[ANN][BURST] Burst | Efficient HDD Mining | New 1.2.3 Fork block 92000

[Elmit]

The currently 10 best miners:

[ 23.10% ] BURST-KQ2P-FWCW-AAYU-D9G24 (582) /bin/laden
[ 5.83% ] BURST-3N7E-CX8T-K6AM-D6Q4N (147)
[ 3.77% ] BURST-5M3F-REHB-PWRE-6E4HP (95) M1
[ 3.65% ] BURST-A7NY-ESG8-9VAT-DQJVF (92) M2
[ 2.02% ] BURST-XNS5-62HN-J3UY-79THE (51)
[ 1.98% ] BURST-SDAC-FFUD-SMCB-D3Q74 (50)
[ 1.63% ] BURST-42JY-E6TZ-885E-AZ9HK (41) <-= Pythagorean Switch =->
[ 1.39% ] BURST-ACGB-YGHQ-G9ZL-5XD7U (35) Haitch ACGB [ pool: 12468105956737329840 ]
[ 1.19% ] BURST-B2XN-WGYA-ND3F-2LHHS (30)
[ 1.19% ] BURST-FDUK-NG2J-5LFN-6EP8H (30) UD3

/bin/laden added 2%, but that might be a result of the low Est. Networksize (PB): 6.0335018746995

[haitch]

FYI:

FYI:

burstforum.com uses an invalid security certificate. The certificate is not trusted because it is self-signed. The certificate is only valid for Parallels Panel (Error code: sec_error_unknown_issuer)

And mininghere.com doesn't use any certificates at all - totally insecure.

Did you have a point ?

Mininghere.com does not need one!
Therefore it does not show an error.
If burstforum.com doesn't need one, then don't show this error!

It's not an error, it's a warning that while your communications are secure, they're not as secure as desirable.

What's your problem?

Error code: sec_error_unknown_issuer

Get a good certificate or just remove it. Simple, clear, ....

For further information use GOOGLE!!!!

So remove the secure communications and be as insecure as your site? Why would the burstforum owner want to do do that? If you'd done some Googling yourself, you'd know that even with a self signed certificate the communications between your browser and the site are encrypted. With no certificate at all, like the login to your site, user credentials are sent in plain text and can be STOLEN!

Everyone involved in Burst should lower their security to the same non-existent level as you?

Somehow I don't see that happening.

[Elmit]

FYI:

FYI:

burstforum.com uses an invalid security certificate. The certificate is not trusted because it is self-signed. The certificate is only valid for Parallels Panel (Error code: sec_error_unknown_issuer)

And mininghere.com doesn't use any certificates at all - totally insecure.

Did you have a point ?

Mininghere.com does not need one!
Therefore it does not show an error.
If burstforum.com doesn't need one, then don't show this error!

It's not an error, it's a warning that while your communications are secure, they're not as secure as desirable.

What's your problem?

Error code: sec_error_unknown_issuer

Get a good certificate or just remove it. Simple, clear, ....

For further information use GOOGLE!!!!

So remove the secure communications and be as insecure as your site? Why would the burstforum owner want to do do that? If you'd done some Googling yourself, you'd know that even with a self signed certificate the communications between your browser and the site are encrypted. With no certificate at all, like the login to your site, user credentials are sent in plain text and can be STOLEN!

Everyone involved in Burst should lower their security to the same non-existent level as you?

Somehow I don't see that happening.

Why would the burstforum owner want to do do that?

To remove the error message!

Mixing up subjects is a speciality of you. I am talking about burstforum.com

[haitch]

FYI:

FYI:

burstforum.com uses an invalid security certificate. The certificate is not trusted because it is self-signed. The certificate is only valid for Parallels Panel (Error code: sec_error_unknown_issuer)

And mininghere.com doesn't use any certificates at all - totally insecure.

Did you have a point ?

Mininghere.com does not need one!
Therefore it does not show an error.
If burstforum.com doesn't need one, then don't show this error!

It's not an error, it's a warning that while your communications are secure, they're not as secure as desirable.

What's your problem?

Error code: sec_error_unknown_issuer

Get a good certificate or just remove it. Simple, clear, ....

For further information use GOOGLE!!!!

So remove the secure communications and be as insecure as your site? Why would the burstforum owner want to do do that? If you'd done some Googling yourself, you'd know that even with a self signed certificate the communications between your browser and the site are encrypted. With no certificate at all, like the login to your site, user credentials are sent in plain text and can be STOLEN!

Everyone involved in Burst should lower their security to the same non-existent level as you?

Somehow I don't see that happening.

Why would the burstforum owner want to do do that?

To remove the error message!

Mixing up subjects is a speciality of you. I am talking about burstforum.com

You really are less intelligent than a rock aren't you Elmit. It's NOT an Error, and even with the self signed certificate, Burstforum is more secure than your site.

