Bitcoin Forum
March 30, 2017, 10:57:07 AM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.14.0  [Torrent]. (New!)
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 [31] 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 ... 638 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN] Diamond (DMD) Evolution v 2.0 | Hybrid Security | 25% PoS  (Read 895717 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic.
2tights
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 168

I like big BITS and I cannot lie.


View Profile WWW
May 07, 2014, 10:03:44 PM
 #601

Still solo mining.

24 hours now WITHOUT a single coin though, 36 hours with just 1 (one machine that's never had even one), and that after getting off to a nice start that met with expectations.

The overall diff picture hasn't changed in that time (roughly the same as 3 days ago while trending ever so slightly higher).

What has changed was the mention of "secret" private pools.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=580725.msg6552787#msg6552787
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=580725.msg6550578;topicseen#msg6550578

If they're big, then that puts the little solo miner out of business. But is that really true? Statistically speaking, my miners should have the same probabilities of solving a block (as in BLOCK!) regardless of whether the entire network were all one huge pool except for little old me, or the entire network were nothing but solo miners with me included, correct?

1 big pool + little old me = same probabilities = all solo miners with little old me included, correct?

The so called "lottery ticket" is exactly the same for little old me, and it's completely independent
of the make-up of the rest of that particular statistical universe, correct?



24 hours with zilch is really stacking the odds though.

Something smells fishy. Anyone else experiencing something similar?


Add: @ahmed_bodi, will be sending you some hashpower sometime tomorrow - I want to give this some more time with concentrated hashpower for statistical reasons first. Do I need to create a login or do I just use my DMD address?


How much hash power do you have and how many blocks have you found?
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
ahmed_bodi
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518

Bitrated user: ahmedbodi.


View Profile
May 07, 2014, 10:07:48 PM
 #602

dmd.cryptopools.com back up for testing

URL for mining:
http://dmd.cryptopools.com:3345



no worky. failed to connect.
U used http?

Bitrated user: ahmedbodi.
ninja registrator
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 49


View Profile
May 07, 2014, 10:09:12 PM
 #603

dmd.cryptopools.com back up for testing

URL for mining:
http://dmd.cryptopools.com:3345



no worky. failed to connect.



it looks like Ahemd is still waiting like everyone! or simply kinda stuck and scratching his head?
2tights
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 168

I like big BITS and I cannot lie.


View Profile WWW
May 07, 2014, 10:09:45 PM
 #604

dmd.cryptopools.com back up for testing

URL for mining:
http://dmd.cryptopools.com:3345



no worky. failed to connect.
U used http?

setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 10
setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
sgminer.exe -k groestlcoin --no-submit-stale -o stratum+tcp://dmd.cryptopools.com:3345 -u 2tights.username -p password  --xintensity 300 -g 1 -w 512 --auto-fan --temp-target 82 --lookup-gap


I haven't modified the script and it worked fine the other day
ninja registrator
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 49


View Profile
May 07, 2014, 10:16:39 PM
 #605

dmd.cryptopools.com back up for testing

URL for mining:
http://dmd.cryptopools.com:3345



no worky. failed to connect.
U used http?

setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 10
setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
sgminer.exe -k groestlcoin --no-submit-stale -o stratum+tcp://dmd.cryptopools.com:3345 -u 2tights.username -p password  --xintensity 300 -g 1 -w 512 --auto-fan --temp-target 82 --lookup-gap


I haven't modified the script and it worked fine the other day




I run Groestl on a bamt miner just fine and have been for a while! I also run a small NVidia from windows and neither can connect or mine on his pool as I just tried........ Ahmed whats up?


tried with cpu , NVidia, and 7950 so nope its a NO GO!!!!!!!!



{
"pools" : [
   {
      "url" : "stratum+tcp://mine1.coinmine.pl:3000",
      "user" : "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX",
      "pass" : "XYZ DO YOU SEE ME"
   },
        {
      "url" : "http://192.168.1.103:17772",
      "user" : "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX",
      "pass" : "XYZ DO YOU SEE ME?"
   }
]
,
"auto-fan" : true,
"auto-gpu" : true,
"temp-cutoff" : "84,80",
"temp-overheat" : "80,76",
"temp-target" : "70",
"gpu-fan" : "75-100,50-90",
"intensity" : "22,22",
"vectors" : "1",
"worksize" : "256",
"kernel" : "groestlcoin",
"lookup-gap" : "2",
"thread-concurrency" : "21712",
"shaders" : "1792",
"api-listen" : true,
"api-port" : "4028",
"api-allow" : "W:127.0.0.1",
"expiry" : "120",
"gpu-dyninterval" : "7",
"gpu-platform" : "0",
"gpu-threads" : "2,2",
"gpu-engine" : "1150",
"gpu-memclock" : "1500",
"gpu-powertune" : "0",
"log" : "5",
"no-pool-disable" : true,
"queue" : "1",
"scan-time" : "60",
"scrypt" : true,
"shares" : "0",
"kernel-path" : "/usr/local/bin"
}



