[ANN] [QRK] Quark | Core 0.10 upgrade

[Netnox]

Does anyone have the e-mail of Vic aka mcphervi? Send me a pm

I can provide you with his contact but I think you can still reach out to him via team@quarkfoundation.cc (everyone on the list will receive a mail though).

I got it pmd by someone thanks

[coinerer]

Nothing happens, so let's try something.

Are there some development connections between Quarkcoin and Zetacoin?

[digitalindustry]

News to Quark supporters:

just an update -

- Record number of hit to my Blog - and we are reaching the people in the market with the right education.

- People are interested in Quark both the algorithm and the economics of the system.

- keep in mind of course lot of crypo aspects are faked when it comes to monopoly crypto, so it's hard to tell but even as Andreas admitted in his recent testimony to the Senate Banking committee Bitcoin has low liquidity.

- one thing i like about Andreas is that he doesn't lie, not even to politicians.

- So his answers were of course as correct as he could make them, he did omit some of the 51% attack issues moving forward, but probably more for technical reasons.

- From here on in an attack on Quark will help us rather than hurt us, I expect at a point of price ascent our attacker will be "forced to chose"

[iGotAIDS]

Nothing happens, so let's try something.

Are there some development connections between Quarkcoin and Zetacoin?

Yes, a few others too...

[silvermetal]

Nothing happens, so let's try something.

Are there some development connections between Quarkcoin and Zetacoin?

Yes, a few others too...

Interesting that you enter the Quark thread igotaids.
can you be more specific:
- what are the development connections?
- Which others do you mean?

Why I think it is interesting that igotaids is here?
I have read this post:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=599106.msg6592556#msg6592556

And hm, didn't I post earlier a connection between "digitalindustry", "hazzard" and "shake" before Quark was born?

Shake was one of the creators of Quark.
hazard created kopimicoin

[coinerer]

Nothing happens, so let's try something.

Are there some development connections between Quarkcoin and Zetacoin?

Yes, a few others too...

Interesting that you enter the Quark thread igotaids.
can you be more specific:
- what are the development connections?
- Which others do you mean?

Why I think it is interesting that igotaids is here?
I have read this post:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=599106.msg6592556#msg6592556

And hm, didn't I post earlier a connection between "digitalindustry", "hazzard" and "shake" before Quark was born?

Shake was one of the creators of Quark.
hazard created kopimicoin

Shakezulu of Shakezula has coincreation webservice. It is obvious he is involved in creation of many coins. Creating coins is his job.

When I first read log from irc chat at Aug 2014, I was surprised he is involved in the discussion.

All that does not mean Quark has no unique features. See where Quark is  at http://mapofcoins.com/

[silvermetal]

Nothing happens, so let's try something.

Are there some development connections between Quarkcoin and Zetacoin?

Shakezulu of Shakezula has coincreation webservice. It is obvious he is involved in creation of many coins. Creating coins is his job.

I am aware about the service of shake. We must not forget that quark is just a clone of sifcoin. Adam and max created nothing original.

Why do you think there is a development connection between zeta and Quark?

[coinerer]

Nothing happens, so let's try something.

Are there some development connections between Quarkcoin and Zetacoin?

Shakezulu of Shakezula has coincreation webservice. It is obvious he is involved in creation of many coins. Creating coins is his job.

I am aware about the service of shake. We must not forget that quark is just a clone of sifcoin. Adam and max created nothing original.

Why do you think there is a development connection between zeta and Quark?

Similar file link structure

https://www.dropbox.com/s/crss07vqj345tci/zetacoin092r1win32.zip

https://www.dropbox.com/s/hwog0krvseichwq/zetacoin0899r18win.zip
https://www.dropbox.com/s/qx243eoqvu432rm/quarkcoin083r25win.zip

and dev appears very rare here (I don't know why that is important, but people like "news" from devs ).

[silvermetal]

Nothing happens, so let's try something.

Are there some development connections between Quarkcoin and Zetacoin?

Shakezulu of Shakezula has coincreation webservice. It is obvious he is involved in creation of many coins. Creating coins is his job.

I am aware about the service of shake. We must not forget that quark is just a clone of sifcoin. Adam and max created nothing original.

Why do you think there is a development connection between zeta and Quark?

Similar file link structure

https://www.dropbox.com/s/crss07vqj345tci/zetacoin092r1win32.zip

https://www.dropbox.com/s/hwog0krvseichwq/zetacoin0899r18win.zip
https://www.dropbox.com/s/qx243eoqvu432rm/quarkcoin083r25win.zip

and dev appears very rare here (I don't know why that is important, but people like "news" from devs ).

Great find!
I don't know very much about zeta though. Will have a closer look.

