Bitladen asset?
Crowetic are You reading what You are proposing?
Giving money to wannabe 51% attacker to expand portion of mining volume he is controlling right now? Yeah, sure...
I'm switching to solo-mining just to prevent this "greedynitis" spread to pool owners...
its all about money and if people until now didnt realise that also crow is here for the money, at least now it should be clear. but that is nothing that you can blame anybody for.
Not that I am complaining, mind you... but in crow's defense, isn't that why we're all here?
We're all here to make 'something'.
Call it whatever you like, but all cryptos are an 'investment' into {Place your noun here}.
@boba
I've paid out WAY more than I've made with BURST. To be clear.
Also, I continue to pay out even though I have to pay for my pool host with my own money, and the pool fee goes ENTIRELY to my asset, along with a 30TB miner. While your asset pays HALF your pool fee and no miner. Tell me who cares more about money.
Also, wasn't it you that said when BURST went below 100sat that you'd sell and be gone? Oh wait, maybe that was in core team chat.
I resent being called greedy when I've done nothing but positive work for the coin, and facilitated development of the most popular pool, from the ground up. Setup one of the most solid and best assets, and promoted the hell out of the coin on my own dollar.
I would think everyone should see this. My feelings on your post would be that you're still upset with me for calling things as I saw them with your little 'vacation' and stunt you pulled with your asset.
I hold true to what I said then on how I feel about that. I still think what was done was at best shady. I contacted you multiple times with over a week between in most cases before bringing it public. To give benefit of the doubt to you. During these contacts, the sell that pushed me over the edge as far as viewing the situation as scammy behaviour happened. Now riddle me this... if you had net access to post this sell, wouldn't you have had net access to reply to one of my contact attempts?
So please, let us just agree to disagree on the 'methods' you used at that time, and agree that we don't like eachother, and let it be huh? I don't want any more negativity in this thread if possible, and actually, I am hoping the community can come to at least enough of an agreement so that I can start a new OP and we can get off this thread completely.
IMO the thread as it is doesn't leave BURST looking professional, and my goal is to professionalize it with many different projects, including ByteEnterprises, which I have a new direction for in the coming weeks.
Agree with my choice in people I think are okay and the ones I don't, or not... I think we should at least agree on the above mentioned thoughts on how to handle our personal situation.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
@community
Everyone here who has seen all that I've worked to accomplish from the beginning of BURST, should know by now that I want this coin to succeed. My recent suggestions for change were based on things I've seen with this coin and others, and what I believe based on conversation with many people. I don't immediately agree with someone in any situation, ever, and I never will.
I have my own mind regardless of my agreement with someone. This should really be shown duly by the fact that I'm not afraid to say that I consider bitladen a friend. I can see how a lot of you would not feel that way, but this isn't based on only public communication as most likely your decisions are.
I will never go with something just because other people do, and I will also try my best to get more agreement than not before making a decision if it is a situation where I maintain control.
I see the both sides of most arguments, and can easily argue on either, it is just a natrual part of my personality type (which is not a very common type.) So I can see how some people may see me as 'crazy' or whatever they may in certain situations. However, I assure you, I am not crazy.
I'm probably one of the most considerate 'leader' types you will ever come across. I love to get everyone else's full opinions on situations and why they feel that way before coming to a conclusion of my own. Sometimes my conclusion will coincide, and sometimes it will not, but that's just how things go.
What I'm trying to say here, is I have always, and will always, wish a prosperous future for BURST, and I will definitely be a part of it. That is not to say that I may not also want to be in a similar position in a clone if it comes about, as I do believe it is mainly the underlying technology that is most important in the coin, and obviously a clone would contain that as well. The rest of the structure is debatable as far as the outcome (obviously, as most things, especially market type stuff, and more especially crypto/altcoin markets.) They could both very well succeed, and also the measure of success is different for everyone, and the length of time it takes to get there will also vary.
Most everything has so many possible outcomes, and arguments for and against them, contemplating large decisions in things we all love and hope to be successful could take a while and shouldn't be done in a hasty manner.
We shall see how things unfold and what is or isn't in the future, when we get there.
Thanks everyone, and a prosperous future to BURST, all of its futuristic technological power, and for sure the algorithm we know to be the true decentralized power efficient future of true mining... PoC.
That's all for now.