[Elmit]

Headache, you do not understand YOUR and MINE, ....

I am talking about burstforum.com and nothing else. Get your mind focused on that subject, please.

The certificate was fine a month ago, but now it is not anymore. Now it requires to add an exception. There is a warning NOT to do that. Is it the purpose of burstforum.com now to AVOID visitors?

[haitch]

Headache, you do not understand YOUR and MINE, ....

I am talking about burstforum.com and nothing else. Get your mind focused on that subject, please.

The certificate was fine a month ago, but now it is not anymore. Now it requires to add an exception. There is a warning NOT to do that. Is it the purpose of burstforum.com now to AVOID visitors?

Elmit, so to avoid the warning about the site not being as secure as desirable, he should turn off security altogether, and be as insecure as your site?

Your logic is .... astoundingly stupid.

My mind is completely focused - I'm not talking about my sites; I'm talking about your assertion that the owner of burstforum.com turn off encryption so that you don't get the warning about the site not being totally secure, so make the site as insecure as yours. This is the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard. It's like suggesting because a home owner doesn't have the best of breed door locks, they should remove all the door locks they have.

Elmit, I've always assumed you were just a thief - but now, with this suggestion, you've confirmed that you're a dumber than a box of rocks thief.

[jwinterm]

Any list of existing assets or easy way to see them?

[haitch]

Any list of existing assets or easy way to see them?

Luxe posted this earlier - there are some missing, but it pretty comprehensive:

all assets with at least one trade ...

ACTIVE (with trades in last 4 weeks)
name 'ByteEnt', id '1800253871016293364', bidOrders '14', askOrders '8', trades '311', accounts '86'
name 'BdePool', id '3101115594843807035', bidOrders '7', askOrders '7', trades '185', accounts '35'
name 'ByteEMini', id '639537212154320', bidOrders '3', askOrders '3', trades '102', accounts '11'
name 'HardInvest', id '15295227971848272658', bidOrders '1', askOrders '11', trades '234', accounts '47'
name 'ByteBank', id '15398588224704032134', bidOrders '6', askOrders '3', trades '109', accounts '17'
name 'solarfarm', id '11330004142522539040', bidOrders '5', askOrders '5', trades '477', accounts '71'
name 'pos', id '17647398155953557298', bidOrders '2', askOrders '10', trades '44', accounts '41'
name 'hash', id '18119229184320918134', bidOrders '17', askOrders '10', trades '844', accounts '77'
name 'PetaByte', id '14668748687827404894', bidOrders '7', askOrders '6', trades '143', accounts '32'
name 'Debenture', id '17164677442585110887', bidOrders '2', askOrders '7', trades '74', accounts '21'
name 'ByteGear', id '18266087415257944078', bidOrders '2', askOrders '6', trades '103', accounts '29'
name 'Income', id '11188744773544606055', bidOrders '10', askOrders '49', trades '155', accounts '120'
name 'BdeBank', id '4053085726300717216', bidOrders '3', askOrders '10', trades '261', accounts '38'
name 'Drives', id '13332903480994488665', bidOrders '0', askOrders '1', trades '8', accounts '2'

INACTIVE (without trades in last 4 weeks)
name 'BCPT', id '12791182347560578640', bidOrders '3', askOrders '15', trades '502', accounts '78'
name 'HardCloud', id '12747217131514889961', bidOrders '1', askOrders '0', trades '4', accounts '3'
name 'BLotto14', id '3027301435742414364', bidOrders '2', askOrders '7', trades '97', accounts '35'
name 'StupidPts', id '4271892478945522528', bidOrders '0', askOrders '5', trades '50', accounts '4'
name 'SyGear', id '11269823358919764726', bidOrders '0', askOrders '0', trades '2', accounts '1'
name 'BMPOOL', id '11375670541237055652', bidOrders '0', askOrders '3', trades '95', accounts '11'
name 'TestAsset', id '13121531462532881593', bidOrders '0', askOrders '0', trades '2', accounts '2'
name 'BLTPS', id '12588513172055458075', bidOrders '0', askOrders '1', trades '1', accounts '16'
name 'Asset', id '7680550370207558962', bidOrders '0', askOrders '0', trades '3', accounts '1'
name 'BurstFund', id '673530795527425458', bidOrders '0', askOrders '0', trades '2', accounts '26'

[Irontiga]

I believe I made a tool to view assets....There's a table at the bottom.

https://block.burstcoin.info/as.php?as=1800253871016293364

[Beoga]

Is any working smart contract for BURST? Or some samples of AT?

[BurstIncomeAsset]

Ok we bought the altcoins we needed, now we have to wait until they go up in price.

It is still a passive income if you think about it, but I need to monitor it now 3-4 times /day instead of once. Well I believe the work will be worth it, because we will make more profit now.

I strongly believe we will make big profits from now on.

[jwinterm]

Thanks Haitch and Irontiga.