From the link i provided from igotaids (point 3) he mentions r3wt...and look to the first page of Quark announcement...surprise surprise who do we found there?? R3wt!!!

I think igotaids have some more valuable information about Quark.

[digitalindustry]

Nothing happens, so let's try something.

Are there some development connections between Quarkcoin and Zetacoin?

Shakezulu of Shakezula has coincreation webservice. It is obvious he is involved in creation of many coins. Creating coins is his job.

I am aware about the service of shake. We must not forget that quark is just a clone of sifcoin. Adam and max created nothing original.

Why do you think there is a development connection between zeta and Quark?

Similar file link structure

https://www.dropbox.com/s/crss07vqj345tci/zetacoin092r1win32.zip

https://www.dropbox.com/s/hwog0krvseichwq/zetacoin0899r18win.zip
https://www.dropbox.com/s/qx243eoqvu432rm/quarkcoin083r25win.zip

and dev appears very rare here (I don't know why that is important, but people like "news" from devs ).

Great find!
I don't know very much about zeta though. Will have a closer look.

From the link i provided from igotaids (point 3) he mentions r3wt...and look to the first page of Quark announcement...surprise surprise who do we found there?? R3wt!!!

I think igotaids have some more valuable information about Quark.

ha it's like watching one of those little ant farms.

[Netnox]

I think Quark is still doing pretty impressive with being a top 20 coin (counting non mineable coins and IPO aswell) after so many coins have been released. Still higher ranked than;

Anoncoin
Reddcoin
Cloakcoin
Vertcoin
Myriadcoin
Qora
Stealthcoin
Feathercoin
Primecoin
Zetacoin
Novacoin
Viacoin
Vericoin
Maxcoin
Worldcoin
Megacoin
LitecoinDark
Terracoin
Fibre
Shadowcash
Digitalcoin and many others and just around 0.00005 it would bet at top 10, but i wanna see ATH 

[ifightformerkel]

Do you think the price will rise in 14 days after the reward halving?

[cryptohunter]

I think Quark is still doing pretty impressive with being a top 20 coin (counting non mineable coins and IPO aswell) after so many coins have been released. Still higher ranked than;

Anoncoin
Reddcoin
Cloakcoin
Vertcoin
Myriadcoin
Qora
Stealthcoin
Feathercoin
Primecoin
Zetacoin
Novacoin
Viacoin
Vericoin
Maxcoin
Worldcoin
Megacoin
LitecoinDark
Terracoin
Fibre
Shadowcash
Digitalcoin and many others and just around 0.00005 it would bet at top 10, but i wanna see ATH 

qrk is very stable due to the fact most investors will not sell for years or until they turn a profit on their 20k sats buy in. If we had some ongoing projects and reasons to buy in  you would see prices quickly climb.

[silvermetal]

ha it's like watching one of those little ant farms.

Some more to watch for you:

If someone still was in doubt whether Kolin was not aware about Quark or mining Quark from day 1:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=260031.msg2777607#msg2777607

Also see that "Spoetnik" was interested in Quark just one post after Kolin lol

[digitalindustry]

ha it's like watching one of those little ant farms.

Some more to watch for you:

If someone still was in doubt whether Kolin was not aware about Quark or mining Quark from day 1:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=260031.msg2777607#msg2777607

Also see that "Spoetnik" was interested in Quark just one post after Kolin lol

yep i own the whole quark market its all me - also i'm the time traveler that Satoshi wished he was.

because I set that comment up to look like i thought it was an instamine - see how smart i am?

so as a result i own all the Quark in existence, I cloned Bill Still , (the real Bill is still alive he's in a different star system) (this explains his reluctance to talk about Quark) (I control this Bills mind)

I also then mind controlled all his supporters.

and just think,  i would have gotten away with it as well if it wasn't for "silvermetal" the guy that couldn't get a job so applied to troll the internet.

you have changed the world.

[coinerer]

Why is the content of website http://www.quarktalk.cc/ partially closed for public? (without logging in)

This is not good practice.

[cryptohunter]

ha it's like watching one of those little ant farms.

Some more to watch for you:

If someone still was in doubt whether Kolin was not aware about Quark or mining Quark from day 1:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=260031.msg2777607#msg2777607

Also see that "Spoetnik" was interested in Quark just one post after Kolin lol

This is all very interesting but really what are we trying to demonstrate here?


Can you just spell out your hypothesis here so we can analyse it once and for all? I'm not saying you're correct or incorrect.

QRK started as a scam? and those involved were somehow got unfair advantage?  - i don't think even if that was the intention it worked out like that.

All of this seems fairly improbable since stephen lamb took more or less the vast majority of easy coins along with a couple of other hash whales. These people to my knowledge dumped them all pretty soon after,reducing the price to arond 60 sats and keeping it down below 200 sats for some time.