WITH THIS I AM GETTING OVER 7.1 M/H EACH 7950

ccminer30.exe -q -s 1 -a groestl -o stratum+tcp://mine1.coinmine.pl:3000 -u OKOKOKOKOKOKOK.660 -p KOKOKOKO -v 512

AND THIS GIVES ME OVER 3.0 M/H   NOT BAD FOR AN OLD GTX 660 SIMPLE NOT EVEN TI MODEL



ECM
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 12


View Profile
May 07, 2014, 10:27:09 PM
 #606

Hi,
I just had to sign up to add to this discussion. Was getting a bit frustrated with some ppls unability to understand the complexity of things.

Guys, some positive attitude please. They are trying their best to fix this. I managed to connect. What you have to do is change the "stratum+tcp://" for "http://". The stratum is acting weird remember.

@Ahmed: Im logged on but i get all rejects or stale. States "target-miss". Hopefully that helps your troubleshooting.
And if I understand correctly, you are trying to set up a P2pool? I could prob run a node if you got all the software working Wink Im on a solid connection in Northern Europe.

And the increase in hashpower could come from vultures that see a weak network where no one is mining. That's a definition of a party Wink
2tights
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 168

I like big BITS and I cannot lie.


View Profile WWW
May 07, 2014, 10:29:01 PM
 #607

Hi,
I just had to sign up to add to this discussion. Was getting a bit frustrated with some ppls unability to understand the complexity of things.

Guys, some positive attitude please. They are trying their best to fix this. I managed to connect. What you have to do is change the "stratum+tcp://" for "http://". The stratum is acting weird remember.

@Ahmed: Im logged on but i get all rejects or stale. States "target-miss". Hopefully that helps your troubleshooting.
And if I understand correctly, you are trying to set up a P2pool? I could prob run a node if you got all the software working Wink Im on a solid connection in Northern Europe.

And the increase in hashpower could come from vultures that see a weak network where no one is mining. That's a definition of a party Wink

thanks I can connect now

nothing but rejects
ninja registrator
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 49


View Profile
May 07, 2014, 10:35:59 PM
 #608


ccminer-v0.5\x64>ccminer30.exe -q -s 1 -a groestl -o http
://dmd.cryptopools.com:3345 -u xxxxxx-p xxxx -v 512
     *** ccMiner for nVidia GPUs by Christian Buchner and Christian H. ***
                     This is version 0.5 (beta)
          based on pooler-cpuminer 2.3.2 (c) 2010 Jeff Garzik, 2012 pooler
          based on pooler-cpuminer extension for HVC from
               https://github.com/heavycoin/cpuminer-heavycoin
                        and
               http://hvc.1gh.com/
        Cuda additions Copyright 2014 Christian Buchner, Christian H.
          LTC donation address: LKS1WDKGED647msBQfLBHV3Ls8sveGncnm
          BTC donation address: 16hJF5mceSojnTD3ZTUDqdRhDyPJzoRakM
          YAC donation address: Y87sptDEcpLkLeAuex6qZioDbvy1qXZEj4
[2014-05-07 15:32:55] 1 miner threads started, using 'groestl' algorithm.
[2014-05-07 15:32:57] Long-polling activated for http://dmd.cryptopools.com:3345
/LP
[2014-05-07 15:33:03] accepted: 0/1 (0.00%), 2059 khash/s (booooo)
[2014-05-07 15:33:22] accepted: 0/2 (0.00%), 2640 khash/s (booooo)
[2014-05-07 15:33:49] accepted: 0/3 (0.00%), 2330 khash/s (booooo)
[2014-05-07 15:33:50] accepted: 0/4 (0.00%), 47.12 khash/s (booooo)
[2014-05-07 15:34:06] accepted: 0/5 (0.00%), 2597 khash/s (booooo)
[2014-05-07 15:34:14] accepted: 0/6 (0.00%), 2398 khash/s (booooo)
[2014-05-07 15:34:18] accepted: 0/7 (0.00%), 2610 khash/s (booooo)
[2014-05-07 15:34:36] accepted: 0/8 (0.00%), 2732 khash/s (booooo)
[2014-05-07 15:34:38] accepted: 0/9 (0.00%), 2797 khash/s (booooo)
ECM
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 12


View Profile
May 07, 2014, 10:40:24 PM
 #609

Good, then it wasnt only me getting rejects. Now we know that.
And they will keep getting it wrong until they get it right (duh!). So Ahmed, we are at your disposal as soon as there are any new changes in your code. Keep up the good work!
morrisonsa
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 112


View Profile
May 07, 2014, 10:44:19 PM
 #610

Our attempt at a pool came up with the usual result:

 [Pool]      [Diamondcoin] (Thread 1) We thought a block was found but it was rejected by the daemon, share data: {"job":"29","ip":"XXX","worker":"XXXXXX","height":393842,"blockReward":1000000,"poolReward":990000,"difficulty":0.02,"shareDiff":"15839.58450802","blockDiff":10945.29713536,"blockDiffActual":42.755066935,"blockHash":0000000004232de679778fc6eb680536643394d6911dac3175960d1337a3fa5c"}



Granted total time was about 10 minutes of effort and hashing.

