834 835 836 837 838 839 840 841 842 843 844 845 846 847 848 849 850 851 852 853 854 855 856 857 858 859 860 861 862 863 864 865 866 867 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 875 876 877 878 879 ... 1154 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [4+ EH] Slush Pool (slushpool.com); Overt AsicBoost; World First Mining Pool  (Read 4382591 times)
tommymal83
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 29
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 19, 2014, 06:01:57 PM
 #16561

yes i have had 2 very low points payouts today blocks 22106 and 22105.....both 50%
oh what i normally get......hopefully slush will correct this error....lol  Embarrassed Embarrassed
TrytoHex
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 86
Merit: 10


View Profile
May 19, 2014, 06:15:19 PM
 #16562

I submitted a ticket...
Alexiandar
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 6
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 19, 2014, 06:23:55 PM
 #16563

yes i have had 2 very low points payouts today blocks 22106 and 22105.....both 50%
oh what i normally get......hopefully slush will correct this error....lol  Embarrassed Embarrassed

Same here, 50% of normal payout for 22106
FUBUKY
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 13
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 19, 2014, 06:51:06 PM
 #16564

yes i have had 2 very low points payouts today blocks 22106 and 22105.....both 50%
oh what i normally get......hopefully slush will correct this error....lol  Embarrassed Embarrassed

Same here, 50% of normal payout for 22106


my 200% more payout for 22106

in other block is normal payout
Mudbankkeith
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 868
Merit: 1000



View Profile
May 19, 2014, 06:53:37 PM
 #16565

yes i have had 2 very low points payouts today blocks 22106 and 22105.....both 50%
oh what i normally get......hopefully slush will correct this error....lol  Embarrassed Embarrassed

Same here, 50% of normal payout for 22106


my 200% more payout for 22106

in other block is normal payout

sounds like you got the jackpot!

BTc donations welcome:-  13c2KuzWCaWFTXF171Zn1HrKhMYARPKv97
FUBUKY
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 13
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 19, 2014, 06:57:41 PM
 #16566

yes i have had 2 very low points payouts today blocks 22106 and 22105.....both 50%
oh what i normally get......hopefully slush will correct this error....lol  Embarrassed Embarrassed

Same here, 50% of normal payout for 22106


my 200% more payout for 22106

in other block is normal payout

sounds like you got the jackpot!

normal payout is 0.00703204, in block 22106  first  0.02003204 down to payout 0.01350420
Skydaddy
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 22
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 19, 2014, 07:02:10 PM
 #16567

yes i have had 2 very low points payouts today blocks 22106 and 22105.....both 50%
oh what i normally get......hopefully slush will correct this error....lol  Embarrassed Embarrassed

Same here, 50% of normal payout for 22106


my 200% more payout for 22106

in other block is normal payout

sounds like you got the jackpot!

normal payout is 0.00703204, in block 22106  first  0.02003204 down to payout 0.01350420

And I'll be dang if I can figure out how to submit a ticket with regards to this matter. Could one of the more learned members be so kind? Thanks for the efforts fellow miners!
TrytoHex
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 86
Merit: 10


View Profile
May 19, 2014, 07:21:15 PM
 #16568

yes i have had 2 very low points payouts today blocks 22106 and 22105.....both 50%
oh what i normally get......hopefully slush will correct this error....lol  Embarrassed Embarrassed

Same here, 50% of normal payout for 22106


my 200% more payout for 22106

in other block is normal payout

sounds like you got the jackpot!

normal payout is 0.00703204, in block 22106  first  0.02003204 down to payout 0.01350420

And I'll be dang if I can figure out how to submit a ticket with regards to this matter. Could one of the more learned members be so kind? Thanks for the efforts fellow miners!

