Bitcoin Forum
December 02, 2016, 06:33:59 PM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.13.1  [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Poll
Question: What type of pool payouts do you prefer?
Bitcoins - 3160 (80.5%)
Bank transfer / USD - 407 (10.4%)
Gold/silver coins and bars - 359 (9.1%)
Total Voters: 3924

Pages: « 1 ... 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 810 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819 820 [821] 822 823 824 825 826 827 828 829 830 831 832 833 834 835 836 837 838 839 840 841 842 843 844 845 846 847 848 849 850 851 852 853 854 855 856 857 858 859 860 861 862 863 864 865 866 867 868 869 870 871 ... 1105 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [40+ PH] SlushPool (slushpool.com); World's First Mining Pool  (Read 3924718 times)
Datelli
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 19


View Profile
April 26, 2014, 07:16:57 AM
 #16401

Hi,

maybe a kinda dumb noob question, sorry for that, but i wonder, if all blocks are mined and no new block(s) have been found, what are we actually doing then? I noticed yesterday (friday april 25) during a quite long time all blocks were solved and no new one was found yet. I'm just curious if we're mining of just wasting electricity.

Another quite newbe question about the etimated reward: when I was mining at 800 M/hash the estimate reward was about 0.025 or so. Then I went up to 1 T/hash and the estimate reward was about 0.025. So I upgraded to 1.2 T/hash and the estimate reward was about 0.025. Since yesterday I'm mining at 1.8 T/hash and the estimate reward is still about 0.025. Weird or what?


Thanks for your help,

Michael
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
Sonya
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 42


View Profile
April 26, 2014, 07:34:52 AM
 #16402

Hopefully it's just a glitch that they fix soon. I find the more hash power I add the lower my reward becomes. Other day seems they updated their system which is now calculated every 5 minutes for the past 60 minutes. I'm hoping this does not mean even though we mine all day and night on one block we're only rewarded for the last 60 minutes of it.
organofcorti
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1946


Poor impulse control.


View Profile WWW
April 26, 2014, 12:04:46 PM
 #16403

i see Pool luck (1 day, 7 days, 30 days):   29%, 108%, 93% , 29 is bad is this a sign? a sign that more GH needed?

No, it just means that for that day average number of d1 shares per block was 3.448276 times more than expected for the day. Greater hashrate will reduce variance (the extent of the bad and good luck) but not get rid of the bad luck itself.

Bitcoin network and pool analysis 12QxPHEuxDrs7mCyGSx1iVSozTwtquDB3r
follow @oocBlog for new post notifications
MCTV
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3


View Profile
April 26, 2014, 02:25:12 PM
 #16404

This is a noob question, but it has had me stumped lately because it seems to be happening all the time now. Can anyone comment on long delays for new blocks showing up on the statistics page after the last one is confirmed? The miners show they are working on a block number that is higher than the last bock listed. Is it that blocks aren't listed until found and we only see found blocks being confirmed, not the ones we are searching for?  Thank you! MCTV
necro_nemesis
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 224


View Profile
April 26, 2014, 02:38:42 PM
 #16405

The ones being confirmed are solved but require 100 confirmations before allowing them to be apportioned out as transferable earnings thus unconfirmed. The others are attempting to be solved.
MrTeal
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1246


View Profile
April 26, 2014, 03:23:53 PM
 #16406

Pool users should check their connections to Slush. I noticed with two miners that I hadn't submitted a share in the last ten minutes. My miners were showing that they were still connected to pool 0, but 46.28.205.80 instead of the normal address. There is talk on Eligius about a malicious player doing a man in the middle attack, it's worth reading up on.
vodic62
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 11


View Profile
April 26, 2014, 04:52:24 PM
 #16407

Pool users should check their connections to Slush. I noticed with two miners that I hadn't submitted a share in the last ten minutes. My miners were showing that they were still connected to pool 0, but 46.28.205.80 instead of the normal address. There is talk on Eligius about a malicious player doing a man in the middle attack, it's worth reading up on.

I had this problem about 3 times in last few days. 15 minutes ago my both antminers were submitting work and nothing looked different, but for about one hour they were sending results somewhere else, because slush pool was reporting 0 shares. After reconnection everything is ok again... I really hate how many thieves are attracted around bitcoin.
Alexiandar
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 6


View Profile
April 26, 2014, 06:11:16 PM
 #16408

Pool users should check their connections to Slush. I noticed with two miners that I hadn't submitted a share in the last ten minutes. My miners were showing that they were still connected to pool 0, but 46.28.205.80 instead of the normal address. There is talk on Eligius about a malicious player doing a man in the middle attack, it's worth reading up on.

