bleexrossignol
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 57
Merit: 0
|
|
November 03, 2014, 08:28:43 PM |
|
Does someone know how to post the shaq video on Vine ?
I don't have vine but just googled it and there should be a camera icon at the upper right, once you click it i believe you should start recording (recording the Shaq video) i think it should be 6 seconds. I googled too and vine doesnt work with all devices and it doesnt work on my samsung tab 7.7 and galaxy S1 ... So... if someone has an Iphone ...
|
|
|
|
coinerer
|
|
November 04, 2014, 05:47:41 AM Last edit: November 04, 2014, 06:03:58 AM by coinerer |
|
We should wait a while to see how it goes, rumours say the 'fud' was planned by shadowcoin members and competitors, Blocknet itself is a nice concept, they are releasing the proof of concept soon so lets see what happens. I wanted to buy some ITO but it seems to be "frozen" on BTER, still 530 btc to sell... and I dont understand the aim of the blocknet wallet ? it will be a multicoin wallet ? You can buy from Bittrex, but it would be better to buy from Poloniex since it's cheaper. The working concept will be ready Q2 2015, but proof of concept available soon. I'm just anticipating for now, but if the project delivers i think Quark can be part of it. Let's clear something. Are there connections between http://pastebin.com/jviD91wLand http://www.coinssource.com/blocknet-ito-sales-dwindle-after-dan-metcalf-revelations/http://www.cryptoarticles.com/crypto-news/blocknet-ito-subject-of-all-kinds-of-allegations-but-who-is-right
|
|
|
|
splat44
|
|
November 04, 2014, 06:31:55 AM |
|
About quarkcoins, what can we purchase with those?
Regards.
|
|
|
|
|
silvermetal
|
|
November 04, 2014, 07:39:06 AM |
|
What make you think there are connections?
|
|
|
|
reRaise
|
|
November 04, 2014, 06:14:37 PM |
|
I was wondering if it's possible to add a feature to Quark that runs on top of Counterparty?
|
|
|
|
kitaco
|
|
November 04, 2014, 06:19:48 PM |
|
I would really be looking to remove any proposals to get into Blocknet at this point, simply because Blocknet is going to take a lot of coins down when it launches. It's been a shitstorm of FUD and drama that I think no coin would want to be a part of.
|
@cryptokiely // Donate! - BTC: 1kie1ykRUjxpMH5fAqLWigdtbLCyrMK9k // VRC: VEriKiEfZ9CwVs6GVGLbuBdEJxR2F7CJLq
|
|
|
reRaise
|
|
November 04, 2014, 07:55:39 PM |
|
I would really be looking to remove any proposals to get into Blocknet at this point, simply because Blocknet is going to take a lot of coins down when it launches. It's been a shitstorm of FUD and drama that I think no coin would want to be a part of.
I agree, it wasn't the most successful launch, best to keep an eye on how it progresses and if it delivers we can always try to be part of it, but hey everey coin that has had potential has been receiving lot of FUD and the funny thing is at the end they exploded. I think Quark should be part of or build something on top of Counterparty, it's pretty popular and legit with it's partnership with Bitcoin etc, but following how Blocknet pans out can't hurt.
|
|
|
|
Majormax
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2534
Merit: 1129
|
|
November 04, 2014, 10:40:36 PM |
|
I was wondering if it's possible to add a feature to Quark that runs on top of Counterparty?
Perhaps Clearinghouse would be more appropriate, to better match the speed of QRK.
|
|
|
|
|
reRaise
|
|
November 05, 2014, 12:10:49 AM |
|
I was wondering if it's possible to add a feature to Quark that runs on top of Counterparty?
Perhaps Clearinghouse would be more appropriate, to better match the speed of QRK. Nice idea
|
|
|
|
Rusty_1993
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 143
Merit: 100
Quark it up!
|
|
November 05, 2014, 04:02:59 AM |
|
I was wondering if it's possible to add a feature to Quark that runs on top of Counterparty?
Perhaps Clearinghouse would be more appropriate, to better match the speed of QRK. Nice idea I think this could be bigger than it seems... Great Idea!
|
|
|
|
bleexrossignol
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 57
Merit: 0
|
|
November 05, 2014, 10:17:38 AM |
|
I was wondering if it's possible to add a feature to Quark that runs on top of Counterparty?
Perhaps Clearinghouse would be more appropriate, to better match the speed of QRK. Please explain the concept.... Do you mean a trading platform ?
|
|
|
|
reRaise
|
|
November 05, 2014, 01:04:15 PM Last edit: November 05, 2014, 01:49:30 PM by reRaise |
|
I was wondering if it's possible to add a feature to Quark that runs on top of Counterparty?
Perhaps Clearinghouse would be more appropriate, to better match the speed of QRK. Please explain the concept.... Do you mean a trading platform ? Even if there was a good idea, there is no dev activity, i know max is still here maintaining the code but he pretty much left the community in the dust and screwed everyone.
|
|
|
|
coinerer
|
|
November 05, 2014, 02:32:19 PM |
|
I was wondering if it's possible to add a feature to Quark that runs on top of Counterparty?
Perhaps Clearinghouse would be more appropriate, to better match the speed of QRK. Please explain the concept.... Do you mean a trading platform ? Even if there was a good idea, there is no dev activity, i know max is still here maintaining the code but he pretty much left the community in the dust and screwed everyone. What dev should do?
|
|
|
|
digitalindustry
|
|
November 05, 2014, 04:10:52 PM |
|
I was wondering if it's possible to add a feature to Quark that runs on top of Counterparty?
Perhaps Clearinghouse would be more appropriate, to better match the speed of QRK. Please explain the concept.... Do you mean a trading platform ? Even if there was a good idea, there is no dev activity, i know max is still here maintaining the code but he pretty much left the community in the dust and screwed everyone. yet every day a little anus opens and releases another little turd nugget and it floats to the top of this forum, but never floats to the top of the BNC index?? http://bravenewcoin.com/price/price-index/because these little turds need to be funded by the mother-ship Turd which is of course Bitcoin. but if Bitcoin doesn't keep rising we can't keep funding the little turds? yet Quark stays where it is? and what of the turds that are already floating out there? : D
|
- Twitter @Kolin_Quark
|
|
|
smolen
|
|
November 06, 2014, 12:21:29 AM |
|
Quark Core 0.9.2.1 Quark 0.9.2.1 has been merged into the main Quark branch on github: https://github.com/MaxGuevara/quarkThis updates the code base from the 0.8 core to the 0.9 core. Cool! Old ugly getwork2 hack is gone, unfortunately, new getblocktemplate with longpoll support isn't yet here...
|
Of course I gave you bad advice. Good one is way out of your price range.
|
|
|
reRaise
|
|
November 06, 2014, 12:29:26 PM |
|
I do still think adding quark to Blocknet will be a good idea
|
|
|
|
|
Hilux74
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 912
Merit: 1000
|
|
November 06, 2014, 11:51:39 PM |
|
I'm noticing increased talk of X11 ASICs in existence.
I they are real I think this will be great for Quark since it brings back attention to the fact that the Quark algo with its RANDOM hashing rounds is super secure and still ASIC resistant after more than a year (a long time in crypto).
|
|
|
|
|