Bitcoin Forum
April 27, 2024, 03:08:36 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 [233] 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 ... 298 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN] [HVC] Heavycoin - Ultra-secure, Decentralized Block Reward Voting, Fast  (Read 542196 times)
fredeq
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1537
Merit: 1005


View Profile WWW
April 13, 2014, 06:42:52 PM
 #4641

Can someone tell me what is the usual heavycoin power usage compared to scrypt? Lower, higher? I need a specific value for the hashrate you get. Best would be for udnervolted 280x or 290.

I am trying to add heavy to my site and need this data.

https://whattomine.com - Check what to mine Smiley
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714230516
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714230516

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714230516
Reply with quote  #2

1714230516
Report to moderator
1714230516
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714230516

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714230516
Reply with quote  #2

1714230516
Report to moderator
1714230516
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714230516

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714230516
Reply with quote  #2

1714230516
Report to moderator
kqpahv
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 229
Merit: 100


View Profile
April 13, 2014, 06:57:52 PM
 #4642

Can someone tell me what is the usual heavycoin power usage compared to scrypt? Lower, higher? I need a specific value for the hashrate you get. Best would be for udnervolted 280x or 290.

I am trying to add heavy to my site and need this data.


Way,way lower. I am getting 480W for a 80Mhash 4x 280x rig. Apparently not everyone are getting numbers as low but 600W for 80Mhash is very easy to achieve.
incin
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 140
Merit: 100


View Profile
April 13, 2014, 06:59:41 PM
 #4643

Can someone tell me what is the usual heavycoin power usage compared to scrypt? Lower, higher? I need a specific value for the hashrate you get. Best would be for udnervolted 280x or 290.

I am trying to add heavy to my site and need this data.


3 x 270x System

Code:
Scrypt: 655 watts @ 500 MH/s / Card

Code:
HVC: 440 watts @ 15MH/s / Card

fredeq
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1537
Merit: 1005


View Profile WWW
April 13, 2014, 07:09:53 PM
 #4644

Thank you for the data Smiley

https://whattomine.com - Check what to mine Smiley
Wenzel745
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 61
Merit: 10

I'll use crypto to buy a Fiat


View Profile
April 13, 2014, 07:10:47 PM
 #4645

a little word to you all, the reason for the success of blackcoin and the likes is because people don't put their orders above for a lazy profit. It dissuades the market makes it top heavy and makes you wait longer / never until cashing that. You see 100s of smart asses buy up and put a double up sell down oblivious to the fact when that happens the market will shake.

TAKE OFF THE HIGH SELLS PLEASE.

blackcoins multipool helps a lot, that's one of the reasons their price is doing so well.

BC Multipool only buys between 50-100BTC/day based on Twitter. Driving force on their price is strong community involvement, CoinKite adoption, PoS model, etc.

I would argue that in this current climate of tumbling coin prices that their multipool, by creating buy support, has essentially made their coin stand out as one which is bucking the downward trend, this in turn has attracted investors and those who feel its a safe store of value while everything else decreases.

The question for us then, would be why would miners mine on an HVC multipool if BC already has that niche filled? An HVC multipool would lose the efficiency of Hefty1, and decreases the network hashrate. If we go PoS, sure, multipool would be great. But buy support for a weaker network doesn't seem like it's a great idea.

BTC: 163pZXhATaWiuGAX9o9y6PuKCF8ipDWnJH
HVC: HJWFdgUJPEw1oiLckBFPBzs8vCTLokCGgd
akabane
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 113
Merit: 10


View Profile
April 13, 2014, 08:29:04 PM
 #4646

a little word to you all, the reason for the success of blackcoin and the likes is because people don't put their orders above for a lazy profit. It dissuades the market makes it top heavy and makes you wait longer / never until cashing that. You see 100s of smart asses buy up and put a double up sell down oblivious to the fact when that happens the market will shake.

TAKE OFF THE HIGH SELLS PLEASE.

blackcoins multipool helps a lot, that's one of the reasons their price is doing so well.

BC Multipool only buys between 50-100BTC/day based on Twitter. Driving force on their price is strong community involvement, CoinKite adoption, PoS model, etc.

I would argue that in this current climate of tumbling coin prices that their multipool, by creating buy support, has essentially made their coin stand out as one which is bucking the downward trend, this in turn has attracted investors and those who feel its a safe store of value while everything else decreases.

The question for us then, would be why would miners mine on an HVC multipool if BC already has that niche filled? An HVC multipool would lose the efficiency of Hefty1, and decreases the network hashrate. If we go PoS, sure, multipool would be great. But buy support for a weaker network doesn't seem like it's a great idea.

Yes no point of doing a multipool it will only decrease security of the network.
What HVC need is to be accepted in services like prypto.
massiveman
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 112
Merit: 10


View Profile
April 13, 2014, 09:22:27 PM
 #4647

a little word to you all, the reason for the success of blackcoin and the likes is because people don't put their orders above for a lazy profit. It dissuades the market makes it top heavy and makes you wait longer / never until cashing that. You see 100s of smart asses buy up and put a double up sell down oblivious to the fact when that happens the market will shake.