Go knowledgebase, in the upper left corner you click on submitted a ticket... Smiley
Boelaap
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 11
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 19, 2014, 07:42:29 PM
 #16569

My reward was also "cut in half".  Undecided
I raised a ticket, and things will be sorted out as usual. Roll Eyes
Moria
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 18
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 19, 2014, 09:24:11 PM
 #16570

My reward was also "cut in half".  Undecided
I raised a ticket, and things will be sorted out as usual. Roll Eyes

Yep 22106 was also half here..   email sent to support:)

Regards

M
kabopar
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 616
Merit: 500


View Profile
May 19, 2014, 09:49:46 PM
 #16571

My reward was also "cut in half".  Undecided
I raised a ticket, and things will be sorted out as usual. Roll Eyes

Yep 22106 was also half here..   email sent to support:)

Regards

M
My payout was lower by 18% relatively to the proportional number of my shares.  A possible explanation to this is a sudden rise in the pool hash rate towards the end of the block, which decreases the payout of all the other miners (but at the same time make a significant contribution to solving that block faster).  Let's try to illustrate this with an example: 
The pool hash rate= 1800000 GH/s  Your hash rate=200 GH/s your expected reward=0.002777778 BTC
Now assume that Miner X joined the pool with 200000  GH/s a few minutes before the end of the block, due to Slush's 'anti-hopping' algorithm, Miner X's contribution receives almost full 'weight' despite occuring towards the end of the block, so the increased short-term hash rate at the end of the block is now 2000000  GH/s, your reward drops by 10% to 0.0025 BTC.  This is not due to any 'fault' at Slush.  Actually it might have been caused by a technical or other problem on one of the competing pools, which caused briefly a massive shift of miners to Slush as their 'backup pool'.
Just my 2 mbtc.
Enjoy the recent burst of solved blocks, which more than compensates for that 'disaster'...Smiley

Cheers
mstrongbow
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 322
Merit: 250

3D Printed!


View Profile
May 19, 2014, 10:03:03 PM
 #16572

My reward was also "cut in half".  Undecided
I raised a ticket, and things will be sorted out as usual. Roll Eyes

Yep 22106 was also half here..   email sent to support:)

Regards

M
My payout was lower by 18% relatively to the proportional number of my shares.  A possible explanation to this is a sudden rise in the pool hash rate towards the end of the block, which decreases the payout of all the other miners (but at the same time make a significant contribution to solving that block faster).  Let's try to illustrate this with an example: 
The pool hash rate= 1800000 GH/s  Your hash rate=200 GH/s your expected reward=0.002777778 BTC
Now assume that Miner X joined the pool with 200000  GH/s a few minutes before the end of the block, due to Slush's 'anti-hopping' algorithm, Miner X's contribution receives almost full 'weight' despite occuring towards the end of the block, so the increased short-term hash rate at the end of the block is now 2000000  GH/s, your reward drops by 10% to 0.0025 BTC.  This is not due to any 'fault' at Slush.  Actually it might have been caused by a technical or other problem on one of the competing pools, which caused briefly a massive shift of miners to Slush as their 'backup pool'.
Just my 2 mbtc.
Enjoy the recent burst of solved blocks, which more than compensates for that 'disaster'...Smiley

Cheers

Very well said mate. Cheesy

    Bitcoin-Scratchticket.com       Win Bitcoin Playing Scratchtickets        Provably Fair   
*Got LootCrate?*
*My Stuff For Sale thread/s*   www.CryptoCause.org   Ask me about SEGMining Hosting!
"Don't undertake a project unless it is manifestly important and nearly impossible" - Edwin Land
whispy
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 44
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 19, 2014, 10:54:44 PM
 #16573

Wouldn't it make more sense to reward a miner for the length of time it worked on a block?
That would deter switchers as well as not rewarding somebody who hopped in 5 minutes before a block was found.
Moria
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 18
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 20, 2014, 01:17:22 AM
Last edit: May 20, 2014, 01:33:38 AM by Moria
 #16574

My reward was also "cut in half".  Undecided
I raised a ticket, and things will be sorted out as usual. Roll Eyes

Yep 22106 was also half here..   email sent to support:)

Regards

M
My payout was lower by 18% relatively to the proportional number of my shares.  A possible explanation to this is a sudden rise in the pool hash rate towards the end of the block, which decreases the payout of all the other miners (but at the same time make a significant contribution to solving that block faster).  Let's try to illustrate this with an example:  
The pool hash rate= 1800000 GH/s  Your hash rate=200 GH/s your expected reward=0.002777778 BTC
Now assume that Miner X joined the pool with 200000  GH/s a few minutes before the end of the block, due to Slush's 'anti-hopping' algorithm, Miner X's contribution receives almost full 'weight' despite occuring towards the end of the block, so the increased short-term hash rate at the end of the block is now 2000000  GH/s, your reward drops by 10% to 0.0025 BTC.  This is not due to any 'fault' at Slush.  Actually it might have been caused by a technical or other problem on one of the competing pools, which caused briefly a massive shift of miners to Slush as their 'backup pool'.
Just my 2 mbtc.
Enjoy the recent burst of solved blocks, which more than compensates for that 'disaster'...Smiley