Echoing Beoga's questions, is there any guide, code examples, etc.? Or is it just use the source, Luke?

Is any working smart contract for BURST? Or some samples of AT?

[haitch]

Thanks Haitch and Irontiga.

Echoing Beoga's questions, is there any guide, code examples, etc.? Or is it just use the source, Luke?

Is any working smart contract for BURST? Or some samples of AT?

There's documentation and examples at: http://ciyam.org/at/

H.

[vbcs]

There are also some tools and examples available at http://smartcontr.actor/

EDIT: For some running examples go to smartcontr.actor -> Examine ATs and add the following Ids to inspect them:

- Lottery -> 9192603983782913483
- Crowdfund -> 5080866903808682902
- ACCT -> 13682371899618102560

Also you can check the ATs running on QORA blockchain here: qora.co.in:9090
ATs programmed for BURST, if they are programmed in generic way, could be also used in QORA and vice versa

[jwinterm]

Thanks for the links. I'm thinking about trying to do another lottery or maybe ponzi or something.

[Erkallys]

The currently 10 best miners:

[ 23.10% ] BURST-KQ2P-FWCW-AAYU-D9G24 (582) /bin/laden
[ 5.83% ] BURST-3N7E-CX8T-K6AM-D6Q4N (147)
[ 3.77% ] BURST-5M3F-REHB-PWRE-6E4HP (95) M1
[ 3.65% ] BURST-A7NY-ESG8-9VAT-DQJVF (92) M2
[ 2.02% ] BURST-XNS5-62HN-J3UY-79THE (51)
[ 1.98% ] BURST-SDAC-FFUD-SMCB-D3Q74 (50)
[ 1.63% ] BURST-42JY-E6TZ-885E-AZ9HK (41) <-= Pythagorean Switch =->
[ 1.39% ] BURST-ACGB-YGHQ-G9ZL-5XD7U (35) Haitch ACGB [ pool: 12468105956737329840 ]
[ 1.19% ] BURST-B2XN-WGYA-ND3F-2LHHS (30)
[ 1.19% ] BURST-FDUK-NG2J-5LFN-6EP8H (30) UD3

/bin/laden added 2%, but that might be a result of the low Est. Networksize (PB): 6.0335018746995

Who is this /bin/laden ? I've noticed he has big shares of the reward at each block. Is he a member of the dev team, or of the PR team ?

[atomy1world]

FYI:

burstforum.com uses an invalid security certificate. The certificate is not trusted because it is self-signed. The certificate is only valid for Parallels Panel (Error code: sec_error_unknown_issuer)

I also get this:

This Connection is Untrusted

You have asked Firefox to connect securely to burstforum.com, but we can't confirm that your connection is secure.

Normally, when you try to connect securely, sites will present trusted identification to prove that you are going to the right place. However, this site's identity can't be verified.

What Should I Do?

If you usually connect to this site without problems, this error could mean that someone is trying to impersonate the site, and you shouldn't continue.

[jwinterm]

...
Who is this /bin/laden ? I've noticed he has big shares of the reward at each block. Is he a member of the dev team, or of the PR team ?

He is the alleged owner of a botnet that repeatedly threatened to 51% attack burst, then tried to take over as dev, then after being rejected said he was going to start his own coin (with hookers and blackjack), and then he's been quiet for a few weeks. It's all documented in this thread, if you want to trawl through the last 50 or 109 or 500 pages.

[BurstIncomeAsset]

I think now it is the time for burst to reach it's adult phase. We are better than ever, price holding good at 29 satoshi and we see many new people posting here so the interest in BURST just increased.

We are on a growing path now.

[haitch]

FYI:

burstforum.com uses an invalid security certificate. The certificate is not trusted because it is self-signed. The certificate is only valid for Parallels Panel (Error code: sec_error_unknown_issuer)

I also get this:

This Connection is Untrusted

You have asked Firefox to connect securely to burstforum.com, but we can't confirm that your connection is secure.

Normally, when you try to connect securely, sites will present trusted identification to prove that you are going to the right place. However, this site's identity can't be verified.

What Should I Do?

If you usually connect to this site without problems, this error could mean that someone is trying to impersonate the site, and you shouldn't continue.

From: https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/connection-untrusted-error-message

"The certificate is not trusted because it is self-signed (site name) uses an invalid security certificate. The certificate is not trusted because it is self-signed. (Error code: sec_error_untrusted_issuer) Self-signed certificates make your data safe from eavesdroppers, but say nothing about who the recipient of the data is. This is common for intranet websites that aren't available publicly."

In short: The owner of burstforum.com wants your connection and username/password to be secure, so is using a certificate for encryption; but isn't willing to pay for a commercial certificate. They are therefore using a self signed certificate. These work to encrypt and protect your login credentials, but is not as desirable as having a commercial certificate.

Burstforum.com is a trustworthy site - add the exception and continue to use the site.

H.