Dallski
Newbie
 Offline
Activity: 54
Merit: 0
|
 |
September 29, 2014, 10:48:39 PM |
|
Claymore v8.0
Windows 7 Pro w/ 14.6 beta-may 23
Sapphire HD7950 Dual-X 87% ASIC
GPU 900 / Memory 1250 / 0.925 mV
Getting 453 h/s after 1 hour with all default settings.
|
|
|
|
|
|
OrientA
|
|
September 29, 2014, 11:13:27 PM |
|
Cards available: 1
GPU #0: name: Tahiti, 3072 MB available, 32 units
Total cards: 1
GPU #0: HashCnt = 896
POOL version
GPU #0: -a 4 mode selected
Speed: 429 h/s, TotalHashes: 126K, DevHashes: 5K Mining time: 00:05 @ 64c 150watts*
Version 6.1 was getting 396 h/s @ 67c 170watts*
*Power readings taken from back of PSU LED display
I haven't hit tune mode or anything, going to leave it running 24 hours and see what happens.
Which card, what is your frequency? |
|
|
|
|
|
OrientA
|
|
September 29, 2014, 11:22:49 PM |
|
Claymore v8.0
Windows 7 Pro w/ 14.6 beta-may 23
Sapphire HD7950 Dual-X 87% ASIC
GPU 900 / Memory 1250 / 0.925 mV
Getting 453 h/s after 1 hour with all default settings.
Do you use -a 3 or 4? |
|
|
|
|
ZXSpectrum
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 29
Merit: 0
|
|
September 29, 2014, 11:27:28 PM |
|
Cards available: 1
GPU #0: name: Tahiti, 3072 MB available, 32 units
Total cards: 1
GPU #0: HashCnt = 896
POOL version
GPU #0: -a 4 mode selected
Speed: 429 h/s, TotalHashes: 126K, DevHashes: 5K Mining time: 00:05 @ 64c 150watts*
Version 6.1 was getting 396 h/s @ 67c 170watts*
*Power readings taken from back of PSU LED display
I haven't hit tune mode or anything, going to leave it running 24 hours and see what happens.
Which card, what is your frequency? Sapphire AMD Radeon R9 280X VAPOR-X (Elpida memory) GPU 1030/1500 memory.. I'm remote to the location so I would need to talk someone through flashing it, the trixx program doesn't let me bring the voltage down any further, could get more out of it tbh. |
|
|
|
|
Dallski
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 54
Merit: 0
|
|
September 29, 2014, 11:46:57 PM |
|
Claymore v8.0
Windows 7 Pro w/ 14.6 beta-may 23
Sapphire HD7950 Dual-X 87% ASIC
GPU 900 / Memory 1250 / 0.925 mV
Getting 453 h/s after 1 hour with all default settings.
Do you use -a 3 or 4? I didn't add anything, so the default is -a 0. My pool.bat is just "NsGpuCNMiner.exe -u _____ -p ______" http://i59.tinypic.com/xopi0i.png |
|
|
|
|
|
daeminium
|
|
September 29, 2014, 11:52:52 PM |
|
work fine with 14.9 drivers?
|
|
|
|
|
Palad1n
Member
Offline
Activity: 113
Merit: 10
|
|
September 30, 2014, 12:02:59 AM
Last edit: September 30, 2014, 12:25:00 AM by Palad1n |
|
Wow!
r9 280x (hynix) = 521 h/s stock
r9 270x (elpida) = 419 h/s overclocked
r9 290 (hynix) = 790 h/s overclocked
|
|
|
|
|
|
bonosurgut
|
|
September 30, 2014, 05:43:09 AM |
|
best command line for 290x ? i have decrease hashrate with 8.0 in windows 8.1 with v14.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
dzonikg28
|
|
September 30, 2014, 07:23:33 AM |
|
has anuone had this problem? Worked perfectly on 6.1 until i tryed 8.0 and sad "no cards detected"? tryed reset ,everything and still same message and now even on 6.1 same message..its 3*280x ..they are in device menager..tryed to mine x11 work normaly but xmr want..wtf
|
|
|
|
|
mafostedu
|
|
September 30, 2014, 08:18:09 AM |
|
Wow!