Cheers

My understanding was that the calc, assuming you are mining at the time the block is found (you havent had a blip in providing hash rate etc) is  my shares / pool shares * Block Value..  for a rough calc.  (not deducting fees here)

therefore for block 22106  :-

22106  2014-05-19 16:30:41  11:23:16  18010425802  3586935   0.00206705  301575  25.10258983  97 confirmations left

which makes the calc 0.0049994

The three previous blocks using the same calc would have been :-  

22105 I get  0.0048193
22104 I get  0.0049920
22103 I get  0.0049467

All very similar and in fact almost identical to what was paid out, as were the 4 blocks post 22106

Whilst I appreciate your point about another pool jumpin in, to halve the rate paid it would have had to be approx 1872607.589 Ghash/s jumping in..  approx the rate when the block was found I believe, to drop it 50% and the your shares / total shares dont give those values, and we have also had reports of people getting double payout on that block, so something is not quite right.

This has been happening a lot since we moved to 60 minute averages, in fact one block, for me, dropped from .0048 as the calc to 0.0009 as the reward.

Whilst I appreciate your suggestion, I think something more drastic happened in this case and may be symptomatic of other blocks like this in the recent past.

I know it's not a huge issue, but when you only make 0.1 BTC a week (on average), it's a bigger deal Smiley

Regards

M

PS  dont get me wrong, I love the block count this weekend, and I love this pool, but if theres a possible issue, I think it's only fair to investigate to see what actually happened.

Darthswan
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 818
Merit: 508



View Profile
May 20, 2014, 01:36:26 AM
 #16575

So I see I wasn't the only one.  I was going to bring this up when I got home.  My portion was cut in half also.

            ▄▄████▄▄
        ▄▄██████████████▄▄
      ███████████████████████▄▄
      ▀▀█████████████████████████
██▄▄       ▀▀█████████████████████
██████▄▄        ▀█████████████████
███████████▄▄       ▀▀████████████
███████████████▄▄        ▀████████
████████████████████▄▄       ▀▀███
 ▀▀██████████████████████▄▄
     ▀▀██████████████████████▄▄
▄▄        ▀██████████████████████▄
████▄▄        ▀▀██████████████████
█████████▄▄        ▀▀█████████████
█████████████▄▄        ▀▀█████████
██████████████████▄▄        ▀▀████
▀██████████████████████▄▄
  ▀▀████████████████████████
      ▀▀█████████████████▀▀
           ▀▀███████▀▀



.SEMUX
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
  Semux uses .100% original codebase.
  Superfast with .30 seconds instant finality.
  Tested .5000 tx per block. on open network
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
necro_nemesis
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 224
Merit: 100


View Profile
May 20, 2014, 01:46:26 AM
 #16576

Same here but it's been a good run thereafter.
retrojka
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 39
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 20, 2014, 02:29:06 AM
 #16577

yes i have had 2 very low points payouts today blocks 22106 and 22105.....both 50%
oh what i normally get......hopefully slush will correct this error....lol  Embarrassed Embarrassed

Same here, 50% of normal payout for 22106


my 200% more payout for 22106

in other block is normal payout

sounds like you got the jackpot!

normal payout is 0.00703204, in block 22106  first  0.02003204 down to payout 0.01350420

Why did my reward from block 22106 go from .04 to .01 just now
mstrongbow
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 322
Merit: 250

3D Printed!