I had this problem about 3 times in last few days. 15 minutes ago my both antminers were submitting work and nothing looked different, but for about one hour they were sending results somewhere else, because slush pool was reporting 0 shares. After reconnection everything is ok again... I really hate how many thieves are attracted around bitcoin.



It might be that the password is left to default, so it's the same password to all ants if it wasn't changed. I guess the 'thief' needs to find the IP and then log into that ant's account using the well known default password. Or maybe the other 2 pools weren't changed, so if Slush is down, it switches to the other default pool which was preset by Bitmain. Just a thought.
Namnuta
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 26


View Profile
April 26, 2014, 06:24:58 PM
 #16409

Pool users should check their connections to Slush. I noticed with two miners that I hadn't submitted a share in the last ten minutes. My miners were showing that they were still connected to pool 0, but 46.28.205.80 instead of the normal address. There is talk on Eligius about a malicious player doing a man in the middle attack, it's worth reading up on.

I had this problem about 3 times in last few days. 15 minutes ago my both antminers were submitting work and nothing looked different, but for about one hour they were sending results somewhere else, because slush pool was reporting 0 shares. After reconnection everything is ok again... I really hate how many thieves are attracted around bitcoin.

Has happening twice to me so far. Same IP. Bah!!!!
vodic62
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 11


View Profile
April 26, 2014, 07:15:38 PM
 #16410

Pool users should check their connections to Slush. I noticed with two miners that I hadn't submitted a share in the last ten minutes. My miners were showing that they were still connected to pool 0, but 46.28.205.80 instead of the normal address. There is talk on Eligius about a malicious player doing a man in the middle attack, it's worth reading up on.

I had this problem about 3 times in last few days. 15 minutes ago my both antminers were submitting work and nothing looked different, but for about one hour they were sending results somewhere else, because slush pool was reporting 0 shares. After reconnection everything is ok again... I really hate how many thieves are attracted around bitcoin.



It might be that the password is left to default, so it's the same password to all ants if it wasn't changed. I guess the 'thief' needs to find the IP and then log into that ant's account using the well known default password. Or maybe the other 2 pools weren't changed, so if Slush is down, it switches to the other default pool which was preset by Bitmain. Just a thought.

No it's not my case. I don't have default passwords and antminer was showing that he is submitting work to Slush pool. And my only failover pool in ant configuration is my bitcoin wallet a it wasn't used.
Namnuta
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 26


View Profile
April 26, 2014, 09:03:27 PM
 #16411

Pool users should check their connections to Slush. I noticed with two miners that I hadn't submitted a share in the last ten minutes. My miners were showing that they were still connected to pool 0, but 46.28.205.80 instead of the normal address. There is talk on Eligius about a malicious player doing a man in the middle attack, it's worth reading up on.

I had this problem about 3 times in last few days. 15 minutes ago my both antminers were submitting work and nothing looked different, but for about one hour they were sending results somewhere else, because slush pool was reporting 0 shares. After reconnection everything is ok again... I really hate how many thieves are attracted around bitcoin.



It might be that the password is left to default, so it's the same password to all ants if it wasn't changed. I guess the 'thief' needs to find the IP and then log into that ant's account using the well known default password. Or maybe the other 2 pools weren't changed, so if Slush is down, it switches to the other default pool which was preset by Bitmain. Just a thought.

No it's not my case. I don't have default passwords and antminer was showing that he is submitting work to Slush pool. And my only failover pool in ant configuration is my bitcoin wallet a it wasn't used.

Following this as i was affected. It does not appear to be hardware specific. Im Running BFL hardware.
LoneStar43
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 23


View Profile
April 26, 2014, 09:20:32 PM
 #16412

I have had the same issue the last 2 days as well. Same ip as above, a restart of my ants or cgminer/bfgminer cures it. My miners are in 3 different locations, running differnet software and on different ips all using unique Worker names. Antminer S1, BFL LS, BFL Jala and Red Fury's.
MCTV
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3


View Profile
April 26, 2014, 11:15:33 PM
 #16413

Does everyone's daily reward graph go up and down with peaks and valleys based on the Luck factor? I'm surprised it's not a smoother curve!
MrTeal
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1246


View Profile
April 26, 2014, 11:16:31 PM
 #16414

I have had the same issue the last 2 days as well. Same ip as above, a restart of my ants or cgminer/bfgminer cures it. My miners are in 3 different locations, running differnet software and on different ips all using unique Worker names. Antminer S1, BFL LS, BFL Jala and Red Fury's.
Out of curiosity, do you have Teamviewer installed?
DaveF
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 410


If you can read this you are too close.