Let's just get this all out in the open , deal with it and then forget about it. The origins of the coin and those involved are not all that important at this stage to me. I feel that whatever the start only a few well known hash whales that had bots monitoring the board grabbed it all up and then lost interest and dumped. DI told bill, he brought in a ton of investors, they grabbed a little of each and sit on it. There is not much for sale. Little sells and buys make the price fluctuate a lot. The vast majority never comes near the market.

How's the steam games project going?

[coinerer]

ha it's like watching one of those little ant farms.

Some more to watch for you:

If someone still was in doubt whether Kolin was not aware about Quark or mining Quark from day 1:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=260031.msg2777607#msg2777607

Also see that "Spoetnik" was interested in Quark just one post after Kolin lol

This is all very interesting but really what are we trying to demonstrate here?


Can you just spell out your hypothesis here so we can analyse it once and for all? I'm not saying you're correct or incorrect.

QRK started as a scam? and those involved were somehow got unfair advantage?  - i don't think even if that was the intention it worked out like that.

All of this seems fairly improbable since stephen lamb took more or less the vast majority of easy coins along with a couple of other hash whales. These people to my knowledge dumped them all pretty soon after,reducing the price to arond 60 sats and keeping it down below 200 sats for some time.

Let's just get this all out in the open , deal with it and then forget about it. The origins of the coin and those involved are not all that important at this stage to me. I feel that whatever the start only a few well known hash whales that had bots monitoring the board grabbed it all up and then lost interest and dumped. DI told bill, he brought in a ton of investors, they grabbed a little of each and sit on it. There is not much for sale. Little sells and buys make the price fluctuate a lot. The vast majority never comes near the market.

How's the steam games project going?

I remember that at the beginning of the Quark there was attempts to steal Quarks from miners or  careless wallet owners. Some thief(ves) made fake wallet in order to steal Quarkcoins.

This does not mean Quark is scam at all.

Unfortunately I have involved in mining Quarks after few months, not from beginning.

[Netnox]

Why is the content of website http://www.quarktalk.cc/ partially closed for public? (without logging in)

This is not good practice.

Which part is closed? When i'm logged out i can still see all sections (quark talk, quark core, intentional and other)

[silvermetal]

This is all very interesting but really what are we trying to demonstrate here?

Read the posts of "digitalindustry". He tells you these answers. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=260031.msg9162675#msg9162675

Can you just spell out your hypothesis here so we can analyse it once and for all? I'm not saying you're correct or incorrect.

No I jumped into conclusions too fast in the past. I have learned from that, and still make mistakes sometimes.
For example "r3wt" is indeed present in the beginning but he is not the scammer as outlined by "igotaids".  Accountname "reb0rn21" (whoever that was, but I have my thoughts) was the scammer from day 1.

QRK started as a scam? and those involved were somehow got unfair advantage?  - i don't think even if that was the intention it worked out like that.

I think other people had different thoughts about that: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=260031.msg2774780#msg2774780
--> to me this sounds like "mining monopoly" and who is screaming that he hates mining monopoly so much?
I read the posts of DI differently, because I know he likes to do self reflection. (telling that I am a troll, but in fact he is the troll etc)

But this link doesn't proof anything. Still seems that pretty much people (including you) could mine Quark from day 1.

All of this seems fairly improbable since stephen lamb took more or less the vast majority of easy coins along with a couple of other hash whales. These people to my knowledge dumped them all pretty soon after,reducing the price to arond 60 sats and keeping it down below 200 sats for some time.

Maybe you are right. It's one of the things I try to find out.

Let's just get this all out in the open , deal with it and then forget about it. The origins of the coin and those involved are not all that important at this stage to me. I feel that whatever the start only a few well known hash whales that had bots monitoring the board grabbed it all up and then lost interest and dumped. DI told bill, he brought in a ton of investors, they grabbed a little of each and sit on it. There is not much for sale. Little sells and buys make the price fluctuate a lot. The vast majority never comes near the market.

That's your opinion and I respect that. You can always ignore me just like "maok" is doing if you are irritated by my posts.
For example I try not to react on comments from sockpuppets of DI (like "nixon99" and "Hilux74")

Oh and don't get me wrong. I liked the videos of Bill still very much because I had bought my Quark before Bill Still was promoting it. I experienced it as a very well marketing strategy.
The low sell orders are very worrisome (to me). Maybe you are correct that the vast majority never comes to the market, but as long as you can't do much more with Quark other than speculating at exchanges I don't really believe that.

How's the steam games project going?

As long as I don't know the truth about Quark (who is really controlling Quark (is it decentralized or one person??)), I am not involved in any Quark projects. Best is to ask maok or macduro.