View Profile
May 20, 2014, 03:54:22 AM
 #16578

yes i have had 2 very low points payouts today blocks 22106 and 22105.....both 50%
oh what i normally get......hopefully slush will correct this error....lol  Embarrassed Embarrassed

Same here, 50% of normal payout for 22106


my 200% more payout for 22106

in other block is normal payout

sounds like you got the jackpot!

normal payout is 0.00703204, in block 22106  first  0.02003204 down to payout 0.01350420

Why did my reward from block 22106 go from .04 to .01 just now

heh, mine went back up to my avg. payout amount Cheesy

    Bitcoin-Scratchticket.com       Win Bitcoin Playing Scratchtickets        Provably Fair   
*Got LootCrate?*
*My Stuff For Sale thread/s*   www.CryptoCause.org   Ask me about SEGMining Hosting!
"Don't undertake a project unless it is manifestly important and nearly impossible" - Edwin Land
retrojka
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 39
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 20, 2014, 04:07:00 AM
 #16579

yes i have had 2 very low points payouts today blocks 22106 and 22105.....both 50%
oh what i normally get......hopefully slush will correct this error....lol  Embarrassed Embarrassed

Same here, 50% of normal payout for 22106


my 200% more payout for 22106

in other block is normal payout

sounds like you got the jackpot!

normal payout is 0.00703204, in block 22106  first  0.02003204 down to payout 0.01350420

Why did my reward from block 22106 go from .04 to .01 just now

heh, mine went back up to my avg. payout amount Cheesy

I knew my .04 payout was too good to be true
kabopar
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 616
Merit: 500


View Profile
May 20, 2014, 07:14:58 AM
 #16580

My reward was also "cut in half".  Undecided
I raised a ticket, and things will be sorted out as usual. Roll Eyes

Yep 22106 was also half here..   email sent to support:)

Regards

M
My payout was lower by 18% relatively to the proportional number of my shares.  A possible explanation to this is a sudden rise in the pool hash rate towards the end of the block, which decreases the payout of all the other miners (but at the same time make a significant contribution to solving that block faster).  Let's try to illustrate this with an example:  
The pool hash rate= 1800000 GH/s  Your hash rate=200 GH/s your expected reward=0.002777778 BTC
Now assume that Miner X joined the pool with 200000  GH/s a few minutes before the end of the block, due to Slush's 'anti-hopping' algorithm, Miner X's contribution receives almost full 'weight' despite occuring towards the end of the block, so the increased short-term hash rate at the end of the block is now 2000000  GH/s, your reward drops by 10% to 0.0025 BTC.  This is not due to any 'fault' at Slush.  Actually it might have been caused by a technical or other problem on one of the competing pools, which caused briefly a massive shift of miners to Slush as their 'backup pool'.
Just my 2 mbtc.
Enjoy the recent burst of solved blocks, which more than compensates for that 'disaster'...Smiley

Cheers

My understanding was that the calc, assuming you are mining at the time the block is found (you havent had a blip in providing hash rate etc) is  my shares / pool shares * Block Value..  for a rough calc.  (not deducting fees here)

therefore for block 22106  :-

22106  2014-05-19 16:30:41  11:23:16  18010425802  3586935   0.00206705  301575  25.10258983  97 confirmations left

which makes the calc 0.0049994

The three previous blocks using the same calc would have been :-  

22105 I get  0.0048193
22104 I get  0.0049920
22103 I get  0.0049467

All very similar and in fact almost identical to what was paid out, as were the 4 blocks post 22106

Whilst I appreciate your point about another pool jumpin in, to halve the rate paid it would have had to be approx 1872607.589 Ghash/s jumping in..  approx the rate when the block was found I believe, to drop it 50% and the your shares / total shares dont give those values, and we have also had reports of people getting double payout on that block, so something is not quite right.

This has been happening a lot since we moved to 60 minute averages, in fact one block, for me, dropped from .0048 as the calc to 0.0009 as the reward.

Whilst I appreciate your suggestion, I think something more drastic happened in this case and may be symptomatic of other blocks like this in the recent past.

I know it's not a huge issue, but when you only make 0.1 BTC a week (on average), it's a bigger deal Smiley

Regards

M

PS  dont get me wrong, I love the block count this weekend, and I love this pool, but if theres a possible issue, I think it's only fair to investigate to see what actually happened.


Apologies, my theory was sound, however in this case Slush made compensation adjustments, and now my reward for 22106 is about 1% above my 'proportional share', which is within the common variance.
I hope that your reward got fixed as well.

Cheers
Pages: « 1 ... 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 810 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 824 825 826 827 828 [829] 830 831 832 833 834 835 836 837 838 839 840 841 842 843 844 845 846 847 848 849 850 851 852 853 854 855 856 857 858 859 860 861 862 863 864 865 866 867 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 875 876 877 878 879 ... 1154 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!