I hope I'm a newb, and block rewards really arent 1000000


And thats a very long way of saying percentage...
ninja registrator
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 49


View Profile
May 07, 2014, 10:51:40 PM
 #611

A MILLION DIAMONDS?.... NICE HIT SO PRINT IT AND PLAQY IT FOR ON THE WALL MEMORIES!
TheCoinFinder
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 658


View Profile
May 08, 2014, 12:01:52 AM
 #612

http://www.hashharder.com/groestl/diamondcoin

Please help us test that this pool is working.

srcxxx
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 266


View Profile WWW
May 08, 2014, 12:57:31 AM
 #613

http://www.hashharder.com/groestl/diamondcoin

Please help us test that this pool is working.



Hi pool operators trying to set up pool mining for DMD!

Maybe a stupid question, but still here I go... Why don't you use testnet? This way difficulty is very low and you can see if you've solved a block or not in a matter of minutes. Why do you need mainnet?

Thanks
morrisonsa
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 112


View Profile
May 08, 2014, 01:07:07 AM
 #614

I don't believe it has testnet?
morrisonsa
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 112


View Profile
May 08, 2014, 01:14:10 AM
 #615

http://www.hashharder.com/groestl/diamondcoin

Please help us test that this pool is working.



Not sure, you have this marked as scrypt, its groestl.
srcxxx
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 266


View Profile WWW
May 08, 2014, 02:13:41 AM
 #616

I don't believe it has testnet?

Why not?

All bitcoin forks have testnet. It just sometimes it is broken.
I used it on groestlcoin. Works pretty well.
You just need two wallets with different ports on the same machine, and there you go... Your testnet with super low difficulty.

https://github.com/DMDcoin/Diamond-Coin-2.0.1/blob/master/src/bitcoinrpc.cpp#L46

https://github.com/srcxxx/GroestlCoinTestnetBox
HR
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 896


Transparency & Integrity


View Profile
May 08, 2014, 03:47:45 AM
 #617

Still solo mining.

24 hours now WITHOUT a single coin though, 36 hours with just 1 (one machine that's never had even one), and that after getting off to a nice start that met with expectations.

The overall diff picture hasn't changed in that time (roughly the same as 3 days ago while trending ever so slightly higher).

What has changed was the mention of "secret" private pools.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=580725.msg6552787#msg6552787
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=580725.msg6550578;topicseen#msg6550578

If they're big, then that puts the little solo miner out of business. But is that really true? Statistically speaking, my miners should have the same probabilities of solving a block (as in BLOCK!) regardless of whether the entire network were all one huge pool except for little old me, or the entire network were nothing but solo miners with me included, correct?

1 big pool + little old me = same probabilities = all solo miners with little old me included, correct?

The so called "lottery ticket" is exactly the same for little old me, and it's completely independent
of the make-up of the rest of that particular statistical universe, correct?



24 hours with zilch is really stacking the odds though.

Something smells fishy. Anyone else experiencing something similar?



Got up in the middle of the night to take a piss, and it came to me, it's called:


LATENCY

and I then proceded to think to myself, "you idiot"!


If it's taking forever to submit, you're not going to get
anything, even if your theoretical odds are 1 in 75 to
1 in 125 (depending on the diff at any given moment).


And that's not to mention what would be happening
if huge concentrated hashrates (secret pools)
are right next to active nodes.


Out of curiosity, I pinged the nodes in the original launch post https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=580725.msg6507800#msg6507800 and they all timed out.  Sad


I'd post further findings, but since nobody else has had similar problems, why bother?

I'm going back to bed. I've got a long, long hard day tomorrow. Good luck to the other two or three of you who are troubleshooting.
pcmerc
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196


View Profile
May 08, 2014, 04:30:39 AM
 #618

OSX wallet compiled from latest source - http://pcmerc.com/files/Diamond-Qt.dmg

Please report any issues to me so I may address them.


pcmerc~
http://kryptochaos.com
http://pool.kryptochaos.com
pcmerc
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196


View Profile
May 08, 2014, 05:49:08 AM
 #619

On it! standby...
LeetPoolsOP
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 105


View Profile
May 08, 2014, 06:12:17 AM
 #620

What seems to be the issues that the pools are having?

Auto Profit-Switch Scrypt,x11,x13 that pays in BTC: http://LeetPools.net
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 [31] 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 ... 638 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!