r9 280x (hynix) = 521 h/s stock
r9 270x (elpida) = 419 h/s overclocked
r9 290 (hynix) = 790 h/s overclocked
What's the setup for r9 290 ? I have 4x R9 290 Trixx (hynix) 1000/1250 with Win 8.1 + 13.12 Catalyst With 6.1 I get 2900+ i.e. 725 kh/card while with 8.0 I get less than 700 kh/card (~ 695 to 698) However with 280x Asus D2CU (Hynix) @ 1170/1500 I get 550 which was less than 500 with 6.1 So I guess version 8.0 has no added benefit for 290 cards but improves speed by 10% for 280x. |
|
|
|
|
Claymore (OP)
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325
Miners developer
|
|
September 30, 2014, 09:26:14 AM |
|
Wow!
r9 280x (hynix) = 521 h/s stock
r9 270x (elpida) = 419 h/s overclocked
r9 290 (hynix) = 790 h/s overclocked
What's the setup for r9 290 ? I have 4x R9 290 Trixx (hynix) 1000/1250 with Win 8.1 + 13.12 Catalyst With 6.1 I get 2900+ i.e. 725 kh/card while with 8.0 I get less than 700 kh/card (~ 695 to 698) However with 280x Asus D2CU (Hynix) @ 1170/1500 I get 550 which was less than 500 with 6.1 So I guess version 8.0 has no added benefit for 290 cards but improves speed by 10% for 280x. Try "-h 1376,1376,1376,1376". In next update I will improve this option so "-h 1376" will mean 1376 for all cards, but right now you have to specify hashrate for every card individually by using comma. Press "m" to see current hashrate. You can also try 1344, 1312, 1280, 1248, 1216 values. |
|
|
|
anatolikostis
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2026
Merit: 1005
|
|
September 30, 2014, 09:42:54 AM |
|
Wow!
r9 280x (hynix) = 521 h/s stock
r9 270x (elpida) = 419 h/s overclocked
r9 290 (hynix) = 790 h/s overclocked
What's the setup for r9 290 ? I have 4x R9 290 Trixx (hynix) 1000/1250 with Win 8.1 + 13.12 Catalyst With 6.1 I get 2900+ i.e. 725 kh/card while with 8.0 I get less than 700 kh/card (~ 695 to 698) However with 280x Asus D2CU (Hynix) @ 1170/1500 I get 550 which was less than 500 with 6.1 So I guess version 8.0 has no added benefit for 290 cards but improves speed by 10% for 280x. 290 msi gaming with Hynix GDDR5 pulls 749h/s @1000/1250 |
|
|
|
|
|
OrientA
|
|
September 30, 2014, 09:46:30 AM |
|
Is Catalyst 14.7 better than 14.6?
|
|
|
|
|
Feeniks
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 37
Merit: 0
|
|
September 30, 2014, 10:30:02 AM |
|
Yes it is
|
|
|
|
|
UberMakedonische
Member
Offline
Activity: 120
Merit: 10
|
|
September 30, 2014, 11:35:00 AM |
|
Wow!
r9 280x (hynix) = 521 h/s stock
r9 270x (elpida) = 419 h/s overclocked
r9 290 (hynix) = 790 h/s overclocked
What's the setup for r9 290 ? I have 4x R9 290 Trixx (hynix) 1000/1250 with Win 8.1 + 13.12 Catalyst With 6.1 I get 2900+ i.e. 725 kh/card while with 8.0 I get less than 700 kh/card (~ 695 to 698) However with 280x Asus D2CU (Hynix) @ 1170/1500 I get 550 which was less than 500 with 6.1 So I guess version 8.0 has no added benefit for 290 cards but improves speed by 10% for 280x. Try "-h 1376,1376,1376,1376". In next update I will improve this option so "-h 1376" will mean 1376 for all cards, but right now you have to specify hashrate for every card individually by using comma. Press "m" to see current hashrate. You can also try 1344, 1312, 1280, 1248, 1216 values. I have same cards and the same things are happening for me. With 7.0 miner i am getting 720 h per card, with 8.0 max 680 h. I've tried the option -h but still no improvement. I also tried driver 13.12 and 14.7 and no results. This is only for R9 290 cards, for 280X i have improvement around 15%. |
|
|
|
|
Palad1n
Member
Offline
Activity: 113
Merit: 10
|
|
September 30, 2014, 12:27:19 PM
Last edit: October 01, 2014, 12:15:10 AM by Palad1n |
|
Wow!
