~snip~
Legendary bowlers such as Shane Warne and Muttiah Muralitharan bowled out opposing teams for less than 100 runs in flat tracks which offered hardly any support for the spinners.
Source?? or it didn't happened. Historically English, Aussie, NZ, SA batsmen were never good player of spin, except few exceptions.
How many times Murli or Warne dominated Indian batsmen on spin tracks in India (As it is common believe that Indian pitches are heaven for Spinners? They must have been dominating force in India, right? Both Murli and Warne struggled in India badly. Murli succeeded to penetrate Indian defense only one time in India. The little success Murli got against the Indians were at his home turf, even there he failed to dominate according to his reputation. And Warne, well he never got any significant success against Indians.
Because of this reason Indians got tag of "Good players of spin". Although current batch is not good as it used to be. Because i have noticed them getting knocked out against the part timers in every format couple of times. Root's recent performance with the ball is another add on in that list.
As far as I remember, Sri Lanka never prepared pitches like this one in any of the 133 tests which Muralitharan played. Because they thought that it was against the spirit of cricket. And back then, Sri Lanka was overly dependent on him.
Wrong, Sri Lankan pitches were spin friendly wickets even in ODI, let alone Test format.
Before the Ahmedabad test, there were five occasions where the test match ended in 2 days in 21st century. Out of that, four matches involved weak teams such as Zimbabwe or Afghanistan. The only other occasion was the match between Australia and Pakistan in 2002 (Sharjah), when Pakistan was bowled out for totals of 59 and 53 in a track which supported spinners (Warne took 8 wickets). Pakistan were the hosts, so they can't complain.
Ahmedabad test is the only occasion in 21st century, where a match between two equal-strength teams ended in two days. A lot has been talked about pacers getting undue advantage in SENA nations. But as I have posted above, all the two-day test matches of 21st century involved spinners destroying the opposing team, or lop-sided contests.
let's Check Pink ball D/N game history and judge, Shall we?
We have data of 16 pink ball tests.
-India (Kolkatta and Ahmadabad) * Ind vs Ban - 2 days
* Ind vs Eng - 2 days
-Australia (Adelaide)* Aus vs NZ - 3 days
* Aus vs SA - 3.5 days
* Aus vs Pak - Match went to 5th day due to Rain.
* Aus vs Eng - Match went to 5th day due to Rain.
* Aus vs SL - 2.5 days
* Aus vs Pak - 3.75 days ( Match got over despite multiple rain delays)
* Aus vs NZ - 3.5 days
* Aus vs Ind - 2.5 days
Pakistan (Dubai)* Pak vs WI - 5 days
* Pak vs SL - 5 days (first hour of 5th day)
England (Birmingham)* Eng vs WI - 2.5 days ( despite rain delay)
South Africa (Port Elizabeth)* SA vs Zim - 2 days
New Zealand (Auckland)* Nz vs Eng - 4.75 days ( 2 days washed out due to rain)
West Indies (Bridgetown)* WI vs SL - 4 days ( Match got over in first hour of 4th day. Rain effected the first 2 days heavily, 3 sessions lost due to rain)
Source :
Out of 16 games only 2 game went to 5th day without any delay. So I can make up only couple of things, which i already mentioned in my previous posts.
1. Pink ball concept is new for everyone so no one is familiar how it behaves and its going through experimental phase.
2. Ahmadabad pitch was not 5 day test pitch but it was not 2 days pitch either, batsmen from the both teams batted poorly and less shitty team won the game, as simple as that.