TAKE OFF THE HIGH SELLS PLEASE.

blackcoins multipool helps a lot, that's one of the reasons their price is doing so well.

BC Multipool only buys between 50-100BTC/day based on Twitter. Driving force on their price is strong community involvement, CoinKite adoption, PoS model, etc.

I would argue that in this current climate of tumbling coin prices that their multipool, by creating buy support, has essentially made their coin stand out as one which is bucking the downward trend, this in turn has attracted investors and those who feel its a safe store of value while everything else decreases.

basically i believe people are fickle, especially in the crypto currency world which has very few true investors, lots of speculators. So I think buy support is good, that's why I believe in a multi-pool for this coin. You say blackcoin has that niche filled but there is tons of room for another multi pool,the BC pool doesnt have that many miners even.
The question for us then, would be why would miners mine on an HVC multipool if BC already has that niche filled? An HVC multipool would lose the efficiency of Hefty1, and decreases the network hashrate. If we go PoS, sure, multipool would be great. But buy support for a weaker network doesn't seem like it's a great idea.
Kreativekrypto
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196
Merit: 100


View Profile
April 13, 2014, 09:26:09 PM
 #4648

Let's think outside the box on this multipool possibility, what if we developed the first x11/hefty-1 merged mining multipool. Issue with hvc network solved? I'm purely trying to figure out new options for us.
dygus
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1193
Merit: 1000


Peaky Blinder


View Profile
April 13, 2014, 09:58:13 PM
 #4649

Can someone tell me what is the usual heavycoin power usage compared to scrypt? Lower, higher? I need a specific value for the hashrate you get. Best would be for udnervolted 280x or 290.

I am trying to add heavy to my site and need this data.


Way,way lower. I am getting 480W for a 80Mhash 4x 280x rig. Apparently not everyone are getting numbers as low but 600W for 80Mhash is very easy to achieve.
How did you get 80 Mhs for such low power. I also have 4x280 and I've got only 70 Mhs for 630 W?

CHANGE FINANCE First Decentralised Global Crypto Bank
[color=#15B5E2 ]LINK TO ICO | LINK TO DISCUSSION
cayars
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 168
Merit: 100


View Profile
April 13, 2014, 10:56:47 PM
 #4650

I could be totally wrong but I would think the multi pool idea has some problems of its own.

The pool mines other coins and dumps/exchanges them for BTC. This causes those coins to lose value as there is a constant sell going on from the pool.  You then also have two sets of fees to factor in.

I'm sure we'll see copy cats of BC doing this soon. All this hash power mining and selling the other alt coins will drive down the price of the BTC you get from mining which is needed to purchase HVC.

It'll work OK for the first coin but have diminishing returns with multiple coins trying to setup multipools.

Just a thought.

We might need an original idea of own that no one else is doing to get maximum benefit.
jakiman
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1638
Merit: 1011


jakiman is back!


View Profile
April 13, 2014, 11:29:48 PM
 #4651

How did you get 80 Mhs for such low power. I also have 4x280 and I've got only 70 Mhs for 630 W?

Best I could do 585W (at wall) @ 1080/1000 @ 1.054V @ 19.8MH/s each. (79.2 Mhs)
(4 x Gigabyte 280x, AMD FM2 4400, 8GB RAM, Bronze PSU)

jakiman
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1638
Merit: 1011


jakiman is back!


View Profile
April 13, 2014, 11:33:09 PM
 #4652

I could be totally wrong but I would think the multi pool idea has some problems of its own.

The pool mines other coins and dumps/exchanges them for BTC. This causes those coins to lose value as there is a constant sell going on from the pool.  You then also have two sets of fees to factor in.

I'm sure we'll see copy cats of BC doing this soon. All this hash power mining and selling the other alt coins will drive down the price of the BTC you get from mining which is needed to purchase HVC.

It'll work OK for the first coin but have diminishing returns with multiple coins trying to setup multipools.

Just a thought.

We might need an original idea of own that no one else is doing to get maximum benefit.

Nothing changes for other coins. Multipool has been around for quite a while now.
Same amount of coins are mined per day regardless and similar are getting sold.

It works well for Blackcoin because they made a nice anonymous pool and the coin itself cannot be mined.
But for other PoW coins, only reason I can see is if you want ASIC miners to mine & forget getting HVC. (if they even want HVC that is...)

incin
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 140
Merit: 100


View Profile
April 14, 2014, 12:32:06 AM
 #4653

Well anyone with BlackCoin in their bags has seen a 4 fold price increase in 3 days. I bought this morning at the then current high and i have made more on that than 24 hours of mining (top 30 @ 1gh hash). Blackcoin is POS and has a very talented dev/market team supported by a strong community. We have a talented but near silent dev and strong community. A multipool requires competent people working the markets, that is to say blackcoin doesn't flood the market with altcoins. They disburse them across all the exchanges (automated where possible). If they devalue the alts then they shoot themselves in the foot.