r9 280x (hynix) = 521 h/s stock
r9 270x (elpida) = 419 h/s overclocked
r9 290 (hynix) = 790 h/s overclocked
What's the setup for r9 290 ? I have 4x R9 290 Trixx (hynix) 1000/1250 with Win 8.1 + 13.12 Catalyst With 6.1 I get 2900+ i.e. 725 kh/card while with 8.0 I get less than 700 kh/card (~ 695 to 698) However with 280x Asus D2CU (Hynix) @ 1170/1500 I get 550 which was less than 500 with 6.1 So I guess version 8.0 has no added benefit for 290 cards but improves speed by 10% for 280x. Try "-h 1376,1376,1376,1376". In next update I will improve this option so "-h 1376" will mean 1376 for all cards, but right now you have to specify hashrate for every card individually by using comma. Press "m" to see current hashrate. You can also try 1344, 1312, 1280, 1248, 1216 values. I have same cards and the same things are happening for me. With 7.0 miner i am getting 720 h per card, with 8.0 max 680 h. I've tried the option -h but still no improvement. I also tried driver 13.12 and 14.7 and no results. This is only for R9 290 cards, for 280X i have improvement around 15%. Today I will test rig with x6 r9 290 Tri-X. 290 Tri-x I have not yet tested it on a new version of Claymore. |
|
|
|
|
qqqq
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1011
|
|
September 30, 2014, 12:38:18 PM |
|
Wow!
r9 280x (hynix) = 521 h/s stock
r9 270x (elpida) = 419 h/s overclocked
r9 290 (hynix) = 790 h/s overclocked
What's the setup for r9 290 ? I have 4x R9 290 Trixx (hynix) 1000/1250 with Win 8.1 + 13.12 Catalyst With 6.1 I get 2900+ i.e. 725 kh/card while with 8.0 I get less than 700 kh/card (~ 695 to 698) However with 280x Asus D2CU (Hynix) @ 1170/1500 I get 550 which was less than 500 with 6.1 So I guess version 8.0 has no added benefit for 290 cards but improves speed by 10% for 280x. Try "-h 1376,1376,1376,1376". In next update I will improve this option so "-h 1376" will mean 1376 for all cards, but right now you have to specify hashrate for every card individually by using comma. Press "m" to see current hashrate. You can also try 1344, 1312, 1280, 1248, 1216 values. I have same cards and the same things are happening for me. With 7.0 miner i am getting 720 h per card, with 8.0 max 680 h. I've tried the option -h but still no improvement. I also tried driver 13.12 and 14.7 and no results. This is only for R9 290 cards, for 280X i have improvement around 15%. Same for me... |
|
|
|
|
|
OrientA
|
|
September 30, 2014, 02:26:16 PM |
|
I tried both 14.6 and 14.7 for my 7970. The performance is the same. Can anybody else confirm this?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deagle21
|
|
September 30, 2014, 04:04:30 PM |
|
Claymore, any thought on lowering your Dev Fee since Kachur GPU Miner is out and its runs faster than yours with only a 0.7% fee. I like you miner with nice features but I'm getting better performance with Kachur GPU Miner.
|
|
|
|
|
Claymore (OP)
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325
Miners developer
|
|
September 30, 2014, 04:54:09 PM |
|
Claymore, any thought on lowering your Dev Fee since Kachur GPU Miner is out and its runs faster than yours with only a 0.7% fee. I like you miner with nice features but I'm getting better performance with Kachur GPU Miner.
It is not faster at least on cards I tested and also I cannot make it work on all cards, but it works in general, so I will reduce dev fee in two times in next update. |
|
|
|
|
