|
iru786
|
 |
May 04, 2014, 09:05:31 AM |
|
Something is wrong... Found blocks are being rejected.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Each block is stacked on top of the previous one. Adding another block to the top makes all lower blocks more difficult to remove: there is more "weight" above each block. A transaction in a block 6 blocks deep (6 confirmations) will be very difficult to remove.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
iru786
|
|
May 04, 2014, 09:10:40 AM |
|
I am trying to solo mine but wallet keeps on crashing and with this difficulty, Solomining is getting out of question very fast
|
|
|
|
|
cryptonit
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 3038
Merit: 1053
bit.diamonds | uNiq.diamonds
|
|
May 04, 2014, 09:14:19 AM |
|
This needs a relaunch, IMHO
All you can do is solo mine, I have been solo mining for a few days now with all these wallet issues. I have a decent amount.
The problem is there are no pools, so if you are able to solo mine and it isnt that hard, but the wallet has been an issue for most people that have all missed out and now the difficulty is just too insane for small miners.
As I said, i been solo mining for a few days and have a decent amount but feel like Ive cheated whilst people waited for a new wallet and didnt keep pushing their existing wallets to open to sync then mine. Lord knows it took me at least half a day to get the wallet to work/sync then mine. Reboot machine and having to reconfigure the fickle wallet back up to solo mine.
Thats just my thoughts on the matter. Not trolling, or attacking anyone.
Unless someone has a working DMD pool ?
to stop any speculations network will stay running every minute u solo mine u dont waste meanwhile we do our best to help pools get this going |
|
|
|
cryptonit
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3038
Merit: 1053
bit.diamonds | uNiq.diamonds
|
|
May 04, 2014, 09:14:56 AM |
|
I am trying to solo mine but wallet keeps on crashing and with this difficulty, Solomining is getting out of question very fast
use latest stable fix wallet |
|
|
|
ando0022
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
|
|
May 04, 2014, 09:22:44 AM |
|
I am trying to solo mine but wallet keeps on crashing and with this difficulty, Solomining is getting out of question very fast
use latest stable fix wallet I can confirm the last wallet fix is working good. |
|
|
|
|
cryptonit
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3038
Merit: 1053
bit.diamonds | uNiq.diamonds
|
|
May 04, 2014, 09:45:32 AM |
|
WayForward, can you give us a number of coins mined per 1Mh/s every hour?
TIA
i mined 6 DMD in last 8 hours with 60 mhash (3x amd290 6x amd280) so u can see diamonds are very valuable and rare |
|
|
|
|
AizenSou
|
|
May 04, 2014, 10:09:41 AM |
|
WayForward, can you give us a number of coins mined per 1Mh/s every hour?
TIA
i mined 6 DMD in last 8 hours with 60 mhash (3x amd290 6x amd280) so u can see diamonds are very valuable and rare With around 30 DMD/day with your system is still somehow more profitable than mine scrypt or X11 coins. No wonder alot of people are trying to solomine DMD. Less energy and less heat, more profit. Good decision for moving to groestl. Congrat! DMD network will become more stable. I don't think it will explode soon in term of price, but rather stable and grow like DRK. The fun comes when ASIC scrypt is everywhere and GPU miners move to another algo. |
|
|
|
|
off_d
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 12
Merit: 0
|
|
May 04, 2014, 10:13:41 AM |
|
WayForward, can you give us a number of coins mined per 1Mh/s every hour?
TIA
i mined 6 DMD in last 8 hours with 60 mhash (3x amd290 6x amd280) so u can see diamonds are very valuable and rare that exact comment proves that such launch is unfair. i'm mining for 1 day and got 4 dmd. and that's solely because i managed to get mining when the difficulty was still low. but again, for 6 hours the wallet had crashed without me noticing (my mistake), thus the difficulty had risen. so if you mined 6 dmd in last 8 hours with 60 mhash, imagined what happens to people that have 10 mh (i have 7) and their wallets were crashing constantly yesterday... |
|
|
|
|
sterob
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 175
Merit: 100
★YoBit.Net★ 350+ Coins Exchange & Dice
|
|
May 04, 2014, 10:29:04 AM |
|
WayForward, can you give us a number of coins mined per 1Mh/s every hour?
TIA
i mined 6 DMD in last 8 hours with 60 mhash (3x amd290 6x amd280) so u can see diamonds are very valuable and rare that exact comment proves that such launch is unfair. i'm mining for 1 day and got 4 dmd. and that's solely because i managed to get mining when the difficulty was still low. but again, for 6 hours the wallet had crashed without me noticing (my mistake), thus the difficulty had risen. so if you mined 6 dmd in last 8 hours with 60 mhash, imagined what happens to people that have 10 mh (i have 7) and their wallets were crashing constantly yesterday... this is solo mining. The result is pretty much luck based. Also for solo mining, card own hash rate matter more than how many hash you have. You can have 7mh or 1x7970 but would still get more block than people with 10x 270 ~ 20mh. |
|
|
|
|
istvandv
|
|
May 04, 2014, 12:07:22 PM |
|
WayForward, can you give us a number of coins mined per 1Mh/s every hour?