View Profile WWW
April 26, 2014, 11:26:50 PM
 #16415

I have had the same issue the last 2 days as well. Same ip as above, a restart of my ants or cgminer/bfgminer cures it. My miners are in 3 different locations, running differnet software and on different ips all using unique Worker names. Antminer S1, BFL LS, BFL Jala and Red Fury's.
Out of curiosity, do you have Teamviewer installed?

I'm a bit more active on this on the Eligius thread, but I don't have TeamViewer installed.

-Dave

1800bitcoin.com domain for sale. PM me.
Moria
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 18


View Profile
April 27, 2014, 12:30:28 AM
 #16416

I have had the same issue the last 2 days as well. Same ip as above, a restart of my ants or cgminer/bfgminer cures it. My miners are in 3 different locations, running differnet software and on different ips all using unique Worker names. Antminer S1, BFL LS, BFL Jala and Red Fury's.
Out of curiosity, do you have Teamviewer installed?

I'm a bit more active on this on the Eligius thread, but I don't have TeamViewer installed.

-Dave

Not been affected yet by this, thank you for heads up, but what I have done is put a block in my router from communicating with that dot addy, so hopefully the worst that would happen now is they would go offline rather than mine for someone else.

-Graham
Gabr1el
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 19


View Profile
April 27, 2014, 07:58:58 AM
 #16417

-Dave
[/quote]

Not been affected yet by this, thank you for heads up, but what I have done is put a block in my router from communicating with that dot addy, so hopefully the worst that would happen now is they would go offline rather than mine for someone else.

-Graham
[/quote]

This is what happened to 2 and a half of my usb erupters who weren't giving shares
to my workers on slush pool.It Was Friday night Central European time.Most likely it was my gear going bonkers but I checked for most usual mistakes and everything was fine except erupters although they were working full capacity weren't submitting to Slush.MOST PROBABLY it was my gear and lack of experience though Smiley

P.S. Only pool visible in BFGMiner was startum.slush , hope this helps ...
P.P.S. Rest of them (more than 70 % of all of my Mhs) was accepting shares from
Slush and working fine.
Sir Alan
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 221


View Profile
April 27, 2014, 10:00:43 AM
 #16418

I sometimes see this issue when scrypt mining with CGminer: everything goes fine for days, weeks - then suddenly shares stop being recorded by the server, although the miner is still processing happily.  It used to happen when mining Bitcoin with Slush or BTCguild using CGminer: the miner was still processing, but no shares were recorded.  The shares are going - where?  Perhaps they are simply evaporating.  After I switched to BFGminer the problem went away, or at any rate it hasn't yet reappeared.

As is usual with such issues, it generally happens either in the early hours of the morning or when I am away from home, giving a nice long run without reward before I can restart the miner.

1Eeyore17YeHrbJW5Q3pSdV8sXujkdrrFc
Lucko
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 714



View Profile
April 27, 2014, 10:54:18 AM
 #16419

Not sure if your issue is the same but if you are redirected to ip 46.28.205.80 it is a "pirate" pool that somehow redirect you to them... It is happening to me too on 4 different pools with 19 rigs 4 locations and 2 ISP (BTCGuild, ScryptGuild, Ghesh and Eligius).
Mentalfloss
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 43


View Profile
April 27, 2014, 10:56:14 AM
 #16420

Does everyone's daily reward graph go up and down with peaks and valleys based on the Luck factor? I'm surprised it's not a smoother curve!

Not here, at this small of a pool, but you would see a much smoother flow of smaller rewards at BTC Guild.

A few months ago I split my miners for a few weeks between here and BTC, and the amount earned here at Slush's pool was slightly higher.
Pages: « 1 ... 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 810 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819 820 [821] 822 823 824 825 826 827 828 829 830 831 832 833 834 835 836 837 838 839 840 841 842 843 844 845 846 847 848 849 850 851 852 853 854 855 856 857 858 859 860 861 862 863 864 865 866 867 868 869 870 871 ... 1105 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!