As for HVC, I have supported it from day 1. HVC is POW and multipool is unlikely beneficial to the coin at this stage. As has been mentioned getting HVC accepted with some more merchants would probably be the single best thing right now. Voting is voting, big miners mine for profit (typically dumping) and low vote goes against their quick profits. Unfortunately they also are the ones with the most credited votes. Campaigning the big dogs to lower their vote isn't likely gonna happen either. HVC is still strong and a great algo. I think people are panicking too soon. The only issue with HVC right now is the sustain phase. We'll just have to see how it pans out i guess.

Kreativekrypto
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196
Merit: 100


View Profile
April 14, 2014, 12:58:53 AM
 #4654

Congrats everyone we completed our thunderclap goal 100%!!!

We can still add more to it but its now guaranteed to drop Smiley thank you to everyone who spread the word to make it happen.

Also with over 100,000 social reach we may get some people new to crypto posting here so we just need to be patient and grow the community through social and education!
gpools
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 364
Merit: 250


View Profile
April 14, 2014, 01:46:38 AM
 #4655

Now we are have 100% support https://www.thunderclap.it/projects/10329-heavycoin-secure-e-currency?locale=en we need more please vote
gpools
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 364
Merit: 250


View Profile
April 14, 2014, 01:47:33 AM
 #4656

Now we are have 100% support https://www.thunderclap.it/projects/10329-heavycoin-secure-e-currency?locale=en we need more please vote
Kreativekrypto PM me i want more plan PR HVC
cayars
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 168
Merit: 100


View Profile
April 14, 2014, 01:48:57 AM
 #4657

I could be totally wrong but I would think the multi pool idea has some problems of its own.

The pool mines other coins and dumps/exchanges them for BTC. This causes those coins to lose value as there is a constant sell going on from the pool.  You then also have two sets of fees to factor in.

I'm sure we'll see copy cats of BC doing this soon. All this hash power mining and selling the other alt coins will drive down the price of the BTC you get from mining which is needed to purchase HVC.

It'll work OK for the first coin but have diminishing returns with multiple coins trying to setup multipools.

Just a thought.

We might need an original idea of own that no one else is doing to get maximum benefit.

Nothing changes for other coins. Multipool has been around for quite a while now.
Same amount of coins are mined per day regardless and similar are getting sold.

It works well for Blackcoin because they made a nice anonymous pool and the coin itself cannot be mined.
But for other PoW coins, only reason I can see is if you want ASIC miners to mine & forget getting HVC. (if they even want HVC that is...)

What I meant is that with 2 or 3 different multipools mining the same set of coins there would be a huge amount of dumping that would cause the mining of that coin to not be as profitable as just one multipool dumping it.
cryptomines
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 126
Merit: 100


View Profile
April 14, 2014, 01:52:01 AM
 #4658

Congrats everyone we completed our thunderclap goal 100%!!!

We can still add more to it but its now guaranteed to drop Smiley thank you to everyone who spread the word to make it happen.

Also with over 100,000 social reach we may get some people new to crypto posting here so we just need to be patient and grow the community through social and education!

Great work! HVC has a great community!

If you are voting low please consider voting 1 as it will apply the maximum downward pressure to the vote. Longer term mining on the mint phase is our best option right now. Let's slow the mint and give us more time to figure out the next 2 phases.

Votes over the last 60min, 1024- 13 votes, 512- 27 votes, 64- 2 votes, 10- 2 votes, 1- 16 votes

How low can we go? Sub 500 for the next block reward?

Would be really good to have the final HVC logo before the thunder clap goes off....
cayars
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 168
Merit: 100


View Profile
April 14, 2014, 02:19:23 AM
 #4659

Well anyone with BlackCoin in their bags has seen a 4 fold price increase in 3 days. I bought this morning at the then current high and i have made more on that than 24 hours of mining (top 30 @ 1gh hash).

its a pump and dump parasitic shitcoin, that is being over pumped and a lot of people will be left holding bags.
also why would anyone go "alt->bc->btc->usd" instead of simply "alt->btc->usd"?

probably more like alt>btc>bc>btc>usd
fee to change alt coint to btc
fee to change btc to black coin
on sell
fee on bc to btc
etc
incin
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 140
Merit: 100


View Profile
April 14, 2014, 02:47:01 AM
 #4660

Well anyone with BlackCoin in their bags has seen a 4 fold price increase in 3 days. I bought this morning at the then current high and i have made more on that than 24 hours of mining (top 30 @ 1gh hash).

its a pump and dump parasitic shitcoin, that is being over pumped and a lot of people will be left holding bags.
also why would anyone go "alt->bc->btc->usd" instead of simply "alt->btc->usd"?

probably more like alt>btc>bc>btc>usd
fee to change alt coint to btc
fee to change btc to black coin
on sell
fee on bc to btc
etc

talk about scam :|
its pumped by same chinese whale(s) that robbed people blind using pump and dump fraud on many other alts


They are being added to Coinkite....
https://coinkite.com/faq/alts

Pages: « 1 ... 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 [233] 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 ... 298 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!