TIA
i mined 6 DMD in last 8 hours with 60 mhash (3x amd290 6x amd280) so u can see diamonds are very valuable and rare that exact comment proves that such launch is unfair. i'm mining for 1 day and got 4 dmd. and that's solely because i managed to get mining when the difficulty was still low. but again, for 6 hours the wallet had crashed without me noticing (my mistake), thus the difficulty had risen. so if you mined 6 dmd in last 8 hours with 60 mhash, imagined what happens to people that have 10 mh (i have 7) and their wallets were crashing constantly yesterday... i mined yesterday 12 hrs, got 0 blocks... that was when diff was 16 to 24, when diff went higher i had to stop, i only have 3.1 Mh/s hope we can solve the pool issues, i want my precious |
|
|
|
|
popshot (OP)
|
|
May 04, 2014, 12:12:10 PM |
|
The person who runs the diamondblocks.info has disappeared and we have no contact with him. We're building our own Block Explorer. |
|
|
|
|
popshot (OP)
|
|
May 04, 2014, 12:34:11 PM |
|
This highly suggests that we're dealing with a sync issue with the new blockchain. As long as there was old blockchain data to sync, the client was able to start up. After block 386228, that changes.
There are no sync issues, please redownload the chain or use the one supplied in the First Post. Please use the latest wallet-qt client 2.0.1. There's nothing special at 386228 block. |
|
|
|
|
popshot (OP)
|
|
May 04, 2014, 01:26:51 PM |
|
which pool work?
There aren't any pools at the moment, it's work in progress. It's Sunday today and some experienced pool owners who pledged to make one for Diamond are busy but should come up with something soon. Do solo mining instead for the time being.  |
|
|
|
HR
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1011
Transparency & Integrity
|
|
May 04, 2014, 01:29:40 PM |
|
This highly suggests that we're dealing with a sync issue with the new blockchain. As long as there was old blockchain data to sync, the client was able to start up. After block 386228, that changes.
There are no sync issues, please redownload the chain or use the one supplied in the First Post. Please use the latest wallet-qt client 2.0.1. There's nothing special at 386228 block. Or what comes after it? Or how things are handled after it? It certainly marked a "before and after" in my testing. Don't take the test results personal. Bugs happen. As you might imagine, I'm anxiously looking forward to the version's "What's Fixed".  |
|
|
|
|
popshot (OP)
|
|
May 04, 2014, 01:42:09 PM |
|
And what exactly did you want to download? The newest available files can be downloaded form (first post): |
|
|
|
|
riddler_xyz
|
|
May 04, 2014, 01:50:09 PM
Last edit: May 04, 2014, 02:01:18 PM by riddler_xyz |
|
well wouldnt hurt to update 1st post ...
and after copying the blockchain it says 400k blocks left ... and loads like my internet '95
used 2.0 ... with 2.01 seems to work ... its reindexing right now ... 2.0 didnt do that ...
10k block download now ...works ...
bit confusing this thread ...
as said ... please update post 1 ... with correct sources to prevent future problems ...
|
If bitcoinmining riggs could buy miningriggs with bitcoin by themselves wouldnt that be asexual reproduction ? So wouldnt that make BTC a lifeform ?
|
|
|
morrisonsa
Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
|
May 04, 2014, 01:54:30 PM |
|
Then you didn't do it correctly.
|
|
|
|
|
|
popshot (OP)
|
|
May 04, 2014, 02:07:15 PM |
|
There are no sync issues, please redownload the chain or use the one supplied in the First Post.
Please use the latest wallet-qt client 2.0.1.
There's nothing special at 386228 block.
Or what comes after it? Or how things are handled after it? It certainly marked a "before and after" in my testing. Don't take the test results personal. Bugs happen. As you might imagine, I'm anxiously looking forward to the version's "What's Fixed". The reason there are no sync issues is because we reverted to the old DB engine. So before and after the fork the Block Chain is structured in the same way, so it just continues regardless of the algo. before up to block 386226: scrypt after the block 386227: Grøstl It takes a bit of time to get over that block but after it does, it syncs as normal. |
|
|
|
|
paladin281978
|
|
May 04, 2014, 02:09:39 PM |
|
which pool work?
There aren't any pools at the moment, it's work in progress. It's Sunday today and some experienced pool owners who pledged to make one for Diamond are busy but should come up with something soon. Do solo mining instead for the time being. solo mining with such difficulty? Unreal |
|
|
|
|
popshot (OP)
|
|
May 04, 2014, 02:12:23 PM |
|
well wouldnt hurt to update 1st post ...
and after copying the blockchain it says 400k blocks left ... and loads like my internet '95
used 2.0 ... with 2.01 seems to work ... its reindexing right now ... 2.0 didnt do that ...
10k block download now ...works ...
bit confusing this thread ...
as said ... please update post 1 ... with correct sources to prevent future problems ...
Sorry about that confusion but we were making so many changes recently and had a bit of lag with updating the main post sometimes with the latest links displayed in the newest post (at that time). The first post has been already updated. |
|
|
|
|
